Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Out comes the kitchen sink.

The actions of this last week will go down in history as the end of the U.S. as an economic superpower. I realize that’s a harsh view to take. And I love this country dearly. But the writing is now on the wall. The regulators—SEC, Treasury, Federal Reserve, and President Bush—have officially bankrupted this country, destroyed the dollar and guaranteed that our quality of life will be on the downward slope for the next decade.

I’ve already commented at length on the Fannie/ Freddie deal. In a nutshell that intervention added $5 trillion—at least $1.2 trillion of which is garbage—in liabilities to the US balance sheet. And it:

  • Didn’t solve the housing crisis—housing starts fell 6.2% in August (a 17-year low) while building permits fell 8.9%.
  • Won’t boost the homebuilder industry—you can’t sell homes if banks are lending.
  • Sure as heck didn’t save the stock market: all we got was a feeble one day rally.

However, this latest intervention—one that required Congress to expand the statutory limit on the national debt to $11.3 trillion—is the kiss of death. The benefits to US taxpayers to this deal are even fewer than those of the Fannie/Freddie deal. The Feds have now thrown everything they’ve got, including the kitchen sink, at the market. How the markets react remains to be seen.

As for the commentators going ballistic and saying this move is “unprecedented,” they’re wrong. The government has attempted to solve financial crises before by creating a separate fund or trust to buy crummy assets. The last time they did this was with the Resolution Trust Corporation [RTC] during the Savings & Loan crisis in the early 1990s.

The RTC, like today’s superfund, was a separate entity meant to take over insolvent banks and then sell off their assets—both good and bad. However, the key difference between the RTC and the government’s proposed superfund is that that the RTC primary dealt with real estate holdings? real assets that are relatively easy to value? while today’s superfund will deal with mortgage backed securities or debt?intangibles or paper that are impossible to value.

When you buy real estate, the asset changes hands at a price and the deal is closed. Buying derivatives from someone entails a shift in risk, but for many securities, the deal is not closed until the derivative expires or is triggered. Thus, the Feds are lining up several hundred billion dollars worth of open-ended liabilities.

Until the deal is announced and all the details worked out, it’ll be difficult to gauge its impact. But one thing is for certain: It will be highly pro-inflationary.

Commodities have been slammed in the last two months due to the dollar rally. But we are now nearing a time of hyperinflation when the Feds paper over any and all problems with reckless abandon. As the market comes to realize this, commodities and other inflationary hedges will begin their bull market anew.

Print this article with comments

This article has 19 comments:

