<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Brian Rezny - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>© seekingalpha.com. Use of this feed is limited to personal, non-commercial use and is governed by Seeking Alpha's Terms of Use (http://seekingalpha.com/page/terms-of-use). Publishing this feed for public or commercial use and/or misrepresentation by a third party is prohibited.</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny</link>
    <item>
      <title>Spain: Not Really A Bailout</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/667931-spain-not-really-a-bailout?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">667931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The debt crisis in the euro zone is three years old. It's still feeding on itself. And euro zone officials are still running behind it.</p><p>And now Spain has become the fourth euro zone country to reach out for a bailout (following Greece, Portugal and Ireland)…but don't call it a 'bailout'. It's really just a friendly loan, according to Spain's <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/newsbook/2012/06/spains-banks" rel="nofollow">economy minister</a>: "In no way is this a rescue. It's a loan with very favorable conditions".</p><p>Call it what you will, it is really further proof that euro zone officials can't quite catch up to the crisis. Even worse, the $125 billion not-really-a-bailout might end up hurting Spain just as much as it 'helps'. It might hurt because the money isn't really for Spain, it's meant to shore up Spanish banks. But in order to recapitalize the banks, the burden is put on the shoulders of the Spanish government</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 01:18:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>The debt crisis in the euro zone is three years old. It's still feeding on itself. And euro zone officials are still running behind it.</p><p>And now Spain has become the fourth euro zone country to reach out for a bailout (following Greece, Portugal and Ireland)…but don't call it a 'bailout'. It's really just a friendly loan, according to Spain's <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/newsbook/2012/06/spains-banks" rel="nofollow">economy minister</a>: "In no way is this a rescue. It's a loan with very favorable conditions".</p><p>Call it what you will, it is really further proof that euro zone officials can't quite catch up to the crisis. Even worse, the $125 billion not-really-a-bailout might end up hurting Spain just as much as it 'helps'. It might hurt because the money isn't really for Spain, it's meant to shore up Spanish banks. But in order to recapitalize the banks, the burden is put on the shoulders of the Spanish government</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/667931-spain-not-really-a-bailout?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/eu">EU</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewp">EWP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Book World Vs. Amazon</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/525661-the-book-world-vs-amazon?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">525661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>When Amazon (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='Amazon.com, Inc.'>AMZN</a>) was founded in 1994, the book market was antiquated. But that was the nature of the business. Books take up a lot of space, and even the biggest brick and mortar stores can only hold so many titles. And stores typically relied on walk-in customers to move those titles.</p><p>So it was no mistake that Amazon targeted the book market. By cutting out the middle man (the distributor or retailer), Amazon connected readers with publishers. And because a book isn't ordered until it's actually purchased by the consumer, it doesn't have the constraints of stocking physical supply, so it can 'hold' millions of titles.</p><p>And then in 2007 Amazon released the Kindle ... and took a 90% stake in the eBook market. Amazon used its discounting power to dominate the market by dropping prices to $9.99 per book. Amazon was perfectly willing to forgo a profit to</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:27:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>When Amazon (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn' title='Amazon.com, Inc.'>AMZN</a>) was founded in 1994, the book market was antiquated. But that was the nature of the business. Books take up a lot of space, and even the biggest brick and mortar stores can only hold so many titles. And stores typically relied on walk-in customers to move those titles.</p><p>So it was no mistake that Amazon targeted the book market. By cutting out the middle man (the distributor or retailer), Amazon connected readers with publishers. And because a book isn't ordered until it's actually purchased by the consumer, it doesn't have the constraints of stocking physical supply, so it can 'hold' millions of titles.</p><p>And then in 2007 Amazon released the Kindle ... and took a 90% stake in the eBook market. Amazon used its discounting power to dominate the market by dropping prices to $9.99 per book. Amazon was perfectly willing to forgo a profit to</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/525661-the-book-world-vs-amazon?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bks">BKS</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/amzn">AMZN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Motors' Earnings Report</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/383751-general-motors-earnings-report?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">383751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>As much as General Motors' (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='General Motors Company'>GM</a>) earnings report released last week was an earnings report, it was also a banner for President Obama's re-election campaign. After being rescued by the government three years ago, "Government Motors" looks like it has made a turnaround.</p><p>In 2009, GM got $19.4 billion in loans, and $30.1 billion in debtor-in-possession financing; and in exchange for that, the U.S. got 60% of the company.</p><p>And now, after surviving on government life support, GM posted the highest profit in its 103-year history. The company posted profit of $7.6 billion in 2011…beating its previous record of $6.7 billion in 1997. And the company reclaimed its spot as the world's largest automaker after global sales rose 7.6%.