Seeking Alpha

Arnold Landy's  Instablog

Arnold Landy is a registered investment advisor, managing clients' funds since January, 2006. His previous careers include: small business owner, analyst for "The Value line Investment Survey," urban planner/analyst for State of New Jersey, school teacher in Jersey City, carny at state... More
My business:
LANDY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
My blog:
LANDY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT BLOG
  • THE DUMBNESS OF DIVIDENDS

    Dividends are not a positive factor in deciding whether or not to own particular stocks. That’s because dividends reduce the value of the underlying shares by the amount of the dividend. Suppose there exists a corporation that consists of a broken hot dog cart, with no regular place to sell hot dogs, and it has no other assets or liabilities. This company would not be worth much. But, suppose this corporation had $1 million dollars in its corporate bank account. Then, the company would be worth nearly $1 million.  A person could do very well buying the company for less than $1 million, then disposing of the hot dog stand, closing the business, then withdrawing the $1 million from the bank account. But, if the current owner of this business paid out in dividends to herself the $1 million that was in the bank account, the business would be left with roughly zero value. So, the business is worth a great deal before the dividend, but not much afterward. Likewise, publicly traded stocks trade at prices set by investors’ evaluation of what the company is worth. The value of any company depends on its earnings, prospects for the future, assets and liabilities. Cash is part of the assets. And each dividend paid out translates into either more borrowing or less cash on the balance sheet.

    Clearly, dividends do NOT provide a cushion under the stock price, as investors have found out painfully in recent years. And their payment has further weakened many companies already suffering from declining profits.

    However, paying dividends does make great sense when a financially strong company earns more than it needs to use for working capital or for its capital budget. Here, the cash would just continue to grow.  An example would be Microsoft (MSFT).   Better to pay out the excess cash in a dividend to shareholders (your maximum tax rate on dividends is only 15%) than to let it pile up in the company treasury while incurring the high corporate income tax rate on the interest that it earns.

    Dividend payments are fine for companies that are strong, financially.  Examples are:  Diamond Offshore (DO),  Intel (INTC), Lockheed-Martin (LMT), Lowe's (LOW), Microsoft (MSFT), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), 3M Company (MMM), Stryker (SYK), Wal-Mart WMT), and Walgreen (WAG).   But cash is part of a company’s assets. Once paid out in a dividend, that cash is no longer part of what the company is worth. The bottom line: dividends are efficient and appropriate when companies have excess cash, but a dividend payment does not increase shareholder value because it subtracts a like amount from the what the company is worth, which is expressed in its stock price. Therefore, investors should not consider a dividend as a positive factor, in and of itself, in evaluating whether or not to own a particular stock.

    Disclosure: My clients or I own shares in: Intel (INTC), Microsoft (MSFT), Lockheed-Martin (LMT), Lowe's (LOW), Johnson and Johnson (JNJ), Stryker (SYK), 3M Co (MMM), Wal-Mart (WMT), and Walgreen (WAG).

    Tags: DO, INTC, LMT, LOW, MSFT, JNJ, MMM, SYK, WMT, WAG, DIVIDENDS
    Nov 21 06:32 am | Link | 6 Comments
  • RETIREMENT INVESTING FOR MONTHLY INCOME


     
    I.  Estimate your annual need for investment income
          A.   Add up how much you spent over the past twelve months.  Get this from your checkbook or your bank statements.  
                  1.  Subtract unusual huge purchases, such as an outlay for a new car. 
                  2.  Subtract monthly items that will disappear, due to lifestyle changes, like if you sell your house, stop commuting to work, or if Medicare will reduce your health insurance bills.
                  3.  Add any large future things you want to budget for, like an increased budget for travel.    
                  4.  Subtract expected income from non-investment sources 
                         a.  Social Security
                         b.  Property rental income
                         c   Allowance from rich uncle
                   5.  Divide your "annual need for investment income" by twelve to determine your monthly need, which you will withdraw from your investment account each month.
                 
                                    
    II.  Set aside enough money in risk-free investments that will provide five years of income during stock market meltdowns
          A.   Multiply your "annual need for investment income" (calculated earlier) by five to tell you how much money to set aside to cover you for five years, if needed. 
                      