  •  
    Until housing bottoms there will be no inflation. Deflation rules for now.
    2008 Sep 22 07:47 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "Didn’t solve the housing crisis—housing starts fell 6.2% in August (a 17-year low) while building permits fell 8.9%".
    Isn't that looking in the rear window for progress? We didn't give the housing markets a fair chance to stabilize. I think it won't be at least until 2009 until we can accurately judge the ramifications. I think you're being a little presumptuous. You may be right but it's early.
    2008 Sep 22 08:09 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I AGREE WITH THE ARTICLE AND VERY SAD THAT AMERICA THE HOPE OF MIND KIND AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS BEING DESTRYED.
    IT WAS ONCE SAID NO FOREIGN ARMY WILL INVADE AMERICA, BUT AMERICA WILL SELF DESTRUST IT SELF.
    HERE IS THE PROBLEM:
    TWO USLESS WARS BOTH UN WINABLE IRAQ AND AFGHAN.
    AFGHAN FIRST THE RUSSIAN AFTER 10 YEARS THEY DID THE RIGHT THING AND LEF
    IT IS MORE CHEAPER TO SPEND THE MONEY SEEKING BIN LADEN THAN INVADE, WE GIVE PAKISTON GOVT BILLIONS THEY
    GIVE US SOME TOKEN SUPPORT BUT THE POPULATION OF PAKISTAN DO NOT AGREE WITH THEIR GOVT AND DO NOT SUPPORT OUR WAR IN AFGHAN.
    REMEMBER VIETNAM FIRST THE FRENCH THEN WE GOT IN AND THE END A DISASTER.
    IRAQ WE SUPPORT A GOVERNMENT IN A FORTRESS THE POPULATION OF IRAQ ARE AGAINST US TO KEEP SOME OF THEM QUITE WE POUR BILLIONS TO BUY THEIR FAVOUR.
    THIRD PROBLEM FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM WITHOU ADEQUATE REGULATION;
    THE FINANCIAL FISACO, WALL STREET WITH PUT, CALL, STRADLE, SHORTING ETC ALL A GAMBLING GAME, WE HAVE CONVERTED WALL STREET AS THE LARGEST GAMBLING CASINO.
    LOW COST LABOUR DESTROY ALL OF OUR GREAST MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY WHEN THE LABOUR COST IN CHINA IS $100.00 AND THE COST GOES HIGHER THEN FIND ANOTHER COUNTRY WITH SLAVE LABOUR AT $50.00 PER MONTH PLUS
    A BOWL OF RICE FOR THE WORKERS AT LUNCH TIME,
    ULTIMATELY ALL MIDDLE CLASS IN AMERICA WILL BE DESTROYED, WHEN OUR UNEMPLYMENT REACHS 15%
    THE IDEA OF COMMUNISM WILL BEGING TO GET HOLD IN AMERICA AND THE REST OF THE WESTERN WORLD.
    HISTORY REPEATS IT SELF.
    JOSEPH FOSTER A WORLD TRAVELLER AND A RETIRED
    BUSINESS MAN.



    2008 Sep 22 08:22 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    wes: the author is correct. The current moves will put a paper bottom under the housing market. So prices will stabilize and start going up _ victory for the goverment! Pryrric victory, because all asset prices will be going up at the same time, and the dollar will be taking. You'll be a millionare, but it'll cost $50 to go to the movies.
    2008 Sep 22 08:25 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Wow I think your opening paragraph is a little strong. There's just as much of a chance the government could make money on these loans as lose money... they are getting them at a HUGE discount. Have a little faith...
    2008 Sep 22 08:27 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The commodity drop started before the Dollar's rally began. Hedge Funds like the lemmings they are fled where they could. The Dollar offered the greatest leverage because the Bearishness was so onesided.

    When it became evident that the Financial Crisis in the US seemed to be accelerating, the dollar's rise ended very abruptly. The Bailout has added pressure and the further expansions on the original plan are going to accelerate the decline. Euro $1.49-1.50 is probable this week even without the final details.

    The ECB is sticking to its Inflation Fighting mandate and a strong dollar does not help this.

    The more entitlement spending added to the Bail out, the greater the pressure on the Dollar.

    Hard Asset strength is a show of flight from the Dollar overall.
    2008 Sep 22 08:29 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Likely a most realistic, non-cheerleader evaluation of the current situation.
    Having Bush and the Fed try to fix the mess is like having a vampire managing the Red Cross blood supply. Unfortunately, legislators are largely ignorant of economic principles and easily led by lobbyists.

    Start paying legislators the mean average income of their electorate and send all lobbyists to Gitmo!
    2008 Sep 22 08:38 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    right on rdr4, and a perfect analogy on the vampires

    now lets just hope somebody doesn't decide to cancel the elections
    2008 Sep 22 09:39 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It is not certain that inflation will rule, however that is the goal of the government, to inflate our way out of this massive deflation. Yes they can coexist, because commodities can go up due to the weakening dollar while housing can continue to tank. There is going to be a massive increase in borrowing by the central government which should pump money into the system, keeping China afloat. They export stuff to us, we export credit to them. Credit is all we produce. The lack of borrowing by citizens will be offset some by government borrowing. The government will in effect, borrow FOR US.
    2008 Sep 22 10:50 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree with the author. Mr. Foster also summed it up well as did the other comments. I think the CEO's that devastated all the companies that the govt. is bailing out should be prosecuted and hopefully sent to jail. They should return every penny of money stolen from the shareholders.
    2008 Sep 22 11:52 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If you're upset, then look to the CEO of our country. He's the guy that sat on his hands while everything fell apart. Sure does know how to spend! spend! spend! though, doesn't he!