</p><p>As good as the headline sounds, there are problems under the surface. And as much as the headline is a great campaign line, reality is brewing under the surface. The company's</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:47:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>As much as General Motors' (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm' title='General Motors Company'>GM</a>) earnings report released last week was an earnings report, it was also a banner for President Obama's re-election campaign. After being rescued by the government three years ago, "Government Motors" looks like it has made a turnaround.</p><p>In 2009, GM got $19.4 billion in loans, and $30.1 billion in debtor-in-possession financing; and in exchange for that, the U.S. got 60% of the company.</p><p>And now, after surviving on government life support, GM posted the highest profit in its 103-year history. The company posted profit of $7.6 billion in 2011…beating its previous record of $6.7 billion in 1997. And the company reclaimed its spot as the world's largest automaker after global sales rose 7.6%.</p><p>As good as the headline sounds, there are problems under the surface. And as much as the headline is a great campaign line, reality is brewing under the surface. The company's</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/383751-general-motors-earnings-report?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gm">GM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Jobs Report: A Deeper Look Shows Persistent Problems</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/349181-the-jobs-report-a-deeper-look-shows-persistent-problems?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">349181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>At first glance, the news was good in last month's jobs report. It was still good at a second glance. But a longer look shows that there are some persistent problems in the labor market.</p><p>At first glance, the jobless rate fell to 8.3%, the lowest rate in almost three years. That means that the jobless rate has fallen .8% in the past six month, the fastest decline since 1984. The economy added 243,000 jobs, and companies hired the most workers in nine months.</p><p>At second glance, there was more good news. Every January, the Labor Department updates its estimates of employment data. And this latest revision signals that since hitting the bottom in February 2010, the job market recovery has been better than we thought. Since that time, the economy has added 2.92 million jobs.</p><p>While the news was good, we still have to look at the report in</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:02:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>At first glance, the news was good in last month's jobs report. It was still good at a second glance. But a longer look shows that there are some persistent problems in the labor market.</p><p>At first glance, the jobless rate fell to 8.3%, the lowest rate in almost three years. That means that the jobless rate has fallen .8% in the past six month, the fastest decline since 1984. The economy added 243,000 jobs, and companies hired the most workers in nine months.</p><p>At second glance, there was more good news. Every January, the Labor Department updates its estimates of employment data. And this latest revision signals that since hitting the bottom in February 2010, the job market recovery has been better than we thought. Since that time, the economy has added 2.92 million jobs.</p><p>While the news was good, we still have to look at the report in</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/349181-the-jobs-report-a-deeper-look-shows-persistent-problems?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is The U.S. Facing A Japan-Style 'Lost Decade'?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/306487-is-the-u-s-facing-a-japan-style-lost-decade?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">306487</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>It was Christmas Day, 1989, when the Bank of Japan raised the benchmark interest rate to 4.25%. The move was supposed to prevent an asset bubble and curb inflation. The result: the market crashed, the economy stagnated, and a debt crisis ensued. And in the more than 20 years since then, little has changed.</p> <p>Japan has struggled through over two decades of weak growth and deflation. And the Nikkei index is still down something like 80% from its peak in 1989.</p> <p>
  <b>Nikkei 225 Index 1989 to 2011<br/></b>
</p> <p>Source: <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">finance.yahoo.com</a></p> <p>There are parallels that can be drawn between Japan and the U.S. Japan’s problems were the result  of a frothy real estate market. And both countries have a threateningly high level of debt, over a decade with a flat stock market, and aging populations.</p> <p>The similarities naturally lead to the question: are we facing a “Japanization” of the U.S.? Pimco’s Mohamed</p>    ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:44:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>It was Christmas Day, 1989, when the Bank of Japan raised the benchmark interest rate to 4.25%. The move was supposed to prevent an asset bubble and curb inflation. The result: the market crashed, the economy stagnated, and a debt crisis ensued. And in the more than 20 years since then, little has changed.</p> <p>Japan has struggled through over two decades of weak growth and deflation. And the Nikkei index is still down something like 80% from its peak in 1989.</p> <p>
  <b>Nikkei 225 Index 1989 to 2011<br/></b>
