Brad Ferris is the author of the investment blog Triaging My Way To Financial Success and President of Triage Capital Management Incorporated. He is 28, lives in London Ontario Canada and holds a Graduate Diploma in Business Administration Marketing as well as a Bachelor’s of Science in... More
When I invest I tend to use a number of criteria when selecting a target price for a buy or sell as I’ve outlined in past posts. Determining price is a balance between the qualitative factors contributing to the operating environment of a business and its quantitative performance. The beauty of the markets is that at any given time there are individuals who believe a company is undervalued, fair valued and overvalued all at the same time. Those opinions make the market what it is and it’s our responsibility as investors to determine an opinion on an investment and invest accordingly.
When Charles first befriended me a number of years ago he would often give me an example when I struggled with determining a price for a company I wanted to own,
“Picking a price is like asking a hot girl to the prom; you can wait for the right moment but if you wait long enough someone else will take her and you’ll find yourself dancing solo to the last song of the night.”
I still think back to this analogy stubbornness takes over and I’m determined to stick to a target price before purchasing a stock and miss out on an opportunity to own part of a great company.
Investors often hear the opinions of others or say themselves, “not at that price,” in a stubborn response to the current price of an investment. As a value investor myself I try my best to get the best possible discount to the intrinsic value of a company I can whenever I make a purchase. What I have to be conscious of is the realization that as a shareholder I am part owner of a business and begin participating in the operations, successes and profits of that company the day I buy my first share. A great company, one with enduring characteristics, sells services or products that have sustainable demand and may not be cheap on any basis for a number of years. As an investor I can choose to either participate directly in the financial success of that company or wait for an opportunity that might never come.
Investors need to be aware that everyone loves a deal, but price can be the ultimate barrier for making a smart long-term investment. A fellow member of the FWF (Taggart) made reference to the criticisms of Warren Buffett on frequent occasions. Buffett buys companies at a premium to what others view the current value of a company to be, but it’s the long-term value, earning power and competitive advantage those companies hold where the true value is rarely realized in the present.
Just as in life there are times as an investor when you sometimes get what you pay for and there’s often no replacement for quality.
Carl Lavin, managing editor for Forbes.com, posed a question to a group of bloggers asking the following question,
“Recently, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported a jump in the unemployment rate to 10.2%. Some economists think we could be looking at 10.5% by early next year. Given these grim forecasts, how do you counsel recent college graduates and others entering the job market for the first time in this employment climate? Is there any advice or strategies you find particularly useful?”
When I graduated from university and received my license to practice as a Registered Nurse I had no problem finding full time employment due to the clear and obvious shortage of nurses that exists within the healthcare system today. But as a business graduate in 2004 I clearly remember the pressures many in my graduating class faced when attempting to find fulltime employment that was both meaningful and rewarding.
I’ve mentioned a few times in past posts the importance of identifying unsustainable trends in the economy and business cycles of companies. Every investor needs to be proactive in their investing activities to identify risk because far too often each of us are solely reactive to developments in the market and this leads to significant losses of our capital and opportunity for gains. Trees never grow to the sky and when a stock chart or market goes parabolic gravity has a sickening effect on the scale and speed of its inevitable descent.
I practice diversification by investing outside of Canada and this directly exposes me to varying degrees of currency risk each time I purchase a foreign stock, bond, mutual fund or ETF. As a long-term investor I recognize that volatility in FOREX (foreign exchange) comes with the territory of being diversified globally and that over the long-term currency fluctuations tend to even out. But as an investor in the accumulation phase of his portfolio construction I’m concerned about the short-term effect of currency volatility because it can impact the price I pay for an investment and any gains (income, capital gains, interest) I subsequently receive. While I view currency exchange as a cost of investing I want to always minimize my exposure to costs as much as possible because costs directly impact my ability to achieve short-term gains and compound long-term results.
Calculating a fair-value for what you want to pay for any foreign currency is difficult, but I tend to look to historical averages to get a sense of how far in one direction or another the specific currency has moved. Last year the Canadian Dollar (CDN$) traded well above its historical average to a high near $1.13US and you didn’t have to be an economist to figure out the dramatic effect that would have on our export economy; the valuation was unsustainable. My expectation of where the CDN$ will trade over the next decade or more is between $0.75-0.85US and if I have an opportunity to trade my loonies at par with the USD I view that as a key short-term opportunity. My expectation is that in the future when I contribute to my RSP to invest in US stocks I’ll likely get $0.75-0.85US for each CDN$. The problem for many investors is that they buy US stocks with CDN$’s, receive dividends in USD and then convert that those dividends back into CDN$’s. The costs incurred from all these activities can add up quickly and significantly diminish investor returns.
In my situation I’ve chosen to keep all foreign equities and fixed income investments in my RSP to minimize taxation (exempt from 15% withholding tax), decrease my foreign currency costs and maximize compounding growth. The only time I purchase USD is when I make a contribution to my RSP and all subsequent dividends are paid and maintained in USD within the account.
