Seeking Alpha

Steven Towns


About this author:

Following TDK Corporation's (TDK) strong fiscal year earnings release last Thursday and an even more bullish forecast for this fiscal, its shares have jumped both at home (+3.57% today) and in the U.S. On Friday in Japan its ordinary shares (Tokyo: 6762) gained 2.80% while its ADRs gained 3.14% (its ADRs gained 1.65% Thursday following TDK's earnings release after the Tokyo Stock Exchange closed).

TDK's 32% higher y-o-y net profit and forecasted 38% increase in the current fiscal prompted a number of analysts to upgrade and boost target share prices. Credit Suisse Japan was the most bullish with an 11,200 yen price target (US$99). TDK closed Monday in Japan at 9,870 yen versus 9,270 yen before announcing earnings, a nearly 6.5% increase. The surging yen will add more gains to holders of TDK ADRs which closed Friday at $83.43. Monday's 9,870 yen close equals $87.23 at the current exchange rate of Y113.15/US$1. A list of TDK's analyst upgrades follows.

Credit Suisse Japan: "neutral" --> "outperform", target of 11,200 yen (was 9,400y)

Mizuho Securities: 3-->1, target of 11,000 yen

UBS Japan: "neutral" --> "buy", target of 11,000 yen (was 9,200y)

Shinko Securities: 2-->1

TDK Corporation ADR (TDK) 1-yr chart:

Print this article with comments

This article has 2 comments:

  •  
    That's nonsense and unconstructive criticism. How would you have liked it to read? I didn't say anywhere in the post to "buy this now" or say "I recommend" TDK. I only stated facts. FACT: I. a stronger yen translates into higher ADR share prices, even in cases when the ordinary shares trade lower but the yen's gain on the dollar is higher percentage wise. II. I said "holders" of TDK ADRs... I didn't say "if you buy"... FACT: Credit Suisse was in fact the most "bullish" because it set the highest target share price among analyst upgrades in conjunction with an "outperform" rating upgrade from "neutral."

    I respect your work and contributions. However, I strongly question the motive behind your comment.
    2006 May 01 08:30 AM | Link | Reply