Why Dividend Investors View Stocks Differently 15 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
"Everyone cares about the stock's potential to decline in price."
That sentence was in an article I wrote about dividend investing. One commenter had this to say:
Not really. If I'm trading it, that [would be] kind of central to the whole thing. If I'm investing, though, who cares? After all, if it pays a nice dividend, that dividend is safe, and that dividend is growing, what difference does it make what the market price is? Frankly, lower is better; you can buy more. Obviously, if the stock price falls because the dividend is cut, that's a whole different kettle of fish—but the problem is the cut [in the dividend], not the price drop.
The commenter "gets it." Dividend investors focus on the dividend—and especially its growth—far more than they do on the stock's price.
Investors in strong dividend-paying stocks are doing just fine in 2008. Tens of millions of dollars have been distributed to dividend stockholders this year, and they will continue to be paid every month and every quarter.
But this cash reward from dividend stocks is ignored by most of Wall Street and the financial media. There is no "Dividend Index" reported minute-by-minute the way the Dow, NASDAQ, and S&P 500 are reported. But those are all price indexes. They reflect price changes only and therefore give an incomplete picture of "how stocks are doing." After all, total returns (the ultimate goal of every investor) are made up of price returns plus dividends.
Dividends are stocks' secret weapon. They operate in the background. They are not sexy enough to get much attention. For example, if you have ever published an article on Seeking Alpha, you know that you are asked to categorize your article into as many categories as you can. Thirty-six categories are provided. Hedge Funds, IPOs, Options, and Small Caps all have a box to check. But there is none for Dividends. [SA Editor's note: We do have a category for dividends, and while it does not appear on the submit form, if an article focuses on dividends, we tag it as such.]
I am not sure why that is. According to Morningstar, S&P 500 companies have grown their dividends at a 16% annual clip for the past three years, 12% in the past 12 months. If there were a Dividend Index based on the S&P's 500 stocks, it would be up 9 to 10% this year.
Many dividend investors focus on increasing dividends more than the stock's price. Two main metrics for dividend investors thus become: (1) initial yield at time of purchase, and (2) dividend growth rate.
As to initial yield, according to Morningstar, the dividend yield on the S&P 500 right now is 2.6%, which is higher than it has been in a few years. (That yield has been inflated by the general drop in stock prices this year.) Many stocks, of course, yield much more than 2.6%. Reasonable minds can differ as to what an acceptable minimum initial yield should be for a dividend stock. I set a floor of 2.5% (or 1.9% for stocks with an uninterrupted 25-year history of dividend growth). Another commenter to my earlier article criticized that, saying that 4% was his or her minimum. The point is, each investor can set his or her own minimum acceptable dividend yield as part of the stock selection process.
As to dividend growth, the key number is the rate of increase in the annual money-per-share paid to stockholders. The best dividend companies increase their dividends annually. Many have done so for decades, without a freeze or a cut. My personal minimum growth requirement is 5% (as demonstrated by historical figures). I'm sure that many dividend investors demand a higher minimum.
My Easy-Rate™ point system for evaluating dividend stocks awards higher scores for both greater initial yields and faster rates of growth than my minimums. So I would never buy a dividend stock with both an initial yield and historical dividend growth rate right at the two minimums. One or the other would need to be higher to warrant a purchase. Again the key is that the two measures—initial yield and rate of growth—are essential to a good selection process, along with your normal fundamental checks for company soundness. As either of the two key measures increases, so does the risk that that level of return or growth is not sustainable.
There are plenty of solid dividend-paying candidates. Here are just a few examples (all figures from Morningstar as of 9/2/2008):
- Abbott Laboratories (ABT): initial yield 2.4%, 3-year growth rate 7.4%
- Coca-Cola (KO): 2.8% and 10.8%
- GlaxoSmithKline (GSK): 4.7% and 5.4%
- Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (KMP): 6.5% and 6.5%
- Sunoco Logistics (SXL): 7.3% and 12.7%
Dividend increases mean that the yield on your original investment goes up over time. (That is, the "initial yield" does not apply to you any more, just to new purchasers.) At an average annual increase of:
- 6%, your dividend doubles about every 12 years
- 10%, every seven years
- 12%, every six years
- 15%, every five years
Now it is true that many dividend-paying companies have not escaped the bear market. Indeed, some of them—the financials—have been especially hard-hit. Dividend-paying stocks are not immune from market risk.
But the really committed dividend investor does not care as much about this—which is the exact point made by the commenter quoted at the beginning of this article. The committed dividend investor becomes accustomed to varying principal, and cares little more about it than a bondholder cares that his or her bond trades on the open market at varying prices. The investor is focused instead on the cash the investment is bringing in. In fact, if the dividend investor is not using that cash as current income, but is instead accumulating assets to fund a future goal such as retirement, he or she sees price drops as an opportunity to purchase more shares at better prices and yields than before.
That does not mean that dividend investors never sell. But they are probably less likely to sell than investors focused on capital appreciation alone, because dividend "disappointments" are pretty rare in well-selected dividend stocks. Dividend investors' reasons for selling may include a cut in the dividend; a slowing in its growth rate; or a chance to swap for a higher-yielding stock.
