We have been following the link between the S&P 500 and real GDP since 2008, when the first version of our S&P 500 quantitative model was published. We revisit our prediction on a regular basis and calculate a new forecast. Last time we discussed the model on February 5, 2012 and reported a good prediction for the prior period. Here, we update our model with the revised GDP estimates and include the advance GDP estimate for the third quarter of 2012. The monthly closing prices through September 2012 are used.
As discussed in our working paper on the S&P 500 index, there exists a trade-off between the growth rate of real GDP, G(T), and the S&P 500 return, R. The predicted returns, Rp, can be obtained from the following relationship:
Rp = 0.0054dlnG - 0.03 (1)
where G is represented by the Q/Q (annualized) growth rate, because only quarterly readings of real GDP are published by the BEA. Figure 1 compares the observed and predicted returns through September 2012. The third quarter of 2012 is characterized by a rapid rise in the level of the S&P 500 index and its returns over the previous 12 months. The real GDP estimate for the third quarter will be available in approximately two weeks, but one may estimate this value from the S&P 500 returns using (1). Three red diamonds in Figure 1 represent the predicted growth in the returns for the (annualized) GDP growth rate of 4%.
Therefore, the stock market index indicates the growth rate of real GDP above the consensus estimate for the third quarter. Our estimate is also supported by the fall in the rate of unemployment to 7.8% in September from 8.1% in August, which corresponds to the GDP growth rate above 3% per year.
Figure 1. The predicted and observed S&P 500 return. The predicted curve is smoothed by MA(4). The 12-month S&P return observed during the third quarter of 2012 implies the real GDP growth rate of 4%.
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.