<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Calafia Beach Pundit - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Calafia Beach Pundit' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit</link>
    <item>
      <title>Three Fatal Flaws with Healthcare Reform</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/179256-three-fatal-flaws-with-healthcare-reform?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">179256</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Even as the chances of healthcare reform passing are rising, the list of fatal flaws in the reform bills gets longer. I've discussed these before, <a href="http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/2009/11/fatal-flaw-in-healthcare-reform.html">here</a> and <a href="http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/2009/12/fatal-flaw-in-healthcare-reform-2.html">here</a>. Here's the summary so far:<br> <br> <strong>Fatal flaw #1: </strong>The penalty imposed for not buying a policy is very likely to be less than the cost of insurance for a great many people. This, combined with the requirement that insurance companies may not deny coverage to anyone with a pre-existing condition, means that a large number of people will forego signing up for a policy, knowing that they a) will save money and b) can always sign up for insurance if they turn out to develop a serious medical condition. Thus, the actual revenues will fall way short of projections.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:27:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<p>Even as the chances of healthcare reform passing are rising, the list of fatal flaws in the reform bills gets longer. I've discussed these before, <a href="http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/2009/11/fatal-flaw-in-healthcare-reform.html">here</a> and <a href="http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/2009/12/fatal-flaw-in-healthcare-reform-2.html">here</a>. Here's the summary so far:<br> <br> <strong>Fatal flaw #1: </strong>The penalty imposed for not buying a policy is very likely to be less than the cost of insurance for a great many people. This, combined with the requirement that insurance companies may not deny coverage to anyone with a pre-existing condition, means that a large number of people will forego signing up for a policy, knowing that they a) will save money and b) can always sign up for insurance if they turn out to develop a serious medical condition. Thus, the actual revenues will fall way short of projections.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/179256-three-fatal-flaws-with-healthcare-reform?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Last Chance for a 5% Mortgage</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/179236-last-chance-for-a-5-mortgage?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">179236</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="entry-author-parent"><span class="entry-author-name" /></span></p><div class="entry-body"><div><div class="item-body"><div><div style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sy-zOSSZpZI/AAAAAAAACVE/72VqxY4DVhc/s1600-h/30-yr+fixed+mtg+rates" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sy-zOSSZpZI/AAAAAAAACVE/72VqxY4DVhc/s400/30-yr+fixed+mtg+rates" /></a></div><br /><div style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sy-zVtRU_MI/AAAAAAAACVM/Ucn18U97SJk/s1600-h/MBS+Yields+and+Spreads" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sy-zVtRU_MI/AAAAAAAACVM/Ucn18U97SJk/s400/MBS+Yields+and+Spreads" /></a></div><br />According to BanxQuote, the nationwide average for 30-year fixed-rate conforming mortgages yesterday was 5.03%. Call it 5%. I seriously doubt whether we'll see this rate go much lower, and I think there is a very good chance it will be moving higher next year. If you're in the market for a home, this is most likely your last chance to lock in what are essentially the lowest fixed rates on mortgages in history.</div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:23:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<p><span class="entry-author-parent"><span class="entry-author-name" /></span></p><div class="entry-body"><div><div class="item-body"><div><div style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sy-zOSSZpZI/AAAAAAAACVE/72VqxY4DVhc/s1600-h/30-yr+fixed+mtg+rates" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sy-zOSSZpZI/AAAAAAAACVE/72VqxY4DVhc/s400/30-yr+fixed+mtg+rates" /></a></div><br /><div style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sy-zVtRU_MI/AAAAAAAACVM/Ucn18U97SJk/s1600-h/MBS+Yields+and+Spreads" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sy-zVtRU_MI/AAAAAAAACVM/Ucn18U97SJk/s400/MBS+Yields+and+Spreads" /></a></div><br />According to BanxQuote, the nationwide average for 30-year fixed-rate conforming mortgages yesterday was 5.03%. Call it 5%. I seriously doubt whether we'll see this rate go much lower, and I think there is a very good chance it will be moving higher next year. If you're in the market for a home, this is most likely your last chance to lock in what are essentially the lowest fixed rates on mortgages in history.</div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/179236-last-chance-for-a-5-mortgage?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Commodity Prices on the Rise</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178925-commodity-prices-on-the-rise?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178925</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgECPkdAI/AAAAAAAACUU/jeq-aVkbp68/s1600-h/JOC+Index"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgECPkdAI/AAAAAAAACUU/jeq-aVkbp68/s400/JOC+Index" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvhizuTgKI/AAAAAAAACU8/Pu6kA5O2jkY/s1600-h/JOC+Metals"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvhizuTgKI/AAAAAAAACU8/Pu6kA5O2jkY/s400/JOC+Metals" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div> </div><div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgMjPCf1I/AAAAAAAACUc/mIUN0uJibF8/s1600-h/JOC+Petroleum"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgMjPCf1I/AAAAAAAACUc/mIUN0uJibF8/s400/JOC+Petroleum" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div> </div><div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgYWX7i9I/AAAAAAAACUk/_GW7Gs9vf3I/s1600-h/JOC+Miscellaneous"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgYWX7i9I/AAAAAAAACUk/_GW7Gs9vf3I/s400/JOC+Miscellaneous" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgeZCUESI/AAAAAAAACUs/fg4kZsE47PU/s1600-h/JOC+Textiles"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgeZCUESI/AAAAAAAACUs/fg4kZsE47PU/s400/JOC+Textiles" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p><br>The dollar is up almost 5% from its low of last month, but commodity prices are still rising across the board.