Seeking Alpha
About this author:

How long can The New York Times Co. (NYT) afford to buy shareholders' goodwill? Bloomberg reports today that the company "faces increased financial pressure to cut its dividend as credit quality deteriorates amid record advertising declines." Moody's is threatening to downgrade the Times to a junk rating unless it does something about its anemic cash flow. The current quarterly payout of 23 cents gobbles up $132 million a year that could otherwise be reinvested or used to pay down debt.

The situation reminds me of something former Wall Street Journal managing editor Paul Steiger said when he spoke to the Medill Club a few weeks ago. Noting that the Times Co. had just announced earnings from continuing operations of 15 cents a share, he observed, "When you're borrowing money to pay your dividends, that's my definition of losing sustainability."

Irony alert: Here's what Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger said back in March of last year when the company upped its dividend from 17.5 cents a share: "The strong cash flow of the company and our current financial position, with the upcoming sale of our broadcast unit and radio station, give us the ability to return more capital to shareholders."

 

Print this article with comments

This article has 6 comments:

  •  
    Not a good business to be in and not a good management team to invest in.
    2008 Aug 12 05:38 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    NYT is a dead horse. Find a stupid buyer to that it over.
    2008 Aug 12 07:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree with kurt walter
    2008 Aug 12 09:41 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    A junk bond rating? Another too high rating. NYT circulation declines lead to advertising declines which leads to loss of franchise.
    2008 Aug 13 09:26 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This is the first time I've ever heard returning money to owners described as "gobbling up cash flow." Next we will hear that cutting taxes "costs money."
    2008 Aug 13 10:13 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    When you have an unequal stock structure, logic in the boardroom is permanently on vacation.

    This company is a world-class criminal toxic polluter. Having used toxic ink for over a century the newspaper chokes the local landfills.

    It is so toxic, bacteria will not eat it.

    Up to 30% of the bulk space in local landfills is taken up by newspapers. Sooner of later the environmentalists will wake up and demand a clean up.

    Say goodbye to the grey haired lady when that day comes. Your cancer is not news fit to print.

    How many people died from wrapping their fish before freezing in the mercury/heavy-metal ink bleeding newspaper? No one knows.

    There is a direct relationship of where the newspaper landfills are and "Cancer Alley."

    You know in a State where you cannot smoke in a bar, sooner or later the environmentalists will wake up and force a cleanup. When this happens we will talking about bankruptcy. This paper has no intention of ever cleaning their poison up. As far as they are concerned, mercury is good for you, and the local landfills are safe.
    2008 Aug 19 03:25 PM | Link | Reply