Seeking Alpha
About this author:

MBIA (MBI) announced Wednesday that it has reached an agreement with Muni Bond insurer Financial Guaranty Insurance Company [FGIC] to reinsure $184 billion principal amount of public finance bonds insured by FGIC. The agreement is subject to the approval of the NY State Insurance Department which is expected since MBIA said in its press release: “We appreciate the encouragement and support provided by the New York State Insurance Department and Superintendent Eric Dinallo in connection with this transaction.”

This is the “end of days” for FGIC’s credit default swap counterparties but good news for the holders of the bulk of FGIC insured municipal bonds. The reinsurance agreement is a “cut through” agreement meaning the insured bondholder can call on MBIA directly to make payment in the event of default on the insured bond. As a result, these bonds will be upgraded from “B-1” Moody’s and “B” S&P, FGIC’s current financial strength ratings, to A-2 Moody’s and AA S&P, MBIA’s current financial strength ratings. Bonds with a published current uninsured (on their own) rating of at least A-2 Moody’s or AA S&P will see no rating change as a result of the agreement.

Once in effect, MBIA will have the risk and all of the unearned up front premium which would amount to about $735 million, net of an assumed standard ceding commission of 20%, or $184 million, to be retained by FGIC. The ceding commission rate was not disclosed but very probably falls in the range of 20 to 25%.

Let’s assume that MBIA gets about $700 million, that’s 0.38% of par amount, not bad, and enough to generate a low double digit return on the capital required to support the reinsured risks. At the end of 2007, FGIC had US public finance exposure of $222 billion, total unearned premiums of $1.4 billion and a very low S&P US public finance weighted average capital charge of 10% of average annual debt service.

This is good news for MBIA and the holders of FGIC and MBIA insured municipals. It is bad news for FGIC credit default swap counterparties and probably for all counterparties with a financial guarantee insurer on the other side of a CDS.

Print this article with comments

This article has 3 comments:

  •  
    Warren Buffet was asking too much to reinsure these bonds, almost 50% more compare to MBIAs cost. This is an example how competition is good for the bond market.
    2008 Aug 28 08:29 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I could kiss Jay Brown. He's doing an incredible job taking a company that everyone said was gone, and building it back up bit by bit. The only thing I kick myself over is not tripling down when they dipped below $4 --- I only doubled down to be conservative. I'm currently up 50% overall since buying originally in January. I expect them to be up around $30 by next year. I feel sorry for anyone that bought since 1996, but if they held on and went long past this crisis, they won't lose as much and likely will have a half-way decent return within a decade (they've still banked all the dividends). Those that sold in panic will have lost it all and given more of their money to the loudest shorts.
    2008 Aug 28 10:36 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Buffett and MBIA aren't really competing- Buffett has a AAA rating in contrast to MBIA's "off brand" reinsurance.
    2008 Aug 29 12:39 PM | Link | Reply