Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Given the events of the past few days it is once again time to examine the immortal question posed by children and traders alike, “are we there yet”?

Nope, not yet, we aren’t there yet, not even close. The bottom hasn’t been found in the credit markets or the stock market and, unfortunately, we still have a way to go.

I am not sure when the bottom will be found but we will know we are getting there when the U.S. economy makes it for 60 days without a run on a financial institution. After 60 days without a major financial crisis I will write “Hey kids, we’re there”. But until then, the trip continues.

When we get “there” I hope we don’t look back on the good old days of high leverage and spending beyond our means and wish we could go back to that simpler time; a time before mark to market accounting and accountability. I hope “there” is a happy place where the U.S. has a future because we have low unemployment, high productivity, low deficits and lots of investment and savings. But then again, I still believe in the tooth fairy.

In June I wrote that we weren’t there yet because we flunked the “60 day test” and because Lehman Brothers (LEH) and other banks and investment banks “would have expired but for the unbelievable work of Bernanke”. I started getting terrible hate e-mail. So, I started using a food tester before I ate.

A little later in June I was on FOX Business Network and repeated that we weren’t there. Later that day several people that with uncontrollable anger syndrome called me on the telephone and randomly shouted obscenities at me. So, I stopped opening my own snail mail.

A few weeks later I wrote a series of blog articles on money supply and its implications that were published on Seeking Alpha. I suggested that economists were “making up data” that didn’t exist and Fed policy was going to result in credit rationing. I was called names on blogs and received comments from “on line screamers” who believe in screaming often, loud and with nasty language. So, I had my kids start using my wife’s maiden name at school.

But, despite the threats, the name calling and the blog screams, we weren’t there in June, July or August and still aren’t there in September. And, Fed policy that caused credit rationing didn’t include rations for Freddie (FRE), Fannie (FNM), Lehman (LEH) and, now,  AIG (AIG).

Since June when I first suggested that we had a way to go, the Dow, the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ are down approximately 7.80%, 9.43% and 9.08%, respectively.

I’m sorry we aren’t there yet. And, I don’t like it when people call me names. I am sorry that so many people have trusted senior executives at their companies and those executives have let them down. I am sorry the regulators have let us down and I am sorry that investors are losing money.

But, we still aren’t there yet and until we have 60 days without a financial crisis we aren’t going to be there.

For non-professional investors who want to play the market, I have some advice. Before buying stocks you need to answer a more fundamental question: Red or black?

Print this article with comments

This article has 21 comments:

  •  
    how about "professional" investors who want to play the market?they're supposed to be the smart ones investing people's hard earned money.not the ones with silver spoons in thier mouth,but the ones who WORK for a living!

    RED or BLACK?
    2008 Sep 17 12:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    red
    2008 Sep 17 12:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Blood is actually purple until it comes into contact with air...
    2008 Sep 17 12:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "RED or BLACK?"
    an imperfect reference to a 'Crap Shoot', only he referenced roulette.
    2008 Sep 17 12:51 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Painful but true. This doesn't end as long as the financial shorts are being fed an extra 10 billion or more to play with every week, and shift their winnings from target to target. I keep waiting for the regulators to buy a clue and realize it won't end because they are all tough or meet some ideological litmus test of how to intervene. It only ends when shorts lose their shirts.

    The Fed is asking for the Treasury to create more bills, which is being spun as Fed weakness when it is just trying to supply the banking system with securities it wants to hold. But it is still dumb. They should instead be buying corporates outright in open market operations, leaving all of it as freshly created high powered money. Tons of them, and concentrated on whatever the target de jour is.

    The real ammo they have is the 11% spread between short treasury rates and intermediate term financial corporate rates. And they won't make any progress until they start acting like a profit seeking arb with unlimited firepower, and simply force that spread to close by bidding the hell out of it until it does, quantity unlimited.
    2008 Sep 17 01:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Some one needs to pull the car over and smack the kids every now and again. We'll get there when we get there, now be patient. Sit this next year out and sit on your hands if you can't be nice to one another.
    2008 Sep 17 01:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I completely agree with Mr. Sunshine's [ past and current ] comments, and would add that even if the "60 day" stress test passes without another financial sector calamity, the outcome of the national election could very well provide the shock for the next leg down: Democrat hegemony -- and a lengthy leg down it shall be.

    2008 Sep 17 01:25 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Buy and hold folks; think long term.

    You keep buying and holding while I sell and you'll be rich in 50 years.

