market authors
selected for publication
ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. (XJT)
Q2 2008 Earnings Call
August 6, 2008 10:00 am ET
Executives
Kristy Nicholas – Investor Relations Contact
James Ream – President and Chief Executive Officer
Analysts
[Richard Olson - In Bridge Capital]
[Matthew Hart]
Presentation
Operator
Welcome to the ExpressJet second quarter 2008 financial results call. (Operator Instructions) I would now like to turn the call over to Kristy Nicholas.
Kristy Nicholas
On the call we have Jim Ream, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Phung Burns, Staff Vice President-Finance, Controller and Interim Chief Financial Officer.
Portions of this call may contain forward-looking statements not limited to historical facts, but reflecting our current beliefs, expectations and our intentions regarding future events. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning risk factors that could affect our actual results is described in our filings with the SEC, including our 2007 10-K.
During this call certain non-GAAP certain financial disclosures may be made relating to our performance measures. In accordance with SEC rules we will provide a reconciliation to our most directly comparable GAAP financial measures on our website at www.ExpressJet.com. Jim will cover the operating and financial results for the quarter and then he will take questions.
Now I'd like to introduce Jim Ream.
James Ream
Let me get the highlights and then open it up to questions.
We, as you saw in the press release closed the quarter, had a net loss of $31.7 million. The quarter includes some non-recurring charges related to some fleet decisions that we've made re: some analysis of the goodwill results that was on the books as the [inaudible] from Continental, all related to some subsequent business decisions we're going to talk about later on in the call.
If you normalize for these write-offs, our operating income loss would have been cut in half. We would have had about a $22 million improvement year-over-year on an operating level, and that includes another $10 million of fuel price impact in the second quarter of this year.
So we feel that we made substantial progress on the revenue side with all the businesses that we're involved with. Obviously the things that I want to talk about next involve the events that we've made decisions on make going into the second quarter particularly relevant. So we did want to close. But we did want to talk about the second quarter that we did end it with $191 million in cash. That includes the restricted cash and the impaired value of the auction rate securities.
Well first let me talk about the announcement we made in the last 60 days where we had reached a new agreement with Continental Airlines. The agreement is for seven years starting in July and we're just starting our second month under that new agreement.
The agreement has given some significant economic concessions to Continental Airlines in order to secure a long-term transaction. It's based on two facts. One, that they had the contractual flexibility to come in and reset the economics on this agreement. They made it pretty clear that the agreement was not workable the way it was today and that they were going to terminate if we were not able to reach some positive outcome.
So we worked pretty hard to try to get to the economic benchmark that they were shooting for. Our opinion is the economic benchmark is going to be a little bit geared towards more of a marginal bid. It may come from another operator that had already had their business in place.
So it's really going to be a stretch for us to be successful under the new agreement. We're going to have to have very much unit cost improvement in order for us to have some modest amount of income under the new CPA and I feel that we've got a reasonable shot of hitting that unit cost improvement, but as a result of that we're still going to earn probably a fair amount less than most of our peers in the industry on a per tail basis.
So they have the contractual flexibility but more importantly just as the industry has gotten far more challenging and with fuel prices in particular putting a lot of pressure on smaller aircraft, it really just reflects the economic value of the under lying airplane that we're using in serving Continental Airlines. It obviously doesn't make sense for them to lose hundreds of millions and then for us to make tens of millions with an airplane that's supporting that network and the one that's suffering the most from higher fuel prices.
I really feel that we've really got kind of a right value proposition now for Continental given where fuel is and an airplane that's of value to their network. And I think that's really mostly what's reflective in this new CPA. We're working with all of our suppliers and unions to sit down and make sure they understand what we need to do to hit the cost targets in order for us to be successful. Those discussions are going along very productively and I feel that we're making good progress and we hope to have that wrapped up here over the course of the next say 45 days to 60 days or so.
If we're not successful in those conversations, then I'm not sure we have a sustainable business. So it's pretty important that we get this done. They understand that and I think that's why those conversations are going along pretty well.
The challenge we have is that with the fleet decisions, and I'll talk about some of those, and with where the industry is generally and how all networks are pulling their capacity down, is that we're looking at a fair amount fewer ASM's in the fourth quarter than we're flying currently. So it's somewhere in the neighborhood of a 30% drop off in the capacity.