</p> <p>Source: <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">finance.yahoo.com</a></p> <p>There are parallels that can be drawn between Japan and the U.S. Japan’s problems were the result  of a frothy real estate market. And both countries have a threateningly high level of debt, over a decade with a flat stock market, and aging populations.</p> <p>The similarities naturally lead to the question: are we facing a “Japanization” of the U.S.? Pimco’s Mohamed</p>    <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/306487-is-the-u-s-facing-a-japan-style-lost-decade?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tariffs On Chinese Imports A Job Creator?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/297709-tariffs-on-chinese-imports-a-job-creator?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">297709</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><span>To call China a “currency manipulator” sounds harsh and accusatory. It’s more diplomatic to say that the yuan is “fundamentally misaligned.” <br/></span> <div><span>That is the language of legislation that the Senate will vote on this week. While the bill’s language is tempered, its goal is not. The bill would impose duties on Chinese imports to counter the country’s undervalued currency (because a weak currency gives China an ‘unfair’ trade advantage).</span>  <div><span>To do that, the Commerce Department would estimate currency undervaluation when it calculates “countervailing duties” on imports that are considered subsidized by China’s weak currency.</span>  <div><span>The Economic Policy Institute says that our trade deficit with China has cost around 2.8 million jobs over the past decade. Lawmakers that support the bill say that it could create as many as 2 million jobs. And there is “nothing, nothing we can do to create jobs better than by correcting China’s trade imbalance,” according</span>  </div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:14:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><div><span>To call China a “currency manipulator” sounds harsh and accusatory. It’s more diplomatic to say that the yuan is “fundamentally misaligned.” <br/></span> <div><span>That is the language of legislation that the Senate will vote on this week. While the bill’s language is tempered, its goal is not. The bill would impose duties on Chinese imports to counter the country’s undervalued currency (because a weak currency gives China an ‘unfair’ trade advantage).</span>  <div><span>To do that, the Commerce Department would estimate currency undervaluation when it calculates “countervailing duties” on imports that are considered subsidized by China’s weak currency.</span>  <div><span>The Economic Policy Institute says that our trade deficit with China has cost around 2.8 million jobs over the past decade. Lawmakers that support the bill say that it could create as many as 2 million jobs. And there is “nothing, nothing we can do to create jobs better than by correcting China’s trade imbalance,” according</span>  </div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/297709-tariffs-on-chinese-imports-a-job-creator?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxch">FXCH</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Lead Widens</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/296227-apple-s-lead-widens?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">296227</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>It has been one month since Steve Jobs resigned as CEO of Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>). And in the past month, the stock is up almost 8%.</p> <div>
  <span>Apple recently overtook Exxon Mobile (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='Exxon Mobil Corporation'>XOM</a>) as the world’s largest company by market cap, and over the past month that lead has widened. <div><b><span>Apple</span></b><span> <b>vs. </b></span><b><span>Exxon Mobile </span></b>- (click charts to expand)<b><span><br/></span></b> <div><em><span>Source: finance.yahoo.com</span></em></div> <div>  <div><span>With a market cap of $377 billion, Apple is almost as valuable as Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) and Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corporation'>MSFT</a>) <i>combined</i>.</span> <div><span>And there are plenty of other things Apple has surpassed in value. A recent article in <em>The Atlantic</em> listed a few:</span><div> </div> <ul><li><span>Apple is worth more than all the bricks in the Great Wall of China (that’s based on $.52</span> </li></ul> </div></div></div></div></span>
</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:10:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>It has been one month since Steve Jobs resigned as CEO of Apple (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl' title='Apple Inc.'>AAPL</a>). And in the past month, the stock is up almost 8%.</p> <div>
  <span>Apple recently overtook Exxon Mobile (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='Exxon Mobil Corporation'>XOM</a>) as the world’s largest company by market cap, and over the past month that lead has widened. <div><b><span>Apple</span></b><span> <b>vs. </b></span><b><span>Exxon Mobile </span></b>- (click charts to expand)<b><span><br/></span></b> <div><em><span>Source: finance.yahoo.com</span></em></div> <div>  <div><span>With a market cap of $377 billion, Apple is almost as valuable as Google (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/goog' title='Google Inc.'>GOOG</a>) and Microsoft (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/msft' title='Microsoft Corporation'>MSFT</a>) <i>combined</i>.</span> <div><span>And there are plenty of other things Apple has surpassed in value. A recent article in <em>The Atlantic</em> listed a few:</span><div> </div> <ul><li><span>Apple is worth more than all the bricks in the Great Wall of China (that’s based on $.52</span> </li></ul> </div></div></div></div></span>
</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/296227-apple-s-lead-widens?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aapl">AAPL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Changing Sentiment For Emerging Market Debt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/293445-changing-sentiment-for-emerging-market-debt?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">293445</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>Back in May I wrote about “A Green Light on Emerging Market Bonds.” The green light is still on. If anything it’s brighter. <div>In the past, the debt of emerging economies has spelled risk. The Asian financial crisis of 1997 and the collapse of the Russian ruble in 1998 were stinging reminders of the dangers of investing in developing countries. <div>But today emerging market bonds are behaving like a safe haven investment. <div>Emerging market bond funds saw inflows of $1.7 billion last month (according to Lipper), more than any other fixed income fund category. And so far this year inflows have amounted to something like $11.4 billion…a 20% increase over last year. <div>Of course there are always risks inherent to investing in developing economies, like political instability and currency fluctuation. But if there is a shift in the perception of emerging market debt, there is a good reason.