Ike vs. Refining Capacity and Oil Price 13 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
It should once again be an interesting week for crude oil. It appears that Hurricane Ike shut down 19 percent of refining capacity, causing analysts to predict that gasoline may once again rise to $4 per gallon on average if the outages start to approach a month or longer (see Bloomberg article). While some refineries escaped damage, extensive power outages and closed transportation and shipping lines will make it difficult to return to normal operations quickly.
While gasoline prices were on the rise late last week, the effect on crude oil was a little less certain. On Friday, as the storm was still in the gulf, crude oil traded below $100 a barrel for a short time before finally closing above $102 a barrel. Crude oil has recently been looking for reasons to go down as it has sold off after reaching prices in the $140s just a few months ago. Whether the current disruptions in the gulf and the recent breaking and bouncing of crude oil prices off the psychological barrier of $100 will help to reverse the slide in crude oil (which has been selling-off even on good news) should become a little more clear as the week progresses.
Rumors of funds liquidating various commodity positions, aided by speculators now taking short positions (see previous post), have been given as reasons for the recent slide in crude oil and commodities in general. This week may give an indication of how strong the selling is, and whether some funds will take any run-ups in crude prices as an opportunity to sell into strength. Taking some production off-line, even a small amount, should help to signal the current level of strength of the crude oil market. If this current development is shaken off in short order, crude oil bears may in fact see the $80 a barrel price they have been predicting. This week should provide a little more clarity, but then again, with crude oil this seems to be a popular refrain.
Related Articles
|



























This article has 13 comments:
Possibly you didn't catch the London open.
Gee.
> jack
The percent utilization of operable refinery capacity - 78.21% - down 10.41%
US crude oil stockpiles fell by 5.8 million barrels
Gasoline stockpiles fell by 6.4 million barrels
Distillate stockpiles fell by 1.25 million barrels
Gasoline stockpiles down 3.7 million barrels
ULS diesel stockpiles (<15 PPM Sulfur) fell by 1.1 million barrels
Kerosene-type jet fuel down 2.3 million barrels
& Heating oil stockpiles down 15.7% from year ago
This in the week that OPEC cut production by 500,000 barrels. What did oil do - it went down. I guess it doesn't operate under the laws, or even theories, of basic economics.
Maybe by the time you read this, the new report will be out here: tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav...
> jack
Please note that oil is down $4.49 to $96.69, this morning. It appears that IKE did not effect refining as much as the oil wonks wished it would. And, people are using less and less gasoline and diesel as the gouging by Big Oil continues at the pumps. Are we to go into mourning for EXXON, et al as their quarterly profits plunge? Excuse me while I go into hysterical laughter over their situation.
Exxon did not exit retail gas business because of alleged slim margins -- me thinks left business because of PR associated w. $4.00 gas sign next to ExxonMobil name at pump!
For all of you "Big Oil" haters. How come the price of oil has declined over 30% if they have control over the oil prices? The top ten private enterprise oil producing companies only control less that ten percent of the world's oil producing reserves. If they have the ability to still control oil prices with that little leverage, I would like to know their secret.
How about building new refineries before drilling. Let's put the ox in front of the cart first for once.
Maybe I'm just missing the point, but if there really is an answer that isn't political, or one that doesn't say "big oil" is keeping its profits, I'd like to hear that answer. Those are the two general theories making the rounds, and it seems to me that neither can actually be 100% true, if they even have a glimmer of truth. But I really would like to understand, in plain English.
If gasoline and crude oil followed a more historical path over the last year or so, gasoline would be closer to 4.5-5/gallon. Maybe even higher. Big oil companies are capital constrained like any other industry. Arguably even more so given the fact that they can operate on 10% of the total reserves in the world .
Exxon probably has terrible margins on their retail gas stations relative to E&P. Hence, a capital constrained company sells off their low margin businesses in an effort to invest more heavily in higher margin businesses like more exploration and production.
Within the last 3 years refinery margins were at their peak for both distillate and gasoline production. They put off a lot of maintance work at that time so that they could boost earnings as much as possible. Now they are paying the piper. That is a large reason that refinery utilizations are down so extensively. They are operating with really old facilities and put off maintaining them properly for a few years.
In my opinion, although no one asked, the recent volatility has practically nothing to do with the underlying fundamental picture. Quite frankly this is all about liquidations. I don't pretend to know where the equilibrium price of oil is but I am quite confident oil should not be moving $5 a day and natural gas moving 50 plus cents a day under normal, fundamentally driven circumstances. Don't be too hasty to draw conclusions about the direction of energy prices currently. There is a tremendous amount of noise in the system. This is what happens when you let banks get into the world of energy. This is little more than market contagion spread by the failure of most institutions that used credit to hold assets.
The case winner here is that we need more infastructure (pipelines, refineries, etc). Until that happens energy price volatility will remain tremendously high. Drilling is a moot point if it isn't refined and distributed. Enough Said.