<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>BioBlogger - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'BioBlogger' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger</link>
    <item>
      <title>Encysive Pharmaceuticals Blind-Sided: Thelin Receives Approvable Letter from FDA</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/8237-encysive-pharmaceuticals-blind-sided-thelin-receives-approvable-letter-from-fda?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8237</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[For Encysive Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ticker: ENCY) investors, Monday was one of those days that biotech investors abhor – a day when what appeared to be a sure bet, or as close as a sure bet one can get in biotechland, goes south.  Encysive lost almost half its market value today on news released after the close Friday that the company’s drug Thelin received an approvable letter from FDA.  The news came as a shock as most investors assumed FDA would outright approve the drug.

<p>Although the company is being tight-lipped on exactly what FDA’s issues are, the company stated in its press release that the “letter contains concerns and observations that must be satisfied prior to achieving approval, including a request for additional clinical trial work.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:48:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[For Encysive Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ticker: ENCY) investors, Monday was one of those days that biotech investors abhor – a day when what appeared to be a sure bet, or as close as a sure bet one can get in biotechland, goes south.  Encysive lost almost half its market value today on news released after the close Friday that the company’s drug Thelin received an approvable letter from FDA.  The news came as a shock as most investors assumed FDA would outright approve the drug.

<p>Although the company is being tight-lipped on exactly what FDA’s issues are, the company stated in its press release that the “letter contains concerns and observations that must be satisfied prior to achieving approval, including a request for additional clinical trial work.<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/8237-encysive-pharmaceuticals-blind-sided-thelin-receives-approvable-letter-from-fda?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ency">ENCY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FDA Delay of Tysabri Verdict Not a Surprise (BIIB, ELN)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/8153-fda-delay-of-tysabri-verdict-not-a-surprise-biib-eln?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8153</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Elan Corp. (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/eln/">ELN</a>) and Biogen Idec (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/biib/">BIIB</a>) announced that the FDA has extended its review of Tysabri by three months, pushing the PDUFA date out to June 28th.  
</p>
<p>This was not entirely surprising given the complex risk management program that needs to be put in place before it is reintroduced; if anything, this is more favorable than an “approvable letter,]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:53:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Elan Corp. (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/eln/">ELN</a>) and Biogen Idec (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/biib/">BIIB</a>) announced that the FDA has extended its review of Tysabri by three months, pushing the PDUFA date out to June 28th.  
</p>
<p>This was not entirely surprising given the complex risk management program that needs to be put in place before it is reintroduced; if anything, this is more favorable than an “approvable letter,<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/8153-fda-delay-of-tysabri-verdict-not-a-surprise-biib-eln?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/biib">BIIB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eln">ELN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nabi Biopharmaceuticals Continues Clinical Development of StaphVax (NABI)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/8152-nabi-biopharmaceuticals-continues-clinical-development-of-staphvax-nabi?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8152</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Last November, Nabi Biopharmaceuticals (ticker: NABI) announced that the confirmatory Phase 3 study of StaphVax failed to meet its primary endpoint.  Because the results were contrary to what the company predicted would occur, they formed an outside advisory panel to determine what caused the “unexpected results.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:46:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Last November, Nabi Biopharmaceuticals (ticker: NABI) announced that the confirmatory Phase 3 study of StaphVax failed to meet its primary endpoint.  Because the results were contrary to what the company predicted would occur, they formed an outside advisory panel to determine what caused the “unexpected results.<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/8152-nabi-biopharmaceuticals-continues-clinical-development-of-staphvax-nabi?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nabi">NABI</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tysabri Comes Out On Top At FDA Panel Meeting (BIIB, ELN)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/7581-tysabri-comes-out-on-top-at-fda-panel-meeting-biib-eln?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The bulls had it right – despite the pundits, including me, who believed the outcome of the Panel meeting would be at best a limited market return for Tysabri, Biogen Idec (ticker: <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/symbol/biib">BIIB</a>) and Elan (ticker: <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/symbol/eln">ELN</a>) hit the lottery.  The Panel not only voted unanimously to bring back the drug as a standalone treatment but also voted 7-5 in favor of allowing the drug to be used in first-line therapy.  A final decision by the FDA is expected by the end of the month.