<span> Developing</span> </div></div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:30:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><div>Back in May I wrote about “A Green Light on Emerging Market Bonds.” The green light is still on. If anything it’s brighter. <div>In the past, the debt of emerging economies has spelled risk. The Asian financial crisis of 1997 and the collapse of the Russian ruble in 1998 were stinging reminders of the dangers of investing in developing countries. <div>But today emerging market bonds are behaving like a safe haven investment. <div>Emerging market bond funds saw inflows of $1.7 billion last month (according to Lipper), more than any other fixed income fund category. And so far this year inflows have amounted to something like $11.4 billion…a 20% increase over last year. <div>Of course there are always risks inherent to investing in developing economies, like political instability and currency fluctuation. But if there is a shift in the perception of emerging market debt, there is a good reason.<span> Developing</span> </div></div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/293445-changing-sentiment-for-emerging-market-debt?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/emb">EMB</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Banks Received A Lot Of Money Under TARP</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/290579-banks-received-a-lot-of-money-under-tarp?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">290579</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>
  <span>The Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program was funded by $700 billion in public money. But that number was dwarfed by the Federal Reserve’s secret (now public) lending program during the financial crisis.</span>
</div><div> </div><div>
  <span>Through the Freedom of Information Act and litigation, Bloomberg obtained data that show the Fed lent $1.2 trillion in public money to financial institutions from August 2007 to April 2010. The Fed held a veil over the program because disclosing the numbers would “stigmatize” banks and impact stock prices.</span>
</div><div> </div><div>
  <span>And the numbers are nothing to scoff at. Morgan Stanley (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ms' title='Morgan Stanley'>MS</a>) borrowed the most with a peak loan of $107.3 billion. That peak was reached on September 29, 2008 -- the very same day that the firm issued a press release indicating that it had “strong capital and liquidity positions.” But what’s striking here is that the total borrowed amounts to almost three times the bank’s total profits</span>
</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:45:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><div>
  <span>The Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program was funded by $700 billion in public money. But that number was dwarfed by the Federal Reserve’s secret (now public) lending program during the financial crisis.</span>
</div><div> </div><div>
  <span>Through the Freedom of Information Act and litigation, Bloomberg obtained data that show the Fed lent $1.2 trillion in public money to financial institutions from August 2007 to April 2010. The Fed held a veil over the program because disclosing the numbers would “stigmatize” banks and impact stock prices.</span>
</div><div> </div><div>
  <span>And the numbers are nothing to scoff at. Morgan Stanley (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ms' title='Morgan Stanley'>MS</a>) borrowed the most with a peak loan of $107.3 billion. That peak was reached on September 29, 2008 -- the very same day that the firm issued a press release indicating that it had “strong capital and liquidity positions.” But what’s striking here is that the total borrowed amounts to almost three times the bank’s total profits</span>
</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/290579-banks-received-a-lot-of-money-under-tarp?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xlf">XLF</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Germany's Justified Opposition To The Euro Bond</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/289272-germany-s-justified-opposition-to-the-euro-bond?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">289272</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <span>50 years ago ... on August 13, 1961, in the cover of night and in the space of five hours, the Berlin wall was built by East Germany’s communist regime. At the outset, the wall was a patchwork of available materials: concrete, bricks, even wood. But by the time the wall fell in 1989, it had become a formidable symbol of the divide between capitalism and communism.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>The physical, and symbolic, barrier imposed by the wall weakened Germany. But today Germany has a whole new set of problems. Problems that started when the country bound its hands to the fiscally irresponsible countries of Europe in joining the eurozone. And those problems are rolling to a boil. </span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>Things have been simmering since 2010 with the bailouts of Greece, Ireland and Portugal. And again recently, with the European Central Bank buying Spanish and Italian government bonds (to the tune of $32 billion</span>
</p>                     ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:40:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>
  <span>50 years ago ... on August 13, 1961, in the cover of night and in the space of five hours, the Berlin wall was built by East Germany’s communist regime. At the outset, the wall was a patchwork of available materials: concrete, bricks, even wood. But by the time the wall fell in 1989, it had become a formidable symbol of the divide between capitalism and communism.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>The physical, and symbolic, barrier imposed by the wall weakened Germany. But today Germany has a whole new set of problems. Problems that started when the country bound its hands to the fiscally irresponsible countries of Europe in joining the eurozone. And those problems are rolling to a boil. </span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>Things have been simmering since 2010 with the bailouts of Greece, Ireland and Portugal. And again recently, with the European Central Bank buying Spanish and Italian government bonds (to the tune of $32 billion</span>
