Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Container traffic is the proverbial canary in the coalmine of international trade, and at Shenzhen in China, the port that serves key high value export industries, volumes fell in June by 0.6 per cent from the previous month and grew only 3.5 per cent against the same month last year; in H1 2008 volumes were up 7 per cent against 14% during the same period last year.

At Shanghai, the country's largest port, container throughput has also halved, and these figures are all the more ominous given that June is the peak month for container traffic; exports are now slowing fast. The domestic situation doesn't look great either; China's stockpile of unsold new vehicles rose about 50 percent in the six months ended June, hitting a four-year high, as sales growth slowed.

I have argued for many months that the Chinese growth model was unsustainable (see China 'Miracle' faces Meltdown...) and that the country would see slumping growth as its terms of trade deteriorated. The Communist Party apparently agrees, because at last Friday's Politburo meeting they decided to backslide on fighting inflation and prioritise growth. Among the implications will be to delay a revaluation of the Renmbini, at least for a few months more.

But there is a deeper problem looming than just a cyclical growth slowdown; recent rapid and contradictory economic and security policies and rising social tensions are signs of a system in crisis and a leadership gripped by paranoia. We have seen a stream of reactionary policies (the latest being a bizarre pre-Olympics restriction on visas for foreign visitors, meant to target human rights activists but affecting businessmen too) from a central leadership trying to preserve its authority, stabilize social stability and postpone an economic crisis. Aggressive nationalist sentiment has been officially stoked up against 'splittist' forces ranging from Tibetan nationalists to religious groups like the Falun Gong, but may prove difficult to control once unleashed. There is much anecdotal evidence that local governments, and even organs of the central government, are actively resisting directives from Beijing. So too are key state enterprises like China National Petroleum Corp., China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. and the state banks.

The political situation is far more unstable that most foreign observers appreciate. Chinese history since 1949 (and all the way back to the First Emperor) indicates that the central bureaucratic leadership is willing to sacrifice social and economic stability to preserve power. The Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution under Mao or the crackdown at Tiananmen Square under Deng offer clear evidence of this. Maintaining centralised control and fighting centrifugal pressures from the provinces have always been paramount in Beijing; the risks of a major political upheaval in China are higher than they have been in decades.

The implications for commodities are potentially devastating, particularly as there has been substantial official stockpiling ahead of the Olympics (particularly of fuel) and speculative stockpiling ahead of a hoped for revaluation. In fact, copper offers an instructive view of the Alice in Wonderland world that is the Chinese economy. Globally, copper consumption is falling, yet known stocks are mysteriously low.

What gives? China has over 200 seaports, 128 of which are open to foreign vessels. Even copper producing giants like Codelco admit to not knowing where their exports are ending up; many shipments just don't show up in official Chinese customs data, as the copper is being shipped into free trade zones where it can be warehoused in bond. Since the metal doesn't pass through customs, it doesn't show up in official trade data. This provides an ideal way to store the copper out of the public gaze for an unlimited period of time. Duty is only paid if the metal is imported, but not if it stays in a bonded warehouse or is shipped to another country, even if its ownership changes.

So we have a massive speculative hoard of copper lying in bonded warehouses all over China (a total area equivalent to roughly 12 football pitches would be needed). The financing cost would run into the hundreds of millions, but as I suspect state owned banks are financing all this, perhaps unwittingly under the direction of corrupt officials, that's not a big problem. In the 1990's, a Japanese trader at Sumitomo tried to corner the copper market, ultimately blowing up in 1996 with losses of $2.6bn (like the Hunt brothers in Silver in the 1980's), leading to a market collapse and massive losses for his company. The copper market should be in a surplus of 2 million tons by the end of 2008, yet official data lead to consensus forecasts of a surplus of sub 100k tons this year.

Those naive pensions funds diversifying into commodities as 'uncorrelated assets' are in for a rude awakening if I'm right in suspecting one of the biggest manipulations in the history of the metal markets is set to implode in coming months. The speculators attempting to disguise or misrepresent the growing but hidden surplus are going to have to purchase and finance more and more physical inventory.

