<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>A.M. Steinbeck - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'A.M. Steinbeck' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/a-m-steinbeck</link>
    <item>
      <title>Simon Property Group: Time to Go Short</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/117925-simon-property-group-time-to-go-short?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">117925</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="3" >Simon Property Group&rsquo;s (SPG) decision  to eliminate 90% of their cash dividend is the most vile of breaches  between shareholder and management.   They&rsquo;ve used a small loophole  that allows REITs to issue shares instead of cash and still retain their  REIT status.</font> </p> <p><img src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=SPG&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" align="right" style="padding: 5px; margin-left: 5px;" width="284" height="150" /><font size="3" >They claim it&rsquo;s the prudent  thing to do and reserve the right to &ldquo;reinstate the cash dividend  when it becomes less prudent.&rdquo;  What does that mean?  When  would one ever enter into a less prudent transaction?  To add insult  to their arrogance, they also claim that this is not in response to  the current retail operating environment.  On the conference call  they also stated that their smaller tenants need them more than they  need their tenants.  Delusional is the word that comes to mind.</font> </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:13:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>A.M. Steinbeck</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>A.M. Steinbeck submits:</strong><p><font size="3" >Simon Property Group&rsquo;s (SPG) decision  to eliminate 90% of their cash dividend is the most vile of breaches  between shareholder and management.   They&rsquo;ve used a small loophole  that allows REITs to issue shares instead of cash and still retain their  REIT status.</font> </p> <p><img src="http://app.quotemedia.com/quotetools/getChart?chscale=1y&amp;webmasterId=91022&amp;snap=true&amp;symbol=SPG&amp;chtype=AreaChart&amp;chwid=284&amp;chhig=150&amp;chfill=ee0066CC&amp;chfill2=110066CC&amp;chln=0066CC&amp;chmrg=0&amp;chfrmon=false&amp;chton=some" align="right" style="padding: 5px; margin-left: 5px;" width="284" height="150" /><font size="3" >They claim it&rsquo;s the prudent  thing to do and reserve the right to &ldquo;reinstate the cash dividend  when it becomes less prudent.&rdquo;  What does that mean?  When  would one ever enter into a less prudent transaction?  To add insult  to their arrogance, they also claim that this is not in response to  the current retail operating environment.  On the conference call  they also stated that their smaller tenants need them more than they  need their tenants.  Delusional is the word that comes to mind.</font> </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/117925-simon-property-group-time-to-go-short?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spg">SPG</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/a-m-steinbeck">A.M. Steinbeck</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Homebuilders: Why It Should Never Be More Than a Trade</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/116983-homebuilders-why-it-should-never-be-more-than-a-trade?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">116983</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="3" >People keep asking me, &ldquo;When is it  going to be time to get back into homebuilders?&rdquo;   And the  right answer is anytime you feel like gambling.  Buying common  shares of a public homebuilder is a lot like lending money to your deadbeat  uncle so he can payoff his bar tab.  You&rsquo;re never going to see  that money again unless you can convince his drunken buddies to buy  his loan from you.</font></p> <p><font size="3" >Homebuilders borrow money from you (in  the form of common share offerings), to collateralize their debt, to  subordinate your shares to future preferred offerings, to buy more property,  to build more houses, to borrow more money&hellip;to  increase SG&amp;A.   That&rsquo;s their purpose.  SG&amp;A and stock options for upper management.</font></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:14:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>A.M. Steinbeck</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>A.M. Steinbeck submits:</strong><p><font size="3" >People keep asking me, &ldquo;When is it  going to be time to get back into homebuilders?&rdquo;   And the  right answer is anytime you feel like gambling.  Buying common  shares of a public homebuilder is a lot like lending money to your deadbeat  uncle so he can payoff his bar tab.  You&rsquo;re never going to see  that money again unless you can convince his drunken buddies to buy  his loan from you.</font></p> <p><font size="3" >Homebuilders borrow money from you (in  the form of common share offerings), to collateralize their debt, to  subordinate your shares to future preferred offerings, to buy more property,  to build more houses, to borrow more money&hellip;to  increase SG&amp;A.   That&rsquo;s their purpose.  SG&amp;A and stock options for upper management.</font></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/116983-homebuilders-why-it-should-never-be-more-than-a-trade?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ctx">CTX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dhi">DHI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/hov">HOV</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kbh">KBH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/len">LEN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mho">MHO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tol">TOL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xhb">XHB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/a-m-steinbeck">A.M. Steinbeck</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>M/I Homes: Common Share Price Perplexing </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/98262-m-i-homes-common-share-price-perplexing?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">98262</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>While the credit storm batters the worldwide  markets, M/I Homes' common shares (MHO) have been a floating fortress.&nbsp;  An island of strength in a sea of uncertainty.&nbsp; What makes this  situation more bizarre is their sinking cash position.&nbsp; As of their  June filing, their cash on hand was $2M while long term debt stood at  $274M.&nbsp;</p><p>Year to date, the common is up 115%;  while the preferred (MHO-A) is essentially flat and trading at about  one-half its redemption value.&nbsp; Their bonds (55305BAC5) are  also trading at a 20% discount to par and 13% lower than their first  print in January.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:12:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>A.M. Steinbeck</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>A.M. Steinbeck submits:</strong><p>While the credit storm batters the worldwide  markets, M/I Homes' common shares (MHO) have been a floating fortress.&nbsp;  An island of strength in a sea of uncertainty.&nbsp; What makes this  situation more bizarre is their sinking cash position.&nbsp; As of their  June filing, their cash on hand was $2M while long term debt stood at  $274M.&nbsp;</p><p>Year to date, the common is up 115%;  while the preferred (MHO-A) is essentially flat and trading at about  one-half its redemption value.&nbsp; Their bonds (55305BAC5) are  also trading at a 20% discount to par and 13% lower than their first  print in January.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/98262-m-i-homes-common-share-price-perplexing?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mho">MHO</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/a-m-steinbeck">A.M. Steinbeck</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
