A year ago, we described the evolution of unemployment in Spain using the LSQ technique as applied to the integral version of Okun's law:

*u(t) = u(t _{0}) + bln[G/G_{0}] + a(t-t_{0})* (1)

where *u(t)* is the rate of unemployment at time *t*, *G* is the level of real GDP per capita (we used TED, Conference Board, EKS PPP), *a* and *b* are empirical coefficients. The best-fit (dynamic) model for Spain minimizing the RMS error of the cumulative model (1) is as follows:

*du = -*0.406*dlnG +* 2.00*, t<*1995

*du = -*1.11*dlnG +* 1.54*, t>*1994 (2)

This model suggests a big shift in the slope and a smaller change in the intercept around 1995. Having a new unemployment estimate for 2011, we have updated Figure 1 (original Figure 1) from our previous post and confirmed the excellent predictive power of the model. The predicted value is 21.4% and that borrowed from the U.S. BLS is 21.8%.

Figure 1 also shows a prediction (red circle) of the unemployment rate in Spain in case of a 10% fall in real GDP per capita in 2013. The current economic performance in Spain is awful and some experts see a GDP fall of 25%. We are scared to publish the number for the fall by a quarter of the current GDP level since even a 10% fall will result in a 33% rate of unemployment. Essentially one third of labor force will be unemployed. Unfortunately, even a zero GDP growth rate will result in a 1.5% increase in unemployment (see eq. 2).

Figure 1. The observed and predicted rate of unemployment in Spain between 1971 and 2011.

In 2013, the rate may reach 33% in case of 10% fall in real GDP.

The cumulative form of the dynamic Okun's law is characterized by standard error of 1.68% for the period between 1971 and 2011 (0.92% after 1995). The average rate of unemployment for the same period is 13.6% (14.6% after 1995) with a standard deviation of the annual increment of 2.12%.

**Disclosure: **I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.