Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Stocks discussed in the in-depth session of Jim Cramer’s Mad Money TV program, Monday, August 25.

Housing Continues to Hurt - Freddie Mac (FRE), Fannie Mae (FNM)

“We need housing to stop hurting us,” Jim Cramer told viewers. He said that until the crisis that hangs over Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae is finally resolved, the markets will continue to trade lower. Cramer said that sometimes the market just lies as it did today when Freddie and Fannie shares were up while the rest of the financial service stocks fell. While it's wrong to take all stocks lower because of problems of a select few, that's exactly what will continue to happen until the U.S. Treasury steps in and takes action. He called Fannie and Freddie “the root of all market evil.” In order for the market to finally bottom, said Cramer, housing must stabilize. That requires lower interest rates, lower home inventory and higher home sales, things that cannot happen until the fate of Fannie and Freddie are resolved. Cramer said he stands by his prediction that the markets will not take out the lows set on July 15, but that prediction fail if the government doesn't step in soon. He started a new “Mortgage Mess Countdown” to see how just how long it takes the Treasury to act and save the market from its continued slide.

The Pelosi Endorsement - Clean Energy (CLNE), Fuel Systems (FSYS)

Cramer said he's putting his money with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and investing in Clean Energy. He cited a recent Wall Street Journal article, which reported that Pelosi owns somewhere between $100,000 to $250,000 worth of stock in the alternative fuel provider. “It’s even better than Warren Buffett being a shareholder,” Cramer said, because Buffett doesn’t control the House of Representatives.” Cramer last recommended Clean Energy and Fuel Systems on August 1. While Fuel Systems rose sharply and is up 46.6% since he mentioned it, Cramer said Clean Energy should also spike soon on the heels of its political connections. Cramer said Clean Energy stands to get a boost from the passage of a November ballot initiative in California, which calls for $5 billion to be set aside for the purchase of 70,000 trucks and 150,000 cars in the state to be converted to compressed natural gas. That initiative, which is currently drawing a 60% approval rating in the polls, would be a windfall for Clean Energy, which builds and operates natural gas fueling stations, and is much larger than any of the company's other current projects. Cramer also likes Clean Energy on the heels of its better-than-expected quarter, where it reported a loss of only 5 cents a share compared to analyst estimates of 11 cents a share loss.

The Low Down - Nordson (NDSN)

Cramer told investors to read between the lines when it comes to the stock on Nordson, which fell 23% on Friday after it missed earnings estimates by 5 cents a share and lowered forecasts by 16%. On the surface, said Cramer, it may seem like an overreaction to take a stock down 23% and destroy $60 million in market cap on just a 16% decline in estimates. But Cramer explained that the seemingly small earnings miss signifies something much more profound. Cramer said Nordson has unknowingly gone from a dependable growth stock to a stock that no one wants to own in this environment, and in so doing, is now making the slow transition from a growth stock to a value stock. “Management's credibility is gone,” said Cramer. With 22% of the company's sales in the housing sector and another 7% exposed to autos, Cramer predicted zero chance of a rebound for the stock in such a tough market. He said the transition from growth to value could take as long as 18 months, during which time the stock will likely be headed low down. Cramer said Nordson traded at 17 times its forward earnings before last Friday, and even at today's numbers it still trades at just 14 times earnings. He predicted that the stock will have to retreat another 12 points before value investors would consider the company a bargain and begin replacing the droves of growth investors that are currently leaving the company.

Electronic Prescription Systems Required - Allscripts (MDRX)

Glenn Tullman, chairman and CEO of Allscripts, spoke about what the recent Medicare bill means for his company. Cramer last recommended the stock on July 1, but also advised investors to take profits in the company after the bill was passed. Tullman said the Medicare bill not only requires physicians to use electronic prescription systems like the ones Allscripts offers, but actually penalizes them for not doing so. “So you can’t ask for a better endorsement than the government actually pushing your product,” Tullman said. He said that using technology to improve a business process makes sense and he's pleased with the progress his company, and the industry, has made thus far. When asked about the company's upcoming special cash dividend payment, Tullman said that while there may be a short-term downdraft from the payment, he's confident in the company's long-term value. “If you believe in the long-term premise,” he said, then that dip is a buying opportunity.” Cramer called the company a good story and recommended again owning the stock.

Sudden Death - Windstream (WIN), Banco Santander-Chile (SAN), Vodafone Group PLC (VOD)

Cramer was bullish on Windstream. He believes their payout is better and there is a chance of a takeover.

He was bearish on Banco Santander-Chile. The bank is well run, Cramer said, but it has too much exposure to bad European mortgages.

Vodafone Group PLC has a dividend Cramer likes but he likes Windstream’s dividend better.

Seeking Alpha publishes a summary of Jim Cramer's stock picks every day including: Mad Money Recap, Lightning Round and Stop Trading!

