Seeking Alpha

Kurt Wulff


About this author:

A positive trend for oil price drives investment value in buy-recommended Canadian income stocks Canadian Oil Sands Trust (COSWF.PK) and Penn West Energy Trust (PWE). Near-month futures price continues to bump against an upper limit at 40% above the 200-day average. Though the trend may point to higher price, we stick with $150 in 2010 as a sustainable level.

A potential punitive windfall profits tax that would unfairly discriminate against U.S. producers may drive up oil price further to the benefit of Canadian and non-U.S. producers. With higher Alberta royalties taking effect next year in most cases, Canadian producers may be free of additional tax increases for awhile. Conversely, at some point oil price may fall back to settle around the 200-day average, currently $105 a barrel, as has happened in the past. Our protection on the downside is that at McDep Ratios of 0.90 and 0.84, the stocks are priced for oil at perhaps $90 and $84 respectively. We regard COSWF as a unique, high-quality long-term asset while we expect PWE to be a profitable, well-run conventional oil producer as it integrates recent acquisitions.

Originally published on July 11, 2008.

Print this article with comments

This article has 32 comments:

  •  
    PWE is an absolute steal at a price of under $30, and a dividend yield in excess of 13%, and what I expect to be a payout ratio of under 50% this year.

    With that payout ratio, PWE will be able to pay off a substantial amount of debt this year, increase capex, AND further increase its dividend at the end of 2008.

    Although I doubt oil will go over $150 this year (barring an Israeli attack on Iran), I also think it unlikely that oil will go under $110 for any prolonged period of time this year. I also doubt we'll see nat gas averaging under $9.50 for any quarter this year (even though we're at about $9 now).

    If I am right about oil and gas prices, PWE's free cash flow (cash flow not used to pay dividends) will more than double in 2008 versus 2007.

    Jack
    2008 Aug 04 10:39 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You can pair PWE/PGH/HTE and PVX against a 50% position in DUG to keep your principal (in theory) market neutral, while extracting ~ 15% dividend yield. If you are betting on oil going up, don't do DUG and get 15% + upside in the stock price.
    2008 Aug 04 11:33 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    DSB I like the way you think....
    2008 Aug 04 11:48 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Jack Yetiv, welcome back. Have not heard from you in a while. When can we see another one of your great analysis articles? By the way what are your thoughts on (GMS)?
    2008 Aug 04 12:12 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Thanks. Check out the "my website" link by my name to see this trade in more detail. I have been cooking over the trade for a week & I want people to poke holes in it (and give me 5 stars). Some of the language is NWS. IBC (linking site) has some of the best content and advice in this market - bar none. It has changed the way I invest, it features dozens of high caliber contributors - often with differing points of view.
    2008 Aug 04 12:29 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    RE: Pairing PWE etc. with DUG: The 15% you quote is actually nearer 13-14% BEFORE Canada lops off 15% of that - putting the net at 11-12%. (Not all investors can reclaim the foreign tax on U.S. tax return). THEN, since you've matched your investment with a like amount in DUG, your actual theoretical net is 5 1/2 to 6%. Not to shabby compared with fixed income invetments, but not nearly as rosy as portrayed.
    2008 Aug 04 01:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    RE PWE as a steal under $30: Take a look at the recent historical financials, another look at analyst's ratings and their justification, and the ongoing price deterioration. This "recommendation" is reminiscent of the Commentor's pumping of TSL from the 40's all the way down to the 20's. Articles generally sound reasonable and with fair amount of what passes for analysis (though heavily weighted on P/E, alone) - but have been a VERY POOR predictor for price movement (with one exception - CSIQ - from which the Commenter must have acquired a strained arm with all his self back-patting). In contrast, Commentor has failed to acknowledge his failures....
    2008 Aug 04 01:41 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    wsigler,

    Who can't claim the 15% credit back in the US? I was unaware of that. Considering that MOST investors get the 15% back, and are not double taxed, then this is apples to appples vs. some other tax advantaged cash flow/dividend investment.

    Second, how is the theoretical net lowered by a match in DUG? Would you please explain the numbers? Are you saying that the opportunity cost of the 50% position is eating into yield? I don't see how the yield gets knocked down to 5.5 or 6%.

    Matching your investment with a 50% position in DUG (i.e. for $100K invested in the basket, 50K goes into DUG - which yields ~2%) would cause the investment to be market neutral - extracting dividend yield. At that point, your yield is contingent upon whether or not the trusts lower distributions.

    thx for your input.
    2008 Aug 04 01:59 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To Wsigler:

    While criticizing my detailed articles, you write a couple of sentences that won't even pass for analysis. Why don't you actually ANALYZE something and CONTRIBUTE to this site, rather than just superficially dismissing someone else's analysis.

    Since I began recommending stocks on this site nearly one year ago, the Dow and Nasdaq have dropped 20%. My recommendations have about broken even--while CSIQ has increased about 50%, TSL has dropped by about 30%. My PWE recommendation has gone down about 3%--but REAL dividends have more than compensated for that PAPER "loss" and I bought some more today at $28.50 for a div yield of 14.3%.

    So my recommedations have just about broken even (actually, up a few percent), despite the broad markets having dropped by over 20%.

    Many financial managers and experts have done FAR worse in the past year than breaking even.

    Finally, let's revisit this issue in a couple of weeks, after TSL, CSIQ and PWE have reported.

    In the meantime, what are YOUR recommendations to SA readers?

    Jack Yetiv
    2008 Aug 04 06:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Jack, that performance might put you in the top20% of hedge funds :-) You should ask for your 2/20 deal straightaway.
    Seriously though, how do you see the PWE payout being sustained, is there any history in PWE's past that suggests when they might cut a payout, i.e. if oil goes to $104 within 2 quarters they'll cut the distribution by X%?
    I realize that's asking alot but you seem to know what you're talking about.
    2008 Aug 04 08:12 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    PWE is being given away here. HTE, PGH, PVX and AAV are all highly attractive with this pullback as well. They are all now trading at their lowest levels in months. When oil was $70.00 PGH was over 17.00. It is now under $17.00 and oil is over 120. One of the reasons these issues have dropped so hard is that there is worry on the street about these companies hedging policies and practices. I have been adding to my positions the past 3 trading days and will continue to add, as this fear about hedging is now well built into the stock prices at these levels. This is an opportunity to capture substantial yields for the long haul. (5 to 7 years)
    2008 Aug 04 10:08 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Beancounter, PWE has paid 34 cents per month for somewhere around 29 months, give or take a few. During that time, PWE has sold at realized prices for gas UNDER $7 per MCF, and oil at about $60. During those times, of course, the payout ratio was high--but obviously, it was sustainable.

    Recall, also, that PWE hedges a fair bit of its future output. Oil and gas prices in the past five or six months have allowed PWE to forward-sell its oil and gas at well over $120 and $10. We will learn this Thurs how much production PWE has hedged, and at what price, but I guarantee you it will be substantial. Thus, even if nominal oil and gas prices drop from here, what PWE makes in the future can actually increase--SUBSTANTIALL...

    Finally, remember that--despite the recent major drops--oil today at $120 and nat gas at $8.70 are still higher than at ANY time in 2007. Therefore, the Canroys are still on track to have a blow-out 2nd quarter, and a very strong 3rd--compared to any previous time in history. Of course, if what we are seeing now proves to be close to the lows, then some incredible returns will be made on the Canroys over the next few months.

    But even if oil goes to $100, and nat gas stays in the $8's (both of which I doubt will happen), PWE will STILL make more money in 2008 than it EVER has previously. Thus, the dividend seems very secure.

    To me, the downside risk is pretty limited, while the upside potential is significant--and you are collecting 14% all along.

    Jack
    2008 Aug 04 11:49 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Like I've said before, I would not touch PWE until it dropped to $28, now I'll see how much further down it may go when oil drops to 111.

    To continue the payout, PWE had to issue Bonds.
    2008 Aug 05 02:15 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Amos Tiedeman: New laws re Can. trusts come into play in 2011 (3 yrs) but you're talking of yields staying high for 5-7 years. I don't understand -- can you explain what you mean and your reasoning? Thanks . . .
    2008 Aug 05 02:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Kurt Wulff: I just looked up COSWF on Marketwatch, and for dividend it said "not applicable." I thought all royalty trusts had to have dividends?
    2008 Aug 05 03:21 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Jack - thanks! Have you considered writing for seekingalpha.com?
    2008 Aug 05 08:47 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    After getting knocked around in REITs over the last year and after carefully looking into things on a deeper lever, I've concluded that PWE is one of the very best ways to get superior income - and a chance for modest growth. PWE (and PGH) are great core holdings and at current prices, offer an excellent entry point for a long term holding. Next time they spike up, sell some covered calls and stay long.
    2008 Aug 05 10:13 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Re: pairing PWE vs oil short. Lost my a$$ on that trade last year- and that was when futures market was much more contangoed making a short crude position favorable.

    Remember, much PWE production is hedged and/or is NG- so you will want to underhedge. The oil market will move much more violently than the equity market which can force retail player out of the position and get you whipsawed.

    IMO, better to just get long the canroy's if you like oil, ng...
    2008 Aug 05 11:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    UH-OH! Enerplus (ERF) today announced a huge quarter, a 12% increase in it's dividend, and the market.....yawned!? What gives? I know its a down day (dow currently down 180), but still! Does this not bode well for PWE tmrw?
    2008 Aug 07 03:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    JACK, Can you interpret PWE's earning release for us? How does it compare with your forecasts? Thanks!
    2008 Aug 07 06:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Like I've repeated ad nauseum, PWE's management is not to be trusted. They will have to reduce/eliminate their dividend absent more asset sales or Bond sales.

    Their earnings appear to evaporate despite record cash flows, I don't have a clue as to what their goals are. Perhaps, they are preparing for life after 2011 by incurring as much debt as possible now.
    2008 Aug 08 09:38 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I attended the live conference call this morning. Basically Management is saying that they feel their hedging strategy is sound and that they will continue the .34 distribtion per unit trust throughout the rest of the year. They stated that they MAY increase distribution to unit holders in 09 but they may also use it for capital expenditures. As to the market price, they feel that a 30
    % discount to relative book value is what most Oil & Gas companies trade at in the Market. That said looks like a $26-28 price point is in the cards for quite a while.

    This is a strong company and we can expect distributions to stay where they are now without much risk. I feel badly for those of you (including myself) who bought at highter prices expecting the double gain of a unit price increase along with a great distribution payout.

    Now is a great time to buy if your a dividend investor. As for the rest of the longs under water. Hold your breath - eventually the loss will be recovered but it will take a few years!

    2008 Aug 08 12:28 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    One more item as to hedging strategy -PWE management is EXTREMELY conservative and the hedging price going forward is around $68-$76 - Not anywhere near what one would have thought. (perhaps 120??? So 40% or more of the revenue is LOST by the hedging strategy. In fact, management stated in the call that they were tempted to hedge the entire production when the price of oil started to climb but the Board maintained its position that around 60% remain open to spot market pricing. Not at all what Jack had expected.
    2008 Aug 08 12:52 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Management stated that the payout ratio is 61%! Not under 50% as we would have expected. So that is further evidence that they have not performed as wel as expected. Share price is falling and in my opinion will continue to fall to about 24.00 per unit.
    2008 Aug 08 12:59 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This is very dissapointing for those of us long PWE. How do they not perform well with oil at 120-140 for Q2? Points to poor management. I'm much more impressed by Enerplus's (ERF) results, seems like a very well managed company. I'm looking to add to my position in ERF south of $39.
    2008 Aug 08 01:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Looks like Jack Y. has to have a spokesperson to interpret his views.

    No matter. I know I've blown it more than once. So its back to the drawing board, so what.
    2008 Aug 08 04:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I own a lot of PWE and I like it. The debt is a little high and I am GLAD to see the distribution was not increased. Debt paydown in 08 will be significant. PWE has an excellent mgmt team and is well respected, they also have some great long term assets.
    Another two trusts I own are Baytex BTE which I don't see anyone mentioning and Freehold FRU (which trades only in Canada). These are two excellent trusts. Can someone tell me why they love Pengrowth, I see only declining reserves on a per unit basis.
    In terms of other hedging strategies, both BTE and PWE trade options. I do a lot of out of the money covered call writing on the trusts, I get the income, the option premium, and something more if it is called away. All I give up is the home run if the stock runs away.
    2008 Aug 11 12:51 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    JACK, WOULD LOVE TO KNOW YOUR THOUGHTS ON PWE?
    2008 Aug 11 01:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    PGH is in the process of building a steam retrieval plant, small but by using new tech, will decrease costs significantly. Its a pilot plant. Should be operational within a year. What is PWE doing to enhance shareholder value?
    2008 Aug 11 03:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    COSWF and ERF have both just made significant increases in their dividend payouts. PWE has in recent past hedged too much too low. Hopefully that will create an opportunity in future. In answer to Paul's question, PWE has almost doubled their revenue, known reserves and future income tax credits when they took over CNE.

    What all the Trusts mentioned need is ONE BIG BUY OUT AT A 50% PREMIUM. If McDep is right, which I think he is, the assets (known reserves) are materially undervalued. Personally, I will be surprised if we don't see multiple buyouts in next 18 months; in part motivated by the tax law change. The big dogs in the industry, Exxon, Chevron, BP, etc. need to increase known reserves and the most certain way to do that is to simply "buy" know reserves. This especially true if you think better to have your stash close to home vs. in a far away desert.
    2008 Aug 12 08:36 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Debt at PWE will NOT be decreased, doesn't anyone follow what they do rather than what they say?

    I owned CNE prior to its being sacrificed to PWE. My holdings of PWE consist of the stock issued to buyout PetroFund(PFT) and Canetic. Both of these trusts died because of PWE.

    You are right about everything except the final result. They issued debt to pay the dividend because they didn't have the cash to do so.

    I believe they sold a stake in a Wind Farm in Canada last year to fund a dividend. What part of that asset was not to like? I have read rumours that they own a light sweet crude field of 400 million brls. which is being held off the books. Talk to me about mismanagement and I give you PWE.
    2008 Aug 13 02:54 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hi everyone, I'm reading your comments and I'd like to post my 2 cents about PWE. This is the balance sheet of the company from Google Finance (If there's another source with different numbers please let me know) finance.google.com/fin...
    I see long term debt increasing and retained earnings decreasing....I also see their accounts receivable increasing but what worries me most is the debt. I'd like some insights about this issue. It seems they have invested some capital in plant and equipment but I don't know about their projections to cover the debt.
    2008 Sep 08 07:49 PM | Link | Reply