Bank of America: 'Paulson Plan Benefits Mostly Goldman, Morgan' 18 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Surprise, surprise, surprise. Guess who the Paulson plan benefits?
Bank of America's (BAC) top credit strategy analyst says Paulson Debt Plan May Benefit Mostly Goldman, Morgan.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley may be among the biggest beneficiaries of the $700 billion U.S. plan to buy assets from financial companies while many banks see limited aid, according to Bank of America Corp.
"Its benefits, in its current form, will be largely limited to investment banks and other banks that have aggressively written down the value of their holdings and have already recognized the attendant capital impairment," Jeffrey Rosenberg, Bank of America's head of credit strategy research, wrote in a report dated yesterday, without identifying particular banks.
Many banks may not participate in the Troubled Asset Relief Program because they haven't had to write down as much assets under accounting rules, meaning decisions to sell into the program would cause them to lose capital, Rosenberg wrote. Investment banks operate "under a mark-to-market accounting model while commercial banks hold assets at cost until realizing a loss (or until they reasonably expect one)," he wrote.
Even without sales by commercial banks and savings-and-loans under the program, the companies may be harmed as the disclosure of prices paid in the troubled-debt auctions force them to ``hasten the pace'' of their own losses, Rosenberg wrote in his report. Banks and insurers mark down certain securities and derivatives to market prices in their earnings reports, avoiding losses on others unless they deem the declines to not be temporary and provisioning against loans as they go bad.
Bank lobbying groups today asked Congress and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to suspend a rule that forces companies to put a price on difficult-to-value assets such as subprime mortgages.
Here is a translation of that last paragraph: Banks are unhappy with the size of their bailout (of which they deserve zero), simply because Goldman and Morgan are getting a bigger bailout (of which they equally deserve zero).
Is it any wonder Paulson wanted his bill ramrodded through without debate?
1.8 Trillion dollar bailouts just do not go far enough these days. Everyone wants more.
Related Articles
|




























This article has 18 comments:
Just wait & see.
Paulson has been wrong along on these issues what makes you believe he is right this time.
Let the crash happen now instead of dragging it out for decades.
Are we going to trust the same Govt. and Business entities that got us into this mess to now come up with a plan to get us out?!
Elections are coming up. There should not be one incumbant left holding a position! They are all incompetent if not complicant.
Tell Congress and the Administration to bail on the bailout!
I subjugate myself to you.
Now where is my bailout?
Freefall:
A crash will be worse that '29...
probably more like '89, 1789...
in France...
Les Miserabes could be your life...
I am starting to worry about you. First, I haven't seen a disertation on deflation in a long time. I know you are stressed by King Henry. Soooo take a breath and check out Barry's Blog
bigpicture.typepad.com.../
There is no TARP, it's all about SHIT (Securitized Hybrid Investment Trust Bailout Plan)
There is no way ( Colonel Klink ) Henry Paulsen would favor his best interest in his thousands of shares in Goldman Sacs .Would he?
What in hell has this country's policies came to?
How much more crap do those in positions think the public will take before they start destroying the pack of political and financial Hyenas circling our camp ?
As i understand the Constitution there is noting that says we should bail out private enterprise.
It will be a huge slide down that slippery slope and, in the long run, do NOTHING good.
Your interpretation of BAC comments is downright criminal. Just because GS/MS have been very aggressive in markdowns does not mean they will benefit the most. It is likely that in the reverse auction the price paid by the Fed will be closer to where the rest of the banks are marking the assets. Further MS/GS have little to no exposure to Sub-Prime; GS was short and MS took their hits an year ago.
Do you have anything constructive on how to fix the problem? All you do is shill for your asset management firm and spread FUD. The stock market wiped out close to $1.4T in value today, more than double of the $700B requested by Paulson to provide liquidity to the debt markets. You must be popping open the bubbly celebrating as Americans see their pension funds, IRAs and 401Ks get wiped out.