</p><p>These charts (click to enlarge) show the Journal of Commerce commodity price index (top chart), followed by the four sub-categories of the same index. All are indexed so that their price is equal to 100 at the time the 2001 recession ended.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:33:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgECPkdAI/AAAAAAAACUU/jeq-aVkbp68/s1600-h/JOC+Index"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgECPkdAI/AAAAAAAACUU/jeq-aVkbp68/s400/JOC+Index" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvhizuTgKI/AAAAAAAACU8/Pu6kA5O2jkY/s1600-h/JOC+Metals"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvhizuTgKI/AAAAAAAACU8/Pu6kA5O2jkY/s400/JOC+Metals" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div> </div><div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgMjPCf1I/AAAAAAAACUc/mIUN0uJibF8/s1600-h/JOC+Petroleum"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgMjPCf1I/AAAAAAAACUc/mIUN0uJibF8/s400/JOC+Petroleum" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div> </div><div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgYWX7i9I/AAAAAAAACUk/_GW7Gs9vf3I/s1600-h/JOC+Miscellaneous"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgYWX7i9I/AAAAAAAACUk/_GW7Gs9vf3I/s400/JOC+Miscellaneous" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgeZCUESI/AAAAAAAACUs/fg4kZsE47PU/s1600-h/JOC+Textiles"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyvgeZCUESI/AAAAAAAACUs/fg4kZsE47PU/s400/JOC+Textiles" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p><br>The dollar is up almost 5% from its low of last month, but commodity prices are still rising across the board.</p><p>These charts (click to enlarge) show the Journal of Commerce commodity price index (top chart), followed by the four sub-categories of the same index. All are indexed so that their price is equal to 100 at the time the 2001 recession ended.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178925-commodity-prices-on-the-rise?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No Sign of Economic Stall</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178715-no-sign-of-economic-stall?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178715</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<h3> </h3>  <div><div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SypmFTMJsuI/AAAAAAAACUM/qh6hKZZSx10/s1600-h/Weekly+Claims+4-wk+avg"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SypmFTMJsuI/AAAAAAAACUM/qh6hKZZSx10/s400/Weekly+Claims+4-wk+avg" /></a></div><br> The 4-week moving average of weekly claims for unemployment continues to move lower.<br> <br> In contrast this to the headline I see on Bloomberg Thursday morning: &quot;The dollar rose to the highest level in three months against the euro while stocks and commodities slid as investors shunned risky assets on concern the global economic rebound will stall. Treasuries rallied.&quot; I don't see any sign of a global economic stall. Instead, I see markets that are still shell-shocked, still trading at levels that imply a great deal of concern for the future. Why else would someone believe that a stronger dollar&mdash;which is only a few percentage points above its all-time lows&mdash;is a reason to not buy U.S. assets with otherwise-attractive yields?</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:44:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<h3> </h3>  <div><div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SypmFTMJsuI/AAAAAAAACUM/qh6hKZZSx10/s1600-h/Weekly+Claims+4-wk+avg"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SypmFTMJsuI/AAAAAAAACUM/qh6hKZZSx10/s400/Weekly+Claims+4-wk+avg" /></a></div><br> The 4-week moving average of weekly claims for unemployment continues to move lower.<br> <br> In contrast this to the headline I see on Bloomberg Thursday morning: &quot;The dollar rose to the highest level in three months against the euro while stocks and commodities slid as investors shunned risky assets on concern the global economic rebound will stall. Treasuries rallied.&quot; I don't see any sign of a global economic stall. Instead, I see markets that are still shell-shocked, still trading at levels that imply a great deal of concern for the future. Why else would someone believe that a stronger dollar&mdash;which is only a few percentage points above its all-time lows&mdash;is a reason to not buy U.S. assets with otherwise-attractive yields?</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178715-no-sign-of-economic-stall?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Narrowing CDS Spreads Bode Well</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178706-narrowing-cds-spreads-bode-well?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178706</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<h3> </h3>  <div><div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SypgDxDoPLI/AAAAAAAACUE/Gpyf-Mv8-RY/s1600-h/CDS+spreads"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SypgDxDoPLI/AAAAAAAACUE/Gpyf-Mv8-RY/s400/CDS+spreads" /></a></div><br> Yet another update on this important measure of the likelihood of corporate defaults. Credit spreads have fallen dramatically over the past year, resulting in spectacular performance for corporate bonds of all stripes. When spreads were soaring at the end of last year, it was because the market was bracing for an extended depression and an accompanying deflation. Things didn't turn out quite so bad, so now the market is braced for a run-of-the mill recession. There's still lots of room for improvement, especially now that the Fed once again has assurred us that they are not going to upset the economic applecart by raising rates anytime soon.<br> <br> When cash yields zero, while other things, like investment grade bonds, junk bonds and emerging market debt carry yields that are still quite high relative to Treasury yields, then to hold cash and not more risky bonds only makes sense if you think the economic outlook is going to deteriorate materially. With credit spreads still at levels that in the past have been consistent with the onset of recession, the bond market is priced to a deteriorating economy. To lose money in corporate bonds, therefore, the economy has to <i>really</i> deteriorate. The Fed is doing its best to minimize that risk, and it is also making the odds of winning a corporate bond bet as high as possible, by keeping cash yields at zero. You should never fight the Fed.