Seeking Alpha

Amit Chokshi

View as an RSS Feed
View Amit Chokshi's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • Under Armour: Short Selling Opportunity [View article]
    Good call on the short, looks down pre market
    Oct 30 08:46 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Downey Financial's Problems Run Deep [View article]
    Thanks for the comments but I don't think DSL institutional investors really do know what they own. It's very difficult to get under the hood of financials, just look at FMT for example, lot of lost money there for institutions and the Ford-led investor group walked away once doing their own due diligence.

    Same can be said for some of the sharpest guys around like Tom Brown and David Einhorn who ran into problems with some of their holdings in the financial sector. I'll give the benefit of the doubt to Brown and Einhorn because they are really elite investors based on their long-term records, but I've known plenty of analysts on the buyside for institutional funds that are just flat out weak, my opinion is the same for most sellside analysts as well.
    Oct 11 01:30 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Shanghai's P/E Ratio Isn't High By Historic Measures [View article]
    Is the E for current year operating earnings or for net earnings which would include investment gains? Given that many firms in China are booking significant investment gains, the P/E may be understated if it includes investment gains along with operating earnings.
    Oct 9 06:23 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • G. Willi-Food: Da or Nyet? [View article]
    Just to clarify, I posted this on the author's website directly:

    I manage a fund that is long WILC but I’m pretty certain your analysis is wrong. Unless the news has changed since the past few hours you’re not identifying the buyer of the Russian poultry business accurately. Willi Food INVESTMENTS, which trades as WLFD on the TASE is buying the Russian business. AG, through WLFD owns 62% of Willi Food INTERNATIONAL, which is WILC and what US shareholders own.

    The acquisition will have no material benefit to WILC shareholders other than to show AG and Willi mgmt are working on the deal front. WLFD is the holding co, the Russian business will be held alongside WILC and the real estate and other WLFD holdings but don’t look to factor any of the egg business into WILC’s financials. Check the TASE, WLFD stock is rocking because WLFD shareholders receive the benefits of that deal, WILC shareholders do not.
    ----------

    I am in the author's camp obviously by having WILC in my fund (and a significant position in my fund) and believe this is a great investment but the news reports have been somewhat confusing as far as what the implications for WILC shareholders are. This deal by AG and Willi mgmt won't impact WILC shareholders like me but it portends hopefully good M&A deals down the road. Skeptical WILC longs should keep in mind Gil was hired as an M&A guy specifically for WILC so there will be deals done for the WILC operating co as well.
    Oct 5 09:59 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Seitel/ValueAct Looking to Acquire Pulse Data on the Cheap [View article]
    Thanks for publishing this commentary. Just FYI the exhibits are all truncated and do not expand in a manner that makes them easy to see. How should I be submitting these exhibits in the future?
    Sep 25 10:41 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Watching the Tape on Intertape [View article]
    I've looked at this co a bit, one issue i'm struggling with is why the hedge funds brought in the old CEO who looks to have tanked the co before. ITP would be one of the faster cos to rebound in a recession as most cyclicals trade way ahead of economic slowdowns and upswings, just not sure the hedge funds + new management will do it but i'm taking a close look.
    Sep 17 08:42 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • What Sort of Returns Can You Expect Shorting Naked Puts? [View article]
    I haven't looked at academic research in a while but while puts may be expensive, on a put-call parity basis aren't calls consistently even more expensive relative to puts? Right now, I expect puts to be very expensive due to market bearishness but selling naked options is a long-term losing strategy. A lifetime of 40% annualized returns gets erased from a 0 day like Black Monday, one of those 10 sigma events that seems to happen every 2-3 years.
    Sep 16 12:18 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Some Core Themes for Portfolio Planning [View article]
    Rob Arnott is a genius, unfortunate that WisdomTree (Siegel/Steinhardt) gets credit for his fundamental indexing research.
    Sep 13 04:56 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Take-Two Software: Risky But Worth It [View article]
    Is it possible it's overbought, it did get into the $12-$13 range just 1-2 months ago. TTWO also received an ESRB rating for Manhunt 2 as well which should do pretty well.
    Sep 11 08:17 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Coach is the Real Retail 'Tell' Stock [View article]
    I agree with you, I also believe some former high fliers are going to phase into the long-period of valuation compression like WMT and HD did over the past decade. COH is a great company but I think like SBUX the market may re-assess whether these companies deserve premium valuation multiples. I also think DSW is a good candidate as well but I was scared out of shorting it unfortunately.
    Aug 29 11:11 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Ecology and Environment: Microcap With Major Potential [View article]
    The minority interest is a deduction for the profit/loss that is not "owned" by the company. Since the subsidiaries are generating a larger portion of EEI's operating performance, the actual profit is larger and therefore the minority interest that must be deducted grows as an overall absolute number. Keep in mind that EEI holds many operating subs due to its global nature.

