No Happy Ending for Auction Rate Securities Mess - Barron's 14 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
While markets seemed to take comfort from last week's moves by Citigroup (C), Merrill Lynch (MER) and UBS (UBS) to buy back about $30B of illiquid auction-rate securities [ARS] from clients at face value, Barron's Jacqueline Doherty says the mess is still far fom a happy ending. Here's why:
- With about $220B in ARS still outstanding, look for regulators - bolstered by their initial successes - to go after more issuers, such as Credit Suisse (CS), Wachovia (WB) and Bank of America (BAC).
- Aside from potential losses arising from the buybacks (Citi estimates a $500M loss, UBS is looking at $900M, while Merrill says the impact won't be material), the banks and brokers need to come up with the cash to finance the purchases. Most will likely have to sell debt.
- The deals do more for retail clients than institutional investors (Citi offered its 'best efforts' to help corporate clients with $12B in ARS, and UBS says it will buy back $10.3B by June 2010). Some large investors are already suing banks that sold them ARS, while others have thrown their weight around - and procured 'sweetheart deals' of $0.90 on the dollar, vs. a street value of about $0.70.
Municipal ARS issuers have successfully exited and/or restructured more than half their $175B in ARS debt, and the trend should continue. Same for closed-end funds. Student lenders ($85B) and CDOs ($20B) that sold auction-rate debt have made little if any progress; the former, because it can't sell new debt at low-enough rates to make it plausible, and the latter because of the deteriorating credit quality of the underlying.
Related Articles
|
Find People on SA
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largest
increase in followers
in the last 7 days-
1
David Fry
-
2
Philip Davis
-
3
Bill Gross
-
4
Tyler Durden
-
5
TraderMark
Fastest Climbers » -
1
-
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most activeSee all
Instabloggers.
Top Instabloggers » -
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
This article has 14 comments:
They are all very cash strapped so where are they going to get the money from? Why from Uncle Ben, of course. But how long can this farce go on for?
Also impeach bush and cheney.
I agree the bad companies (banks) and decision makers should pay for the bad moves they made. The first bad move was packaging/selling subprime loans so bad/predatory lenders could continue the practice (resetting Alt-A and prime ARM loan losses haven't kicked in yet), and now we're beginning how much the piper will have to be paid - I don't think the country has enough money to bail out this giant pyramid scheme, so there will have to be more borrowing if the government (I mean you, I and our grandchildren) bail these guys out. Investments are by definition risky, so let the risk takers pay - the government will have enough to deal with when FDIC payments are made on government backed savings/CDs when banks start going under.
For Democrats, there corruption is tied directly into lobbying/bribes by Countrywide/Pimco in repealing Glass-Steagall, implementing 'Fairness Doctrine' which allowed the corrupt to easily profit when you know where a market is going to land. It is legislating into your own pocket and is disgusting. Same on energy with the environmental lobby. Pain will be the catalyst for true 'change' but I Obama is the last person alive I would want to see attempt to fix these problems. Nor is McCain any better, his liberal understanding of economics which got us here in an ugly state are no better. I expect four years of horrific economy and qualified leadership to be voted in whether that be Democrat, Republican or Independent. The American public are fed up, but in general get skewed approaches to economic fixes by the Democrat party that was shrewd enough to make large-scale investments into media in the mid to late nineties and never stopped.
Either way, US government has become a Cerebus, two ugly heads of the same dog. And as for Venvidi's comment, Ben can keep printing until the American consumer goes broke which seems has just begun to occur in the last few short months. Our entire economic system is going from the failed 'Efficient Market Hyposis' to Save and Invest. The parties I mentioned
The problem that we are facing now has been developing for decades - the notion that markets don't need regulation and are best left alone to regulate itself. But as history has shown us and is showing us now, Capitalism is driven by greed. and I'm not making a moral statement here, just one of fact. The business game is all about making as much money or profit as you can, be it businesses or individuals. It's the drive to book the sale, close the deal, sell the security. mark the profit, earn the commission, take home the bonus. And as we know, people, and corporations will do almost anything, bend any rule, skirt any law or self-imposed industry 'good practice standard' for money (including murder). So where are the 'regulators' to keep all this from happening? They stood around, Alan Greenspan foremost among them, with arms folded because of an unshakeable belief in the "efficiency of the market place" which requires no interference from government. Greenspan said that this crisis could not have been prevented, but now that it has happened will be prevented from re-ocurring in the future because of reforms demanded by 'third parties', i.e., the investors who are too scared shitless to buy these hyped mortgage back securities. In sum, nothing could have been done, or more egregiously should have been done, only and until the market demanded these changes on its own. So all the while the country is sailing along believing that some one is steering the ship and looking out for shoals, there was no one. Certainly no one who was being paid to regulate and provide oversight that is. We must over come this over used fallacy that government has no place in regulating business. It has every place. Remember, greed driven capitalism if not controlled will devour itself. That was the lesson on 1929 and countless other crashes and crises. If we are now saying that despite the sanctity of this 'free market' is best falsehood, these firms are 'too big too fail' then for that kind of insurance provided by the American taxpayer, they need to play by the rules that protect and benefit that taxpayer. They must, for their own good , as well as the country, submit and welcome regulation. If only to keep themselves from killing each other in the mad drive for profits. This is not 'socialism', it's just plain common sense good business practice used every day by businesses when they are managed right. It is however, socialism for the public to incur the losses, and criminal capitalism for business to escape without penalty.
To have it both ways leads to disaster..
Sebiamo
glass/steagal (1935) knew what they were doing. it/s a shame the present batch of speculators/crooks got their way.
> jack