</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:34:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<h3> </h3>  <div><div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SypgDxDoPLI/AAAAAAAACUE/Gpyf-Mv8-RY/s1600-h/CDS+spreads"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SypgDxDoPLI/AAAAAAAACUE/Gpyf-Mv8-RY/s400/CDS+spreads" /></a></div><br> Yet another update on this important measure of the likelihood of corporate defaults. Credit spreads have fallen dramatically over the past year, resulting in spectacular performance for corporate bonds of all stripes. When spreads were soaring at the end of last year, it was because the market was bracing for an extended depression and an accompanying deflation. Things didn't turn out quite so bad, so now the market is braced for a run-of-the mill recession. There's still lots of room for improvement, especially now that the Fed once again has assurred us that they are not going to upset the economic applecart by raising rates anytime soon.<br> <br> When cash yields zero, while other things, like investment grade bonds, junk bonds and emerging market debt carry yields that are still quite high relative to Treasury yields, then to hold cash and not more risky bonds only makes sense if you think the economic outlook is going to deteriorate materially. With credit spreads still at levels that in the past have been consistent with the onset of recession, the bond market is priced to a deteriorating economy. To lose money in corporate bonds, therefore, the economy has to <i>really</i> deteriorate. The Fed is doing its best to minimize that risk, and it is also making the odds of winning a corporate bond bet as high as possible, by keeping cash yields at zero. You should never fight the Fed.</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178706-narrowing-cds-spreads-bode-well?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inflation: Alive and Well</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178493-inflation-alive-and-well?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178493</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykJ6i4tpKI/AAAAAAAACTs/RieCm98mFB8/s1600-h/CPI+vs+PPI+Inflation"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykJ6i4tpKI/AAAAAAAACTs/RieCm98mFB8/s400/CPI+vs+PPI+Inflation" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykKEkTHnwI/AAAAAAAACT0/Hv9FO4oG1Kw/s1600-h/CPI+and+PPI+Core"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykKEkTHnwI/AAAAAAAACT0/Hv9FO4oG1Kw/s400/CPI+and+PPI+Core" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p><br>These two charts <em>(click to enlarge) </em>show year over year changes in the consumer and producer price indices; the top chart shows total, or &quot;headline,&quot; inflation, while the bottom chart shows just &quot;core&quot; inflation (excluding food and energy). Energy prices are a big part of the current headline numbers, as the difference between these two charts illustrates.</p><p>Looking at all prices, inflation has jumped rapidly from negative to back to where it was on average over the past decade or so (about 2%). But on the margin, the jump is even more impressive. In the past six months, consumer prices are up at a 4.2% annualized rate, and producer prices are up at a 8.3% annualized rate.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:20:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykJ6i4tpKI/AAAAAAAACTs/RieCm98mFB8/s1600-h/CPI+vs+PPI+Inflation"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykJ6i4tpKI/AAAAAAAACTs/RieCm98mFB8/s400/CPI+vs+PPI+Inflation" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykKEkTHnwI/AAAAAAAACT0/Hv9FO4oG1Kw/s1600-h/CPI+and+PPI+Core"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykKEkTHnwI/AAAAAAAACT0/Hv9FO4oG1Kw/s400/CPI+and+PPI+Core" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p><br>These two charts <em>(click to enlarge) </em>show year over year changes in the consumer and producer price indices; the top chart shows total, or &quot;headline,&quot; inflation, while the bottom chart shows just &quot;core&quot; inflation (excluding food and energy). Energy prices are a big part of the current headline numbers, as the difference between these two charts illustrates.</p><p>Looking at all prices, inflation has jumped rapidly from negative to back to where it was on average over the past decade or so (about 2%). But on the margin, the jump is even more impressive. In the past six months, consumer prices are up at a 4.2% annualized rate, and producer prices are up at a 8.3% annualized rate.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178493-inflation-alive-and-well?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A U-Shaped Recovery in Housing Starts</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178491-a-u-shaped-recovery-in-housing-starts?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykG8Y04vkI/AAAAAAAACTk/PTWOMDUOrEk/s1600-h/Housing+Starts"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykG8Y04vkI/AAAAAAAACTk/PTWOMDUOrEk/s400/Housing+Starts" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p>Not every sector of the economy is in a V-shaped recovery.</p><p>Based on housing starts data so far this year, residential construction is in a U-shaped recovery <em>(click chart above to enlarge)</em>. It sure looks like it's hit bottom, but the upturn is relatively anemic.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:18:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykG8Y04vkI/AAAAAAAACTk/PTWOMDUOrEk/s1600-h/Housing+Starts"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SykG8Y04vkI/AAAAAAAACTk/PTWOMDUOrEk/s400/Housing+Starts" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p>Not every sector of the economy is in a V-shaped recovery.</p><p>Based on housing starts data so far this year, residential construction is in a U-shaped recovery <em>(click chart above to enlarge)</em>. It sure looks like it's hit bottom, but the upturn is relatively anemic.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178491-a-u-shaped-recovery-in-housing-starts?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Confusing Connection Between M2 and Inflation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178402-the-confusing-connection-between-m2-and-inflation?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178402</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><div><div><div>In a <a href="http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/12/m2-money-growth-lowest-since-2005.html">recent post on Carpe Diem</a>, Mark Perry notes that year over year M2 growth is now at its lowest point since the beginning of 2005, and asks &quot;Wouldn't M2 money growth have to be much higher to fuel the kind of inflation many are worried about?