If you look at the above storage charts, like the one for nickel, they look much like a gold or silver chart - something to make a bank account out of.
In the two previous major topping cases of '00 and '07, the canary in the coal mine was the Russell 2000. The more broad based small cap index went through the topping process shown above a few months earlier than the S&P 500. The high and the waning RSI strength across the tops of the highs occurred there first. And it's happening again right now in the Russell, but not yet in the large caps. The leader groups that have been telegraphing the overall market, i.e. the RLX retail index and the large cap techs, still look good. But you have to suspect that this is only by virtue of them being large cap, waiting to be turned the way of the Russell.
Peak Oil: Caused by Geology, Politics or Infrastructure Issues? [View article]
What matters with oil supply has little to do with how much is left or to be found. It has everything to do with the net energy flow rate by which it hands us usable energy. That's why Hubbert is confounding the world with the accuracy of his predictions. As we get into the harder-to-recover oil, this effect becomes more acute. The dynamics change fast as the peak is encountered and are going to surprise the conventional analysts. See the posts at my blog goodstockinvesting.blo... and goodstockinvesting.blo... for a look at how the peak changes the projection game.
Louise Yamada on the Market's Direction [View article]
Her problem is that she is a brilliant, logical, smart thinker: and the market has seemingly "had it in" for that kind for awhile now - tending to do the opposite of what it should do by all the oscillator and formation norms not to mention fundamentals. She's not the only one who is confused.
The market this year has been trampling all over direction predictors based on comparison to past extremes (usually reliable), valuation, and about everything except leader groups. Cramer has been calling the market right because he has been looking at his 3 leader groups (tri-pyramid or something he calls it) of financials, oil, and tech. I've been ignoring the financials, but watching tech, retail, and the Baltic Dry Index as the leader groups that telegraph what the broad market does. That's been pretty reliable. Everything else but leader groups seems to lead you astray.
Right now those leader groups are not looking too bad (check RLX, QQQQ, $BDI). But all that could be trumped by an Israel/Iran war coming up soon. I've been a bit preoccupied with this possible development and how to invest around it at my blog, but it's important. If that happens, I don't think you'd need Louise to tell you the direction of the stock market.
I agree with Einhorn. Gold pricing tends to be a function of fiscal policy stupidity. And it doesn't matter if that stupidity causes deflation, inflation, or some gyration back and forth between the two. That is why Gold has a high correlation with debt. Debt threatens instability, no matter what form that may take. I have a post up at my blog goodstockinvesting.blo... showing two charts - a debt chart and a gold chart. They are twins and have a much tighter correlation than the inflation rate vs gold or about anything you could plot vs gold.
Gold Juniors Poised for Historic Bull Run [View article]
A lot of fascinating stats in this article. One that really is something to think about is that less than 1% of all invested money is in gold and its shares. We are going through the paper asset/hard asset cycle which has us in the middle of a big up cycle (see my chart in goodstockinvesting.blo...). If there is just a little investment capital redirected from stocks and such to unprintable money (gold and other commodities) there will be an tsunami crowding into a thimble.
Gold Stocks: The Ultimate Options Strategy [View article]
It's true that there was the inflationary event in 1934, during the pre-1968 era of the gold price being set by the government, when Roosevelt jumped the price from $20.67 to $35. This devalued the dollar as we are doing now. The gold standard was a major drag back then. Every major currency left the gold standard at some point during the Great Depression.
But the gold mining stocks did 400%+ climbs before 1934, with gold flat during a period of severe general price deflation. For a nice article on this, google "Gold Stocks in a Depression" by Jeff Clark
On Nov 02 11:58 AM chap08 wrote:
> "look at what gold stocks have done over a large variety of strong > market disturbances - from deflation to inflation" > > Where is your deflation period? I hope you are not referring to Homestake > in the 29 to 35 period. The boom in gold stocks in this period was > due to an inflationary event, not a deflationary one. It was caused > by the devaluation of the dollar from $20.67 to $35 on the gold standard. > Suddenly, due to a deliberately inflationary government edict, gold > production and reserves were worth about 70% more in dollar terms. > This kicked off a gold mining boom that doubled production by the > end of the 30s. > > None of your examples demonstrate the performance of gold stocks > in deflation, or when gold is "steady" (for the reason I give above, > you are totally wrong to say that gold was steady in the 30s). The > reality is that, if we were to return to a deflationary trend, gold > stocks would fall hard. During the deflation scare of 2008, gold > fell by 30%. If the Fed starts raising rates and the dollar rallies, > gold and gold stocks will fall again.
