Seeking Alpha
About this author: By this author:

Wall Street's rule of thumb, that recession is two consecutive quarters of declining GDP, is not technically correct.  But it's not a bad rule of thumb.  Certainly there's no recession when the economy is growing substantially, even if the growth is below trend.  That's where we are today.
GDP
The latest quarter, 1.9 percent, is decent against a long run average of about three percent.  The details were fairly predictable:

  • residential construction terrible
  • consumer durables bad
  • federal government up
  • exports up

A couple of items were not so predictable:

  • business spending on equipment down.  The latest monthly numbers are positive, so look for a reversal next quarter
  • inventories down a lot.  Most likely this large a correction won't continue.

Next quarter?  We have a good shot at another decent but not strong quarter.  I'll update my forecast next week.

Business planning implications:  don't get caught up in the doom and gloom headlines.  Look into the detail of how your customers are faring.  Plenty of sub-sectors are bucking the trend.

Print this article with comments

This article has 4 comments:

  •  
    What is it with all the Polly Anna comments on the GDP. We know the numbers are played with at BLS and that elections are coming, and that the global recession has just gotten started. Do you know about the environment from which the numbers are drawn? If so did you consider that in your fairy story? We are likely in a long, slowing decaying series characterized by inflation, joblessness and a Congress that has not got a clue. What are you so hopeful about?
    2008 Jul 31 05:05 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    wait til the revisions DOWNWARD come in over the next year or more... these guys are just slapping lipstick on a pig until after the elections... then if (hopefully) Obama gets in, they'll blame him for the whole mess
    2008 Aug 01 01:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It's only 1.9% growth if you believe the 1.1% inflation number.

    Do you beleive that that was the inflation number? Really? Seriously?

    If, instead, the correct inflation number was, say, 2.5% (which is still about half the CPI number), then the growth was .5%. If, instead, the inflation number was 3% (which seems likely) then growth was ZERO.

    PPI was 14%, remember, so 3% would seem to be a lower bound, wouldn't it?

    Sheesh.
    2008 Aug 01 02:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    recession from marh 2009.
    2008 Aug 01 09:59 PM | Link | Reply