&quot;<br><br>A standard monetarist answer to his question would be &quot;yes.&quot; But in my experience the connection between M2 and inflation can be quite convoluted, to say the least. Let me explain this by first noting that the connection between M2 money growth (M2 being the most reliable, enduring and meaningful measure of &quot;money&quot; that I'm aware of) and inflation is not always what one would expect. Milton Friedman was one of the best economists of the past century, but his inflation forecasts over the past three decades, based on his observations of M2 growth, were often famously off the mark. Here are two charts which illustrate the difficulty of relating M2 growth to inflation.</div></div></div></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:37:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div><div><div><div>In a <a href="http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/12/m2-money-growth-lowest-since-2005.html">recent post on Carpe Diem</a>, Mark Perry notes that year over year M2 growth is now at its lowest point since the beginning of 2005, and asks &quot;Wouldn't M2 money growth have to be much higher to fuel the kind of inflation many are worried about?&quot;<br><br>A standard monetarist answer to his question would be &quot;yes.&quot; But in my experience the connection between M2 and inflation can be quite convoluted, to say the least. Let me explain this by first noting that the connection between M2 money growth (M2 being the most reliable, enduring and meaningful measure of &quot;money&quot; that I'm aware of) and inflation is not always what one would expect. Milton Friedman was one of the best economists of the past century, but his inflation forecasts over the past three decades, based on his observations of M2 growth, were often famously off the mark. Here are two charts which illustrate the difficulty of relating M2 growth to inflation.</div></div></div></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178402-the-confusing-connection-between-m2-and-inflation?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inflation Expectations and Recovery Hopes</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178336-inflation-expectations-and-recovery-hopes?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178336</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyfF79faeWI/AAAAAAAACS0/EJP570BXr_M/s1600-h/10-yr+BE+04-"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyfF79faeWI/AAAAAAAACS0/EJP570BXr_M/s400/10-yr+BE+04-" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p>This chart shows the breakeven inflation rate for 10-year TIPS (aka the market's 10-year expected inflation rate). It's simply the difference between the nominal yield on 10-year Treasuries and the real yield on 10-year TIPS. <em>(Click chart to enlarge)</em></p><p>As should be obvious, after collapsing last year, inflation expectations have rocketed higher this year for a rather spectacular comeback. Inflation expectations haven't completely returned to the levels they were registering several years ago, but at this rate it won't take much longer to get there.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:39:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyfF79faeWI/AAAAAAAACS0/EJP570BXr_M/s1600-h/10-yr+BE+04-"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyfF79faeWI/AAAAAAAACS0/EJP570BXr_M/s400/10-yr+BE+04-" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p>This chart shows the breakeven inflation rate for 10-year TIPS (aka the market's 10-year expected inflation rate). It's simply the difference between the nominal yield on 10-year Treasuries and the real yield on 10-year TIPS. <em>(Click chart to enlarge)</em></p><p>As should be obvious, after collapsing last year, inflation expectations have rocketed higher this year for a rather spectacular comeback. Inflation expectations haven't completely returned to the levels they were registering several years ago, but at this rate it won't take much longer to get there.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178336-inflation-expectations-and-recovery-hopes?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Industrial Production: Another V-Shaped Sign</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178331-u-s-industrial-production-another-v-shaped-sign?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sye9ZPV8VJI/AAAAAAAACSs/-qSseT3iE38/s1600-h/US+Ind+Prod"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sye9ZPV8VJI/AAAAAAAACSs/-qSseT3iE38/s400/US+Ind+Prod" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p>Industrial production has surged at a 9.3% annualized rate since the recession ended late last June. Consumers are getting back their spending mojo, and factories are gearing back up after having shut down in a panic. <em>(Click chart to enlarge)</em></p><p>This is just the standard stuff of any recovery. Factories still have tons of idle capacity, but that just means that revving up production is relatively cheap and painless&mdash;no need to go out and build new plants, just turn the machinery on.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:04:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sye9ZPV8VJI/AAAAAAAACSs/-qSseT3iE38/s1600-h/US+Ind+Prod"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Sye9ZPV8VJI/AAAAAAAACSs/-qSseT3iE38/s400/US+Ind+Prod" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p>Industrial production has surged at a 9.3% annualized rate since the recession ended late last June. Consumers are getting back their spending mojo, and factories are gearing back up after having shut down in a panic. <em>(Click chart to enlarge)</em></p><p>This is just the standard stuff of any recovery. Factories still have tons of idle capacity, but that just means that revving up production is relatively cheap and painless&mdash;no need to go out and build new plants, just turn the machinery on.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178331-u-s-industrial-production-another-v-shaped-sign?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why a Strong Dollar Is Not a Problem, Part 2</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178317-why-a-strong-dollar-is-not-a-problem-part-2?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178317</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/178154-why-a-stronger-dollar-is-not-a-problem"><strong>&lt;&lt; Go to Why a Strong Dollar Is Not  a Problem, Part 1</strong></a></p><div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyfkJ9YtlFI/AAAAAAAACTE/WcdT3CcfWFA/s1600-h/Real+Broad+Dollar+Index"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyfkJ9YtlFI/AAAAAAAACTE/WcdT3CcfWFA/s400/Real+Broad+Dollar+Index" /></a></div><br><p>It's amazing to me that the market seems awfully concerned about the recent rise in the dollar's value. This chart shows what is arguably the best measure of the dollar's value against a large basket of currencies, since it is both trade-weighted and inflation-adjusted. At the end of November the dollar was trading (for the fourth time in history) at its lowest level ever. Today it is up about 3% from that low. How can this possibly be construed as a bad thing?</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:48:34 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<p><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/178154-why-a-stronger-dollar-is-not-a-problem"><strong>&lt;&lt; Go to Why a Strong Dollar Is Not  a Problem, Part 1</strong></a></p><div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyfkJ9YtlFI/AAAAAAAACTE/WcdT3CcfWFA/s1600-h/Real+Broad+Dollar+Index"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyfkJ9YtlFI/AAAAAAAACTE/WcdT3CcfWFA/s400/Real+Broad+Dollar+Index" /></a></div><br><p>It's amazing to me that the market seems awfully concerned about the recent rise in the dollar's value. This chart shows what is arguably the best measure of the dollar's value against a large basket of currencies, since it is both trade-weighted and inflation-adjusted. At the end of November the dollar was trading (for the fourth time in history) at its lowest level ever. Today it is up about 3% from that low. How can this possibly be construed as a bad thing?</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178317-why-a-strong-dollar-is-not-a-problem-part-2?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uup">UUP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/udn">UDN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why a Stronger Dollar Is Not a Problem</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178154-why-a-stronger-dollar-is-not-a-problem?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178154</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p><span><span></span></p><div><div><div><div><div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Syan4skzTJI/AAAAAAAACSg/9sYHOSErMe4/s1600-h/Equities+vs+Dollar"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Syan4skzTJI/AAAAAAAACSg/9sYHOSErMe4/s400/Equities+vs+Dollar" /></a></div><p><br>Yesterday marked a milestone of sorts: the S&amp;P 500 hit a new closing high for the year, even as the dollar traded about 3% above its November lows. For almost all of the past year or so, there has been a strong inverse correlation between moves in the dollar and equities. Now we see that relationship possibly beginning to break down. If this continues, it could have some very significant consequences, although there is some fundamental disagreement about what those consequences might be.</p></div></div></div></div></span>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:00:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<p><span><span></span></p><div><div><div><div><div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Syan4skzTJI/AAAAAAAACSg/9sYHOSErMe4/s1600-h/Equities+vs+Dollar"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/Syan4skzTJI/AAAAAAAACSg/9sYHOSErMe4/s400/Equities+vs+Dollar" /></a></div><p><br>Yesterday marked a milestone of sorts: the S&amp;P 500 hit a new closing high for the year, even as the dollar traded about 3% above its November lows. For almost all of the past year or so, there has been a strong inverse correlation between moves in the dollar and equities. Now we see that relationship possibly beginning to break down. If this continues, it could have some very significant consequences, although there is some fundamental disagreement about what those consequences might be.</p></div></div></div></div></span><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178154-why-a-stronger-dollar-is-not-a-problem?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uup">UUP</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/udn">UDN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CMBS Index Looking Bullish</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178153-cmbs-index-looking-bullish?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178153</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/12/14/saupload_screen_shot_2009_12_14_at_10.33.47_am.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" alt="" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/12/14/saupload_screen_shot_2009_12_14_at_10.33.47_am_1.png" /></a></div> <p><br /> Here's a graph of the price of a AAA-rated commercial mortgage-backed security index that is published by the folks at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.markit.com/en/products/data/indices/structured-finance-indices/cmbx/cmbx-prices.page?">markit</a>. Earlier this year, prices fell as low as 56, whereas today they are over 82 and rising. That's an impressive gain, and it comes despite the ever-increasing drumbeat of concern for commercial real estate.</p> <p>What this means is that the market was way too pessimistic earlier this year about the prospects for commercial real estate loan defaults. Even though defaults are likely to rise next year, they are now projected to rise by less than previously expected. This ties into a reply I made on a recent post comment, to the effect that rising default rates are not likely to be bearish for the market or for the economy, since the market has already discounted those losses. Enormous losses have been booked already in our forward-looking markets; what remains to be seen is whether the actual losses are more or less than what has been anticipated.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:56:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/12/14/saupload_screen_shot_2009_12_14_at_10.33.47_am.png" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" alt="" src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/12/14/saupload_screen_shot_2009_12_14_at_10.33.47_am_1.png" /></a></div> <p><br /> Here's a graph of the price of a AAA-rated commercial mortgage-backed security index that is published by the folks at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.markit.com/en/products/data/indices/structured-finance-indices/cmbx/cmbx-prices.page?">markit</a>. Earlier this year, prices fell as low as 56, whereas today they are over 82 and rising. That's an impressive gain, and it comes despite the ever-increasing drumbeat of concern for commercial real estate.