Bondholders Are Unjustified Big Winners in Treasury Plan - Hussman 10 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Excerpt from the Hussman Funds' Weekly Market Comment (9/22/08), which this week takes the form of an open letter to Congress on the financial crisis:
As an economist and investment manager, I am concerned that the plan advocated by Treasury is essentially a plan to bail out the bondholders of financial institutions that made bad lending decisions, with little help to homeowners who are actually in financial distress. It is difficult to believe that the U.S. government is contemplating taking on the bad assets of these institutions at probable taxpayer loss and effectively immunizing the bondholders (and shareholders) of these companies...
These institutions are not failing because 95% of the assets have gone bad. They are failing because 5% of the assets have gone bad and they over-stretched their capital. At the heart of the problem is “gross leverage” – the ratio of total assets taken on by the company to its shareholder equity. The sequence of failures we've observed in recent months, starting with Bear Stearns, has followed almost exactly in order of their gross leverage multiples. After Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac went into crisis, Lehman and Merrill Lynch followed. Morgan Stanley, and Hank Paulson's former employer, Goldman Sachs, remain the most leveraged companies on Wall Street, with gross leverage multiples above 20...
The stockholders and bondholders of the company itself should be the first to bear losses, not the public. That is the essence of what a free and fair market, and a responsible government would enforce. The investors in the companies that produced the losses should be accountable for them, and the customers and counterparties should be protected.
Related Articles
|



























This article has 10 comments:
banks need to borrow money to lend to home buyers and businesses. Banks borrow in essence by selling equities to speculators and bonds to investors. By definition, equity holders are speculating; bond purchasers are a bit more prudent, trading off high potential returns for more security. The base lenders in our scheme of things are bond buyers, especially when they buy investment grade bonds. Wipe them out and the whole system collapses. Opps, I guess it has. OK, then the base lender in our new scheme of things is the Fed. Opps, then the base lender to the Fed is, you're right afterall -- the taxpayers. I see what's coming -- subprime tax-loans followed by federal bailout of taxpayers. What a great country!
so...
Government = National Debt + Taxpayer Equity
Which do you think has control over the assets - the foreign creditors who own the debt or the taxpayers?
Since the government would run out of money if the lending was ever cut off, I would say the foreign creditors. Just like in a bankruptcy, the assets have been seized and used to try to make the creditors whole. The fact that our own government would shift open market investment losses from the creditors to the taxpayers illustrates this realization nicely. We no longer own the government. We squandered it away on silly wars and porky budgets.