          B.   Invest your risk-free money in either bank CDs (with at least 1/5 of the money accessible each year) or a money market fund or TIPS (U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities).


    III.  Invest the balance of your investment money in a diversified portfolio of stocks or index funds, with no one stock initially accounting for more than 5% of the total.
         A.  Your monthly income depends on how much you arrange to be sent to you. 
           B.  Your monthly income does NOT depend on how much in dividends or interest you receive.  It depends on your total return, which includes dividends, interest and capital gains.
           C.  Total return from stocks has averaged 9 - 10% over the past 50 years and past 100 years.  Use this growth to fund your monthly income during the good years.
           D.  Avoid all high-fee mutual funds and closed-end funds.  Avoid all leveraged funds.  All funds, if any,  should be low-fee funds or low-fee ETFs.
                   

     


    IV.  Start monthly withdrawals for retirement income.  Withdraw from stocks when stocks are dear, but not when stocks are cheap, like in 2008.
          A.  Withdraw all monthly income from stocks when in normal times or in good times. 
                    1)  Calculate the trailing ten-year average earnings for the S & P 500, adding an adjustment for inflation, and compare to the current level of the S & P 500.  Calculate quarterly.
                    2) If the P/E calculated above is twelve or higher, make all monthly withdrawals from the stock portfolio.  In 2009,  the S&P must stay above 900 for this P/E to remain above twelve.
            B.   Withdraw all monthly income from your risk-free reserve fund when the S & P  P/E (based on ten year average earnings, adjusted for inflation) goes below twelve. Review quarterly. In this way you avoid selling stocks when they are low.

     
    V.  Income tax considerations should be kept in mind
          A.  Maximize holdings of stocks in taxable accounts to take advantage of maximum 15% tax rate on dividends and long-term capital gains.
          B.  Fixed income investments should be directed to tax sheltered  IRAs, 403Bs (teachers' annuities), and 401Ks, as much as possible.
                1.  Interest from fixed income investments is taxed fully, whether in a taxable account or when withdrawn from a sheltered retirement account.
                2.  Stock gains and dividends also are taxed fully when withdrawn from a sheltered retirement account and you miss out on the 15% maximum tax rate.            

     

     
    V.  Confront Inflation
           A.  Avoid investments in long-term bonds, except for TIPS.
           B.  Fixed income investments recommended above will not be hurt by inflation
           C.  Stock investments will not be hurt by inflation, in the long run, as costs, selling prices, dividends, stock prices, and the value of assets owned by the companies you invest in will all rise with inflation.
            D.  Adjust your monthly  investment income need once a year, based upon expected inflation, your past twelve month's spending and your future plans. 

     

     

    Nov 13 11:33 am | Link | Comment!
  • Book Review: "Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System," by Barry Eichengreen, Reviewed by Arnold Landy

       Economist Barry Eichengreen offers great insights into the workings of the international monetary system from 1850-2008 in the second edition of Globalizing Capital, published 2008 by the Princeton University Press.   This book shows the strong influence that the monetary system has had on the world economy at various points in history.
       The most dramatic example began in 1929, as nations’ rigid reliance on the gold standard facilitated the spread of the  Great Depression from country to country. Under the gold standard, the major countries of the world were linked by a common policy whereby nations pledged to convert their currency into gold at a fixed price upon demand by anyone who would present it for such an exchange. This system maintained the value of paper money relative to gold and relative to the currencies of other countries. Countries saw that maintaining fixed currency values facilitated trade with other countries, as importers and exporters were freed from the risk of financial ruin that might otherwise result from fluctuations in currency values between the time an order was placed and the receipt of payment.
        The rigid linking of currencies to the price of gold was thought to prevent trade imbalances among countries. If a country imported much more than it exported, the flow of money outward would cause the general price level to drop, which would make additional importing less attractive and make one’s exports more competitive. Another benefit of the gold standard was that the promise to exchange for gold gave the public confidence in paper currency printed by central banks. Unfortunately, this became a double-edged sword.

