Seeking Alpha

Nadeem Walayat


About this author:

The US government's takeover of the bankrupt Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) on Sunday is reminiscent of the UK government's nationalization of Northern Rock Bank, albeit the scale of Sunday's takeover is several orders of magnitude larger. Still, the result is the same, total loss of capital for the shareholders. I won't repeat the dynamics of what has transpired on Sunday as the volume of similar articles speak for themselves.

Those now contemplating buying 'cheap' banks should be aware that while many of the banks may survive, especially those that are too big to go bust such as the GSEs and Northern Rock in the UK, it does not mean that investors will not experience a near total loss of capital at the once thought of impossibility of big bank busts now increasingly becomes routine as the credit crisis moves into Phase II - The Economic Crunch.

Many banks will be able to hobble along though the aid of bailout money and capital injections by the clearly foolish and inexperienced sovereign wealth funds that know not what to do with all of the newfound petrodollar and Western consumer junk buying wealth. However this does imply that capital will be depleted which basically achieves the same outcome of loss of value of more than 90% for shareholders.

Most of the big banks are insolvent, much of the capital has already been destroyed, the only question that remains is how much of tax payers money will be spent on keeping the banks afloat. Despite all of the hype from the British government and some inexperienced market commentators, the British economy will be hit the hardest from the credit crisis due to the size of the financial sector and the lack of size of the manufacturing sector. Thus we witnessed the Sterling crash by more than 12% against the US Dollar, exceeding the forecast target of £/$1.80 by a good 4 cents. Much commentary has immediately jumped on the bandwagon of how this will boost exporters. But what exporters? The UK's manufacturing base has shrunk to just 14% of the UK economy and of that exporters are barely a pin prick.

The only world-beating industry Britain had was the financial sector, which was inflated by the derivatives market that saw an artificial mark to market pricing boost bank profits, while few wondered how the banks could be making such huge profits, when in actual fact the amount they earned from retail operations was barely 5% of the profits reported.

The answer was that the profits were NOT real, they comprised a tulip mania methodology in the form of CDOs and mortgage backed junk. But that came to a halt suddenly one day in August 2007, when market participants stopped buying the tulip backed securities, and thus the market collapsed. Well, it would have collapsed if there were an open market instead of what resembled an inter bank money market price quote as compiled by the British Banking Association, while reporting a jump in the inter bank rates.

However, this failed to report the true extent of the problem as the Banks, fearing a loss of credibility in a confidence obsessed market place, mis-reported the true extent of distress they were under and hence the crisis to some extent flew under the radar of the regulators,. It was only in March of this year that the true extent of the problem started to dawn on the governments of the world that basically the big Western banks were all virtually bankrupt due to their exposure to the fast deleveraging derivatives market.

Government action was taken, but as I pointed out at the time, the UK government was throwing £50 billion at the financial system, a huge sum for the British taxpayers. This was a mere drop in the the $500 trillion derivatives ocean, and the true amount that the UK taxpayer would end up financing will run in the several hundreds of billions of pounds. Total losses that the tulip-backed banking crisis will generate keeps doubling, up from $100 billion way back in June 2007, to $200 billion, $400, $800, $1600 billion was the latest. Well, losses have now passed $600 billion and we are not passed the worse point yet. Another doubling of estimated losses coming up by year end to $3 trillion?

What does all this mean?

It means that the world's western governments are fighting the twin battles of inflation as a consequence of all of the money being printed for the politicians to save their electoral necks, and deflation from bursting of the credit bubble and global deleveraging.

As I warned way back in March of this year in the article DELEVERAGING- Gold and Commodities Teetering on the Brink of a Bear Market?, inflation will give way to deflation, as the economic crunch transpires. The last component required was to snuff out the commodities bull markets following the final peaks this summer. The impact on inflation will lag somewhat so evidence of deflation may not emerge until early next year in the economic data. However, it will, and this will contribute to deep interest rate cuts.

The UK interest rates could be cut all the way from 5% to as low as 3%. However, as we have witnessed with the deep US interest rate cuts to 2%, the rate cuts will fail to stimulate the economies as it will not be enough to counter asset price deflation as a consequence of banks being forced to sell assets as deleveraging continues.

The trends remain inline with roadmap of March this year as the following graph illustrates:

The light at the end of the tunnel will only come once the banks are able to repair their balance sheets, requiring much more taxpayer bailout money.

What could investors do?

Speaking for myself, I have focused on fixing cash savings inline with government 100% guarantee limits at fixed rates of return above 7% in Sterling for maturity in 2 years time in advance of much lower interest rates, as well as diversifying into other currencies albeit at lower rates of interest. I am avoiding bonds as the consequence of the flood of government bailout debt implies higher bond yields.

The collapse in emerging markets has also perked my interest into accumulating limited holdings for the long-term, primarily in China, and adding to existing investments in India. My original analysis way back in October / November 2007 targeted China's SSEC to fall by 40% to below 4000 as the graph illustrated.

Subsequent analysis in March this year concluded with a revised target of 3,000 to coincide with the strong support zone of between 2,500 to 3,000. The SSEC index has since fallen below that level to under 2,200. The SSEC is clearly homing in on the 2,000 support level and therefore the downside now looks increasingly limited on a long-term basis.