</p>
<p>Now that the “big]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:01:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The bulls had it right – despite the pundits, including me, who believed the outcome of the Panel meeting would be at best a limited market return for Tysabri, Biogen Idec (ticker: <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/symbol/biib">BIIB</a>) and Elan (ticker: <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/by/symbol/eln">ELN</a>) hit the lottery.  The Panel not only voted unanimously to bring back the drug as a standalone treatment but also voted 7-5 in favor of allowing the drug to be used in first-line therapy.  A final decision by the FDA is expected by the end of the month.
</p>
<p>Now that the “big<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/7581-tysabri-comes-out-on-top-at-fda-panel-meeting-biib-eln?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/biib">BIIB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eln">ELN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tysabri To Be Discussed At FDA Advisory Committee Meeting: Findings From The Briefing Documents (BIIB, ELN)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/7473-tysabri-to-be-discussed-at-fda-advisory-committee-meeting-findings-from-the-briefing-documents-biib-eln?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7473</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Today begins the two-day FDA Advisory Committee addressing the future of Biogen Idec’s (ticker: BIIB) and Elan’s (ticker: ELN) Tysabri.  Over the past several months, The Biotech Stock Blog has had <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/?sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Fbiotechstockblog.com&s=Tysabri">several posts</a> speculating on the fate of this drug.  Over the next couple days we will be a lot closer to understanding that fate.  I have endured a considerable amount of <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/article/7257">criticism</a> for voicing my opinions that went against popular sentiment.  Apparently, I have not had enough – I am going to opine on Tysabri one more time.
</p>
<p>Yesterday, the FDA released the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4208-index.htm">Briefing Information for the Advisory Committee Meeting</a> occurring today and tomorrow regarding the reintroduction of Tysabri back into the market.  The most illuminating information to come from the documents was comments made by the FDA’s Office of Drug Safety (ODS) that stated:  “It is the opinion of ODS that the RiskMAP* in its current form does not adequately address the risk of PML.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:04:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Today begins the two-day FDA Advisory Committee addressing the future of Biogen Idec’s (ticker: BIIB) and Elan’s (ticker: ELN) Tysabri.  Over the past several months, The Biotech Stock Blog has had <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/?sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Fbiotechstockblog.com&s=Tysabri">several posts</a> speculating on the fate of this drug.  Over the next couple days we will be a lot closer to understanding that fate.  I have endured a considerable amount of <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/article/7257">criticism</a> for voicing my opinions that went against popular sentiment.  Apparently, I have not had enough – I am going to opine on Tysabri one more time.
</p>
<p>Yesterday, the FDA released the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4208-index.htm">Briefing Information for the Advisory Committee Meeting</a> occurring today and tomorrow regarding the reintroduction of Tysabri back into the market.  The most illuminating information to come from the documents was comments made by the FDA’s Office of Drug Safety (ODS) that stated:  “It is the opinion of ODS that the RiskMAP* in its current form does not adequately address the risk of PML.<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/7473-tysabri-to-be-discussed-at-fda-advisory-committee-meeting-findings-from-the-briefing-documents-biib-eln?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/biib">BIIB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eln">ELN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Research Report Highlights Reality of Tysabri&#8217;s Prospects (ELN, BIIB)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/7257-research-report-highlights-reality-of-tysabris-prospects-eln-biib?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7257</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I can almost hear the echoes of the punching of keys by exacerbated Tysabri bulls frantically typing opinions to post on the message boards rebuffing and rationalizing the survey released today by Piper Jaffray. 
</p>
<p>The survey conducted on 140 neurologists found that only 59% believed Tysabri should return to the market and that only 6% would use Tysabari as first-line therapy.  The results were not all bad, however – 92% believe the drug could be useful therapy to patients and 57% believe the effectiveness is worth the risk of PML.     
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:01:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I can almost hear the echoes of the punching of keys by exacerbated Tysabri bulls frantically typing opinions to post on the message boards rebuffing and rationalizing the survey released today by Piper Jaffray. 
</p>
<p>The survey conducted on 140 neurologists found that only 59% believed Tysabri should return to the market and that only 6% would use Tysabari as first-line therapy.  The results were not all bad, however – 92% believe the drug could be useful therapy to patients and 57% believe the effectiveness is worth the risk of PML.     