</p> <p>What this means is that the market was way too pessimistic earlier this year about the prospects for commercial real estate loan defaults. Even though defaults are likely to rise next year, they are now projected to rise by less than previously expected. This ties into a reply I made on a recent post comment, to the effect that rising default rates are not likely to be bearish for the market or for the economy, since the market has already discounted those losses. Enormous losses have been booked already in our forward-looking markets; what remains to be seen is whether the actual losses are more or less than what has been anticipated.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178153-cmbs-index-looking-bullish?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>100 Years of Inflation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/178123-100-years-of-inflation?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178123</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyaRtfufjPI/AAAAAAAACSY/YOKR2Kkz37A/s1600-h/CPI+Range+by+Decade"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyaRtfufjPI/AAAAAAAACSY/YOKR2Kkz37A/s400/CPI+Range+by+Decade" /></a></div><br><p>This chart puts the past 100 years of inflation into a context you've unlikely seen before. The message of this chart is that the &quot;best&quot; days of inflation are in the past. By best, I mean the times when inflation was low and relatively stable. The best decade, as shown in this chart, was the 1990s, with the second-best being the 1960s.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:59:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyaRtfufjPI/AAAAAAAACSY/YOKR2Kkz37A/s1600-h/CPI+Range+by+Decade"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyaRtfufjPI/AAAAAAAACSY/YOKR2Kkz37A/s400/CPI+Range+by+Decade" /></a></div><br><p>This chart puts the past 100 years of inflation into a context you've unlikely seen before. The message of this chart is that the &quot;best&quot; days of inflation are in the past. By best, I mean the times when inflation was low and relatively stable. The best decade, as shown in this chart, was the 1990s, with the second-best being the 1960s.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/178123-100-years-of-inflation?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another V-Shaped Sign: Retail Sales Recovery</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/177849-another-v-shaped-sign-retail-sales-recovery?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">177849</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyK1UjcVq9I/AAAAAAAACSA/Tge5gbeEH7o/s1600-h/Real+retail+sls+6-mo"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyK1UjcVq9I/AAAAAAAACSA/Tge5gbeEH7o/s400/Real+retail+sls+6-mo" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p>Here's yet another V-sign (and a very graphic one at that): the impressive strength in retail sales over the past six months.<em>(Click chart to enlarge)</em></p><p>This, despite 10% unemployment and a significant amount of &quot;resource slack&quot; in the economy. What it means is that there are still an awful lot of people working; they have been working harder and more productively, and their incomes have been rising faster than inflation.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:23:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyK1UjcVq9I/AAAAAAAACSA/Tge5gbeEH7o/s1600-h/Real+retail+sls+6-mo"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyK1UjcVq9I/AAAAAAAACSA/Tge5gbeEH7o/s400/Real+retail+sls+6-mo" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p>Here's yet another V-sign (and a very graphic one at that): the impressive strength in retail sales over the past six months.<em>(Click chart to enlarge)</em></p><p>This, despite 10% unemployment and a significant amount of &quot;resource slack&quot; in the economy. What it means is that there are still an awful lot of people working; they have been working harder and more productively, and their incomes have been rising faster than inflation.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/177849-another-v-shaped-sign-retail-sales-recovery?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improving News for Household Balance Sheets</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/177640-improving-news-for-household-balance-sheets?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">177640</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFV-5vdE0I/AAAAAAAACRw/Yftxh4Md54o/s1600-h/Households+Balance+Sheet"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFV-5vdE0I/AAAAAAAACRw/Yftxh4Md54o/s400/Households+Balance+Sheet" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p>According to the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/Z1/Current/z1r-5.pdf">Federal Reserve</a>, in just six months following the low of last March, households' net worth has increased by almost $5 trillion, or 10%. Household debt fell by almost $60 billion, while the value of household real estate holdings increased by over $600 billion (yes, increased!) and, thanks to a strong stock market and increased savings, households' financial assets increased by $4.2 trillion since last March.</p><p>Moreover, in the six month period ending Sept. '09, household disposable personal income rose by $235 billion, owner's equity in household real estate rose by nearly $1 trillion (yes, one trillion!) and owners' equity as a percentage of household real estate rose by 12%. This is an impressive and across the board improvement in key indicators of households' well-being.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:39:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFV-5vdE0I/AAAAAAAACRw/Yftxh4Md54o/s1600-h/Households+Balance+Sheet"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFV-5vdE0I/AAAAAAAACRw/Yftxh4Md54o/s400/Households+Balance+Sheet" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><p>According to the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/Z1/Current/z1r-5.pdf">Federal Reserve</a>, in just six months following the low of last March, households' net worth has increased by almost $5 trillion, or 10%. Household debt fell by almost $60 billion, while the value of household real estate holdings increased by over $600 billion (yes, increased!) and, thanks to a strong stock market and increased savings, households' financial assets increased by $4.2 trillion since last March.</p><p>Moreover, in the six month period ending Sept. '09, household disposable personal income rose by $235 billion, owner's equity in household real estate rose by nearly $1 trillion (yes, one trillion!) and owners' equity as a percentage of household real estate rose by 12%. This is an impressive and across the board improvement in key indicators of households' well-being.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/177640-improving-news-for-household-balance-sheets?