Seriously. Why do you writers continue to compare GOOG, RIMM and AAPL by looking to their P/Es? Can you answer that question? Have you heard of P/FCF at all? Do you realize that Apple defers revenue it receives from iPhone sales an recognizes the revenue ratably over a 24-month period? What if Apple deferred all of its revenue? Would you still use Apple's P/E to compare it to other companies? Think about it. If Apple only recorded $1 billion in revenue because it decided to defer all of its revenue, but produced $4 billion in free cash flow (4x the revenue) would you still be inclined to look at Apple's P/E as if it meant anything? Obviously not. So why do you do so when Apple defers a large portion of its revenue each quarter? It's because you know nothing about stocks, fundamentals and finance and probably shouldn't be writing anything ever.
Seriously. Why do you writers continue to compare GOOG, RIMM and AAPL by looking to their P/Es? Can you answer that question? Have you heard of P/FCF at all? Do you realize that Apple defers revenue it receives from iPhone sales an recognizes the revenue ratably over a 24-month period? What if Apple deferred all of its revenue? Would you still use Apple's P/E to compare it to other companies? Think about it. If Apple only recorded $1 billion in revenue because it decided to defer all of its revenue, but produced $4 billion in free cash flow (4x the revenue) would you still be inclined to look at Apple's P/E as if it meant anything? Obviously not. So why do you do so when Apple defers a large portion of its revenue each quarter? It's because you know nothing about stocks, fundamentals and finance and probably shouldn't be writing anything ever.
3 Stocks Poised to Move on Tuesday [View article]
3 Stocks Poised to Move on Tuesday [View article]