Still these are volatile and uncertain times and the expectation therefore is for all investments to be for a period of well beyond the time frame of the current crisis, so for well beyond 2011, but definitely the "You Must be Mad to buy in this market" conclusion of late last year no longer stands. The market is what I would now consider to be deeply oversold, though despite the strong growth prospects, Chinese stocks could still get cheaper, which for this analyst is an acceptable risk for some long-term exposure, even after taking account of the fact that 2,500 to 3,000 levels will now act as strong overhead resistance.

But where the bulk of portfolios are concerned, cash still has to be king despite the impact of the collective currency devaluation as a result of exploding levels of government debt. That is expected to see UK debt bust through the 40% of GDP golden rule onwards and upwards towards 60% of GDP by late 2009.

And as for the US taking over $5 trillion of Fannie and Freddie debt, whatever bookkeeping tricks are deployed, the fact of the matter is that $5 trillion is now effectively US Government Debt against which illiquid housing stock and derivatives are set. Therefore US debt has now doubled, the consequences of which will be experienced in the loss of the dollar's real value. That does not mean that the US Dollar will fall, as the loss of value is relative to the other collapsing fiat currencies. My analysis of 17th August still stands for the US Dollar to be in a bull market that targets USD 90 by early 2009 (current USD 79).

You're trying hard to protect your capital from asset price deflation and government debt inflation.

Print this article with comments

This article has 13 comments:

  •  
    "You're trying hard to protect your capital from asset price deflation and government debt inflation."

    So how do you do this?
    2008 Sep 10 08:58 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Cheers to Nadeem for his forceful opinion of the market which I largely agree. Interesting to note that he thinks inflation haunting us will turn to deflation next year. So next year is another year to be wary of rather a year of relief. No as sure as Nadeem about the prospects of China shares, they probably won't start being bullish unless the developed economies do.
    2008 Sep 10 09:18 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Re PastTense "So how do you do this?"
    I've asked this same question in response to other commentators on The Big Picture.
    So far...? no answers.
    2008 Sep 10 10:42 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If the answer is, "stay in cash", how does one do that "safely"?
    2008 Sep 10 11:06 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    IMO the way to go is high-yielding MLPs. The yield puts a floor under the price and the good ones are hedged for the next 3 years or so. They will be able to pay the yields under any foreseeable circumstances. When people have really capitulated and stop looking for price rises, they will be satisfied with high yields 8-11%. I like LINE and MWE, specifically.
    2008 Sep 10 12:57 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    mplaut -
    Thanks for your response. I currently have some TCLP, but as a follow-up, what kind of "black swan" event(s) could sour MLPs as "safe" havens?
    2008 Sep 10 01:33 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Actually, less so "black swan" event(s), than what would just be adverse developments that could hurt MLPs
    2008 Sep 10 02:03 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    MLPs are set up to be "boring" steady low-risk businesses. LINE recently sold off some assets (in Appalachia) that are hot but therefore do not fit the MLP business model. LINE also has around 20 years worth of reserves.

    I guess the main threat is a change in the tax law that has been talked about that would hurt them. It is possible but IMO not likely. We need both energy and infrastructure now.
    2008 Sep 10 02:36 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    THE ONLY ANSWER IS TO FIRE CONGRESS,

    BOTH PARTIES.

    NEED TO BRING IN FRESH NEW BLOOD

    THAT WILL WORK FOR THE AMERICAN

    PEOPLE RATHER THAN POLITICAL SPECIAL

    INTEREST THAT MAKE THE IN-CROWD RICHER.


    I DO NOT AGREE THAT THE CHINA MARKET HAS SIGNIFICANT RESISTANCE AT 2,000. I THINK IT WILL GO EVEN LOWER, PERHAPS BACK TO 2004 LEVELS.

    DID YOU KNOW THAT FANNIE AND FREDDIE GAVE CONGRESS $174 MILLION DOLLARS TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY WHEN THEY WERE BUYING ALL THE PHONY SECURITIES BASED ON PHONY APPRAISALS AND LOAN DOCUMENTATION? THEY DESERVED TO FAIL. BUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DID NOT DESERVE THIS CRAP. CONGRESS HAS FAILED EVEN WORSE.

    WE NEED HUGE CHANGE.

    A COMPLETELY NEW CONGRESS AND PRESIDENT BEFORE OUR COUNTRY IS FORCED TO LIVE UNDER THE BOOT OF A MUSLIM/ARAB DICTATORSHIP OR CHINA/RUSSIAN INFLUENCE. WAKE UP AMERICA!

    2008 Sep 10 03:09 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    it might be too late for the sleeping sheeples.
    2008 Sep 11 11:28 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Who makes the printing presses? I want to invest in that company. We will need many more if the taxpayers continue to pay for bailouts. The presses will need to print lots of greenbacks to cover all this stupidity. I say, let them all fail. The sun will rise and life will move on.
    2008 Sep 11 02:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    all looking for a bottom. at least we can wipe it with tulip backed paper.
    2008 Sep 11 04:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    great title, interesting article, good info - thank you much!
    2008 Sep 11 07:40 PM | Link | Reply