Financial Crisis: Our Founding Fathers' America 10 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
In many ways, the current financial unraveling should be viewed under the auspices of two Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson.
Thomas Jefferson, an Anti-Federalist viewed big business in general, and financiers in particular as corrupt. He preferred the average man to be a farmer as opposed to a banker. Jefferson feared that big cities and big money would indeed corrupt the morals and values of the American people (as it did throughout history as in Rome).
The Federalist, Alexander Hamilton simply accepted the fact that the benefits of business, and a financier class far out-weighed the liabilities. If America was to be great, financial institutions would lead the way. Since when did a nation ever farm its way to greatness?
Most of us are aghast at the risk of impending financial crisis. But what seems to bother us more is the extent to which our government is manipulated by that class of individuals. It could well be that Alexander Hamilton's vision became corrupted by the greed of human nature. However, we would also conclude that the financier class will ALWAYS be bailed out by the government, even though it is at the expense of the masses... In the grand scheme of things, there is no such thing as moral hazard nor malfesence in modern America. see discount windows, SEC trading policies, and Federal Backstops. Maybe a bailout for revolving credit card debt is next..
Related Articles
|

























This article has 10 comments:
I believe both Hamilton and Jefferson were both right to some extent. I know, I sound just like an economist or broker, but ..... Although, I respect Jefferson very much, his vision was a little short sighted in regard to the future technology (Ben Franklin's specialty) and economic potential of America, i.e. we all couldn't be farmer's. And in Hamilton's mind, strong financial institutions was a lesser evil that made this country into a strong independent nation.
Also, to quote your words, "there is no such thing as moral hazard nor malfesence." There is no such word as "malfesence." I'm sorry, but I have enough trouble with correctly spelled words, maybe you meant, "malfeasance."
Your friend,
famos
Thank you for your thoughts and comments.
Please feel free to visit usmegatrends.blogspot.....
Steve Benard, if you are reading this I am interested in emailing you but your website does not list any contact info.
Respectfully,
Brian A. Davis
P.S. Sorry about the spelling error.
BD
True, but only so long as it is obeyed.
If you read the US Constitution, then review current laws, judicial mandates, and Executive Orders, you'll quickly realize that the Constitution is in turned deliberately ignored, malevolently misinterpreted, and maliciously mangled.
The very folk who swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” are the very parties responsible for such malign behavior. For the last century, they have, almost without fail, violated every restriction imposed by the Constitution.
Furthermore, the redefinitions and circumlocutions provided as justification invert logic and foreshadow a more virulent strain of 1984 Orwellian Newspeak.
If the Judiciary, the Legislative and the Executive are the guardians of Constitutional Law, then who watches the guardians? Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who cures the malignancy festering in the heart of America?
And you wonder why we have a few problems?