I am new to options and I've just started reading books, including Cramer's two chapters on options in his new book, which are great. I've been running numbers and going through the option chains, but the more I look at it, the more I get the feeling that selling options is the easy way to make money with them. You are the casino as the seller; the more gamblers the better.
Selling puts to accumulate positions of interest sounds interesting. You buy the positions you want with filled limit orders at discount prices if your buyer cooperates or you take in a steady stream of risk-free sales if they don't. I have a dumb question for you experienced options people out there. If you are assigned the stock when the put is exercised, do you get to keep it until you want to sell it?
Redux: Future S&P Returns Could Be Extraordinary [View article]
The point you are making is exactly the one John Bogle makes with the chart he shows in one of his books (Common Sense On Mutual Funds I think it was) where the price of the stock market is plotted vs the total of the constituent companies' earnings/share and their dividend payout. This was graphed over some 100+ years. The two lines stray only slightly from each other over the years and form a pretty tightly intertwined pair and wind up at the same destination after 100 years! The charts you show are just a small section of this 100 year view.
It would be nice if this would continue as it has for decades and our stocks would follow the money higher. But so much of "the money" lately is being created out of thin air with government printing presses and an out-of-control parabolic debt curve. This will become more unstable and breakdown at some point unless it is fixed soon.
I accidentally referred to the savings and loan crisis above as late 90s (it was just the dot-com excesses over that period). The S&L mess was early 90s and helped to aggravate the recession then. It was actually the warm up for what we are going through now. These lenders had extended credit to people who should not have received it and there was a mini-mortgage meltdown and a miniature government tax-payer bailout. This amounted to $124 billion. That's billion with a "b", not the "T" we are tossing around now. But it created the legal precedent and the moral hazard for the idiocy we see now. Bill Seidman, head of the Resolution Trust Corportation that cleaned up the mess back then and forerunner of TARP, said this
"The banking problems of the '80s and '90s came primarily, but not exclusively, from unsound real estate lending"
I accidentally referred to the savings and loan crisis above as late 90s (it was just the dot-com excesses over that period). The S&L mess was early 90s and helped to aggravate the recession then. It was actually the warm up for what we are going through now. These lenders had extended credit to people who should not have received it and there was a mini-mortgage meltdown and a miniature government tax-payer bailout. This amounted to $124 billion. That's billion with a "b", not the "T" we are tossing around now. But it created the legal precedent and the moral hazard for the idiocy we see now. Bill Seidman, head of the Resolution Trust Corportation that cleaned up the mess back then and forerunner of TARP, said this
"The banking problems of the '80s and '90s came primarily, but not exclusively, from unsound real estate lending"
Crude Oil and Gold: Not Worth Worrying Over [View article]
Many of the commodity ratios like gold/oil and oil/nat gas have entered a much different world the last two years or so. I don't think their decades old correlation is going to be the same anymore. Oil/gas has forever been changed by peak oil. If you look at the oil vs gas production curves at goodstockinvesting.blo... you can see why this is so. This chart also shows why nat gas, along with coal, has to be the bridge to our non-fossil future.
As for gold/oil, we have entered into a new monetary situation that has forever changed gold's role.
Julian Robertson: Bearish on Gold and Bonds, Bullish on Credit Cards and Galleon Arrests [View article]
The supply and demand "fundamentals" for gold are like those for teen retailers - subject to immediate change for no sound reason. The jewelry part lends itself somewhat to supply/demand analysis, but both jewelry and investor angst are about as inscrutable as teen fads.
This means fundamental analysis is the LAST method you want to think about when analyzing gold. That leaves technical and fractal - and they both seem to agree that gold is in a strong primary move up.
More telling, perhaps, than investor sentiment right now is consumer sentiment. That has shot to a 6 month explosion seen only 3 times in the last 20 years - all sharp turn points back to the downside. I put up some charts on this at my blog pointing out how it jives with some other things.