    Thanks!
    2008 Sep 17 01:32 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So I have a question for the author: when will we be there? I mean, give us at least a guess with a timeframe

    I suspect by the end of the year - but I have little data to back up my assertion.

    Thoughts?
    2008 Sep 17 01:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    you'll be at least 60 days late and always buy at the top.... your artical is bull crap.
    2008 Sep 17 02:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Which came first: the chicken or the egg? Real estate prices must stabilize on 60 days as well, otherwise financial companies will continue to suffer losses.
    2008 Sep 17 02:38 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Loved your article--I think your sense of humor is first rate. However, I disagree with you on one thing--it's not red or black; it's red or blue. Looks like you took the red pill a while ago and woke up! Well Neo, what's next?
    2008 Sep 17 03:06 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    well, there are 2 ways to "get there":
    one is using the IMF highway: balance your budget, lets free FX adjust your trade imbalance, accept the GDP free fall and provide some unemployment subsidies, the second one is drive to Zimbawe road,
    turn left in Bolivia Circle, stop to buy some broken pies at your friends retail post, ask for some loans from your pals overseas and send back some bonds with greetings. First is black, the second is red, you tell us were are we now.
    2008 Sep 17 03:06 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Optimism will return to the country, the world and the market as soon as the election is over. No matter who wins, it will not be Bush and we will all be more optimistic and better off for it. There will never again be another Bush in the White House - not a mother or a father, not a sister or a brother, not son or a daughter - nothing, no one, no how. That will be the time to start breaking out the champagne.
    2008 Sep 17 03:32 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "And, I don’t like it when people call me names."

    Well I'm gonna call you one: Correct!

    One of my largest frustrations is the 30- and 40-something "investor class" that (still!) believes that every drop in stocks is a buying opportunity. They can't wait to call a bottom where there is none. This thing is gonna take a long time. Look at the Nikkei starting in 1990 if you need to understand just how long a "long time" is. We have used up the magical bottomless pool of free money; we tapped it to bail our way out of the last 3 crises: 1987, Tech, and 9/11. THERE IS NO MORE MONEY. The federal government is arguably the most bankrupt "company" today, and it is being relied upon to bail out the other bankrupt companies. All have engaged in deficit spending and leverage; time to pay up.

    Today is the first of many "supplemental fundings" by Treasury. They did a paltry $40 Billion. The fed and Treasury have spent or committed $900 Billion. Gold smells ink jugs being pried open, and it smells like blood in the water.
    2008 Sep 17 03:35 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The bottom will come when Cramer can resist going 60 days without calling one. The market is smarter than everyone. Listen to the market. How quickly some forgot that after the last bear market and relegated their heads at the door of emotion and hope only to once again get it clocked while being hyped, obfuscated and assuaged daily by the 'experts' and cheerleaders.
    2008 Sep 17 04:08 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Midas Mulligan, please spare us fearmongering re the Dems. Look at stock performance during Clinton's presidency! and he raised taxes and still stocks achieved nice gains, while the nation built up a surplus. Think before you write.
    2008 Sep 17 06:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The author here....the reference was supposed to be to roulette. It never occured to me to reference craps. The game of craps takes some level of skill to at least understand the rules. The game of roulette is pure chance.

    Also, I am not presuming to give professional traders advice in this blog article. This is for retail investors only who have a job during trading hours and are just looking for a simple rule for when they should start buying mutual funds and other diversified investments again.
    2008 Sep 17 09:52 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The author again...

    Thanks for reading and thanks for caring enough to comment.
    2008 Sep 17 09:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Decent article accept leave out all the "people are calling me bad names." It's not relevant to your 60-day rule and it just creates clutter. If you don't want to get flamed then don't post publicly, especially on stock market predictions!
    2008 Sep 18 07:57 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    How did you figure out the 60-day rule? Aptly-named Bear Stearns (Mar 18) to Lehman Brothers (Sep 15) is more like 6 months, Sunshine.

    Your predictions sound so much like those "oh here's peak oil" or "oh investment banks are trading below book value let's go shopping" analysts folks who are carrying their belongings in carton boxes.

    The end of the tunnel is not the when confidence comes back. It is rather when all have lost faith and Buffett, private equity and sovereign funds come in.

    Of course, by then you and half the lower Manhanttan expese accounts would have evaporated into the hot air you sold us in the first place.
    2008 Oct 04 11:21 PM | Link | Reply