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/7257-research-report-highlights-reality-of-tysabris-prospects-eln-biib?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/biib">BIIB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eln">ELN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FDA Has Egg On Its Face&#8230;Again (NFLD)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/7053-fda-has-egg-on-its-faceagain-nfld?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7053</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal reported in Wednesday’s edition that a previously halted study of Northfield Laboratories’ (ticker: NFLD) synthetic blood product, Polyheme, showed 12 of 81 patients who received Polyheme suffered heart attacks with two of those patients dying whereas none of the patients who received real blood experienced a heart attack.  To make matters worse, the company never revealed the results and the FDA approved a subsequent pivotal study that allows patients to be given Polyheme without the patients’ consent.  This revelation begs numerous questions: Why didn’t the FDA review these data?  Why did Northfield sweep the data under the rug?  This will put more scrutiny on the FDA, which is already under the microscope for a laundry list of real and perceived lapses at the agency, including the Vioxx debacle and last week’s New York Times article questioning the approval of an implantable device for depression.

<p>The Polyheme study referred to in the WSJ article was a controlled study comparing Polyheme versus real blood in patients undergoing surgery to repair aortic aneurysms.  In 2001, the company abruptly halted the study citing slow enrollment.  This is a plausible reason given only 152 of the projected 600 patients had enrolled in the study during a four year period.  However, the fact the data on the 152 patients where never reviewed or published and the data were never submitted to the FDA raises numerous questions.  According to internal documents cited in the WSJ article, Polyheme not only resulted in an increase in heart attacks but patients treated with Polyheme also show increased incidences of heart arrhythmia and pneumonia.
</p>
<p>Dr. Stephen Gould’s, Northfield’s Chairman and CEO, is of the opinion that some hospitals gave patients both Polyheme and real blood resulting in hypertension that led to the heart attacks.  Some experts, however, disagree.  Given the toxicity of hemoglobin outside the confines of the red blood cell – free hemoglobin is known to cause inflammation in blood vessels that in turn can lead to heart attacks – many physicians speculate that polymerized hemoglobin may still cause inflammation albeit at a lower level that free hemoglobin despite claims made by the company.  The fact that heart attacks and pneumonia have a common denominator – inflammation – suggests something more than the excessive fluid claim made by Dr. Gould, and the fact the company did not come clean with this data implies they have something to hide. 
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:05:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal reported in Wednesday’s edition that a previously halted study of Northfield Laboratories’ (ticker: NFLD) synthetic blood product, Polyheme, showed 12 of 81 patients who received Polyheme suffered heart attacks with two of those patients dying whereas none of the patients who received real blood experienced a heart attack.  To make matters worse, the company never revealed the results and the FDA approved a subsequent pivotal study that allows patients to be given Polyheme without the patients’ consent.  This revelation begs numerous questions: Why didn’t the FDA review these data?  Why did Northfield sweep the data under the rug?  This will put more scrutiny on the FDA, which is already under the microscope for a laundry list of real and perceived lapses at the agency, including the Vioxx debacle and last week’s New York Times article questioning the approval of an implantable device for depression.

<p>The Polyheme study referred to in the WSJ article was a controlled study comparing Polyheme versus real blood in patients undergoing surgery to repair aortic aneurysms.  In 2001, the company abruptly halted the study citing slow enrollment.  This is a plausible reason given only 152 of the projected 600 patients had enrolled in the study during a four year period.  However, the fact the data on the 152 patients where never reviewed or published and the data were never submitted to the FDA raises numerous questions.  According to internal documents cited in the WSJ article, Polyheme not only resulted in an increase in heart attacks but patients treated with Polyheme also show increased incidences of heart arrhythmia and pneumonia.
</p>
<p>Dr. Stephen Gould’s, Northfield’s Chairman and CEO, is of the opinion that some hospitals gave patients both Polyheme and real blood resulting in hypertension that led to the heart attacks.  Some experts, however, disagree.  Given the toxicity of hemoglobin outside the confines of the red blood cell – free hemoglobin is known to cause inflammation in blood vessels that in turn can lead to heart attacks – many physicians speculate that polymerized hemoglobin may still cause inflammation albeit at a lower level that free hemoglobin despite claims made by the company.  The fact that heart attacks and pneumonia have a common denominator – inflammation – suggests something more than the excessive fluid claim made by Dr. Gould, and the fact the company did not come clean with this data implies they have something to hide. 