Gold is better than shorting the government. A short can only gain 100%. Over the last 10 years, gold stocks have done roughly a 7 bagger. Government stupidy has been the greatest of all investments for the last 10 years. Viva La stupidity.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedDr. Copper Spots a Monster Crash [View article]
Are Stocks Making a Major Top? [View article]
Peak Oil: Caused by Geology, Politics or Infrastructure Issues? [View article]
Louise Yamada on the Market's Direction [View article]
The market this year has been trampling all over direction predictors based on comparison to past extremes (usually reliable), valuation, and about everything except leader groups. Cramer has been calling the market right because he has been looking at his 3 leader groups (tri-pyramid or something he calls it) of financials, oil, and tech. I've been ignoring the financials, but watching tech, retail, and the Baltic Dry Index as the leader groups that telegraph what the broad market does. That's been pretty reliable. Everything else but leader groups seems to lead you astray.
Right now those leader groups are not looking too bad (check RLX, QQQQ, $BDI). But all that could be trumped by an Israel/Iran war coming up soon. I've been a bit preoccupied with this possible development and how to invest around it at my blog, but it's important. If that happens, I don't think you'd need Louise to tell you the direction of the stock market.
America's Overheated Printing Presses and Huge Debts Helping Drive Gold Higher [View article]
Gold Juniors Poised for Historic Bull Run [View article]
Gold Stocks: The Ultimate Options Strategy [View article]
But the gold mining stocks did 400%+ climbs before 1934, with gold flat during a period of severe general price deflation. For a nice article on this, google "Gold Stocks in a Depression" by Jeff Clark
On Nov 02 11:58 AM chap08 wrote:
> "look at what gold stocks have done over a large variety of strong
> market disturbances - from deflation to inflation"
>
> Where is your deflation period? I hope you are not referring to Homestake
> in the 29 to 35 period. The boom in gold stocks in this period was
> due to an inflationary event, not a deflationary one. It was caused
> by the devaluation of the dollar from $20.67 to $35 on the gold standard.
> Suddenly, due to a deliberately inflationary government edict, gold
> production and reserves were worth about 70% more in dollar terms.
> This kicked off a gold mining boom that doubled production by the
> end of the 30s.
>
> None of your examples demonstrate the performance of gold stocks
> in deflation, or when gold is "steady" (for the reason I give above,
> you are totally wrong to say that gold was steady in the 30s). The
> reality is that, if we were to return to a deflationary trend, gold
> stocks would fall hard. During the deflation scare of 2008, gold
> fell by 30%. If the Fed starts raising rates and the dollar rallies,
> gold and gold stocks will fall again.
Gold on Sale? [View article]
Selling puts to accumulate positions of interest sounds interesting. You buy the positions you want with filled limit orders at discount prices if your buyer cooperates or you take in a steady stream of risk-free sales if they don't. I have a dumb question for you experienced options people out there. If you are assigned the stock when the put is exercised, do you get to keep it until you want to sell it?
Redux: Future S&P Returns Could Be Extraordinary [View article]
It would be nice if this would continue as it has for decades and our stocks would follow the money higher. But so much of "the money" lately is being created out of thin air with government printing presses and an out-of-control parabolic debt curve. This will become more unstable and breakdown at some point unless it is fixed soon.
Is VIX 20 Important? [View instapost]
"The banking problems of the '80s and '90s came primarily, but not exclusively, from unsound real estate lending"
Is VIX 20 Important? [View article]
"The banking problems of the '80s and '90s came primarily, but not exclusively, from unsound real estate lending"
Crude Oil and Gold: Not Worth Worrying Over [View article]
As for gold/oil, we have entered into a new monetary situation that has forever changed gold's role.
Julian Robertson: Bearish on Gold and Bonds, Bullish on Credit Cards and Galleon Arrests [View article]
This means fundamental analysis is the LAST method you want to think about when analyzing gold. That leaves technical and fractal - and they both seem to agree that gold is in a strong primary move up.
Bullish Sentiment Survey Signaling Market's Turn? [View article]
Doug Casey: Why Gold Miner Stocks Are 'Burning Matches' [View article]