Market participants have to confront a stark asymmetry. There are many ways to lose money, but there appears to be only three ways to make money. Nearly all strategies seem to come down to some variant of momentum or trend following, mean reversion, and carry trades.
Each is associated with different market conditions and requires different behaviors and tactics. In momentum trades, one wants to buy what is going up and sell what is going down. The use of trailing stops may be more beneficial than exiting a trade at a pre-determined level. This seems to be the most common of the three strategies.
Mean reversion is the picking of market extremes. It is the opposite of trend following strategies. It requires selling that which has been rising and buying that which has been falling. The mean used can by dynamic, such as a 20- or a 200-day moving average. The mean also can be more stable, such as purchasing power parity. Since picking tops and bottoms is difficult, the win-loss ratio tends to be less advantageous. This in turn requires strict money management discipline. The losses associated with a few failed attempts to pick an extreme need to be limited so the time it is successful more than pays for the failures and more.
Carry trade strategies are deceivingly complicated and most controversial. They entail the selling of a low yielding asset to fund the purchase of a higher yielding asset. Such strategies require three conditions: sufficiently wide interest rate differentials, stable funding rate, and low volatility.
This last condition might not seem so obvious, so permit a brief explanation. The goal of the strategy is to earn the interest rate differential. If the currencies are too volatile, they threaten to overwhelm the carry. Indeed, foreign exchange prices are often more volatile than interest rate market.
So typically what happens is one makes a little money (from the carry), makes a little money and then loses a lot of money on an abrupt move in the currency market. This is why many traders and observers have compared carry trades to picking up pennies in front of a steam roller.
Recently, a large investment house (and one that should know better) issued a report that the FT and Dow Jones jumped on claiming the carry trade is dead. It was killed by unconventional monetary policy, under which, as one journalist wrote, "global interest rates have gravitated toward zero" and such policies make currencies more unpredictable.
Yet the death of the carry trade has been exaggerated. Ironically, other articles in the same publications disprove the claim by offering examples of carry trades. In fact the persistence of carry trades is why some suggest it is the second oldest profession.
It is not really true that interest rates are gravitating toward zero. Carry trades are not simply interest rate arbitrage, but also can have a temporal component. Consider a carry trade in which one sells a three-month US dollar deposit, paying 0.4%, and buys a six-month Australian deposit yielding 3.75%.
Japanese investors can borrow funds even cheaper. The US-Japanese 10-year yield differential stands near 90 bp, which is above the 100-day moving average. This may be one of the reasons why preliminary data may soon show Japan has surpassed China as the largest foreign holder of US Treasuries.
Add in a temporal component. Consider investors that borrow 2-year Japanese money for around 10 bp and lend to the US Treasury for 165 bp (10-year yield). If one believes Japanese rates will not rise (reasonable) and the US Treasury 10-year yields will not rise much, and might actually fall, within one's investment horizon, it may be an interesting carry trade. It does still require that the yen does not strengthen, or it can quickly eat away the carry.
With a notable exception of Americans, typically when people invest outside their home country, fixed income investments are clearly preferred over equity investments. Currency variability has a larger role in the total return of fixed income investments than equities. This means that a low volatile foreign exchange environment is more important to carry trade strategies.
The euro, yen and Swiss franc volatility (against the US dollar) are near multi-year lows. Within the G10, there are four countries that are typically used as the long-leg of carry trades: Australia and New Zealand dollars, the Norwegian krone and Swedish krona. Their short-term interest rates are some multiple above the lowest yielding G-10 currencies.
Investors, of course, are not confined to G10 currencies. Mrs. Watanabe has shown a new interest this year in Turkish lira denominated uridashi bonds and Australian dollar and South African rand samurai bonds. Or consider the attractiveness of the Brazilian real. The dollar has been confined to a BRL2.00-BRL2.05 range for more than three months. If one expects that range to more of less hold, selling dollars and buying the real may offer an interesting carry opportunity.
The speculative participants in the futures market have continued to be attracted to the Mexican peso. It was the only liquid currency future that saw an increase last week in gross long positions. It is the highest yielding of the currency futures and speculators have accumulated a larger net long peso position than next two currency futures put together. Against the dollar, the peso has been flat, but the carry can be 30 bp a month (as a conservative estimate, depending on the particulars).
