This Uncertainty Is Unacceptable 14 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
As the world listens to Messrs. Paulson and Bernanke argue for support of their three-page $700 billion manifesto, I wish to focus your attention on a central aspect of the credit crisis – the scale and scope of the credit derivatives octopus.
To illustrate, consider this: If scientists can “identify all the approximately 20,000-25,000 genes in human DNA”, and “determine the sequences of the 3 billion chemical base pairs that make up human DNA,” then why can’t the financial scientists identify the extent of the credit derivatives market?
This is a national, if not global, emergency. In such an emergency, is it acceptable to say, “We don’t know what we don’t know?” Or, “It’s too hard to figure out.” Nonsense. If this emergency were a war, would it be acceptable to say, “We can’t build that tank or missile because we don’t know where the steel is”? Of course not. So, why is it acceptable to say we don’t know the extent of the credit derivatives octopus?
Perhaps certain US government officials do know but they are just not saying so. Perhaps those certain US government officials reside in the US Treasury and Federal Reserve Bank. If so, then their actions these past anxiety-riddled months are about as inept as could be possible as a more comprehensive plan of action should have been constructed (from such knowledge) rather than the firemen Hank and Ben put out the latest financial wildfire this weekend, right now routine we have been treated to.
Investment Strategy Implications
Along with the insane decisions to implement FAS 157 and eliminate the uptick rule, the outrageous neglect on the part of those charged with oversight of the entire financial services industry, and the fundamental rationale supporting each (efficient markets and laissez-faire), you can add the unacceptable argument that it’s just too hard to figure out the credit derivatives octopus.
In the process, the world’s markets and economies are now forced to experience a disorderly unwinding of the credit bubble – a disorderly unwinding that could have been mitigated had certain action steps, and the rationales supporting them, been avoided.
Sadly, today’s testimony will almost certainly contain a lot of shoulder shrugging “we don’t know what we don’t know, it’s too hard to figure out” statements. Unacceptable.
Related Articles
|


























This article has 14 comments:
Please write or phone your representatives to save yourself from a century of financial servitude from the likes of Bernanke and Paulson.
Sorry .... if it smells like a skunk IT IS A SKUNK.
A sham indeed.
Blaming the mess on the current administration is pure, 100% ignorance. Where were you when the liberal messmakers were pressuring everyone in the realty and banking sectors that all Americans were "entitled" to a home? That bubble was created by a social agenda that had no place buckling the banking and realty sectors, and it knowingly created illicit opportunities for unqualified homeowners, private profits for Fannie and Freddie with public funding, and led us straight to the mess we have today, pure and simple. Thank God that Paulsen and Bernanke are in place. Greenspan and Clinton were so concerned with being popular they held interest rates below GNP for years. Always a sure bet for financial calamity. Why haven't we heard from Rubin on this? Because he was complicit in it then, and is an officer on Wall Street now. A stark contrast to what Paulsen is standing for now - character in service to his country.
Paulson is complicit in the creation of these financial puffballs, he should be under indictment, not in charge.
There is groundswell developing for his impeachment.
Stay tuned, Main Street might not know much but you don't need to be a rocket surgeon to know when you are getting gouged.
One other little tidbit for you, the top of the bubble of ALtA and prime loans is just starting to melt.