China: Wind Power for 1.3B People 14 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
In a recent trip to China, I experienced the “China Speed” in developing their new mega cities all over the country. The magnitude is beyond my imagination. Anything in this country is “big”. 1.3B population, yes it is a “B”, and let me tell you this, the population of children under age 10 is the same as the whole population of Canada: 40 Million. The China’s biggest city Shanghai is twice the size of New York. The high speed train of Shanghai is two times faster than US, that is half the speed of an airplane.
Then you will ask, where does China get all the energy it needs? The answer is simple, China does not have enough energy to sustain such a magnitude of growth, and it imports crude from every single corner of the earth. And it is planning big for its next generation of energy: Wind power.
According to the Global Wind Energy Council, China’s installed wind energy capacity could reach 122GW by 2020. China’s exploitable wind resource is estimated around 1000GW. In Inner Mongolia of Northern China, massive wind projects have been deployed over the last couple of years, the estimated capacity has reached over 1GW. In West China, provinces such as Gansu, and Qinghai, are also developing their own wind power projects to meet local energy demand. The central government has chosen wind power as an important alternative energy to combat green house emission and secure energy supply.
The wind energy booming in China has attracted many worldwide wind turbine manufacturers invest in China, such as GE (GE), Gamesa (GCTAF.PK) and Vestas (VWDRY.PK). There are also many domestic manufacturers including A Power Energy Generation (APWR), Nantong CASC, REpower North, Nordex, Hunan Hara XEMC Windpower. Among these companies, only GE, Vestas, and APWR are listed in North America, and recently APWR signed 50 of 2.7MW wind turbine contract, and has total annual production capacity of 1.1GW by 2009.
Related Articles
|























This article has 14 comments:
www.norwin.dk/NORWIN_N...
It was recently named to Forbes List of 'Asia's Best 200 Under A Billion for the second year in a row. Current P/E about 9.
Disclosure: I'm long Jinpan (NASDAQ:JST)
It was recently named to Forbes List of 'Asia's Best 200 Under A Billion for the second year in a row. Current P/E about 9.
Disclosure: I'm long Jinpan (NASDAQ:JST)
On 2008 Oct 15 12:50 PM Buffett Jr wrote:
> I am interested in APWR but there are some lingering doubts about
> their legitimacy. I think they look good on paper but I'd like to
> see some actual deals go through and some big name analysts covering
> them.
Management have this year put in place a structure, following alliances and acquisition – bringing together interests from China, Japan and the US, to support significant growth and some diversification through renewable energies and potentially related product.
A recent blog posted by Douglas Macintyre on 24/7 Wall Street, outlined below, highlighted criticism by New York Senator Charles Schumer of A-Powers Texas project with US entities US-Reg and Cielo. Schumer appears concerned that manufacture of Wind Turbines will occur in China through A-Power’s alliance and that Chinese jobs will be created, albeit only temporarily if further contracts are not won.
His criticism and concern is that the $1.5B project may attract US economic recovery aid. This criticism appears somewhat off-beam, in particular for the following reasons:
1. Chinese investment – financial institution and corporate – will create US jobs in the wind farm construction phase – possibly the biggest wind farm to date in the US; and
2. US multinationals manufacture by choice in China, creating Chinese jobs and repatriating profits or dividends from China. Why is this so?
Why wouldn’t Schumer focus on helping the emergence of new industries in the US rather than looking to jeopardise a Chinese – US project that will actually create US jobs and help further develop two US entities and potentially new US industry? Especially at a time when Obama, Geithner and Chinese officials have been building US / Anglo – Sino relations, for very good reasons.
Does he want to create a Trade War?
Does he want US multinationals banned from China or banned from selling in or to China? For example bans on Microsoft product in China. Or for that matter HP, Dell, Sun Micro, Adobe, Apple or Research in Motion?
Does he want wholesale sale of US treasuries by China?
Does he want a response by China, which has growing per capita income, or the rest of the world, in the form of – Don’t Buy US Goods?
Does he want a permanent ban on Chinese export of Rare Earths or the products they are used to manufacture, including wind turbines?
Does he want a US and possibly Global Depression?
Douglas Macintyre is correct. Schumer is grandstanding and he is naive. I will add to that, he is a moron, stupid and short sighted. He might be best to keep his mouth shut for fear of a Chinese Dragon jumping into it.
Andrew D Turner (adt)
China Goes To Texas: The Great Wind Farm Dispute
Posted: November 6, 2009 at 6:35 am
Print Email Subscribe Free Newsletter Follow us on Twitter 24/7 Wall St Real Time 500
Chinese interests and private capital will build a huge wind farm in West Texas. China-based wind turbine firm A-Power Energy Generation Systems (NASDAQ:APWR) will lead the project. It will cost as much as $1.5 billion and could supply energy to nearly 180,000.
Senator Charles Schumer of New York State does not like the Texas project, although he might like it more if the turbines were destined for up-state New York. Schumer believes that $450 million in federal stimulus funds could go into the project from the government’s stimulus package. That would help to create as many as 3,000 jobs at turbine plants in China according Reuters.
Schumer wants to have the best and worst of the stimulus programs. He wants job creation and improved alternative energy prospects for America so it can break its addiction to fossil fuels. That may mean a sacrifice which is that China, the growing threat to US global economic dominance, will get a few jobs.
Schumer is naive, or is grand standing. Supplies for alternative energy has to come from somewhere and not all of its will not come from US manufacturers. That is a simple reality which cannot be changed.
Douglas A. McIntyre