Seeking Alpha

Domenic J. Strazzulla


About this author:

Mechel (MTL) is not for orphans and widows - that much is for sure. But if you can stomach some risk and if you have any money to speculate with, I think this is a great name to get into right now.

If you have never heard of Mechel, it is a vertically integrated steel and power producer in Russia. Recently, the company has been under fire from the Russian Anti-Monopoly Committee due to comments made by Putin. Essentially, Putin accused Mechel of selling their coking coal at inflated prices domestically and evading taxes.

Here is why I think MTL will revert back to its fair value ($50 per share) instead of heading toward Enron land:

  • Russian officials (excluding Putin) are not dumb – they understand that they need sane financial markets if they are going to get any foreign capital inflows. They also know that they need capital inflows in order to improve their infrastructure and revamp their fading oil production.
  • High Russian officials, such as President Dmitry Medvedev and chief Kremlin economic aide Arkady Dvorkovich have already made comments that signaled the government will try and sooth the markets.
    • “We should be especially careful about our market, which is becoming important for ordinary people who invest their money in shares and bonds,” Dvorkovich said. “Any actions by companies or authorities affect market quotes and thus people’s well-being.”
  • Mechel has already said that they will fully cooperate with the Russian authorities, which should mean a fast resolution.( My guess is we will have a ruling in 2-3 weeks max)

And when Mechel recovers, I think it will do so very fast. MTL trades for a FP/E of 3.75 for goodness sakes! This name is very undervalued and underappreciated. Don’t miss your chance to get in cheap on this stock.

Disclosure: Author holds a long position in MTL

Print this article with comments

This article has 8 comments:

  •  
    I did get in. 1150 shares @ $19 avg cost.
    2008 Aug 06 08:21 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Wish the author would have compared MTL with what happen a few years back with Yukos. I believe they went bankrupt because of back taxes, right? My take was Putin wanted their company and got it, is this the same or completely different? I owned MTL a while back but I keep making comparisons between the two.

    Any ideas out here guys?
    2008 Aug 06 09:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Just read the authors previous post with a comparison with Yukos. In today's world the line between lies/truth are so blurred. (Goverments - not the author) MTL still seems a bit risky to me.

    2008 Aug 06 09:43 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Yukos was a political issue. The CEO was actively working against Putin. Bad move as Putin was the head of the Soviet Secret Police. It does give one pause though.

    Other recent happenings have painted a different picture of what's going on with MTL:
    - Apparently (rumor has it) the actions against MTL are a play to break off some of the energy component and hand them over to Gazprom.
    - Medvedev has come public and cautioned Putin to not push this issue as it is mal-affecting the Russian stock market.
    - Medvedev was the head of Gazprom and I believe Putin is now (I may be wrong about this)
    - Medvedev has strong ties with Putin. He was on Putin's presidential election campaign.
    - Recently Putin has lodged charges against 2 other coal companies in Russia. This may be an attempt to dampen the edge of the MTL affair.

    Boy! Russian politics makes our government seem like pikers! Doesn't it?

    jegan ;-)
    2008 Aug 06 12:56 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Crikey. It may be undervalued, but a risk type that only an insane person would want to take on. What did Churchill say? Russia is an enigma wrapped in a mystery inside a conundrum?

    That's too hard for me.
    2008 Aug 06 04:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Didn't VIP have tax issues in 2006? Was up 400% at one point in 2007. Might want to look at some out of the money Leaps
    2008 Aug 06 06:12 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    the real issue to worry about is the tax evasion charge - not the anti-monopoly commission. the author completely fails to consider it later on. all in all a poor article that basically sums up all the pros while omitting and keeping silent on basically all the cons. gl to the author with that approach.
    food for thought: the tax issue could be used by the govt to get mechel#s coal assets on the cheap or basically for free. well, that would change the investment thesis, no?
    and regadring the need for foreign money: russia has never before been in such a comfortable position vs. foreign capital as it is today. and in the end, greed always has won over fear. western companies have literally sunk billions in russia - and still continue to invest. go figure
    2008 Aug 07 07:24 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Great company!!! very compelling story
    2008 Aug 11 08:29 AM | Link | Reply