The good news then is that market participants continue to deploy all three strategies (momentum, mean reversion and carry). The bad news is that market participants are deploying all three strategies and the foreign exchange market is as difficult to predict as ever.
We nevertheless make our best attempt. Below is the overview of the near-term technical outlook for the major currencies and review of the latest Commitment of Traders report.
Euro: For the first time in few weeks, the technical tone appears to have improved. Technical support held in near $1.28 and the outside update on Thursday coupled with the follow-through gains on Friday helped stabilize the euro's technical tone. Momentum indicators are curling up and the MACDs will likely cross higher over the next few days.
However, the euro has yet to prove itself to the upside. It won't unless it can move above the trend line drawn off of the September 17 high near $1.3170 and the October 5 high near $1.3070 and comes in near $1.3030 on Monday. It is dropping about 5-6 ticks day. Stops appear to be stacked just below $1.28 and a convincing break is needed to confirm a top is in place.
Yen: The dollar's down trend line identified here last week held. It comes in near JPY78.80 on Monday and it drops a couple of ticks a day. Strong demand for dollars emerged on the brief dip below JPY78. The yen is technically uninspiring against the dollar, but may be more interesting on the crosses. It looks best against the dollar-bloc, broadly neutral against the euro, and more vulnerable against the Swiss franc and sterling.
Sterling: After reversing lower last Friday (October 5), sterling dropped nearly two cents in the first half of the week before stabilizing and then turned up ahead of the weekend to recoup about 50% of what it had lost. Initial resistance is seen near $1.6100 and then a down trend line drawn off September 21 high (~$1.6310), September 28 high (~$1.6270) and the October 5 high (~$1.6215), which comes in near $1.6160 on Monday. It drops 7-8 ticks a day.
Swiss franc: The Swiss franc does not appear to be going anywhere quickly. The dollar is stuck in a range roughly between CHF0.9245 and CHF0.9450. For its part, the euro also appears range bound between CHF1.2050 and CHF1.2150.
Canadian dollar: In recent days, the Canadian dollar has been trading broadly sideways. A month long up trend line drawn off the September 14 low near CAD0.9635 has held back US dollar losses. It is a slowly rising trend line. It comes in near CAD0.9300 on Monday and finishes the week near CAD0.9315. On the upside, the greenback will likely encounter offers in the CAD0.9770-CAD0.9835 band.
Australian dollar: The Aussie has fallen out of favor, under the weight of rate cuts, weakening commodity prices and the slowdown in China. Nevertheless, it recorded higher lows every day last week, but then failed to move above the $1.03 level in the second half of the week. Support is now seen near $1.02. Despite a better than expected jobs report, the market continues to anticipate rate cut in early November. That said, the Australian dollar looks potentially more interesting against the New Zealand dollar. The Aussie has fallen a little more than 5% against its cousin, but appears to be bottoming, as it has done before just below NZD1.25. It looks to have near-term potential toward NZD1.2625 and then possibly NZD1.2700.
Mexican Peso: As anticipated last week, the dollar recovered from six-month lows against the peso to test the MXN13.00 level. New dollar offers emerged and pushed it back down to MXN12.85. Dollar support is seen in the MXN12.80-MXN12.83 area. With the broad sideways range that has been carved out over the past month, the various momentum indicators are not very instructive presently. Market positioning continues to appear stretched and vulnerable to a squeeze, but a compelling catalyst is elusive and good buying of the peso continues to be seen on pullbacks.
Qualitative Summary of Commitment of Traders:
- It is the first increase in gross short euros in five weeks. Smallest gross longs since July.
- The gross long yen position is the smallest in three months.
- Rarely over the past 18 months have the gross sterling shorts fallen below 30k.
- Participation in Swiss franc futures continues to fall. The gross short position is near one-year lows.
- The net and gross long Canadian dollar positions have fallen for three consecutive weeks.
- It is the smallest net and gross long Australian dollar position in two months.
- The net and gross long peso position remains near record levels.
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.