Seeking Alpha

Christopher Whalen » Comments » JPM

  • Can Citigroup Be Restructured Without an FDIC Resolution? [View article]
    To first comment, you need BK to get this done quick. Can't manage the creditors w/o the power of the bankruptcy court to restructure the entity.

    If we don't resolve C, them we have to subsidize the bond holders. Big $$$. And I think that Lehman is the model if we want to solve the problem. Otherwise we muddle and stagnate.
    Apr 17 08:12 am |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Living in the American Mafia State [View article]
    Here's one of my Mexico rants from the WSJ in 1992. I used to kick the stuffin out of Carlos Salinas for being the head of "the perfect dictatorship." See below. Made the Bolsa drop 5% in a single day. ;)

    www.rcwhalen.com/pdf/w...

    Now we are the leading example of the Mafia State.
    Mar 30 06:47 am |Rating: +3 0 |Link to Comment
  • Living in the American Mafia State [View article]
    Actually the politicians in DC are the Mob. The banksters are the owners of these criminals.
    Mar 30 06:42 am |Rating: +7 0 |Link to Comment
  • Banks Stressing the System vs. Potential Winners of the TARP Repayment Race [View article]
    Tyler:

    Good piece. You sure that the T1 capital series in the chart is correct? Tier One Risk Based Capital excludes many but not all intangibles. Are you subtracting the remaining intangibles to get tangible common? For example, Citi has $30bn in total intangibles in the lead bank. $20b is disallowed as part of T1 RBC. But there is still $10b in intangibles in T1 RBC, so I take out the remaining items.

    Chris
    Feb 25 21:38 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Big Banks vs. America [View article]
    No, actually BCS is the custodian, the holder in
    "street name." The beneficial holders are the millions of BCS custodial customers. ;)
    Jan 26 16:57 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Netting Derivatives: Slippery Slope Marred by Opaqueness [View article]
    Good comment. The last several graphs are especially important. I still do not think people appreciate how entirely screwed up CDS contracts are as an insurance/barrier option type offering. In plain vanilla, single name CDS, we are pricing the obligation to fund par less recovery on a corporate bond default, but we price this risk vs. short-term spreads and volatility!!!

    Then there is the correlation problem. Unlike ship sinkings and earthquakes, traditional low-beta insurance risks uncorrelated to the economy/markets (and, indeed, were a hedge to the economy/markets!!!!), CDS is high beta and thus cannot really be hedged. Even a very broad portfolio of such risks will still go to hell in a severe downturn such as we see today. CDS does not manage risk, it creates risk in vast amounts in order to generate commission income for the CDS dealer community.

    That is why I believe that clearing is not really the issue when it comes to "fixing" CDS. I think we need to abandon the ISDA model, which was copied from the IR/FX template, and look at more traditional insurance type models and capital/collateral levels before CDS or its successor make sense and thus gain investor support
    Jan 07 15:15 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • De-Leveraging America [View article]
    Yes, the good news is that buyers -- of securities, homes, cars, etc -- will have more leverage in next little while.
    Sep 11 08:09 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on JPM by Christopher Whalen
Comments by Ticker
Christopher Whalen's
Comments Stats
23 comments
Rating: 13 (21 - 8 )