Seeking Alpha
About this author:

I carried through on Friday’s plan to unwind the short position on crude oil, selling my holding of the double-short, exchange-traded fund Horizons BetaPro NYMEX Oil Bear Plus (HOD). I had planned to do it when the price went up another 5% to give me a 50% gain, but instead settled for 47% just before lunch today.

Why wait for a few more percentage points to take the gain, as several readers rightfully asked in emails and blog posts? I had said 50% for “silly psychological reasons” as I replied to one reader – i.e. that was the gain that would have offset the Nortel loss in one account.

Over the weekend, I read halfway through Timothy Sykes’ book, An American Hedge Fund, and came across a passage where he similarly held out for a few more points because that would exactly offset his loss on previous trades. His experience highlights the utility of having more objective criteria for buying and selling. He writes:

“I promised myself that I would hold [my short position] until I broke even from the two earlier trades. My paper profit now surged to $27,000, but I still didn’t take it. Within minutes, it turned into a $6,000 paper loss. I couldn’t chance another reversal, so I decided to cut my losses. Unfortunately, the quick reversal scared many other short sellers into trying to cover too … and I found myself chasing the stock higher … and was finally out … with a $28,600 loss.”

Preet Banerjee emailed in with his hedged trade on HOD. When oil was near $140, his mock portfolio bought HOD and several energy stocks to arbitrage the undervaluation of oil stocks relative to the commodity. That turned out well, he reports, and now he is unwinding the trade.

Print this article with comments

This article has 8 comments:

  •  
    Larry
    Nice commercial. Wrong place. And don't we all have these kind of could'a, would'a stories...?
    2008 Sep 09 08:08 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    As Jim Rome would say, " If the queen had a package, she'd be the king."
    2008 Sep 09 09:02 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I note that Paul&$hark$ comment is followed by the instruction "Report abuse." I am reporting his comment in accord with that instruction, since it includes no substantive comment on the posting and is clearly abusive in an irrelevant and personal way.
    2008 Sep 09 10:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree with ferguson. I suggest you pull his privilege to comment if he continues with this type of commentary.
    2008 Sep 09 11:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You're absolutely right. Thanks for reporting him. I've removed his comment as well. - Ed.
    2008 Sep 09 11:08 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Click on his name.
    He posted the same message 26 times to multiple messages on this site.

    SPAM anyone?
    2008 Sep 09 11:08 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Boy! I missed that. Still no rule against plain stupidity.
    2008 Sep 09 03:48 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So are you calling the bottom on Oil here? (I am holding USO Puts)
    2008 Sep 09 08:41 PM | Link | Reply
More by Larry MacDonald
Other articles by Larry MacDonald »