So above and beyond getting the unit cost improvement, we also need to get dollar-for-dollar of expense savings for all those ASM's. That's going to be pretty challenging given how quickly those ASM's are disappearing from us, and usually some of this takes a little bit of time to work your way through as you're committed on schedules, maintenance programs and so on to be able to react to this quickly.
I feel we're going to have obviously some pressure on us in the third quarter as we go through the fleet transition and then as we get to the fourth quarter we're still going to have to work pretty hard to try to get all those expense items identified given the drop off in the amount of ASM's that we're dealing with.
On the positive side we've cleared up how the MSN works. We've eliminated that out of the CPA, it gives us more flexibility to look at other opportunities that may present themselves. We've solved the corporate governance issues. We're cleaned up and very much more market rate than where they were previously.
Continental agreed to take aircraft back. Of the 69 that we're operating on our own and bear the cost of whatever the fleet disposition is that they decide upon with those aircraft, and for any airplanes that they retained, that they would reset the lease rates on those aircraft to very much represent the new market value of this aircraft, and I think gives us a fair amount of flexibility as we look at opportunities based on that.
Not surprisingly, the conversation going along with Delta have been very much the same. First it was going to be less expensive for them to park the aircraft that we had under the capacity buy agreement, than it was to operate and just pay us out on all the fixed amounts that we had in that contract. We sat down and worked out a transition plan with them on those 10 airplanes. And then the aircraft that we are working for them out of LAX, they're certainly long 50-seat airplanes, and felt that they had adequate resources to cover what their plans were for LAX and would no longer need us to support that part of the operation. We've put those two together and we're going to eliminate all of our flying with Delta on September 2.
With the option by Continental to return aircraft, it also changed the analysis on all of our branded operation. While we've made consistent progress quarter in and quarter out and we're pretty darn happy with the revenue performance looking at our first year anniversary going into this summer, obviously a lot of the progress we've made on the revenue side was just being consumed with an ever increasing fuel price. It put a lot of pressure on us.
Obviously as I mentioned fuel prices going up put a lot of pressure to follow the aircraft and so this aircraft was really struggling at where fuel prices currently are. Even though we just saw an accelerating awareness level, and a vastly improving loyalty program, great participation by the communities, we have made a decision that at this time it does not make sense for us to continue with the scheduled branded service and so we are going to terminate all those operations on September 2 as well.
It was a really painful decision because I think you know our folks did such a great job of creating a real positive, meaningful impact on the passengers that we had, and the communities really were responding. I think we're pretty comfortable with the market share we had gotten in the first year and we thought that we would continue to improve upon that, but again, where fuel is just made that decision impossible carry this operation forward so we will terminate that September 2 as well.
We are making really good progress on our corporate charter service business. The [inaudible] revenues in the second quarter grew over 3.5 times versus last year's second quarter. Looking at the third quarter, that growth rate will be even higher on a year-over-year basis.
While it was very operationally challenging to make this work the way customers need for it to work, sales cycles can be longer to get the more longer term agreements and to get those ultimately in place we've made so much progress here that we're going to continue to grow this business.
As I mentioned, we've got the new lease rate agreements with Continental. It really allows us a lot of flexibility to use these aircraft in more of a lower utilization environment than we had before and we've made so much progress that we're going to continue to grow this. Of the 69 airplanes, we're going to keep 30 under these new lower lease rates and put them in this unscheduled corporate and charter based business and continue to grow this as we can.
That leaves 205 airplanes working for Continental. They have the right to pull that down to 190 aircraft starting June of next year, and we're working with them on the schedule for this upcoming winter. But obviously, much less utilization on the aircraft that we're flying with them, just based on their re-sizing their own network, based on where they feel demand is going to be for the upcoming winter period.
So that's a quick overview of all the things that have happened. We can open it up to questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
(Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from [Richard Olson - In Bridge Capital].
[Richard Olson – In Bridge Capital]
I just wanted to check a couple of balance sheet items real quick so of the $190 million in cash? How much of that is true liquid cash that you have access to right now.
James Ream
I would say we have about $16 million in true restricted cash for workers comp possible claims in the future that we have in escrow and we have some credit card hold back. That's probably about $20 million. So if you back out those two, that's the amount that we have as true usable cash.