</p>                     <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/289272-germany-s-justified-opposition-to-the-euro-bond?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxe">FXE</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bunl">BUNL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bunt">BUNT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Downgrade Should Matter to Washington More Than to the Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/287797-the-downgrade-should-matter-to-washington-more-than-to-the-market?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">287797</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <span>It happened to Canada in 1992. The country’s sovereign credit rating was lowered to AA+. And the policy response: a ‘thoughtful’ review that resulted in slashed spending<span/> … <span>and brought the country to a budget surplus within three years.</span></span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>As impressive as that was, it took 10 years to get that AAA rating back.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>The U.S. has enjoyed a AAA rating for 70 years. This was the first-ever downgrade of U.S. government debt<span/> … <span>but not necessarily the last.</span></span>
</p>  <p><span>Of course, Washington didn’t applaud the move, and the president wasted no time reproving the decision: “We’ve always been and always will be a AAA country</span>”.</p>  <p>
  <span>But the downgrade itself isn’t what matters here (it wasn’t a surprise, after all). What matters is the reasoning behind it, and the market's reaction to it.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>This is not about economics<span/> … <span>it’s about politics. Our sovereign debt wasn’t downgraded</span></span>
</p>                       ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:21:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>
  <span>It happened to Canada in 1992. The country’s sovereign credit rating was lowered to AA+. And the policy response: a ‘thoughtful’ review that resulted in slashed spending<span/> … <span>and brought the country to a budget surplus within three years.</span></span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>As impressive as that was, it took 10 years to get that AAA rating back.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>The U.S. has enjoyed a AAA rating for 70 years. This was the first-ever downgrade of U.S. government debt<span/> … <span>but not necessarily the last.</span></span>
</p>  <p><span>Of course, Washington didn’t applaud the move, and the president wasted no time reproving the decision: “We’ve always been and always will be a AAA country</span>”.</p>  <p>
  <span>But the downgrade itself isn’t what matters here (it wasn’t a surprise, after all). What matters is the reasoning behind it, and the market's reaction to it.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>This is not about economics<span/> … <span>it’s about politics. Our sovereign debt wasn’t downgraded</span></span>
</p>                       <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/287797-the-downgrade-should-matter-to-washington-more-than-to-the-market?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ief">IEF</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/tlt">TLT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>South Korea: Still a Long-Term Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/287776-south-korea-still-a-long-term-opportunity?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">287776</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><span>“It is time to deal with financial markets with fact-based confidence instead of vague uneasiness,” says South Korea’s finance minister.</span>  <div><span>There was nothing vague or indecisive about the government's move last Wednesday to ban short-selling for three months. And that decision came on the heels of the worst decline for the Kospi Index since October 2008.</span>  <div><span>But even with last week’s volatility, South Korea held its ground. <b>South Korea iShares (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewy' title='iShares MSCI South Korea Index ETF'>EWY</a>)</b> is still a long-term buy, even after shares were battered (to the point of being oversold).  <div><span>(Click chart to enlarge)  </span>   <div><em><span> </span><span>Source: </span></em><span><em>stockcharts.com</em></span>  <div> </div> <div><span>Granted, South Korea’s economic growth in the second quarter was the slowest since 2009, but GDP is projected to expand 4.3% this year. While this is lower than last year’s pace of 6.2%, it’s a respectable rate…especially compared with the U.S. And the country’s jobless rate is steady at  3.3%.</span>  <div><span>But what if we see another</span>  </div></div></div></div></span></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:28:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><div><span>“It is time to deal with financial markets with fact-based confidence instead of vague uneasiness,” says South Korea’s finance minister.</span>  <div><span>There was nothing vague or indecisive about the government's move last Wednesday to ban short-selling for three months. And that decision came on the heels of the worst decline for the Kospi Index since October 2008.</span>  <div><span>But even with last week’s volatility, South Korea held its ground. <b>South Korea iShares (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewy' title='iShares MSCI South Korea Index ETF'>EWY</a>)</b> is still a long-term buy, even after shares were battered (to the point of being oversold).  <div><span>(Click chart to enlarge)  </span>   <div><em><span> </span><span>Source: </span></em><span><em>stockcharts.com</em></span>  <div> </div> <div><span>Granted, South Korea’s economic growth in the second quarter was the slowest since 2009, but GDP is projected to expand 4.3% this year. While this is lower than last year’s pace of 6.2%, it’s a respectable rate…especially compared with the U.S. And the country’s jobless rate is steady at  3.3%.</span>  <div><span>But what if we see another</span>  </div></div></div></div></span></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/287776-south-korea-still-a-long-term-opportunity?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewy">EWY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hold Off on Entering the Gold Market, Look for Sell-Off as an Entry Point</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/285948-hold-off-on-entering-the-gold-market-look-for-sell-off-as-an-entry-point?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">285948</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span>The question: is it time to enter the gold market? </span><span>The answer: hold on.