    Also, the analysis included more data but due to timing issues was not included.
    Aug 27 07:44 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Core Molding Technologies: 2Q Earnings Review [View article]
    I like CMT and its management team overall but even at the lower price it's tough to get too interested as far as investing in the company. Management has kept costs in line as you said and the company looks dirt cheap on a trailing basis, which as with most cyclicals may be a value trap/peak signal. My reservations with CMT is that it only has 3 customers and one - International T&E - is their owner for the most part. It's like a Ford/Visteon relationship and while the company's balance sheet is strong and their capex is now modest, I just feel that an investor in CMT is hoping that truck demand stabilizes. I am not sure its the rails that are killing the trucks as opposed to the 2007 EPA emissions standard change for diesel engines. Because of that I think going off 2006 and even 2005 results as a potential return to norm in 2008 may be misleading because a lot of truck manufacturers increased orders ahead of 2007 in 05-06. Caterpillar and Accuride have both cited weak truck demand as a reason for some operating performance issues and given the slowdown in construction which accounts for a good portion of truck demand, I'm not sure even 2008 could see a pick up.

    If you make some conservative estimates for 2007, these guys could top out at about $120MM in sales which would be below their ideal capacity for strong operating margins. I put their 2007 EPS around $0.41 a share or so (17x forward P/E valuation) and their forward EV/EBITDA around 5.2x (my est is ~$7.5MM for the year). That's a fair value for a company that is mostly US based (no material European truck exposure which is holding up well), has 3 customers that account for 80+% of sales, has a unionized workforce with I believe two sets of unions due for contract renegotiations this month and Jan 2008, and no material insider ownership (for microcaps I prefer to see a large chunk held my management).
    Aug 23 09:29 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Metalico Hasn't Lost Its Luster [View article]
    correction volume dried up - volume slows, price follows, margins for MEA could fall because they are not really any different from the other cos mentioned in my previous reply
    Aug 21 02:05 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Metalico Hasn't Lost Its Luster [View article]
    MEA is interesting at the right price, you do realize the stock sold off after its Q2 because volume has driven up? These guys are not pure recyclers, they play the metal pricing wave, they've got a few acquisitions that they need to integrate which should allow them to scale better but from a valuation perspective it's not the compelling. CMC, MM, SCHN are all down and all do the same thing in terms of scrap metal recycling. The best play in the sector is really IDSA.
    Aug 21 02:04 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Selling Bank of America Puts Is As Safe As It Gets [View article]
    The title of the article is that selling BAC puts is as safe as it gets. Selling naked puts or naked calls is one of the riskiest plays you can make in markets. As far as the margin for the naked put, you're forgetting that you're marking to market too. The cash requirements will go up but now you're going from havign cash of $6k required to $18k, that's a huge increase in cash that's required. You're also marked to market on those options so that $1300 that you're short, if the stock goes down, that is going to show up as a huge negative value to your portfolio and will constrict your flexibility. Have you actually run the numbers in terms of how the greeks will impact that stock option for every BAC stock move?

    Your strategy is very very risky given how far dated the options you're short are. You have no hedge, if you're going to play the option and it seems you mean to imply you want some income as opposed to "playing it", set up a vertical or horizontal spread where you partially hedge your risk. Takign a quick look at the BAC options it seems you've gone to the Jan options because those are the only ones that have some "meat" to them which to me suggests there's even a bigger problem because you're short volatility. The option premiums for BAC look fairly low, so you're taking on more risk by going further out to get some fatter income but you're doing it at low volatility (relative to most options)

    Everything you say regarding the probability of BAC falling/dividend cut may be true but you're dealing with a skewed return profile. If BAC is down to even $37 or $36 per share and you're assigned, you're paying $38.70 for a stock that is worth $37. If they're down to $35 or $30, you get the picture. And if you look at some of these megabanks back in the early 90s, these stocks has dropped into the teens.
    Aug 10 06:41 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
103 Comments
18 Likes