Eventually, this Ponzi scheme will collapse under its own weight, taking mining stocks with it. The Chinese government's implicit decision to delay any revaluation will hasten this inevitable crisis, as it will encourage the flood of speculative money washing through the current account to move on, but will be just one element in a broader crisis that may shake international markets in coming months.

Print this article with comments

This article has 20 comments:

  •  
    Junk article
    2008 Jul 30 08:09 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This article makes for scary reading because if China and commodities fall sharply, the world would likely enter a recessionary period. Right now China and other emerging markets are being held up as counterbalancing the slowdown in developed countries, if this gives then all bets are off. Things may not turn out the way this article predicts but traders have to be prepared.
    2008 Jul 30 08:30 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I often wonder what articles about China and India use as a source of information and statistics. I am not sure if their governments even produce these numbers and how reliable they might be.
    2008 Jul 30 08:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    •  • Website: http://www.cwsx.org
    Brilliant article, thanks
    2008 Jul 30 08:32 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I love the way the same luddites who doubt US economic data (GDP growth, low inflation) but swallow statistics from China hook, line, and sinker. Thanks for the article. A collapse in commodities and a china scare would lead to a flight to the US dollar.

    cyclingscholar
    2008 Jul 30 10:14 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Typical pandering trying to put ones name out in the hope of being hired.

    I agree totally with all of the above. Major destruction during a major snowstorm followed by major destruction during a major earthquake within months of each other, electrical demand up but supply is barely recovering. Shipping to where its needed has been curtailed, ditto exports. Toss in Industry shut downs because of the Olympics and things seem really dire in China.

    GDP dropped from 12% to 10%. Massive slowdown!
    2008 Jul 30 10:18 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I'm neutral on copper, yet find the thesis of this article silly. Even if there are secret stockpiles of copper in China, perhaps they are simply following the Korean model. Korea, last month, ordered that all metal reserves be tripled as a matter of national security.
    Just six motnhs ago, China fronted the government of the Congo $12BILLION for access to the country's copper resources. Doubt they would pay such a sum to such an unstable source if they had all the copper they needed.
    While I think copper could easily fall back to $3, Chinese demand will support the long-term trend. If, as you suggest, China must revalue its currency then copper goes through $4 in a week...stronger currency = higher demand.
    Good luck
    2008 Jul 30 11:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    A far-reaching conclusion drawn on very few data points. You need more than suspicion to predict a crisis of the proportion that you suggest.
    China is large; it has problems, it has opportunities.
    2008 Jul 30 11:26 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    As a curiosity, how would you invest this theory? There is a new powershares base metal double short ETF (BOM), any better way to short copper for the individual investor? Copper has been trending down and with a global contraction ensuing it may drop one way or the other... Thank you in advance for a reply.
    -DW
    2008 Jul 30 01:47 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If China has so much excess copper why are they working on joint venture to open a mega mine in the Congo?
    2008 Jul 30 04:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    A: It appears China is most interested in Congo's cobalt ore for battery production.

    news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/bu...
    2008 Jul 30 06:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I am starting to wonder if this entire website was created by investors for the purpose of manipulating equities, commodities, etc. Why are there no disclaimers? Mr. Maher do you think that the massive earthquake which killed close to 90 thousand, left 4.8 million homeless, and affected 15 million Chinese in the immediate area on May 12th, 2008 might have a slight effect on trade in June of 2008? You know, the same earthquake that damaged many rail lines and even affected the price of copper. These are the same rail lines that probably ship items to the shipping containers that you mention in your article. Anyone shorting copper is a moron.
    2008 Jul 30 08:34 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Agreed.
    2008 Jul 30 10:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To address some of the points raised above:
    1. If you knew anything of the geography and economy of China, you would realise that the earthquake had minimal effect on manufactured exports or the relevant infrsstructure; it affected agriculture and coal production predominantly. Exports are slowing rapidly...
    2. Who cares what China is doing in the Congo, it's irrelevant; I'm describing an illegal speculative scheme that the authorities are unaware of, although some corrupt officials are undoubtedly involved.
    3. Try to keep emotion out of your investment decisions, my previous calls speak for themselves. It's flattering to think I could single handedly crash the copper market, but I'm simply taking an informed view of a clear anomaly. Everyone in the copper market suspects something is up, but won't talk publicly about it...
    2008 Jul 31 04:15 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    •  • Website: http://yyz.us
    I have a similar comment to 2008traveler:

    What are the source(s) of the container ship and export data?