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/7053-fda-has-egg-on-its-faceagain-nfld?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nfld">NFLD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does Adolor&#8217;s Announcement of Positive Entereg Data Assure FDA Approval? (ADLR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/6637-does-adolors-announcement-of-positive-entereg-data-assure-fda-approval-adlr?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6637</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yesterday evening, Adolor (ticker: ADLR) announced top-line results of the Phase 3 study 14CL314 (Study 314) of Entereg in postoperative ileus (POI).  The results showed a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint of time to recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) function following bowel resection surgery.  The mean time to recovery in the Entereg group was about 20 hours sooner than placebo with a p-value less than 0.001.  Entereg also showed statistically significant improvements in the secondary endpoints, including time to discharge order written (DOW), which showed an 18 hour improvement.

<p>Study 314 is the fifth Entereg Phase 3 trial conducted in POI.  Previous studies gave confounding results with some (studies 302 and 308) missing the primary endpoint.  The mixed Phase 3 results prompted the FDA to issue an approvable letter in July 2005.  According to Adolor’s website:
</p>
<blockquote><p>“In the Letter, the FDA indicated that, before the application may be approved, it will be necessary to provide additional proof of efficacy to support use of Entereg following bowel resection surgery. The FDA indicated that this may be achieved by demonstrating statistically significant results in at least one additional clinical study, and indicated that this could be addressed with positive results from Adolor's ongoing Study 314. The FDA also indicated that the company must provide justification that the median reduction in time to gastrointestinal (GI) recovery seen in bowel resection patients treated with Entereg is clinically meaningful.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 16:30:52 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yesterday evening, Adolor (ticker: ADLR) announced top-line results of the Phase 3 study 14CL314 (Study 314) of Entereg in postoperative ileus (POI).  The results showed a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint of time to recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) function following bowel resection surgery.  The mean time to recovery in the Entereg group was about 20 hours sooner than placebo with a p-value less than 0.001.  Entereg also showed statistically significant improvements in the secondary endpoints, including time to discharge order written (DOW), which showed an 18 hour improvement.

<p>Study 314 is the fifth Entereg Phase 3 trial conducted in POI.  Previous studies gave confounding results with some (studies 302 and 308) missing the primary endpoint.  The mixed Phase 3 results prompted the FDA to issue an approvable letter in July 2005.  According to Adolor’s website:
</p>
<blockquote><p>“In the Letter, the FDA indicated that, before the application may be approved, it will be necessary to provide additional proof of efficacy to support use of Entereg following bowel resection surgery. The FDA indicated that this may be achieved by demonstrating statistically significant results in at least one additional clinical study, and indicated that this could be addressed with positive results from Adolor's ongoing Study 314. The FDA also indicated that the company must provide justification that the median reduction in time to gastrointestinal (GI) recovery seen in bowel resection patients treated with Entereg is clinically meaningful.<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/6637-does-adolors-announcement-of-positive-entereg-data-assure-fda-approval-adlr?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/adlr">ADLR</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Barron&#8217;s Tepid Review of Amylin Pharmaceuticals (AMLN, PFE, NKTR, SNY, NVO)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/6350-barrons-tepid-review-of-amylin-pharmaceuticals-amln-pfe-nktr-sny-nvo?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6350</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[In Barron’s this past weekend, Bill Alpert discussed the prospects for Amylin Pharmaceuticals (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/amln/">AMLN</a>).  His conclusion: Amylin’s drug, Byetta, “…could emerge as a star in the war against diabetes despite competition and…a possible link to a rare cancer.  But all the good news already appears to be in the stock price.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:09:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[In Barron’s this past weekend, Bill Alpert discussed the prospects for Amylin Pharmaceuticals (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/amln/">AMLN</a>).  His conclusion: Amylin’s drug, Byetta, “…could emerge as a star in the war against diabetes despite competition and…a possible link to a rare cancer.  But all the good news already appears to be in the stock price.<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/6350-barrons-tepid-review-of-amylin-pharmaceuticals-amln-pfe-nktr-sny-nvo?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amln">AMLN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nktr">NKTR</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nvo">NVO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pfe">PFE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sny">SNY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gilead Reports Another Solid Quarter (GILD, BMY)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/6349-gilead-reports-another-solid-quarter-gild-bmy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6349</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Last night Gilead (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/gild/">GILD</a>) beat expectations once again.  The results were driven by strong Truvada sales and royalties on its anti-influenza drug Tamiflu.  Gilead reported EPS of $0.54, excluding a one-time tax benefit, on total revenue of $609.3 million.  According to Yahoo, The Street was expecting $0.52 per share on $585.1 million in sales.  The company has exceeded expectations on both the top and bottom lines over the past five quarters.

