Seeking Alpha
About this author:

IRVINE, Calif. – Sept. 12, 2008 – RealtyTrac, the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its August 2008 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report, which shows foreclosure filings — default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions — were reported on 303,879 U.S. properties during the month, a 12% increase from the previous month and a 27% increase from August 2007.

Foreclosure filings were reported on 101,724 California properties in August, one-third of the national total and the most of any state. The state’s foreclosure activity increased more than 40 percent from the previous month and more than 75 percent from August 2007. California, Florida and Arizona together accounted for more than half of the nation’s foreclosure activity.

That last sentence motivated the analysis displayed in the chart above. If you exclude the five states with the biggest foreclosure problems (Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan and Nevada), and analyze foreclosures for the remaining 45 states, the results change dramatically. From July to August, foreclosures actually declined by -.41% in those 45 states, compared to a +12% increase when AZ, CA, FL, MI and NV are included. Over the last year from August 2007 to August 2008, foreclosures barely changed in the 45 states, increasing less than 1% (0.89%), much different than the 27% increase with all states.

Bottom Line: Foreclosure problems are highly concentrated in just five states (AZ, CA, FL, MI and NV), which distorts the national picture significantly. Excluding the five states with the biggest foreclosure problems suggests a much less severe problem, and an actual improvement in August foreclosures in the other 45 states (-0.41% vs. July).

 

(Note: Foreclosure data are available at RealtyTrac for August 2008. Using the August 2008 foreclosure levels by state and the percent changes from July 2008 and August 2007, the foreclosue levels for August 2007 and July 2008 were calculated for each state. The five states listed above were then excluded to calculate the percentages in the table above.)
Print this article with comments

This article has 21 comments:

  •  
    The one itty bitty missing fact is that banks are so behind in issuing notice of defaults (NOD) because they are swamped with current ones, that they have been pushing them out by months. If they also published the number of NODs planned, but not yet issued, it would paint a weakening story, not a strengthening one. The media does a terrible job of vetting most types of data, much like your article.
    2008 Sep 12 04:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The reason foreclosures drop when you exclude FL, NV, CA, and NV is because that's where people retire to. The baby boomers, now retiring in greater numbers, leave behind homes elsewhere and builders built out these areas for them. The trend became a problem when the builders got together with mortgage bankers, home appraisers, banks and structured investments to create the illusion of demand. Michigan's numbers are obviously related to the dependence on the auto industry, as you know. The foreclosure problem is not a distorted because when you view the troubled bank list....

    bankimplode.com/list/t...

    you see banks in every state. Why? Four of the Five states were based on a speculation machine that eventually sent the risk to the far corners of the globe via investment vehicles. Following the lead of these "speculation states", local and regional banks funded the 2006/2007 vintages of mortgage-related craziness. Give it a few more months and you will see the impact on these other 46 states, in the form of FDIC Friday afternoon "bank closings". The loss in home value alone has cost local tax collectors billions. Do you think there was one politician that did not see a surplus of funds, generated by higher home valuations, as a long term guarantee to fund one boondoggle after another? You always seem to think short-term. You didn't work in the auto industry before becoming an educator, did you?
    2008 Sep 12 04:52 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I would be much more inclined to find your suggestion significant if I knew what percent these five states contribute to the GNP. I'd also like to know the foreclosure dollar figure attached to the exempted states you're excluding as apposed to the remaining states. Your thesis may be watertight, but I suspect you haven't given enough of the story to make me a believer. SH
    2008 Sep 12 05:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    A few thoughts:
    1) FL, CA, AZ and NV had values outstrip incomes. They had the most room to go down due to affordability of existing population.
    2) The above 4 states had a HEAVY chunk of investment $$$ chasing properties. That artificially drove up demand and everyone who wanted to be in a house went into a house during that time frame. Now we are having supply/demand equalize and it is painful....
    3) The above 5 states represent a BIG chunk of total originations due to population. CA and FL are probably 15%-20% of total originations alone. Then, factor in higher property values in those states and you get a disproportionate potential exposure to bank BALANCE sheets, which is what this is really all about....Are firms properly capitalized and financially viable? Some clearly aren't.....WAMU is going to get killed as values continue to erode in CA (my 2 cents)
    2008 Sep 12 05:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Yeah, and if I don't count my belly I weight only 170 pounds.

    Who gets to decide what we arbitrarily strip from these numbers. Like S&P earnings minus financials? What does that mean?
    2008 Sep 12 06:00 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "Bottom Line: Foreclosure problems are highly concentrated in just five states (AZ, CA, FL, MI and NV)"

    Do the words "for the moment" mean anything to you?

    At one time, it was just Florida. If my city of Seattle is any indication, you'll want to watch the number of condominiums that come onto the market. They were a big part of this summer's increase in unsold homes.

    Call me when the inventory goes below 10 months' supply.
    2008 Sep 12 06:00 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Is that the best your spin machine can come up with?? I enjoyed your articles about inflation down, but this is ridiculous.

    Now that the federal government backstops mortgages, this statistic is meaningless. We're all paying a national mortgage now, no matter what state you live in.

    We're all a bunch of suckers
    2008 Sep 12 06:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Just like elsewhere when a regional collapse comes along everybody gets to share in the stuff to do pile...
    2008 Sep 12 09:25 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The author should have added the Ohio and Georgia foreclosure rates to the 5 toxic states.

