DineEquity's Capitalization Meltdown: What Took So Long? 6 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Tuesday's DineEquity (DIN) 25% capitalization meltdown was predictable and had to happen. The question is, what took so long for this to sink in?
While people come and go, this really is a structural problem, not just the well respected CFO leaving.
It’s been well known that the casual dining sector had peaked in 2004-2006 and was on a slow decrease thereafter. IHOP's Julia Stewart worked to acquire Applebee's, her former company, in 2007, despite clear evidence of their decreased comparable sales and decreasing operating margins.
Load up on debt ($2B) and try to do financial engineering as a key business tenant, in a credit crunch, and this is what happens.
There were many signals of trouble in the company's August 25th 2008 earnings call, with just a few noted below:
- Marketing emphasis on value: when you emphasize value that means operating margins erode. Just a fact.
- Sales price of $700k to $800K per company unit refranchised is a low, bad price.
- DIN’s sales leaseback strategy=increased rent= lower earnings
Disclosure: none
Related Articles
|





















1. DIN operates very few of its restaurants. So, value offerings and higher rent will affect the franchisees, not DIN. The franchisees are used to value offerings, a standard play. All DIN cares about is raising revenues, and vaule offers do just that.
2. Re rent. Again, once the sale/leaseback and franchiing occurs, DIN just collects royalites. Rents don't affect them.
3. $700-800K too low? based on what?
Your own "tiny analysis" is very naive and equally shortsighted:
So you believe higher rents and low margin promotions won't effect DIN? If the franchises are struggling (and they are) how long do you think they'll pay their bills (especially to DIN?) Higher rent will hurt DIN too not the day it's raised but in the ensuing years.
BTW DIN owns restaurants...lots of them. They financed their deal with Wall Street based on theory that they would unload all those corporate stores and retire their MASSIVE debt. But the restaurant(s) that they could have sold a year ago at 1$ Million is now down to 700-800K... if they can find a buyer, if the buyer has financing and is willing to pay for a concept that may be hopelessly outdated
Ihop is Americana, their margins are based on pancakes and coffee (very good margin makers) Applebee's is not anyones destination, hasn't been for , well forever.
If I owned an Applebee's I'd use the lettering and an anagram program to change the sign to read...Pepe's or something else and stop paying DIN a dime.
3. $700-800K too low? based on what?
Let us do the math, you borrow $2B, that is with a $Billion, to buy 500 restaurants...you back out a corporate head quarters worth $39M and you end up paying over $3.5M per restaurant...then you valuate each unit at less than $1M... I would put that short by about...oh say..$2.5M per unit.
A little short on the cash side?...I think so. What a disaster, I would hope that Ms. Stewart gets tossed out on her nasty ass.