Fuld's Miscalculation: Were Berkshire’s Infusion Terms “Too Much?” 2 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Below are some of the juiciest nuggets from Monday’s New York Times article, The Last Days of Lehman Brothers:
Days before second-quarter earnings, Mr. Fuld called on the billionaire investor Warren E. Buffett, who would eventually purchase a stake in Goldman Sachs, but Mr. Buffett was demanding terms that Lehman considered too onerous. [Emph. added]
I bet he’d love a do-over. Looking back on Fuld’s disastrous capital-raising world tour last month, one gets the distinct sense he didn’t close a deal with the Koreans, the Chinese, General Electric (GE), A.I.G. (AIG), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), or anyone else because, even at the eleventh hour, he stayed way too persnickety on price. Buffett’s terms for Lehman (LEHMQ.PK) couldn’t have been too different from what he extracted from Goldman (GS) and G.E.: a 10% preferred, callable either right away or within a reasonable amount of time, and warrants with low exercise price.
The deal was expensive, but is hardly the biggest stickup in Wall Street history. In return, Lehman would have gotten the Buffett imprimatur that would have gone a long way in restoring confidence in the firm. Of course, in retrospect, it’s easy to make the call. Still, Fuld’s reaction to the crisis sure seems like miscalculation on a grand scale.
Related Articles
|


























This article has 2 comments: