Seeking Alpha

About this author:

Russia just declared war… on investors.

As the “R” in BRIC emerging markets, Russia has been one of the hottest places for overseas capital flows in the last ten years. Between 1997 and 2007, capital inflows to the country rose from $4.8 billion to over $50 billion: an all time record.

It’s not difficult to see why. On paper Russia has all the hallmarks of a booming market: a fast-growing economy, dramatic increases in wages and standards of living, and massive currency reserves.

Russia’s GDP has grown at an average annual rate of 7% since 1998. Over the same time period, average monthly salaries have risen eight-fold while unemployment has halved to 6%. All told, 20 millions Russians have risen out of poverty as the country’s economy grew to be sixth largest in the world. And thanks to its massive energy reserves—#1 for natural gas, #2 for coal, and #8 for oil worldwide—Russia sits atop the third largest currency reserves in the world, $581 billion.

However, as good as Russia looks on paper, investing in the country has proven quite problematic. As much as the Kremlin purports to embrace free market capitalism, Russia’s government has a nasty habit of playing hardball with domestic and international firms doing business there—see Yukos in 2004 and BP (BP), Mechel (MTL), Evraz Holding (EVGPF.PK), and Raspadskaya Coal today.

Russia also likes playing hardball regarding energy supplies—it cut off supplies to Ukraine in 2006—and starting cyber wars against its adversaries—Estonia, the U.S. and most recently Georgia. All of these factors combine to make investing in Russia a bit like playing Russian roulette.

However, it wasn’t until Russia physically invaded Georgia this month that investors really started fleeing the country. The Financial Times reported last Thursday that investors have been withdrawing funds from Russia at the fastest rate since the ruble crisis in 1998. They withdrew $16.4 billion in the week of August 8 alone: the second largest weekly drop in 10 years.

Crisis often leads to great value. And Russia as a whole is now quite cheap — the Russian stock exchange has fallen 23% this year and now trades at seven times earnings, one of the cheapest valuations in the world.

But I’d be very careful about putting any money there.

The simplest means of investing in Russia are the two Russian ETFs: Market Vector Russian ETF (RSX) and the ING Russia Fund (LETRX). However, both of these funds are heavily invested in Russia’s massive energy and mineral companies — the very companies the Kremlin has a history of interfering with. So I’d steer clear of either of those.

However, if you’re feeling daring, I’d suggest looking at consumer driven plays in Russia. The macro-trends — Russia’s growing middle class and increased standard of living — are booming. And while even these companies aren’t above political interference —  Russia froze food prices from Oct ’07- Jan ‘08 — they’re too politically sensitive for the government to shut down.

Here are a few worth looking at:

Company Symbol Business
Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods WBD Food products
Rostelecom ROS Telecommunications
Print this article with comments

This article has 16 comments:

  •  
    'However, it wasn’t until Russia physically invaded Georgia this month that investors really started fleeing the country.'

    Wrong. RSX chart here contradicts you completely. Investors started their flight in July, by August 1 RSX already lost more than 15% (quite a drop in one months).

    Any investment in Russia now is Russian Roulette. Government with every day looks like lunatics running asylum.
    2008 Aug 25 12:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Sorry, Graham, but you obviously do not have the remotest idea about Russia's ground realisties. Your article could as well have been written by a White House cold warrior or some academic sitting in his ivory tower. Truth is, a lot of Russia's oligarchs gobbled upü vast fortunes and empires under Putin's predecessor Yeltsin who basically gave away the properties of the people of Russia to those oligarchs for free. look at these guys in their 30s, 40s and 50s and you see plenty of decadent behavious but ZERO entrepreneurship. They didn't earn their empires, they stole it. Putin and Medvedev simply try to slowly reverse part of that plundering. Your case of the 'bad guys in Moscow' robbing poor innocent oligarchs simply doesn't hold water.
    Your view on the war between Georgia and Russia is way off the mark and an absolute distortion of facts and reality. fact is, the NATO promised Russia (then Gorbachev) not to expand into former Soviet republics in exchange for getting Germany into the NATO. Nobody in Washingtonm seems to care for that promise anymore. Second, the USA have built up georgia against Russia and propped up a corrupt, selfish and hostile president there. This guy had nothing better to do than to attack - and now washington crties foul when Russia hits back hard and call that 'aggression' and 'unreasonable response' Go figure,. the entire historsy of the USA over the past 50 years is a history of overblown military action against everyone everywhere who seemed too weak to defend against uncle sam.
    Using military and economic leverage to influence other countires, and more so neighbours and strategic regions is part and parcel of every regional or international power's policy tools. you can rant about that all day - but please, stop blaming it all on the Russians. That common U.S. mantra is as old, as dumb and as annoying as it gets.
    thank you very much
    2008 Aug 25 12:47 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The propaganda war against Russia by the US and UK press is several years old. The level of dishonesty from the media about the Georgian attack matches the dishonesty shown about the Iraqi WMDs. European leaders are playing the game with various degrees of slavishness. Even Mrs. Merkel avoided discussing who started the war or how many people the Georgians killed and said some thing about not playing the blame game. As usual, the neocons and the media whores are defrauding the public. Prepare to pay up again. Amvet
    2008 Aug 25 12:59 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    According to recent stats 1/3 of all russian househods earn more than $20,000 per year. Income tax is 13% flat which leaves 1/3 of the population with $17,400 disposabla income. Adjsut for standard of living and you will arrive to the conclusion that living standards there are not far off those in the USA. Maybe this is why the approval ratings of the PM and president are 83% and 80%.
    2008 Aug 25 01:33 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Having been part of a "superpower" before, Russia now is not an ordinary emerging or developing country. There are severe anomalies in its characteristics. It is both modern (in education levels, arms industry and power, mining, etc) in many respects as other advanced nations as well as primitive (political institutions and capabilities, infra-structure, industry, standard of living, etc) as are many developing countries. It is not surprising that it looks better on paper than in appearace on a day to day basis as found in its confines.It will be so for a long time, and should not be underestimated or ov er-estimated.

    Based on its history and its czarist past, it is expected to protect its national interests, exert influence on its immediate neighborhood, and, when the opportunity arises to its favor, flex its muscles. However, it does not mean that it cannot co-exist peacefully with its immediate neighbours, provided the neighbours don't give it cause to believe ithat its security is being challenged.

    Distant powers have to be mindful of this as well, especially if they are not willing to risk their own involvement in direct armed confrontation with Russia. Before they fully become capable, these distant powers or superpowers have to counsel moderation on their proverbial future allies on Russia's borders. In the meantime, these powers should assist these nations in economic development to build internal strength without posing as threat to Russia..
    2008 Aug 25 02:39 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I have been putting Soviet, er, Russian dezinformatists on "ignore" over at GIM for about a month now, but I see by the above that their presence is not limited to GIM. Their output is very very similar:

    1. Rail against the "oligarchs"
    2. Decry any western criticism as "propaganda"
    3. Threaten the west militarily

    Good article. I would no more invest in Russia than I would invest in Venezuela or the US. In the US the organized criminals aren't brazen enough to be high government officials and officers in major corporations. In Russia, the organized criminals have less need for discretion.
    2008 Aug 25 08:49 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Russia is far more stable now tha it was 10 years ago. And those who invested 10 years ago made a lot of money.
    It is risky no doubt. But is US maket any safer? US Financials are down 70-80%, Russia is down 20%. The only valid argument here is that finacials might have bottom ad Russia may be not.
    In any case, I bought Gazprom Neft today. It pays nice dividend and I don't have to worry about it going bancrupt.
    2008 Aug 25 08:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    > I have been putting Soviet, er, Russian dezinformatists on "ignore" over at GIM for about a month now, but I see by the above that their presence is not limited to GIM.

    Of course, everything coming from russians must be propaganda, but everything coming from the US media is 100% unbiased truth. I am russian living in the US. I see both sides. What reason do I have to spread misinformation?

    I find that the propaganda machine in the US is very well oiled, and equally effective as the one we used to have in the USSR. Sometimes, I think that it is on purpose US education in history and geography is so limited. Uneducated masses are easier to control.

    The world ia a very scary place for an average american.