Get Cramer's Picks by e-mail -- it's free and takes only a few seconds to sign up.

Seeking Alpha is not affiliated with Jim Cramer, CNBC or TheStreet.com

 

 

Print this article with comments

This article has 8 comments:

  •  
    Pelosi won't control the house forever (if much longer).
    2008 Aug 26 11:05 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Good ol Nancy count on her to be on the wrong side of the issue. $4.00 gasoline = rising costs for everything else. Minimum wage hike with no increase in productivity = higher costs for everything else. No increase in domestic energy production (drilling the OCS) with increased demand abroad resulting in $250 per barrel oil = higher costs of everything else. Leads to Nancys' departure sooner rather than later.
    2008 Aug 26 12:20 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hmmmm.

    I thought Jim's bottom call on July 15th had "no reservations". Now, it seems that only the Fed and Treasury can save the market. Let me see--- Fan and Fred have somewhere in the range of 5 trillion on their balance sheets. The Fed/Treasury step in. Now that 5 trillion is onthe taxpayers' balance sheet. How did all that action help the homeowner pay his mortgage, insurance and property taxes.

    Also, please explain how the Fan-Fred problem weighs on the "4 horsemen". Or is it now the "2 housemen"?

    Jim, we don't need lower interest rates. We need higher incomes and/or lower house prices. Which do you think we'll see first?
    2008 Aug 26 12:24 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Pelosi recently stated on national television that we needed to move away from fossil fuels and move toward alternative energy like natural gas. I am not sure that I would want to follow the lead on energy of anyone who is so ignorant about energythat theydo not know that natural gas is a fossil fuel. It certinaly make clear why we do not have an intelligent enrgy policy if the leader of the majority party is that ignorant about energy.
    2008 Aug 26 03:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It looks to me like Cramer can no longer be trusted as he is in tank for for the Democrats... Everytime Jim goes political, it's so shallow and superficial, I doubt that he fools anyone?

    Jim apparently sees no conflict of interest with speaker Pelosi holding up all voting on drilling projects while at the same time investing her money in competing products.

    Pelosi should be impeached!
    2008 Aug 26 03:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Let's get real here folks.

    Cramer an amnesiac manic depressive misanthropic hyper psychopathic promoter whose hidden complete track record trails passive index fund performance. JC erroneously called bottoms since at least January of this year. JC calls himself the best trader on Wall Street. Wonder what Buffett, Heebner, Rogers, Soros, the late Templeton and others would say?

    Re Pelosi and CLNE, let us not forget Feinstein and PCR, Rumsfeld and GILD, Cheney and HAL, Bush and oil, Chuck Schumer causing a run on IndyMac with his hedge fund buddies short IMB, and Harry Reid with his tribal gaming money and land deals benefited by legislation.

    The Pickens Plan includes further picking the taxpayer pocket to leverage his windpower and natural gas deals. Meanwhile his investments, along with CHK, are heading south.

    Am I the only one who finds something curious about FNM and FRE GSE equities going higher while their balance sheets head south? How many times can Merrill come to the trough? Are $560 T in derivative leveraged institutions too big to fail, or too big to rescue?

    Most bankruptcy bailouts wipe out common shareholders.

    Is it possible the 6 Trillion dollar scale of just the FNM and FRE GSEs is beyond taxpayer revenues and the $10 T Treasury market to rescue?

    How many CDOs and other falling assets can the private Federal Reserve put on its balance sheet before insolvency or hyperinflation?

    FDIC went from $50 B available for $6 T deposits to $42 B after the IndyMac closing. FSLIC and RTC cost taxpayers $150 B, with the choicest properties going to cronies.

    And what about all the other unfunded liabilities with social security, the Iraq War and other GSEs? Can we paper them over too, or will we raise taxes to 89% and default on government IOUs?

    Interesting times indeed.

    Maybe it's time we return to the Constitutional definition of money or write in Ron Paul for President.

    2008 Aug 26 03:57 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This just in:

    CNBC reports the Schumer IndyMac closing cost FDIC not $8 B as previously reported, but $32 B, leaving FDIC reserves below legal mandates. A CNBC commentator claims FDIC funds are less than 1% of Federally Guaranteed deposits, that FDIC will raise premium assessments on surviving banks. What insurance company would insure highly leveraged financial institutions today? Berkshire Hathaway and Korea apparently passed on Lehman, and Merrill investments trashed Singapore's Retirement Funds. In 1933 FDR, a one-time banker, and leading bankers opposed FDIC for fear of moral hazard.

    plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose!
    2008 Aug 26 04:27 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    let me explain the markets.......
    1) little thought given to underlying fundamentals;
    2) too much pressure on boosting stock prices;
    3) mathematical theory is king.

    the markets will take off again too early and fall like a rock.
    2008 Aug 27 12:22 AM | Link | Reply