Gold Is Nocturnal Too: Daytime vs Overnight Performance 7 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
In my recent post “The Markets are Nocturnal” I showed that the bullish trend on the S&P 500 over the last 15 years has been the result of the overnight market, NOT the daytime market.
In this post, I want to go through the same exercise, dividing returns between the daytime and overnight markets, for the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index [XAU]. I’ll show that like the S&P 500 (though not to the same degree), gold stocks are driven by what happens after the close.
Daytime vs Overnight Gold Market [1984 to 06/2008]

The three lines above represent the Gold and Silver Index (blue), daytime changes (green), and overnight changes (red) between 1984 and 06/2008. The chart has been logarithmically scaled.
From mid-1987 through 1992 the overnight market put huge downward pressure on gold. Despite very good returns in the daytime market, the overall market was net flat.
Compare that to the huge gold run up we’ve been having since 2000. Almost the entire current bull run in gold is a result of the overnight market. Over that same period, it’s been the daytime market that has been putting downward pressure on the index. See zoomed in chart of 2000 to 06/2008 below.
Current Bull Market [2000 to 06/2008]

Now, as anyone who has read my ramblings knows, I don’t do fundamentals. And I especially don’t do fundamentals when it comes to gold. But the results beg the question: how were the fundamental factors driving gold from 1987 to 1992 different from our current bull market? In both cases, because the market was moving overnight, it would appear that international factors had a huge influence (very negative in the first instance and very positive in the second).
One last note: the gold index goes completely flat over the last year or so. That’s a result of a change in the way the index is calculated, NOT in a fundamental change in the gold markets. (For now) the overnight trend in gold remains intact.
Related Articles
|
























This article has 7 comments:
do you recommend?