</span> <span>I absolutely like gold long-term, but it’s looking a bit frothy right now, so I wouldn’t add to a position today. </span><span>Gold hit a new high, and ended last week up 1.3% ... its fifth consecutive weekly gain. And what’s more: the metal is headed for its 11th annual gain – which would mean the longest winning streak since 1920. </span></p>  <p>G<span>old funds have been inflow leaders. Last week, SPDR Gold Trust Shares (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gld' title='SPDR Gold Trust ETF'>GLD</a>) led with inflows of 13,700,000 shares, a 3.3% increase. That’s after the fund led the previous week, with $1.1 billion in inflows. </span><span>It’s not only individual investors piling into the gold market, last week the central bank of South Korea confirmed its first purchase of gold since the Asian financial crisis of 1997</span></p>     ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 10:39:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p><span>The question: is it time to enter the gold market? </span><span>The answer: hold on.</span> <span>I absolutely like gold long-term, but it’s looking a bit frothy right now, so I wouldn’t add to a position today. </span><span>Gold hit a new high, and ended last week up 1.3% ... its fifth consecutive weekly gain. And what’s more: the metal is headed for its 11th annual gain – which would mean the longest winning streak since 1920. </span></p>  <p>G<span>old funds have been inflow leaders. Last week, SPDR Gold Trust Shares (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gld' title='SPDR Gold Trust ETF'>GLD</a>) led with inflows of 13,700,000 shares, a 3.3% increase. That’s after the fund led the previous week, with $1.1 billion in inflows. </span><span>It’s not only individual investors piling into the gold market, last week the central bank of South Korea confirmed its first purchase of gold since the Asian financial crisis of 1997</span></p>     <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/285948-hold-off-on-entering-the-gold-market-look-for-sell-off-as-an-entry-point?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gld">GLD</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exxon Mobil: Overpunished After an Earnings Disappointment</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/284150-exxon-mobil-overpunished-after-an-earnings-disappointment?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">284150</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <span>Exxon Mobil (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='Exxon Mobil Corporation'>XOM</a>) started the month of July with a pipeline leak into the Yellowstone River, and ended the month with a disappointing earnings report.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>On the upside, net income rose 41% in the second quarter, and revenue rose 36%. And the report marked the best second quarter earnings since 2008.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>But on the downside, profit missed estimates (and non-U.S. refining earnings fell -20%). </span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>And the market reacted. Shares ended the week down -6.4%.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>The reality: the sell-off was overdone. But I’m not looking at that as a possible buying opportunity.</span>
</p> <p><br/><br/><em>(Click to enlarge)</em> <span>Source: stockcharts.com</span></p>  <p>
  <span>Generally speaking, I’m not a fan of big, integrated oil companies (and Exxon</span>
</p>     ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:53:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>
  <span>Exxon Mobil (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom' title='Exxon Mobil Corporation'>XOM</a>) started the month of July with a pipeline leak into the Yellowstone River, and ended the month with a disappointing earnings report.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>On the upside, net income rose 41% in the second quarter, and revenue rose 36%. And the report marked the best second quarter earnings since 2008.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>But on the downside, profit missed estimates (and non-U.S. refining earnings fell -20%). </span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>And the market reacted. Shares ended the week down -6.4%.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>The reality: the sell-off was overdone. But I’m not looking at that as a possible buying opportunity.</span>
</p> <p><br/><br/><em>(Click to enlarge)</em> <span>Source: stockcharts.com</span></p>  <p>
  <span>Generally speaking, I’m not a fan of big, integrated oil companies (and Exxon</span>
</p>     <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/284150-exxon-mobil-overpunished-after-an-earnings-disappointment?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/oih">OIH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xom">XOM</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Caterpillar: A Good Earnings Report Wasn't Good Enough</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/281826-caterpillar-a-good-earnings-report-wasn-t-good-enough?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">281826</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <span>“Expectations were getting to high”, according to Longbow Research.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>Beyond Caterpillar’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cat' title='Caterpillar Inc.'>CAT</a>) profits jumping 44%, revenue increased 37%. Sales in North America rose 30%. And the company increased its full-time workforce by 11%.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>But that didn’t stop shares from falling on the news. Shares slid 6%<span/> ... <span>the biggest decline since April 7, 2009, according to Bloomberg. </span></span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>And the reason for the sell-off: “The first quarter was just incredibly strong. Caterpillar executed very, very well. The second quarter was a bit more normalized”, according to Morningstar.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>Obviously, the market wasn’t looking for normalized … but it looks like last week’s sell-off was a little overdone.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>The bottom line: last week’s earnings report marks the first time in 10 quarters that the company’s profit was lower than expectations. The stock was a little too beaten up on the news (and even after that beating it is still the largest gainer</span>
</p>  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:51:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>