    However, he does a point. A local/regional bank that holds a small amount of loans from these 7 states (and no Fannie/Freddie stock or MBS in their investment portfolio) stands a decent chance of surviving the current financial sh$tst$rm.
    2008 Sep 12 10:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  


    See what Perry fails to mention is simply this:
    The root cause of all the problems we are facing (the credit crisis as a result of leveraged products tied to these prime, alt A, subprime foreclosures) are "IN" the 5 states that he says we can exclude and then everything looks OK.
    But we cannot exclude them because those 5 states, coupled with all that leverage, are completely and utterly overwhelming the other 47 states that are not doing as bad.
    2008 Sep 12 10:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    In Maryland, where I am they also dramatically extended the foreclosure waiting period .. no surprise foreclosures are apparently down (for now). Just wait a few months for these dislocations in the foreclosure market to pass and we'll likely see a dramatic spike out of nowhere (at least to those who believe everything they are being fed from the media).

    dansdeepcreekblog.blog...
    2008 Sep 12 11:48 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What is this article? A Monty Python routine? Only 5 states bleeding profusely is a good thing?

    BLACK KNIGHT:
    None shall pass.
    ARTHUR:
    What?
    BLACK KNIGHT:
    None shall pass.
    ARTHUR:
    I have no quarrel with you, good Sir Knight, but I must cross this bridge.
    BLACK KNIGHT:
    Then you shall die.
    ARTHUR:
    I command you, as King of the Britons, to stand aside!
    BLACK KNIGHT:
    I move for no man.
    ARTHUR:
    So be it!
    ARTHUR and BLACK KNIGHT:
    Aaah!, hiyaah!, etc.
    [ARTHUR chops the BLACK KNIGHT's left arm off]

    ARTHUR:
    Now stand aside, worthy adversary.
    BLACK KNIGHT:
    'Tis but a scratch.
    ARTHUR:
    A scratch? Your arm's off!
    BLACK KNIGHT:
    No, it isn't.
    ARTHUR:
    Well, what's that, then?
    BLACK KNIGHT:
    I've had worse.
    2008 Sep 13 05:49 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Comment by The Realist:

    Yeah, and if I don't count my belly I weight only 170 pounds.

    Who gets to decide what we arbitrarily strip from these numbers. Like S&P earnings minus financials? What does that mean?

    **********************...

    Come on now Realist, 170? You and I know it would be more like 175, 180 maybe. . .
    2008 Sep 13 08:26 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Excellent and informative logic from this story. It reminds me somewhat of the below logical statement:

    “Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country. ” - - - Mayor Marion Barry, Washington, DC“


    2008 Sep 13 08:29 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    we all knew about the speculative residential construction in CA NV AZ FL while it was happening (speculators never intending to reside hoping to flip @ a profit) so what else is new.
    > jack
    2008 Sep 13 08:38 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Mark and king george iii bush use the same type of reasoning to evaluate the current economy.
    2008 Sep 13 09:06 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    [In Maryland, where I am they also dramatically extended the foreclosure waiting period .. no surprise foreclosures are apparently down (for now).]

    There are a number of factors that are still artificially suppressing foreclosure numbers, but as you acknowledged, they're just delaying the invevitable.

    In sales, there's a concept called "objections vs. conditions." Objections are things which can be overcome- "You don't have it in my size, do you?"

    Conditions are issues that can't be changed, preventing a sale... like, the buyer is completely broke and can't afford to pay attention.

    Unfortunately, our "leaders" don't realize that the problems they're trying to "solve" are conditions, not objections.

    [This assumes, of course, that *any* of them give a shight about our country.]

    Until prices fall to an affordable level, there's no changing direction, only stalling.
    2008 Sep 13 11:01 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "Excluding the five states with the biggest foreclosure problems suggests a much less severe problem, and an actual improvement in August foreclosures in the other 45 states (-0.41% vs. July)."

    In Washington State the feeding frenzy to buy houses has cooled dramatically. In Seattle homes were on the market for just a couple of days, now it's a couple of months and prices are dropping. For sale signs are in every neighborhood. The more rural areas are feeling the pinch of the credt crunch the most where incomes are much lower and jobs are harder to come by.
    2008 Sep 13 11:51 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Isn't it interesting that among the states mentioned that California is the state of Nancy Pelosi, the leader of the DemocraticHouse? Reed is the senior senator of Nevada and speaker of the Democratic senate. In Michigan, Levin, the Democratic senator and Dingel, the Democratic member of the house, have been the most influential defenders of the US auto industry, especially against more stringent CAFE standards that might have saved this inept industry.
    2008 Sep 14 01:59 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To say that foreclosures are slowing is like saying that the patient in ICU is not dying quite as fast.... Absurd garbage.... jegan
    2008 Sep 14 01:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    One of the comments made about various states extending their foreclosure time periods was really a key observation at to why these statistics are not consistent and deceptive.

    While RealtyTrac states, "RealtyTrac’s report incorporates documents filed in all three phases of foreclosure: Default — Notice of Default (NOD) and Lis Pendens (LIS); Auction — Notice of Trustee Sale and Notice of Foreclosure Sale (NTS and NFS); and Real Estate Owned, or REO properties (that have been foreclosed on and repurchased by a bank)."

    The state laws can expand the number of days until a foreclosure is enacted. Try using this site....

    www.foreclosures.com/p...

    and see how things have changed. Florida is 180 days? Wasn't it less, before?
    2008 Sep 14 07:44 PM | Link | Reply