ARS Buybacks: Wachovia Follows the Herd 3 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Going once…going twice…bought back! Wachovia (WB) this morning announced that it has settled with the New York Attorney General’s office regarding an investigation into its marketing of auction rate securities (ARS). As market watchers are aware, the market for these complex debt instruments collapsed in February, early on in the ongoing credit crunch. Essentially, auction rate securities are bonds with variable interest rates (often re-set weekly) and indefinite maturities. Investors could get out of the bonds on a weekly basis if they no longer liked the interest rate or needed their cash. In many cases, these bonds were marketed as alternatives to money market funds. The bottom fell out of the ARS market when the large financial institutions which issued them refused to act as a buyer of last resort and no other buyers came forward. At that point, the $330 billion market for ARS’s imploded and investors were left unable to access their funds.![]()
Just how well Wachovia and other banks understood the risks ARS’s posed is unclear, but it had marketed ARS’s as “cash alternatives” with implied liquidity. While Wachovia is neither admitting nor denying wrong doing in this case, it has opted to settle with the Attorney General and buy back nearly $9 billion worth from investors. In the last two weeks, five investment banks have bought back nearly $35 billion worth of ARS’s, including: Citigroup (C), JP Morgan (JPM), Morgan Stanley (MS), UBS (UBS) and now Wachovia. The only hold-out thus far in the industry-wide investigation—which has ensnared 25 firms—is Merrill Lynch (MER). Merrill had better get its legal team prepared because it seems destined for a courtroom battle with NY AG Cuomo.
The Wachovia settlement should cover about 40,000 investors who were allegedly misled about the risks involved in auction rate securities. In addition to the financial strain of the buyback, WB must now increase reserves to cover legal costs. Wachovia was also fined $50 million. The impact of the settlement is estimated to take eight basis points from Wachovia’s Tier 1 Capital ratio, which is a measure of a bank’s capital adequacy or its financial footing. This may prompt Wachovia to raise more capital, potentially through issuance of more stock.
As for our valuation of Wachovia, after the stock’s horrid few months it appears undervalued when compared to historical norms. For example, price-to-revenue has historically ranged between 1.78 and 2.41 times, but the current ratio is well below normal at 1.01. However, Wachovia in all likelihood is going to have negative earnings for at least the next few quarters. Also, the dividend has been slashed recently in an attempt to shore up capital which is always an insight into management’s prospects for the company. So, although we have a Buy rating on the stock—strictly from a value perspective—we would only advise purchase for the most patient and risk-tolerant of investors. It is very possible that in 3 to 5 years the stock will not be at such depressed levels, but it will most likely be a bumpy ride in the meantime.
Related Articles
|



























This article has 3 comments:
Soon to add to the problem is the news that most are looking at the house of creditcards coming down. If I was going to pick a winning horse in the financials I would go with Freddie and Fannie. They seem like they are high risk, but truth is, if they collapse, a black hole will form and suck the rest down anyways.