    While you're at it, you might want to take Greenspan's book off your 'must buy' list.. Volker suggested deregulating banks and investment houses was a bad idea as he was leaving. Greenspan, on the other hand, was all for it....

    jegan ;-)
    2008 Sep 22 12:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    There is much more to the basic materials sector than its role as a hedge against inflation. In global terms, India shall soon enter into a major upswing for basic materials as she tries to develop infrastructure in advance of the Commonwealth Games. Beyond the immediate cyclical trend, India is now preparing to build her infrastructure. The demand for India to do this will be unprecedented, even more than the demand during China's industrialization because China started with a far better infrastructure compared with that available in India.

    My view:

    Trading positions (few weeks) carry risks. Short term (few months) positions carry risk. Long term (1 year plus) risks are low. On a secular basis (next several years), the risk is low and the potential rewards high. Have a look at more information on my blog.
    maxkapital.wordpress.c.../
    2008 Sep 22 01:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    seekingalpha.com/user/... - Joseph Foster really didn't need to shout so long to get his point across and the author relying of facts that haven't matured yet is a little off beat.
    I agree the bail out of any large corportation by the government is a bad idea. It reeks of total socialism to have the government take over a corporation because some idiot CEO's fell asleep at the helm. Better yet where are the subpoenas or do we apply the "sunshine law" and force the corporations taken over by the government to open their records for public review. Including the CEO's and board members financial documents now they work for the Peoples Republilc of the United States of America.
    I acn honestly say I have been a bad judge of character when it comes to politicians. I voted for Bill Clinton the first time and received an invitation to retire from the military ten months later. I moved to California and bought a home from his best friend Eli Broad. The home turned ot to be a lemon. I changed parties and voted for GW and now look what has happend. I can't win for loosing.
    So far I have been batting o with the politicians I took a liking to. I don't like John Mc Cain but if the trend of my voting record is a good gage then he might be the guy to get things fixed in Washington.
    2008 Sep 22 04:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I think congress is as much to blame with the current woes, or maybe even more so, because back in 2005 they had the opportunity to head off the Fannie and Freddie debacle but failed to do so with a bill that they let die on the vine.

    If things shake out like the writer of this article suggests, then those who can should probably be looking at getting into their hands some precious metals to use as armor in the coming decade.
    2008 Sep 22 05:55 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    our financial problem is not the current dilemma requiring the debt level to be raised to $11.3 trillion!!!

    THE PROBLEM WAS CAUSED BY THE INITIAL $9 TRILLION OF DEBT CEILING REQUIREMENT!!!!

    signed: GERRY MANDER
    2008 Sep 22 09:59 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "wes: the author is correct. The current moves will put a paper bottom under the housing market. So prices will stabilize and start going up _ victory for the goverment!"

    You really think the government has any control over this? You're cute.
    2008 Sep 23 07:15 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    how could a asset - deflationnary/ deleveraging economy could become "highly inflationnary", whatever government money is used to buy assets, remains to be seen...
    2008 Sep 24 08:21 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    how a mighty deflationnary environment (asset deflation - deleveraging) could become "hyper inflationnary" as you put it, despite any government money used to buy illiquid asstes (not spent) remains to be seen...
    2008 Sep 24 08:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    By some estimates there are over 600 Trillion dollars of these intangible assets floating around the globe as we speak. This bailout does not add up to a drop in the bucket. The artificial low interest rate environment of the last 20 years combined with a 'self-regulating' Wall St. has led to massive speculation in derivatives that even rating agencies couldn't figure out. Now the party is over and here comes the hangover. This bailout is doomed to fail. Why? Because there is not enough money in the entire world to save all these bad debts. Put your money into a diversified basket of hard, tangible assets now!
    2008 Sep 28 03:14 PM | Link | Reply