Seeking Alpha
About the author: From Bespoke:

9/23 - Goldman Sachs Group announced today that it has reached an agreement to sell $5 billion of perpetual preferred stock to Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. in a private offering. The preferred stock has a dividend of 10 percent and is callable at any time at a 10 percent premium. In conjunction with this offering, Berkshire Hathaway will also receive warrants to purchase $5 billion of common stock with a strike price of $115 per share, which are exercisable at any time for a five-year term.

10/1 - GE announced that it has reached agreement to sell $3 billion of perpetual preferred stock in a private offering to Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. The perpetual preferred stock has a dividend of 10% and is callable after three years at a 10% premium. In conjunction with this offering, Berkshire Hathaway will also receive warrants to purchase $3 billion of common stock with a strike price of $22.25 per share, which is exercisable at any time for a five-year term.

Today's announcement that Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) would invest up to $6 billion in General Electric has many of the same terms as the deal Buffett announced about a week ago with Goldman Sachs.  In both cases, BRK.A is receiving perpetual preferred stock with a yield of 10%, that is callable at a 10% premium.  Additionally, in each case BRK.A has received warrants to buy an equal amount of stock at a price of about 5% below where each stock traded before the deal was announced.

However, there are some differences.  First, Berkshire is investing $5 billion in Goldman and only $3 billion in GE.  Second, while Goldman can call the preferred shares at any time, GE has to wait at least three years before they can call the preferred shares they are issuing.  In other words, BRK.A is lending less money to GE than it is to Goldman and attaching more strings to that smaller investment.  While the market has reacted to the investment as an endorsement of GE by BRK.A, based on these differences, one could argue that Buffett thinks GE's creditworthiness is no better than GS, even though GE is rated AAA while Goldman is rated AA-.

Print this article with comments

This article has 29 comments:

  •  
    Following the announcement, CNBC interviewed Buffet, who was on his airplane, which he said is powered by GE engines that were performing faultlessly! Buffet strongly endorsed GE, stated he believed the "bailout" will pass, and mentioned GS had brought him the GE deal.

    Maybe it's time to buy BRK again.

    2008 Oct 01 03:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    No, he thinks both are entirely creditworthy and that Mr. Market is stark raving mad.
    2008 Oct 01 03:17 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Buffet's GS and GE investments seem to combine equal parts of opportunism, value hunting, and an ability to create value simply by endorsing strong institutions in trouble, all at a very cash high return to him. Now i know why he has been sitting on that growing pile of cash for all those years!
    2008 Oct 01 03:20 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The deal is a combination of debt and equity. Buffett doesn't see GS as more creditworthy than GE, but he sees GS stock as trading at a bigger discount to intrinsic value than GE stock. Such an assessment will be supported by both P/E and P/B analysis.
    2008 Oct 01 03:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Both deals tells u nothing about what Warren Buffett thinks of creditworthiness but it does show you that GE is likely to be much more desperate than Goldman.
    2008 Oct 01 03:27 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    He is buying preferreds. The result may be that he milks the cash cows for all they are worth and then leaves the empty husk for the common stock holders (you and me). Is this possible?
    2008 Oct 01 03:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Ask Matt Lauer. He get his paycheck from these clowns.
    2008 Oct 01 03:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    No, it isn't possible. His warrants become worthless if the common share price falls. The best outcome for him now is if GE fully recovers, and his warrants are deep in the money. The preferred will likely be called once alternate financing is secured, for a quick and easy 10% return for Buffett. He only bought the preffereds to get the warrants.


    If you think GE preferreds are a good deal, why not buy some yourself? You don't have to be a member of royalty to buy them.


    On Oct 01 03:31 PM Michael D. wrote:

    > He is buying preferreds. The result may be that he milks the cash
    > cows for all they are worth and then leaves the empty husk for the
    > common stock holders (you and me). Is this possible?
    2008 Oct 01 03:48 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What's the present value of $3G at 10% in perpetuity? Will GE have cash to call it?
    2008 Oct 01 03:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Looks like Crony Capitalism is alive and well. With the stroke of pen, the common stock is diluted, and it’s value is transferred from the small investor to the politically connected Fat Cat.
    2008 Oct 01 03:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    debtacid, why don't you buy some BRK if you think it's such a good deal?
    2008 Oct 01 03:59 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If it were not callable, at a risk-free discounting rate of 4.5%, the preferred would be worth $6.67B. However, being callable, and since GE usually has no trouble raising such amounts, the figure is closer to $3.15B, considering GE is likely to call them within a year or so.


    On Oct 01 03:50 PM nym wrote:

    > What's the present value of $3G at 10% in perpetuity? Will GE have
    > cash to call it?
    2008 Oct 01 04:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Crony? Connected Fat Cat? What the hell are you talking about?

    Anyone who can write a cheque for $3 billion dollars on the spot can get the same terms as Buffett. But of course, for people like you, anyone more successful than you must be a conspirator and connected crony, right?