Although I believe that over the long-term (20-30 years) currency fluctuations cancel each other out any short-term devaluation of the CDN$ will hurt my ability to contribute the same amount of cash to my RSP for USD denominated purchases.
What I wanted to do was hedge to some degree my recent RSP contributions and planned contributions for 2008-2010 as I expected the CDN$ to depreciate back towards a more sustainable level. It would be difficult to completely hedge my entire position (too costly), but with oil at an apparently unsustainable bubble and the CDN$ moving so closely instep with the price of crude oil (in USD) I decided to place a small hedge in my RSP to help buffer any potential slide in currency valuations. My major motivation for this move was to maintain my purchasing power within the RSP without losing a significant value of it in CDN$’s. The intention of the hedge is to act as an insurance policy. If the valuation of the CDN$ doesn’t change I don’t need the hedge and can eventually sell it for only a loss of opportunity cost. If the CDN$ depreciates significantly I can sell the hedge off in pieces and use/combine the proceeds to make purchases within my RSP to offset the unhedged loss of value in CDN$ when I make new contributions to my RSP account. When I contribute new money from outside my RSP (in CDN$) the loss of purchasing power isn’t as significant because the hedge acts as a balancer.
Example:
Say I contributed $5,000 CDN to my RSP at parity, received $5,000 USD and purchased my hedge for the full amount. In twelve months the parity between currencies has now moved so that the CDN$ is worth $0.80US. What I can now do is contribute the same amount to my RSP in CDN$ ($5,000) as before and sell $1,000 of my hedge to achieve my desired contribution of $5,000 USD.
My choice for the hedge last summer was the PowerShares Double Short Oil ETF (DTO). The reason for choosing the double short ETF versus a regular short ETF was that I didn’t need to expose as much of my capital at risk for the same effect, the ETF was already priced in USD and the correlation of the price of oil to the CDN$ was closer than other alternatives. The effectiveness of this intended strategy was that the hedge would increase at double the decline of the CDN$. I bought the shares in July of 2008 and slowly over the past year began selling small portions of the hedge as the CDN$ and oil depreciated.
As mentioned before my intention is to not fully hedge my RSP over the long-term due to the historical ranges that many currencies range in over time and an inability of any investor to accurately anticipate the direction of valuations of currencies. But as a young investor focused on accumulating assets for future wealth I wanted to protect my purchasing power now without having to add a higher amount in contributions for the same effect. This strategy was fairly simple to implement and shows that an investor doesn’t have to do an “all or nothing” hedge. Having a small position in key investments can protect a portion of your portfolio and at times that’s all you need. The mistake many investors make is they feel they need to hedge their entire position for risk when only half or less can do the trick for the intended effect.
Disclosure: I currently do not hold any shares of DTO.
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.
Barriers to Investing: Price
When I invest I tend to use a number of criteria when selecting a target price for a buy or sell as I’ve outlined in past posts. Determining price is a balance between the qualitative factors contributing to the operating environment of a business and its quantitative performance. The beauty of the markets is that at any given time there are individuals who believe a company is undervalued, fair valued and overvalued all at the same time. Those opinions make the market what it is and it’s our responsibility as investors to determine an opinion on an investment and invest accordingly.
When Charles first befriended me a number of years ago he would often give me an example when I struggled with determining a price for a company I wanted to own,
“Picking a price is like asking a hot girl to the prom; you can wait for the right moment but if you wait long enough someone else will take her and you’ll find yourself dancing solo to the last song of the night.”
I still think back to this analogy stubbornness takes over and I’m determined to stick to a target price before purchasing a stock and miss out on an opportunity to own part of a great company.
Investors often hear the opinions of others or say themselves, “not at that price,” in a stubborn response to the current price of an investment. As a value investor myself I try my best to get the best possible discount to the intrinsic value of a company I can whenever I make a purchase. What I have to be conscious of is the realization that as a shareholder I am part owner of a business and begin participating in the operations, successes and profits of that company the day I buy my first share. A great company, one with enduring characteristics, sells services or products that have sustainable demand and may not be cheap on any basis for a number of years. As an investor I can choose to either participate directly in the financial success of that company or wait for an opportunity that might never come.
Investors need to be aware that everyone loves a deal, but price can be the ultimate barrier for making a smart long-term investment. A fellow member of the FWF (Taggart) made reference to the criticisms of Warren Buffett on frequent occasions. Buffett buys companies at a premium to what others view the current value of a company to be, but it’s the long-term value, earning power and competitive advantage those companies hold where the true value is rarely realized in the present.
Just as in life there are times as an investor when you sometimes get what you pay for and there’s often no replacement for quality.
Tough Job Market Tips
“Recently, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported a jump in the unemployment rate to 10.2%. Some economists think we could be looking at 10.5% by early next year.
Given these grim forecasts, how do you counsel recent college graduates and others entering the job market for the first time in this employment climate? Is there any advice or strategies you find particularly useful?”