[Richard Olson – In Bridge Capital]
What's the interest rate that the [ARS] is earning right now?
James Ream
LIBOR plus 175.
[Richard Olson – In Bridge Capital]
So given you've got roughly $160, $155 million in cash. You've got about $185 million of appraised collateral. It's a hefty chunk of assets so I'm just curious, revisiting the decision about deciding to take shares to redeem the notes. How do you explain that to shareholders that it was more appropriate to issue shares and cause the [law of dilution] as opposed to financing or utilizing the cash that you've got.
James Ream
Well where the industry is right now access to capital is very uncertain. And we're going through quite a transition with the amount of ASM's being pulled out and our ability to resize the cost structure in a time frame that gave us enough comfort that using the cash we had or having some guarantee that we would have access to the capital market put us in really giving the note holders an option.
I think we gave them a pretty solid market rate bond to look at with collateral protection so they had a real secure transaction. But obviously coming out of cash right now, we just didn't feel it prudent given the uncertainty in the industry, and certainly in our ability to respond to a new deal with Continental, and the uncertainty around access really wasn't [inaudible] get financing in place in time even if we had pretty solid assets.
[Richard Olson – In Bridge Capital]
Why not? Why not just redeem or negotiate with half the bond-holders, redeem half them in cash or redeem three-quarters of it in cash or whatever cushion you might need to prevent this massive dilution?
James Ream
Yes we were in conversations with the bond-holders and again they obviously wanted a lot more cash in how those conversations were going than the Board was comfortable to give up right now given the uncertainty where the industry is. So it may be that it all works out perfectly and in hindsight it would have been optimal to have done it.
But when you're standing right now, you're not sure you can get financing done, you're not sure where exactly the industry is going, what kind of counter party risk you may have with Continental given the uncertainty out there, and our own having to resize this company at an order of magnitude that's never really been done before, I think all those things weighed against the Board to take anything other than more of a conservative approach.
[Richard Olson – In Bridge Capital]
What was the sort of attitude of the Board members related to [inaudible] advisors? Were they in support of the decision to dilute?
James Ream
Yes.
Operator
Your next question comes from [Matthew Hart] - [inaudible].
[Matthew Hart]
On the cash, the gain that you mentioned in your release that you got on unwinding the fuel hedges, $23 million, when was that received and is that in the $630 cash balance you cited?
James Ream
No it's not. It was received in July.
[Matthew Hart]
And then ditto for the tax refunds mentioned, it was $38 million.
James Ream
It is in the second quarter and in the number that we reported.
[Matthew Hart]
In terms of the special charges, $22 million and change, was any of that cash?
James Ream
Yes. It will be probably close to two-thirds cash, one-third non-cash.
[Matthew Hart]
And in terms of the cost cutting and all that, you mentioned that the 5%, compensation cuts that management/clerical took was 30% essentially of your target. Is that 30% of that $36 million target that's mentioned, or is that before the $36?
James Ream
The $36 is inclusive of the management/clerical work groups.
[Matthew Hart]
That's $10, $10.8 million basically was what you got then.
James Ream
Yes, sir.
[Matthew Hart]
And just based on the way you've explained it previously, essentially this is what you need to get to EBIT breakeven on the business basically?
James Ream
Well, we're not going to do a lot of projections. I think we will generate positive income under this kind of reduction in our unit costs with the new agreement with Continental. However, it requires us to get dollar-for-dollar and all the expenses out given the drop off in ASM's. So we're really working through the winter period right now where we're going to be flying less now. We're just going through the worst period for this industry and Continental's obviously has pulled their network back greatly in response to where they think demand is going to be.
So you're looking at a very difficult challenge. We're hopeful by the time we get to summer, you can start working out having some more ASM's to work with to help you with this. That's where the challenge is going to be is getting all of the expenses out given the drop off in capacity.
[Matthew Hart]
But approximately the numbers you're talking to are not inclusive of interest expense.
James Ream
Correct.
[Matthew Hart]
Do you anticipate still having roughly $32 million of your run rate annual D&A going forward?
James Ream
Yes.
Operator
I am showing no further questions at this time.
James Ream
Thank you very much. We'll have our 10-Q out on this Friday so any information that needs to be clarified once you see that document, make sure that you give us call. Thank you for participating.
Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.
If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com. Thank you!