Some Graham and Dodd Type Thoughts on Stocks vs. Bonds [View article]
Interesting article, although I'd be nervous about relying on the TIP vs. stock analogy. As at least one commentator pointed out, stocks are riskier than Treasuries, so there is a potential apples to oranges comparison problem you have. Second, you haven't accounted for corporate growth rates. Investing in a company because it has a low price to book ratio is all fine and good - provided the shareholder equity is growing, rather than shrinking, over time. Third, dividends can change based on corporate policy - companies might opt to scrap dividends for buybacks, for instance - sometimes for reasons having nothing to do whatever with corporate earnings. If you want to value a company, you might want to at least take corporate earnings into account somewhere in your equation.
Some Graham and Dodd Type Thoughts on Stocks vs. Bonds [View article]
Third, dividends can change based on corporate policy - companies might opt to scrap dividends for buybacks, for instance - sometimes for reasons having nothing to do whatever with corporate earnings. If you want to value a company, you might want to at least take corporate earnings into account somewhere in your equation.