Canadian Currency Hedge Strategy
I’ve mentioned a few times in past posts the importance of identifying unsustainable trends in the economy and business cycles of companies. Every investor needs to be proactive in their investing activities to identify risk because far too often each of us are solely reactive to developments in the market and this leads to significant losses of our capital and opportunity for gains. Trees never grow to the sky and when a stock chart or market goes parabolic gravity has a sickening effect on the scale and speed of its inevitable descent.
I practice diversification by investing outside of Canada and this directly exposes me to varying degrees of currency risk each time I purchase a foreign stock, bond, mutual fund or ETF. As a long-term investor I recognize that volatility in FOREX (foreign exchange) comes with the territory of being diversified globally and that over the long-term currency fluctuations tend to even out. But as an investor in the accumulation phase of his portfolio construction I’m concerned about the short-term effect of currency volatility because it can impact the price I pay for an investment and any gains (income, capital gains, interest) I subsequently receive. While I view currency exchange as a cost of investing I want to always minimize my exposure to costs as much as possible because costs directly impact my ability to achieve short-term gains and compound long-term results.
Calculating a fair-value for what you want to pay for any foreign currency is difficult, but I tend to look to historical averages to get a sense of how far in one direction or another the specific currency has moved. Last year the Canadian Dollar (CDN$) traded well above its historical average to a high near $1.13US and you didn’t have to be an economist to figure out the dramatic effect that would have on our export economy; the valuation was unsustainable. My expectation of where the CDN$ will trade over the next decade or more is between $0.75-0.85US and if I have an opportunity to trade my loonies at par with the USD I view that as a key short-term opportunity. My expectation is that in the future when I contribute to my RSP to invest in US stocks I’ll likely get $0.75-0.85US for each CDN$. The problem for many investors is that they buy US stocks with CDN$’s, receive dividends in USD and then convert that those dividends back into CDN$’s. The costs incurred from all these activities can add up quickly and significantly diminish investor returns.
In my situation I’ve chosen to keep all foreign equities and fixed income investments in my RSP to minimize taxation (exempt from 15% withholding tax), decrease my foreign currency costs and maximize compounding growth. The only time I purchase USD is when I make a contribution to my RSP and all subsequent dividends are paid and maintained in USD within the account.
Although I believe that over the long-term (20-30 years) currency fluctuations cancel each other out any short-term devaluation of the CDN$ will hurt my ability to contribute the same amount of cash to my RSP for USD denominated purchases.
What I wanted to do was hedge to some degree my recent RSP contributions and planned contributions for 2008-2010 as I expected the CDN$ to depreciate back towards a more sustainable level. It would be difficult to completely hedge my entire position (too costly), but with oil at an apparently unsustainable bubble and the CDN$ moving so closely instep with the price of crude oil (in USD) I decided to place a small hedge in my RSP to help buffer any potential slide in currency valuations. My major motivation for this move was to maintain my purchasing power within the RSP without losing a significant value of it in CDN$’s. The intention of the hedge is to act as an insurance policy. If the valuation of the CDN$ doesn’t change I don’t need the hedge and can eventually sell it for only a loss of opportunity cost. If the CDN$ depreciates significantly I can sell the hedge off in pieces and use/combine the proceeds to make purchases within my RSP to offset the unhedged loss of value in CDN$ when I make new contributions to my RSP account. When I contribute new money from outside my RSP (in CDN$) the loss of purchasing power isn’t as significant because the hedge acts as a balancer.
Example:
Say I contributed $5,000 CDN to my RSP at parity, received $5,000 USD and purchased my hedge for the full amount. In twelve months the parity between currencies has now moved so that the CDN$ is worth $0.80US. What I can now do is contribute the same amount to my RSP in CDN$ ($5,000) as before and sell $1,000 of my hedge to achieve my desired contribution of $5,000 USD.
My choice for the hedge last summer was the PowerShares Double Short Oil ETF (DTO). The reason for choosing the double short ETF versus a regular short ETF was that I didn’t need to expose as much of my capital at risk for the same effect, the ETF was already priced in USD and the correlation of the price of oil to the CDN$ was closer than other alternatives. The effectiveness of this intended strategy was that the hedge would increase at double the decline of the CDN$. I bought the shares in July of 2008 and slowly over the past year began selling small portions of the hedge as the CDN$ and oil depreciated.
As mentioned before my intention is to not fully hedge my RSP over the long-term due to the historical ranges that many currencies range in over time and an inability of any investor to accurately anticipate the direction of valuations of currencies. But as a young investor focused on accumulating assets for future wealth I wanted to protect my purchasing power now without having to add a higher amount in contributions for the same effect. This strategy was fairly simple to implement and shows that an investor doesn’t have to do an “all or nothing” hedge. Having a small position in key investments can protect a portion of your portfolio and at times that’s all you need. The mistake many investors make is they feel they need to hedge their entire position for risk when only half or less can do the trick for the intended effect.
Disclosure: I currently do not hold any shares of DTO.