    However, to be a successful investor/ trader one must attempt to see the world the way its truly is .
    2008 Aug 26 12:26 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "Adjsut for standard of living and you will arrive to the conclusion that living standards there are not far off those in the USA"

    I think you mean "adjust for cost of living". That said, I disagree. Little things like reliably delivered electricity and water and better quality available goods make US more desirable. Also, there's something to be said for less corruption, more freedom of speech and free elections. It's not quantifiable, but they're part of one's standard of living. US has it. Putin's subjects do not.

    If US standard of living and Russia's are comparable, why are Americans not flocking to get in to Russia? Learning Russian is arguably easier than learning English (though not nearly as useful outside Eastern Europe).

    I love Russia. It's sad to see it revert to belligerence and state control.
    2008 Aug 26 08:36 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    From what I've read, and while wearing my hip-waders, it would seem to me that Russia plays hardball with it's large companies. (I don't see any point on retelling the BP, Lukoil or MTL stories... ). However, it is also very clear that we cannot trust our government either. Based strictly on recent news, it seems very clear that we have been baiting Russia. In particular, note the recent Polish missile system. And note that we armed Georgia and have 200+ military advisors in the country. Then look at the constant polemics from the likes of Rice, Cheney and Bush... Give me a break... These people can't be trusted. I'm amazed that we Americans can believe anything they say after the last 8 years. It is also interesting to see the French lining up with us against Russia. Weren't they on the receiving end of the 'Freedom Fries' push just a couple of years ago. Course, like most of Europe, they have been very concerned with energy supplies from Russia. I'm not sure whether the French or we are more fickle.

    Meanwhile, while our government parades their horror at a country that would 'illegally' invade another country.... (Duh!!!)... the Russians are very busy cozying up to China. Russia will pull out of this with our without the US and Europe.

    jegan ;-)

    p.s. Notice how the Russians went in and got out. They at lest seemed to have learned something from Afghanistan. Too bad Bush couldn't take the same tactic like his Dad and Regan did. In and out!
    2008 Aug 26 01:45 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    can any of the smart people figure out how much russia has defaulted on its loans since ww1?its your money.if you like russia put it there.i dont have the courage.
    2008 Aug 26 09:56 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Ultimately it all comes down to RULE OF LAW, and Russia has destroyed confidence in it.
    2008 Aug 28 09:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Russia is a decaying shell of an economy. It is a total crap shoot to invest there, you are betting that corrupt politicians will make decisions in your favor if you do.
    2008 Aug 29 09:18 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    bigcharts.marketwatch....

    This is the best long term chart of the Russian market (TRF) going back 10 years. I was working in investment banking in London in 2003 when smart people I knew were catching on to this story (when TRF was $25/share). Today, those same people are telling me the party is over for now, but not specifically because of Russia, but simply the global macroeconomy is slowing down. I am a seller of Russia too, but not for micro reasons. If anything, Mechel (MTL) is looking like good value at $20/share. Everyone thinks it will get crushed like Yukos, but the owner (Zuzin) has no political ambitions. If the global economy improves, this stock should recover to $40-45/share.
    2008 Sep 04 05:00 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    LETRX is an open-end (and load) mutual fund, not an ETF. So far as I know, RSX is the only ETF available (and a pretty good deal when Russia is going up). There is no inverse Russia fund except EEV, an ETF that tries to return twice the the inverse of EEM (i.e. all emerging markets based on the MSCI index). (Also EUM tries to return the inverse of EEM, but since the expenses are about the same it is smarter to put half the amount in EEV and keep the rest in cash.) Keep an eye on ProShares, Rydex, and Drexion, though, to see who comes out first with an inverse Russia fund.
    2008 Sep 14 11:03 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    LETRX is an open-end (and load) mutual fund, not an ETF. So far as I know, RSX is the only ETF available (and a pretty good deal when Russia is going up). There is no inverse Russia fund except EEV, an ETF that tries to return twice the the inverse of EEM (i.e. all emerging markets based on the MSCI index). (Also EUM tries to return the inverse of EEM, but since the expenses are about the same it is smarter to put half the amount in EEV and keep the rest in cash.) Keep an eye on ProShares, Rydex, and Drexion, though, to see who comes out first with an inverse Russia fund.
    2008 Sep 14 11:03 PM | Link | Reply