    Certainly, statement in past ~24 hours by Hu Jintao support the statement that the Politburo is worried more about growth than inflation.

    Finally, small editorial note, I would bold "if I'm right..." rather than "I'm right..." as it is more honest in my opinion.
    2008 Aug 01 07:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Copper is essential in building infrastructure . Maybe their just hording this stuff in preperation to massive building projects .Copper is not the only commodity the chinese are trying to hoard . Their also trying to goble up energy sources as well .CEO is trying to buy up oil @gas companies all over the world .I would not consider these people as stupid .While america stands around claiming that the energy and commodity bubble has popped , the chinese are going around quietly grabing all the commodities then can at cheaper prices because ,as I said , americans think the commodity bubble has popped and therefore prices will come down ,so the chinese can take advantage of america's stupidity .
    2008 Aug 02 09:05 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Would a downward gap in metals drag all other commodities with it (agricultural commodities specifically)? A Materials/base metals short sounds reasonable (though not after an 4% up day like yesterday).

    With respect to financials, what of this proverbial "other shoe" of CDOs that's expected to drop? Overhyped as a way to buy banks at a lower price?

    Thoughts and speculations welcome
    2008 Aug 05 09:06 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To those who think shorting copper is moronic or that it will never again go to $1.75, tell that to the longs in zinc, lead and nickel, each of which have already crashed 60% or more from their highs. Yeah, but copper is different, even unique. Riiiighttttttttt... 40% of global copper demand is related to construction. Let's see if speculators can pick up that slack in the months ahead. Or what about the single trader who holds most of the LME warrants? How long will he/she continue to do so?

    Already the copper miners have made substantial declines from their highs--some even trading near 52 week lows. They should not be so weak if copper prices are going to stay above $3/lb. since that still gives them excellent operating margins.

    The way I'm playing the potential decline in copper is with COMEX put options. Hard to buy and not a lot of volume, but relatively cheap and great upside if copper does come down to join the other base metals in the reality camp. I'm also long silver so I'm not worried if a crash in copper does not pan out--I've got both angles covered.
    2008 Aug 05 12:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    buyitcheap, many metals have already had a "downward gap" of 60% or more from their peaks--lead, zinc, nickel, uranium. Platinum, palladium and silver are down about 25-40% and may not have much more to go. Gold and copper are down only around 15% each. Gold will catch a crisis bid, copper will not. Copper, along with oil, is a bellwhether for the commodity sector and has been historically very sensitive to shifting market sentiment. Copper is a great short bet even if it has the best fundamentals out of all the metals.

    As for ags, where have you been? Corn, wheat, soybeans, rice, OJ, sugar and many others are already down 30-40% and may be on their way to 60% losses before it is all over. The exception seems to be meats which never went up several hundred percent and therefore they probably don't have as much downside.

    One way to play an ag correction is put options on DBA, the PowerShares Ag ETF. For some reason, these ETF options seem to have both pretty good volume and fair pricing. For example, you can buy the Jan 09 33 puts for $200. With a DBA target of 26, that's a 250% return. As a side bet in case ags are set to romp once again, the Jan 09 40 call will set you back $100. A recovery to the March and July double tops should get you about a 200% return, more than covering the cost of the put.
    2008 Aug 05 01:17 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    well i buy copper all day long --- and now we see the comex at 1.69 hold on to you hats copper will no stop dropping until the 90 cent level ---i have bought and sold over 30 years --mark my words we willl see 90 cents a pound
    2008 Oct 25 04:20 PM | Link | Reply
More by Sean Maher
Other articles by Sean Maher »