    On Oct 01 03:53 PM debtacid wrote:

    > Looks like Crony Capitalism is alive and well. With the stroke of
    > pen, the common stock is diluted, and it’s value is transferred from
    > the small investor to the politically connected Fat Cat.
    2008 Oct 01 04:23 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    WB is getting a better deal at GE because he is a hard nosed business man with cash to spend. For those that think it is because he is a well connected fat cat I suggest that you learn a little bit about how he gained his wealth and, by the way, helped many others including middle class investors do the same.
    2008 Oct 01 04:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    preferred stock that pays 10% interest plus $2 below the current market price. Buffett mitigated the risk by demanding a 10% interest rate and options to buy about 1% of the company at a bargain price.
    2008 Oct 01 04:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    One question that comes to mind is how much upside does GE actually have over the next few years. At the rate they're going it should hit 10 in the middle of the next decade. At least he'll have an offset with the dividend.
    2008 Oct 01 04:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Owen, I like your commentary. Keep up the good work.
    2008 Oct 01 04:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Owen, I like your commentary. Keep up the good work.
    2008 Oct 01 04:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    ok, ok, probably not fair to lump Buffett in with rest of Wall Street but I just wanted to make a point. I admit that without Buffet, GE would have been a lot worse off. Secretly, I admire Buffett like everyone else...
    2008 Oct 01 04:59 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    When companies like GE exhibit desperate actions like paying huge interest rates and diluting existing shareholder, things are bad, bad. We will soon know why GE stock has sunk from 43 to 23 and I expect will be heading lower before this is all over. If things are as bad as GE sees them there is no hope for Ford, GM and Chrysler.
    2008 Oct 01 05:00 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    That is the best word for it DESPERATE.
    2008 Oct 01 05:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Does anyone other than myself see part of the compensation for both GE and GS coming from Buffet's very public endorsement? Now Buffet can rub in his bigger endorsement deals the next time he has burgers with Lebron.
    2008 Oct 01 05:34 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You are all dead wrong. Its the other way around. Not Buffett wanted the USD 3 B. I am sure he wanted more. GE wanted the Buffett name tag at the cheapest price possible. If they have to overpay, they rather overpay on USD 3 B than on USD 5 B. This comes at the price of the callability.

    Anybody who claims that Buffett has not done a great deal should go back to school and study Black&Scholes option pricing. Given an implied 5 year volatility on the GE stock of roughly 35% and the fact that they are in the money already by USD 2, gives these Calls a market value of almost USD 1.5 B. This means Bufett only paid 3-1.5= USD 1.5 B for a 10% dividend with the face value of 3 B. This leaves him with a real interest rate of 20% plus the capital gain of 120% on the preferred (3Billion +10%of 3B). All in all he earns 3 dividends at USD 900 M and is redeemed at 3.3B = USD 4.2 B.
    This means he gains (4.2-1.5)/1.5 = 180% in 3 years = 60% p.a. under the assumption that the options have a fair value of USD 1.5 B. If a certain pay-off of 60% p.a. is not a good deal on preffered stocks that are more senior than normal stocks, then what is a good deal???
    2008 Oct 01 09:20 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "Apres moi, the dilution." 700 billion will dilute a lot of rice. Now, JPMorgan and their 90 trillion (90,000,000,000,000) in derivative exposure....that's the deluge.
    2008 Oct 01 10:17 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    He's making yet another purchase where his MoS is established and downside risk minimal. Who else could demand a 10% yield and get it with few questions asked. GE's not going to zero and Buffett is using his deep pocket and investing smarts to get a deal for Berkshire that not many could hope to replicate.

    An impressive move on his part, but GE ends up with the short end of an expensive financing deal.
    2008 Oct 02 01:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Not coincidentally, today the Senate approved the Indian nuclear deal (bringing India into the nuclear club, a controversy), making GE one of the major suppliers of the what -- 18? or so nuclear power plants for India. I see that piece of legislation as very relevant to Mr. Buffet's decision.

    It looks like BH/Mr. Buffet made GE capital ugliness a non-issue so that GE can move on with rebuilding the infrastructure of most of the world, financed by GS.

    (There is an anecdote about Mr. Buffet wanting to "own a bridge" because everyone had to use it - this reminds me of that).(Except times a zillion).

    At any rate, this seems to put a floor on GE's stock price at $22.84 at the end of 5 years time, or before (the strike price for the $3B in warrants).


    2008 Oct 02 01:59 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Annie Trust You put it all in perspective. Only reason I haven't sold mine (and I have lost a lot of sleep about it) is that I see huge upside potential in this stock.
    2008 Oct 02 08:03 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Same as with GS, this deal is obviously good for BRK. But it's not a bad deal for GE, either. It provides cover for them to price their secondary common offering, which is 400% of the BRK preferred, as opposed to 50% (expanded to 100%) for GS. The question when evaluating it from GE's side is, would it have cost less to raise capital purely from a common offering? Not bloody likely.

    The three-year-to-call part is a material difference, and I'd guess is there because GS was cheaper on an expected growth basis. So in GE, BRK expects to make less on the appreciation of the warrants, so it requires additional returns from the preferred to make up the difference.
    2008 Oct 02 08:07 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    what doe's he care he got a guaranteed 10 pt's
    2008 Oct 02 09:05 AM | Link | Reply