  <span>“Expectations were getting to high”, according to Longbow Research.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>Beyond Caterpillar’s (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cat' title='Caterpillar Inc.'>CAT</a>) profits jumping 44%, revenue increased 37%. Sales in North America rose 30%. And the company increased its full-time workforce by 11%.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>But that didn’t stop shares from falling on the news. Shares slid 6%<span/> ... <span>the biggest decline since April 7, 2009, according to Bloomberg. </span></span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>And the reason for the sell-off: “The first quarter was just incredibly strong. Caterpillar executed very, very well. The second quarter was a bit more normalized”, according to Morningstar.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>Obviously, the market wasn’t looking for normalized … but it looks like last week’s sell-off was a little overdone.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>The bottom line: last week’s earnings report marks the first time in 10 quarters that the company’s profit was lower than expectations. The stock was a little too beaten up on the news (and even after that beating it is still the largest gainer</span>
</p>  <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/281826-caterpillar-a-good-earnings-report-wasn-t-good-enough?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/cat">CAT</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bank of America: A Disappointment as Expected</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/281823-bank-of-america-a-disappointment-as-expected?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">281823</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <span>“Obviously, the solid performance in our underlying businesses continues to be clouded by the costs we are absorbing from our legacy mortgage issues”, according to Bank of America (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac' title='Bank of America Corporation'>BAC</a>) CEO Brian Moynihan, speaking about last week’s earnings report.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>And those costs are casting a cloud over the S&amp;P: Bank of America cut the S&amp;P 500’s earnings by a third, according to Friday’s headline from MarketWatch. Specifically, the $9 billion loss the bank took as the result of a mortgage settlement during the second quarter brought the S&amp;P 500’s growth down to 9.2% for the quarter (down from 15.2% reported by Reuters).</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>Even worse: without Bank of America, financials saw a 4.9% gain for the quarter … but B of A brought that down to a -29.4% loss.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>And those mortgage-related losses (larger than any other major U.S. bank) easily overshadow any positives from last week's report (and without the posted</span>
</p>        ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:47:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>
  <span>“Obviously, the solid performance in our underlying businesses continues to be clouded by the costs we are absorbing from our legacy mortgage issues”, according to Bank of America (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac' title='Bank of America Corporation'>BAC</a>) CEO Brian Moynihan, speaking about last week’s earnings report.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>And those costs are casting a cloud over the S&amp;P: Bank of America cut the S&amp;P 500’s earnings by a third, according to Friday’s headline from MarketWatch. Specifically, the $9 billion loss the bank took as the result of a mortgage settlement during the second quarter brought the S&amp;P 500’s growth down to 9.2% for the quarter (down from 15.2% reported by Reuters).</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>Even worse: without Bank of America, financials saw a 4.9% gain for the quarter … but B of A brought that down to a -29.4% loss.</span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>And those mortgage-related losses (larger than any other major U.S. bank) easily overshadow any positives from last week's report (and without the posted</span>
</p>        <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/281823-bank-of-america-a-disappointment-as-expected?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bac">BAC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Citigroup Still a Sell</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/280087-citigroup-still-a-sell?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">280087</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><span>Last week’s earnings report sent shares of Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='Citigroup Inc.'>C</a>) up 3%, but the rally was short-lived and rightly so.</span> <span>The seemingly impressive numbers, at a closer glance, were tempered by an unimpressive reality. </span></div><div><span>Net income rose 24% in the second quarter, but that was as loan loss provisions declined (those loan loss reserves comprised two-thirds of profits, according to MarketWatch). And the problem is that’s a source that will evaporate. </span><span>Revenue rose 5% over the first quarter, but on an annual basis revenue fell 7%;</span> </div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:06:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><div><span>Last week’s earnings report sent shares of Citigroup (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c' title='Citigroup Inc.'>C</a>) up 3%, but the rally was short-lived and rightly so.</span> <span>The seemingly impressive numbers, at a closer glance, were tempered by an unimpressive reality. </span></div><div><span>Net income rose 24% in the second quarter, but that was as loan loss provisions declined (those loan loss reserves comprised two-thirds of profits, according to MarketWatch). And the problem is that’s a source that will evaporate. </span><span>Revenue rose 5% over the first quarter, but on an annual basis revenue fell 7%;</span> </div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/280087-citigroup-still-a-sell?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/c">C</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High-Yield Bonds: Time to Buy?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/276941-high-yield-bonds-time-to-buy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">276941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>As of last Wednesday, high-yield (junk) bond funds were hit with the largest weekly outflows on record, with investors pulling $484.2 million from ETFs, and $3.4 billion from mutual funds.</div><div>And it wasn’t just last week. Investors have been running from high-yield funds for the past four consecutive weeks; it was just a couple of months ago that junk bond funds saw record inflows.</div><p>