<p>Despite the strong results, Gilead traded down in the after market on concerns over Truvada’s future growth.  In other words, we saw a little “selling on the news.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:54:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Last night Gilead (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/gild/">GILD</a>) beat expectations once again.  The results were driven by strong Truvada sales and royalties on its anti-influenza drug Tamiflu.  Gilead reported EPS of $0.54, excluding a one-time tax benefit, on total revenue of $609.3 million.  According to Yahoo, The Street was expecting $0.52 per share on $585.1 million in sales.  The company has exceeded expectations on both the top and bottom lines over the past five quarters.

<p>Despite the strong results, Gilead traded down in the after market on concerns over Truvada’s future growth.  In other words, we saw a little “selling on the news.<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/6349-gilead-reports-another-solid-quarter-gild-bmy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bmy">BMY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gild">GILD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upheaval at Imclone (IMCL, BMY, AMGN, ABGX)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/6145-upheaval-at-imclone-imcl-bmy-amgn-abgx?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6145</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Back in November, we posted a <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/article/4050">piece</a> discussing the merits of Amgen’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/amgn/">AMGN</a>) and Abgenix’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/abgx/">ABGX</a>) panitumumab in treating colorectal cancer and the negative implications for Bristol-Myers’ (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/bmy/">BMY</a>) and Imclone’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/imcl/">IMCL</a>) Erbitux.  The post incited considerable emotion, and many people adamantly disagreed with the conclusion – “Erbitux is in big trouble.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:01:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Back in November, we posted a <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/article/4050">piece</a> discussing the merits of Amgen’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/amgn/">AMGN</a>) and Abgenix’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/abgx/">ABGX</a>) panitumumab in treating colorectal cancer and the negative implications for Bristol-Myers’ (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/bmy/">BMY</a>) and Imclone’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/imcl/">IMCL</a>) Erbitux.  The post incited considerable emotion, and many people adamantly disagreed with the conclusion – “Erbitux is in big trouble.<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/6145-upheaval-at-imclone-imcl-bmy-amgn-abgx?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abgx">ABGX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amgn">AMGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bmy">BMY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/imcl">IMCL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fate of Serono: J&amp;J Hires Citigroup to Examine a Formal Bid (SRA, JNJ, GDT, STJ, ELN, BIIB)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/6144-fate-of-serono-j-j-hires-citigroup-to-examine-a-formal-bid-sra-jnj-gdt-stj-eln-biib?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6144</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The Financial Times is reporting that Johnson & Johnson (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/jnj/">JNJ</a>) has hired Citigroup to evaluate a possible bid for Serono (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/sra/">SRA</a>).  Citing people close to the situation, the article states that Johnson & Johnson is weighing its options following its failed bid for Guidant (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/gdt/">GDT</a>).
</p>
<p>I am surprised by this revelation, assuming it’s true.  I believe Serono would undoubtedly be an accretive asset for a large pharma company like J&J; however, given their appetite to enter the cardiac rhythm management business, I expected to hear more chatter about a bid for St. Jude Medical (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/stj/">STJ</a>) than for Serono.  Given the Tysabri overhang and the impending FDA Panel and ultimate FDA decision in March, I do not think J&J or any other company is in a rush to put in a bid for Serono.  I believe potential suitors will sit on the sidelines until the FDA provides more clarity on Tysabri’s future.  </p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:21:40 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The Financial Times is reporting that Johnson & Johnson (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/jnj/">JNJ</a>) has hired Citigroup to evaluate a possible bid for Serono (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/sra/">SRA</a>).  Citing people close to the situation, the article states that Johnson & Johnson is weighing its options following its failed bid for Guidant (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/gdt/">GDT</a>).
</p>
<p>I am surprised by this revelation, assuming it’s true.  I believe Serono would undoubtedly be an accretive asset for a large pharma company like J&J; however, given their appetite to enter the cardiac rhythm management business, I expected to hear more chatter about a bid for St. Jude Medical (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/stj/">STJ</a>) than for Serono.  Given the Tysabri overhang and the impending FDA Panel and ultimate FDA decision in March, I do not think J&J or any other company is in a rush to put in a bid for Serono.  I believe potential suitors will sit on the sidelines until the FDA provides more clarity on Tysabri’s future.  </p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/6144-fate-of-serono-j-j-hires-citigroup-to-examine-a-formal-bid-sra-jnj-gdt-stj-eln-biib?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/biib">BIIB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eln">ELN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gdt">GDT</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnj">JNJ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sra">SRA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/stj">STJ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Biotech Stocks Q4 2005 Earnings Scorecard</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/6048-biotech-stocks-q4-2005-earnings-scorecard?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6048</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Earnings season has arrived. Below is a list of many of the largest biotech stocks, their reporting dates, consensus estimates, and actual results (for those that have already reported) for the fourth quarter. Details <strong>(click to enlarge)</strong>:
</p>
<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Biotech_F.jpg" target="_blank">
<br />
<img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Biotech_Fsm2.jpg" /></a>
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:40:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Earnings season has arrived. Below is a list of many of the largest biotech stocks, their reporting dates, consensus estimates, and actual results (for those that have already reported) for the fourth quarter. Details <strong>(click to enlarge)</strong>:
</p>
<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Biotech_F.jpg" target="_blank">
<br />
<img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/wp-content/seekingalpha/images/Biotech_Fsm2.jpg" /></a>
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/6048-biotech-stocks-q4-2005-earnings-scorecard?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/affx">AFFX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/alxn">ALXN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amgn">AMGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amln">AMLN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/azn">AZN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/biib">BIIB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bmrn">BMRN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bste">BSTE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/celg">CELG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dna">DNA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eln">ELN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gild">GILD</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gpro">GPRO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/imcl">IMCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/incy">INCY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ista">ISTA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kosp">KOSP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nabi">NABI</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/nbix">NBIX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/onxx">ONXX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pgnx">PGNX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/phrm">PHRM</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/telk">TELK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vrtx">VRTX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It&#8217;s Official: FDA Panel Will Review Tysabri On March 7th (ELN, BIIB)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/6047-its-official-fda-panel-will-review-tysabri-on-march-7th-eln-biib?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6047</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Elan (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/eln">ELN</a>) and Biogen Idec (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/biib">BIIB</a>) <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/060123/20060122005072.html?.v=1">announced</a> today that an FDA panel will convene on March 7th to discuss the fate of Tysabri.  Information on the panel can be viewed <a href="http://www.fda.gov/oc/advisory/accalendar/2006/cder12543d030706.html">here</a>.
</p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> More on Tysabri <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/?sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Fbiotechstockblog.com&s=Tysabri">here</a>.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:10:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Elan (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/eln">ELN</a>) and Biogen Idec (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/biib">BIIB</a>) <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/060123/20060122005072.html?.v=1">announced</a> today that an FDA panel will convene on March 7th to discuss the fate of Tysabri.  Information on the panel can be viewed <a href="http://www.fda.gov/oc/advisory/accalendar/2006/cder12543d030706.html">here</a>.
</p>
<p><strong>Comment:</strong> More on Tysabri <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/?sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Fbiotechstockblog.com&s=Tysabri">here</a>.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/6047-its-official-fda-panel-will-review-tysabri-on-march-7th-eln-biib?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/biib">BIIB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eln">ELN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BioCryst Receives Fast-Track Status for Peramivir, But Does It Justify The Stock's Appreciation? (BCRX)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/5896-biocryst-receives-fast-track-status-for-peramivir-but-does-it-justify-the-stock-s-appreciation-bcrx?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5896</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yesterday, the FDA granted Fast Track status to BioCryst’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/bcrx/">BCRX</a>) influenza drug, peramivir.  Investors were overjoyed by the news, sending the stock up 18% on the day.  Was the market’s reaction to the news rational?  Is a Fast Track designation worth $90 million?  Investors seem to think so – that’s how much they added to BioCryst’s market capitalization on the news.

<p>To address the question of the value of Fast Track designation, let’s first look at what “fast track]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:17:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yesterday, the FDA granted Fast Track status to BioCryst’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/bcrx/">BCRX</a>) influenza drug, peramivir.  Investors were overjoyed by the news, sending the stock up 18% on the day.  Was the market’s reaction to the news rational?  Is a Fast Track designation worth $90 million?  Investors seem to think so – that’s how much they added to BioCryst’s market capitalization on the news.

<p>To address the question of the value of Fast Track designation, let’s first look at what “fast track<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/5896-biocryst-receives-fast-track-status-for-peramivir-but-does-it-justify-the-stock-s-appreciation-bcrx?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bcrx">BCRX</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should Pfizer Acquire Kos Pharmaceuticals? (PFE, KOSP, MRK)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/5470-should-pfizer-acquire-kos-pharmaceuticals-pfe-kosp-mrk?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5470</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Merck’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/mrk/">MRK</a>) recent announcement that it is developing a drug to increase HDL poses a significant threat to Pfizer’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/pfe/">PFE</a>) cholesterol management franchise.  Pfizer is developing torcetrapib as an HDL raising drug that will be used in combination with its market leading statin, Lipitor; however, torcetrapib is not projected to be on the market until 2009.  Merck announced that it has a drug consisting of an anti-inflammatory and extended-release niacin that it is combining with its statin, Zocor, that is expected to be on the market in 2008, one year ahead of Pfizer’s torcetrapib.  If Merck is successful getting to market first with its HDL raising drug, it would deal a serious blow to Pfizer.  However, there is one way for Pfizer to protect its market leadership – acquire Kos Pharmaceuticals (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/kosp/">KOSP</a>).
</p>
<p>The reasons Pfizer should acquire Kos are four-fold:
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:01:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Merck’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/mrk/">MRK</a>) recent announcement that it is developing a drug to increase HDL poses a significant threat to Pfizer’s (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/pfe/">PFE</a>) cholesterol management franchise.  Pfizer is developing torcetrapib as an HDL raising drug that will be used in combination with its market leading statin, Lipitor; however, torcetrapib is not projected to be on the market until 2009.  Merck announced that it has a drug consisting of an anti-inflammatory and extended-release niacin that it is combining with its statin, Zocor, that is expected to be on the market in 2008, one year ahead of Pfizer’s torcetrapib.  If Merck is successful getting to market first with its HDL raising drug, it would deal a serious blow to Pfizer.  However, there is one way for Pfizer to protect its market leadership – acquire Kos Pharmaceuticals (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/kosp/">KOSP</a>).
</p>
<p>The reasons Pfizer should acquire Kos are four-fold:
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/5470-should-pfizer-acquire-kos-pharmaceuticals-pfe-kosp-mrk?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/kosp">KOSP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mrk">MRK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pfe">PFE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nitromed Update: Cramer Re-Visited (NTMD)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/5468-nitromed-update-cramer-re-visited-ntmd?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5468</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>On November 8th I posted a <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/article/4086">comment</a> concerning Jim Cramer’s call on Nitromed (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/ntmd/">NTMD</a>).  Almost two months later the stock has failed to retain the “Cramer Spike.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:49:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>On November 8th I posted a <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/article/4086">comment</a> concerning Jim Cramer’s call on Nitromed (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/ntmd/">NTMD</a>).  Almost two months later the stock has failed to retain the “Cramer Spike.<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/5468-nitromed-update-cramer-re-visited-ntmd?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ntmd">NTMD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amgen Makes Bid To Acquire Abgenix For $2.2 billion (AMGN, ABGX)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/5122-amgen-makes-bid-to-acquire-abgenix-for-2-2-billion-amgn-abgx?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5122</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Yesterday evening, Amgen (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/amgn/">AMGN</a>) announced its intention to acquire Abgenix (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/abgx/">ABGX</a>) for $22.50 per share plus assumption of debt, representing a 54% premium over Abgenix's closing stock price.