Dividends and dividend-paying companies have lots of positive attributes. Here are my top six:
- Dividends are cash in your pocket. You can re-invest that money in the company, or in another company, or nowhere. You can spend it.
- You do not have to sell a share of stock to get it. They credit it to you each month or quarter.
- Most dividend programs are persistent. Companies with well-established programs rarely cut or eliminate their dividends. Many have uninterrupted, decades-long histories of paying and raising dividends. It is their ability to do this that separates them from "fixed income" investments like bank accounts and bonds.
- Studies show that over long periods, dividend-paying stocks have had the highest total returns of all. According to Ned Davis Research, from 1972 to 2006 (a period that includes the tech bubble, when dividends contributed little), non-dividend-paying stocks gained an annual average return of 4.1%. But dividend-paying stocks returned 10.1%, an enormous 6%-per-year difference. Wharton Professor Dr. Jeremy Siegel's research showed that 97% of the stock market's return from 1871 to 2003 can be traced to re-invested dividends.
- Dividends are closely watched and reported, so information about them is easy to obtain. Over time, companies establish dividend patterns that are consistent. Significant changes in the pattern are reported instantly.
If you build a strong portfolio of dividend-paying stocks that regularly increase their dividends, you can arrive at retirement with a significant income stream paying an enormous yield on your original investment. You may be able to make a transition from a salary paycheck to a "dividend paycheck" seamlessly.
Disclosure: Long GSK, KMP.
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last 7 days
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most active
Instabloggers.-
1
TraderMark
-
2
Don Dion
-
3
Cliff Wachtel
-
4
Mike Havrilla
-
5
James Quinn
Top Instabloggers » -
1
-
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
This article has 15 comments:
Let everyone else moan and groan about falling portfolio value - the lower the better for me, as I buy more stocks when yields go up.
Several MLPs, such as KMP, OKS, PAA, etc. have rock solid yields of 6 to 8% and have an excellent history of increasing dividends. As you state, the day to day stock price variation on these MLPs is not particularly important as long as they maintain and increase their dividends. If the price decreases, the yield will increase and create buying interest thereby bringing the price back up, depending again however on competitive interest rates at the time.
Another way to increase yields is thru selling covered calls. This works especially well with more volatile stocks since the option premiums are larger. For example; FRO with a dividend yield in the high teens is especially mercurial with daily swings in share price of 5% or more quite common. By selling covered calls one, two, or three months out with a strike price slightly more than my entry price, I have been able to realize a dividend + call premium yield of 34% during the last year. My experience with BPT has been similar. Granted, this takes a certain kind of mindset as watching your positions move wildly can be pretty exciting at times. However, if you can realize a 34% yield it will only take three years to get all of your investment back.
Disclosure: Long KMP, OKS, PAA, FRO, BPT. Short calls on FRO & BPT.
Unrelated Business Taxable Income Item 20 Code V.
If this exceeds 1K , across all the taxpayer's shelters, the Fiduciary has to file a 920t Federal income tax form and the Fiduciary has to take that tax from the sheltered account...The beneficial owner, the taxpayer can't pay it for reasons:
It's after the fiscal year...and would be considered a late and excessive contribution;
It's not permitted to pay tax from a sheltered account directly...etc.
The costs of having the fiduciary file the 920t (the bank or brokerage who reports the ?4978? form to the IRS) can be high. This fiduciary doesn't issue the K-1, it comes from the settlement, index-maker or accountants from the MLP, or commodity futures trading ETF, etc.
If not paid, the IRS accumulates the amounts across all the taxpayer's accounts by taxpayer number and can disqualify the tax shelters and render them taxable.
NEVER HOLD ANY SECURITY THAT ISSUES A K-1 in any tax-sheltered account.
Unrelated Business Taxable Income is income received by the Partnership from e.g., a sale of assets (a pipeline MLP selling off a line to an oil company) that is Unrelated to the Business of the MLP's Tax Shelter Registration (e.g., for a MLP of a pipeline Co., that would be the income derived from royalty payments based upon the charges it makes to move the oil...not the income from the sale of an asset.)
Each MLP that trades here or in Canada, has a Tax-Shelter Registration number that relates to the filings of the kind of businesss it expects to do, the kinds of icome and expenses it expects, and the agreement to pass the bulk of these proportionally to the Publicly Traded Partnership-limited partners, to avoid paying income tax at the MLP level.
----------------------...
To "notsosmart" and others reveling in FRO's dividends...I hope the shares aren't in a shelter, because back in FRO's prospectus, in boldface and italics;
"...may hypothecate the shares held ...by shareholders... " or words to that effect.
Hypothecate means use as collateral for loans, which means that in the shelter, your shares are being used to secure a company's loans.
I'd check with FRO's legal team, because that would invalidate your shelter...you can't hypothecate or lend your interests in the shelter to any one else under any circumstances.
Since Frontline is headquartered outside the U.S., they may not care, but I sold mine as soon as I saw that in the 2006-07 Ann Report and prospectus, and similarly for the SFL (Ship Finance International) spinoff. I'd hold them in a taxable account.