       Here is the Eichengreen script (simplified) of the Great Depression. In 1927, the U.S. Federal Reserve began to raise interest rates in order to curb stock market speculation. The increased rates attracted savings from overseas, which caused declines in economic activity in Europe, which had previously been awash in loan capital from the U.S.  This, in turn, caused other countries to raise their own interest rates in order to keep their capital and their gold (gold was money) from fleeing to the U.S and to the other countries that had already raised their rates. Rising interest rates spread from country to country and depressed economic activity.  The economic decline led to bank failures which shrank the money supply and led to deflation, which further suppressed the economy.  Nations hesitated to step in as lender of last resort to banks because that required them to print quantities of new money to liquify the banks, which would detract from their ability to maintain the link between their currency and gold (there’s that pesky gold standard, again). In fact, rescuing banks might have been counterproductive, as the printing of money not backed by gold would lead to fears of devaluation and cause investors to withdraw their national currency - denominated bank deposits, which would worsen the crisis further. In other words, reliance on the gold standard threw the world into what would now be called a negative feedback loop, consisting of shrinking bank deposits, imploding supplies of money, deflation and economic contraction.

       Eichengreen finds confirmation of the gold standard’s role in transmitting the Depression among countries, as he ties the eventual recoveries by various countries to the their subsequent abandonment of the gold standard, together with reflation and their embrace of flexible exchange rates: first the U.K., then the U.S., then France.

       Later chapters in the book cover the  Bretton Woods Agreement (1944-1973), the subsequent breakdown of  pegged exchange rates, and the various currency crises through 2008. Bretton Woods was an attempt to peg currency exchange rates within a 1% range, while providing mechanisms for cooperation and policy coordination among the member countries. Its purpose was to facilitate trade. It broke down for the same reason that all such rigid systems break down - it failed to accommodate the changing economic experiences and political needs of its members. The  Asian currency crisis of the late 90s was similar to earlier crises in that it consisted of the cracking of a framework of pegged exchange rates. This book also provides brief, but instructive treatment of countries that have used  currency boards to peg their exchange rate to the dollar (like Argentina, which did it until pressures caused them to devalue and abandon the peg, and Hong Kong). There is also some discussion of our ongoing trade imbalance with China, wherein China exports goods to the U.S. and keeps its currency exchange rate low by investing in U.S. government debt.

       Eichengreen summarizes the factors surrounding the  creation of the Euro currency, whose purpose (which has succeeded) was to promote trade and economic growth among its members. He provides an insightful case for its continued survival, even as individual members may find themselves under strain from time to time, unable to accelerate the printing of money to prime the national economy. His point is that any country that seriously considers abandoning its reliance on the Euro currency in order to engage in monetary stimulus will experience an outflow of funds from its banking system as investors will want to avoid having their Euro bank deposits converted to a new national currency that will almost certainly lose value. The decline of bank deposits would depress that nation’s economy even further. Awareness of the liklihood of this scenario will likely keep the Euro family together for the foreseeable future.

       Globalizing Capital presents a comprehensive story. Eichengreen’s insights on the mechanisms by which the Great Depression traveled from country to country have been quoted extensively by such experts on the Great Depression as Christina Romer, Chairperson of the Obama Administration's Council of Economic Advisers, and Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Overall, reading this book requires some effort, but it gives the reader a solid understanding of how evolving changes in the international monetary system have directly affected the course of economic history.

        Review by Arnold Landy    10/1/2009

    Oct 01 10:35 pm | Link | Comment!
Full index of posts »

StockTalks

  • General Electric (GE) would likely be hit hard if FASB acts to extend mark-to-market accounting to loan porfolios, as is being considered.
    Aug 24, 2009
  • Going higher, with QQQQ continuing to outperform.
    Jun 10, 2009
More »
Posts by Ticker
AIG, C, DDM, DIA, DO, F, FNM, FRE, GE, GLD, GLL, GMA, GMGMQ.PK, HMC, INTC, JNJ, LMT, LOW, MMM, MSFT, NSANY, QLD, QQQQ, SPY, SYK, TM, WAG, WMT

Latest Comments


Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.