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On Fiscal Policy and Kick-Starting the Economy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/177637-on-fiscal-policy-and-kick-starting-the-economy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">177637</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div>The federal budget numbers improved again in November (on a rolling 12-month basis), mainly because spending in recent months was less than the extraordinary levels of spending in October and November of last year. Nevertheless, it remains the case that both spending and tax revenues are &quot;off the charts&quot; for the post-war period. You have to go back to the early 1940s to find spending running at a higher share of GDP than today, and tax revenues running at a lower share of GDP. That was the time (WW II) that our debt/GDP ratio reached its highest point ever: almost 120%, whereas today it is about 54%. So today's figures are not actually unprecedented, but they are close.</div><div> </div><div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFGaQvQ19I/AAAAAAAACRQ/auy8qbbAJws/s1600-h/Federal+Revenue+%25+of+GDP"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFGaQvQ19I/AAAAAAAACRQ/auy8qbbAJws/s400/Federal+Revenue+%25+of+GDP" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFGoI9zyFI/AAAAAAAACRY/5VwWWPjzI3M/s1600-h/Federal+Spending+%25+GDP"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFGoI9zyFI/AAAAAAAACRY/5VwWWPjzI3M/s400/Federal+Spending+%25+GDP" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFHrrK_HyI/AAAAAAAACRg/69tXCRuIQUA/s1600-h/Deficit+%25+of+GDP"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFHrrK_HyI/AAAAAAAACRg/69tXCRuIQUA/s400/Deficit+%25+of+GDP" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFKjGw3qNI/AAAAAAAACRo/Wuk2keh4YiQ/s1600-h/Receipts+and+Outlays"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFKjGw3qNI/AAAAAAAACRo/Wuk2keh4YiQ/s400/Receipts+and+Outlays" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div>The last chart puts the current budget picture into vivid relief. Spending is out of control due to bailouts, stimulus spending, and a robust increase in ongoing government spending and involvement in the economy. Revenues are extraordinarily weak thanks to the sharp economic downturn and only a few months of modest recovery.</div><div>From a supply-side perspective, what I would like to see is a cancellation of the stimulus spending, since it has already proved itself ineffective, and the application of the recovered funds to increase the private sector's incentives to work and invest.</div><div>At the very least we should have a lower corporate tax rate to allow our businesses to compete in the world, and we should not allow the Bush tax cuts to expire at the end of next year.</div><div>I think these two simple steps&mdash;calling off the stimulus, freezing tax rates at current levels, and reducing the corporate tax rate&mdash;would be a tremendous boost to confidence and investment, and would thus give the economy the &quot;kick-start&quot; that everybody seems to want.</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:29:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div>The federal budget numbers improved again in November (on a rolling 12-month basis), mainly because spending in recent months was less than the extraordinary levels of spending in October and November of last year. Nevertheless, it remains the case that both spending and tax revenues are &quot;off the charts&quot; for the post-war period. You have to go back to the early 1940s to find spending running at a higher share of GDP than today, and tax revenues running at a lower share of GDP. That was the time (WW II) that our debt/GDP ratio reached its highest point ever: almost 120%, whereas today it is about 54%. So today's figures are not actually unprecedented, but they are close.</div><div> </div><div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFGaQvQ19I/AAAAAAAACRQ/auy8qbbAJws/s1600-h/Federal+Revenue+%25+of+GDP"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFGaQvQ19I/AAAAAAAACRQ/auy8qbbAJws/s400/Federal+Revenue+%25+of+GDP" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFGoI9zyFI/AAAAAAAACRY/5VwWWPjzI3M/s1600-h/Federal+Spending+%25+GDP"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFGoI9zyFI/AAAAAAAACRY/5VwWWPjzI3M/s400/Federal+Spending+%25+GDP" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFHrrK_HyI/AAAAAAAACRg/69tXCRuIQUA/s1600-h/Deficit+%25+of+GDP"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFHrrK_HyI/AAAAAAAACRg/69tXCRuIQUA/s400/Deficit+%25+of+GDP" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFKjGw3qNI/AAAAAAAACRo/Wuk2keh4YiQ/s1600-h/Receipts+and+Outlays"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyFKjGw3qNI/AAAAAAAACRo/Wuk2keh4YiQ/s400/Receipts+and+Outlays" hspace="6" vspace="6" /></a></div><div>The last chart puts the current budget picture into vivid relief. Spending is out of control due to bailouts, stimulus spending, and a robust increase in ongoing government spending and involvement in the economy. Revenues are extraordinarily weak thanks to the sharp economic downturn and only a few months of modest recovery.</div><div>From a supply-side perspective, what I would like to see is a cancellation of the stimulus spending, since it has already proved itself ineffective, and the application of the recovered funds to increase the private sector's incentives to work and invest.</div><div>At the very least we should have a lower corporate tax rate to allow our businesses to compete in the world, and we should not allow the Bush tax cuts to expire at the end of next year.</div><div>I think these two simple steps&mdash;calling off the stimulus, freezing tax rates at current levels, and reducing the corporate tax rate&mdash;would be a tremendous boost to confidence and investment, and would thus give the economy the &quot;kick-start&quot; that everybody seems to want.</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/177637-on-fiscal-policy-and-kick-starting-the-economy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Export Growth Surges: Another V-Sign</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/177598-export-growth-surges-another-v-sign?