</p>
<p>The acquisition of Abgenix by Amgen is not a surprise to most since they are partners in the development of <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/article/4050">panitumumab for colorectal cancer</a> and AMG 162 in osteoporosis.  Aside from future panitumumab and AMG 162 royalties, the deal provides Amgen with a solid platform for developing future products with Abgenix's monoclonal antibody technology.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:17:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Yesterday evening, Amgen (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/amgn/">AMGN</a>) announced its intention to acquire Abgenix (ticker: <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/by/symbol/abgx/">ABGX</a>) for $22.50 per share plus assumption of debt, representing a 54% premium over Abgenix's closing stock price.
</p>
<p>The acquisition of Abgenix by Amgen is not a surprise to most since they are partners in the development of <a href="http://biotechstockblog.com/article/4050">panitumumab for colorectal cancer</a> and AMG 162 in osteoporosis.  Aside from future panitumumab and AMG 162 royalties, the deal provides Amgen with a solid platform for developing future products with Abgenix's monoclonal antibody technology.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/5122-amgen-makes-bid-to-acquire-abgenix-for-2-2-billion-amgn-abgx?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/abgx">ABGX</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amgn">AMGN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amln">AMLN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bmy">BMY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/imcl">IMCL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/lly">LLY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/mrk">MRK</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/sepr">SEPR</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PAH Market Heats Up: Myogen Reports Positive Data of Ambrisentan (MYOG)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/4992-pah-market-heats-up-myogen-reports-positive-data-of-ambrisentan-myog?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4992</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Myogen (ticker: MYOG) announced positive top-line results today from the pivotal ARIES-2 trial comparing ambrisentan, a once-a-day oral endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
</p>
<p>ARIES-2 enrolled 186 patients in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating two doses (2.5mg and 5mg) of ambrisentan.  The primary endpoint was exercise capacity, which was defined as placebo-corrected mean change in six-minute walk distance at 12 weeks.  In the study, 2.5mg dose of ambrisentan improved the six-minute walk distance by 32.3 meters (p=0.0219) while the 5mg dose improved 59.4 meters (p=0.0002).  These results compared favorably with other oral PAH therapies, including Encysive's (ticker: ENCY) Thelin, which showed a 31.4 meter improvement in STRIDE-2, and Pfizer's (ticker: PFE) Rovitio, which showed a 50 meter improvement in SUPER-1.
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:07:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Myogen (ticker: MYOG) announced positive top-line results today from the pivotal ARIES-2 trial comparing ambrisentan, a once-a-day oral endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
</p>
<p>ARIES-2 enrolled 186 patients in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating two doses (2.5mg and 5mg) of ambrisentan.  The primary endpoint was exercise capacity, which was defined as placebo-corrected mean change in six-minute walk distance at 12 weeks.  In the study, 2.5mg dose of ambrisentan improved the six-minute walk distance by 32.3 meters (p=0.0219) while the 5mg dose improved 59.4 meters (p=0.0002).  These results compared favorably with other oral PAH therapies, including Encysive's (ticker: ENCY) Thelin, which showed a 31.4 meter improvement in STRIDE-2, and Pfizer's (ticker: PFE) Rovitio, which showed a 50 meter improvement in SUPER-1.
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/4992-pah-market-heats-up-myogen-reports-positive-data-of-ambrisentan-myog?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ency">ENCY</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/myog">MYOG</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/pfe">PFE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tysabri Panel Meeting in March? (BIIB, ELN)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/4922-tysabri-panel-meeting-in-march-biib-eln?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4922</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research website, the list of tentative meeting dates includes a March 7-8, 2006 meeting of the committee on Peripheral & Central Nervous System Drugs. See <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cder/audiences/acspage/advisorycomyear.htm">here</a>.</p>
]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:31:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>BioBlogger</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>On the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research website, the list of tentative meeting dates includes a March 7-8, 2006 meeting of the committee on Peripheral & Central Nervous System Drugs. See <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cder/audiences/acspage/advisorycomyear.htm">here</a>.</p>
<br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/4922-tysabri-panel-meeting-in-march-biib-eln?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/biib">BIIB</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eln">ELN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/bioblogger">BioBlogger</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