  <span>
    <span>
      <span>Has the high-yield sell-off created an entry point? Quite possibly. While the spread between high-yield debt and Treasury securities is below its historic norm, it has widened as of late. </span>
      <span>And one could argue that fundamentals warrant moving into high-yield bonds (balance sheets are healthy and margins</span>
    </span>
  </span>
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:38:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><div>As of last Wednesday, high-yield (junk) bond funds were hit with the largest weekly outflows on record, with investors pulling $484.2 million from ETFs, and $3.4 billion from mutual funds.</div><div>And it wasn’t just last week. Investors have been running from high-yield funds for the past four consecutive weeks; it was just a couple of months ago that junk bond funds saw record inflows.</div><p>
  <span>
    <span>
      <span>Has the high-yield sell-off created an entry point? Quite possibly. While the spread between high-yield debt and Treasury securities is below its historic norm, it has widened as of late. </span>
      <span>And one could argue that fundamentals warrant moving into high-yield bonds (balance sheets are healthy and margins</span>
    </span>
  </span>
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/276941-high-yield-bonds-time-to-buy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/jnk">JNK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Best Buy a Buy?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/275989-is-best-buy-a-buy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">275989</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <span>Best Buy (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bby' title='Best Buy Co.'>BBY</a>), the world’s largest consumer electronics retailer, managed to beat expectations in last week’s earnings report. This means that the bottom line numbers didn’t fall as much as anticipated. And then shares saw their highest climb in 15 months (and ended the week up 9%). So is it time to buy?</span>
</p><p>
  <span>Short answer: No. Slightly longer answer: The company is “a broken story. Not as bad as expected is about the best thing I can say about Best Buy”, according to CNBC’s Guy Adami.</span>
</p><p>
  <span>‘Not as bad’ is pretty accurate: Net income dropped 12%, less than the projected decline. And while</span>
</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:19:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>
  <span>Best Buy (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bby' title='Best Buy Co.'>BBY</a>), the world’s largest consumer electronics retailer, managed to beat expectations in last week’s earnings report. This means that the bottom line numbers didn’t fall as much as anticipated. And then shares saw their highest climb in 15 months (and ended the week up 9%). So is it time to buy?</span>
</p><p>
  <span>Short answer: No. Slightly longer answer: The company is “a broken story. Not as bad as expected is about the best thing I can say about Best Buy”, according to CNBC’s Guy Adami.</span>
</p><p>
  <span>‘Not as bad’ is pretty accurate: Net income dropped 12%, less than the projected decline. And while</span>
</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/275989-is-best-buy-a-buy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bby">BBY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Research In Motion: Oversold, But I'm not Buying</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/275957-research-in-motion-oversold-but-i-m-not-buying?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">275957</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>
  <span>"<span>Control + Alt + Delete<span/><span>."<span> That<span/>'<span>s what one downgrade report had to say about Research In Motion<span/>'<span>s (RIMM) earnings report.</span></span></span></span></span></span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>RIM shares plummeted in a dashed sell-off (to its lowest level since 2006) following a report that was <span/>"<span>beyond disappointing<span/>"<span> and guidance for the upcoming quarter that was worse, according to CNBC.</span></span></span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>Revenue fell -12% from the previous quarter<span/> and<span> now the company is facing <span/>"<span>a lower than expected outlook<span/>"<span> for the next quarter…with revenue, profits and gross margins all declining, according to co-CEO Jim Balsillie.</span></span></span></span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>But that<span/>'<span>s nothing new. RIM has been struggling</span></span>
</p>    ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:52:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Brian Rezny</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong>By <a href='http://www.reznywealth.com/'>Brian Rezny</a>: </strong><p>
  <span>"<span>Control + Alt + Delete<span/><span>."<span> That<span/>'<span>s what one downgrade report had to say about Research In Motion<span/>'<span>s (RIMM) earnings report.</span></span></span></span></span></span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>RIM shares plummeted in a dashed sell-off (to its lowest level since 2006) following a report that was <span/>"<span>beyond disappointing<span/>"<span> and guidance for the upcoming quarter that was worse, according to CNBC.</span></span></span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>Revenue fell -12% from the previous quarter<span/> and<span> now the company is facing <span/>"<span>a lower than expected outlook<span/>"<span> for the next quarter…with revenue, profits and gross margins all declining, according to co-CEO Jim Balsillie.</span></span></span></span>
</p>  <p>
  <span>But that<span/>'<span>s nothing new. RIM has been struggling</span></span>
</p>    <br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/275957-research-in-motion-oversold-but-i-m-not-buying?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bbry">BBRY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/brian-rezny">Brian Rezny</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