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">177598</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<h3> </h3>  <div><div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyEm2o3dzHI/AAAAAAAACRA/ScwaQjzluxA/s1600-h/Goods+vs+containers"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyEm2o3dzHI/AAAAAAAACRA/ScwaQjzluxA/s400/Goods+vs+containers" /></a></div>U.S. exports of goods have rebounded very strongly this year, soaring 51% through October from their low last January. This is yet one more item on the growing list of V-signs. I've been highlighting this chart for a long time, initially because it showed a very strong rebound in outbound container shipments from the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, and I thought that argued for similar growth in subsequent months in the government's official tallies of exports. Container shipments, in other words, were probably good leading indicators of overall export performance. The data is finally in, and this looks to have been a correct assumption.<br> <br> Of course, exports are still well below their best levels of last year, so we are still in the recovery phase of this new business cycle. But it still represents a fairly impressive recovery, which is not surprising given the sudden collapse of confidence and spending last year; all we needed to recover was a return of confidence, and that is the story that has been playing out over the course of this year. There is every reason to expect continued improvement in exports in the months to come.</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:31:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<h3> </h3>  <div><div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyEm2o3dzHI/AAAAAAAACRA/ScwaQjzluxA/s1600-h/Goods+vs+containers"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyEm2o3dzHI/AAAAAAAACRA/ScwaQjzluxA/s400/Goods+vs+containers" /></a></div>U.S. exports of goods have rebounded very strongly this year, soaring 51% through October from their low last January. This is yet one more item on the growing list of V-signs. I've been highlighting this chart for a long time, initially because it showed a very strong rebound in outbound container shipments from the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, and I thought that argued for similar growth in subsequent months in the government's official tallies of exports. Container shipments, in other words, were probably good leading indicators of overall export performance. The data is finally in, and this looks to have been a correct assumption.<br> <br> Of course, exports are still well below their best levels of last year, so we are still in the recovery phase of this new business cycle. But it still represents a fairly impressive recovery, which is not surprising given the sudden collapse of confidence and spending last year; all we needed to recover was a return of confidence, and that is the story that has been playing out over the course of this year. There is every reason to expect continued improvement in exports in the months to come.</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/177598-export-growth-surges-another-v-sign?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Despite Uptick, Unemployment Claims Still Support a Recovery</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/177597-despite-uptick-unemployment-claims-still-support-a-recovery?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">177597</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<h3> </h3>  <div><div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyErDsZ-5fI/AAAAAAAACRI/w_uUG0HP36Y/s1600-h/Weekly+Claims+4-wk+avg"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyErDsZ-5fI/AAAAAAAACRI/w_uUG0HP36Y/s400/Weekly+Claims+4-wk+avg" /></a></div><br> Weekly unemployment claims ticked up a bit last week, but the 4-week moving average is still trending decisively down. In fact, if the recent pace of improvement continues, claims could be back to &quot;normal&quot; levels in 3-4 months.</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:28:42 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<h3> </h3>  <div><div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyErDsZ-5fI/AAAAAAAACRI/w_uUG0HP36Y/s1600-h/Weekly+Claims+4-wk+avg"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyErDsZ-5fI/AAAAAAAACRI/w_uUG0HP36Y/s400/Weekly+Claims+4-wk+avg" /></a></div><br> Weekly unemployment claims ticked up a bit last week, but the 4-week moving average is still trending decisively down. In fact, if the recent pace of improvement continues, claims could be back to &quot;normal&quot; levels in 3-4 months.</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/177597-despite-uptick-unemployment-claims-still-support-a-recovery?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A VIX Xmas Card</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/177498-a-vix-xmas-card?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">177498</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<div style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyBYpYDkf_I/AAAAAAAACQ4/8CbPxalxasI/s1600-h/Vix+Xmas" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyBYpYDkf_I/AAAAAAAACQ4/8CbPxalxasI/s400/Vix+Xmas" alt="" /></a></div> <p><br /> Inspired by <a href="http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/12/christmas-card-from-stock-market.html" target="_blank">Mark Perry</a>, here is my version of the stock market's VIX Christmas Card: the gift of implied volatility that has returned to almost-normal levels. We couldn't ask for much more at this time of the year. One year ago the world celebrated Christmas and New Year's with Great Fear and Trembling, whereas today we are getting ready to celebrate the return of conditions that are much closer to normal. That's a really big deal.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:11:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>Calafia Beach Pundit</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/'>Calafia Beach Pundit</a> submits: </strong>
<div style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyBYpYDkf_I/AAAAAAAACQ4/8CbPxalxasI/s1600-h/Vix+Xmas" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_dZJ6SFB1ecE/SyBYpYDkf_I/AAAAAAAACQ4/8CbPxalxasI/s400/Vix+Xmas" alt="" /></a></div> <p><br /> Inspired by <a href="http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2009/12/christmas-card-from-stock-market.html" target="_blank">Mark Perry</a>, here is my version of the stock market's VIX Christmas Card: the gift of implied volatility that has returned to almost-normal levels. We couldn't ask for much more at this time of the year. One year ago the world celebrated Christmas and New Year's with Great Fear and Trembling, whereas today we are getting ready to celebrate the return of conditions that are much closer to normal. That's a really big deal.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/177498-a-vix-xmas-card?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/calafia-beach-pundit">Calafia Beach Pundit</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
