-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
This Wachovia (WB) episode is only getting more interesting. Before there is a resolution to this catfight, I thought it would be worthwhile to point out the pros and cons of each outcome.
This deal is a no-brainer for everyone but Citi (C):
- Wells Fargo (WFC) is using private money to buy Wachovia, meaning no tax dollars are necessary.
- It will assume ALL of Wachovia’s operations, not just commercial banking.
- Wachovia shareholders get $7 instead of $1 per share.
- The Citi deal requires the “good bank/bad bank” scenario, where it takes only the good stuff, and leaves the rest to the FDIC to take care of.
Wall Street initially applauded Citi’s move to buy Wachovia, because it signaled that they had a strong enough balance sheet to be expanding in this environment. For a brief time, it was moving into the tranche of Wells Fargo, JPMorgan (JPM), and Bank of America (BAC) (As told by the stock price hitting a 3-month high).
In short, we already know that Wells Fargo was in better shape than the pack, but we cannot prove that Citi, the only bank left with anything close to its astonishing $51 billion in write-downs, is improving. The Wachovia deal provides it with an opportunity to signal to Wall Street that it will make it through this mess, and that it will not need another loan from
Considering all of this, maybe we are seeing resistance from the Federal Courts (besides the legal ramifications) because this is the only viable acquisition left on the table for Citi to make, and it would be able to offset any bad news to come.
Disclosure: None
Related Articles
|























This article has 1 comment: