"I agree with the points above, but the biggest issue that Brazil has today is corruption at
all levels."
Point taken! I certainly do not want to come off as someone who seems complacent towards
this issue. Honestly, I also have to admit that it is a topic of which my knowledge is very
limited. However, if I take your points at face value they would obviously constitute an
important obstacle for whatever Brazil sets out to "become".
Ultimately though beauty, as always, is in the eye of the beholder and I would be surprised
to see if Brazil's development endeavors shored up at the sluggishness by which the state
apparatus conformed to modern "western standards". This does not mean of course that
something should not be done and that the issues should not be treated.
I guess that I am seconding Egan's points here since what is "corruption" really in this
context. Clearly, if you are placed with operations in Venezuela et al. the threat of
trigger happy govvy soldiers marching in and taking your property is a BIG issue, but I
would argue that Brazil is another level up from these kinds of adverse business
environments.
@ Brahm
Thanks for this elaborate comment. I do have to concur that this piece was not one of my
most succinct.
It is of course interesting to note that those four economies you mention constitute that
almost infamous BRIC economy group coined by Goldman Sachs almost a decade ago (I think).
My main argument here is consequently first and foremost that Brazil together with other
rapidly developing emerging markets WILL see their share of world GDP grow. I think that
this is the big global development story of the 21st century and it really should not be
lamented. I would also expect that their increasing clout of their economies as a share of
world GDP be especially pronounced in DOLLAR terms. In this way, the world already HAS de-
coupled from the US economy so to speak, but it is a much longer term process than what we
are immediately seeing.
Within this frame of reference I am fundamentally bullish on Brazil (and India btw)
especially compared to China and Russia where I think we will NEVER see a them becoming a
net absorbers of global capacity (i.e. sustainable external deficit economies). Of course,
Russia may experience an external balance at some point but Gazprohm inc will fight long and
hard before that happens.
You see, what Brazil has is a relatively favorable demographic structure and one which at
this very point in time is almost at its "optimal" level if we look at age structure. This
is really the gist of my argument (I guess that I should have been clearer here).
So, I would simply put up the simple hypothesis that Brazil CANNOT be expected to crash
completely due to internal momentum. Obviously, as you say yourself; both India and Brazil
are hard at work to try to halt the spike in inflation and to prevent the money from coming
in too fast. So, they WILL definitely slow, but 1997 style crises should not occur in these
two countries I think.
"Brazil is an interesting case. My take here is that commodity prices will have some effect
on the export revenues. However, I do not expect severe decrease as commodity prices will
moderate probably by only 10-15% overall. Don't expect massive decrease in revenue because a
disproportionate fraction of exports of commodities is to emerging economies. These
economies will not have much decrease in infrastructure investment, and hence the need for
commodity imports will remain significant as most of the economies do not serious balance of
payment problems."
I could not agree more really. I think this is an excellent point. Sure, commodity prices
are falling and can fall further if the investor community starts to worry about deflation
and recessionary risks in OECD, but once countries as Brazil, India, Turkey etc start
accelerating again (my guess is end 2009), then commodities will once again begin their
structurally bound upward march.
@ Whidley
Thanks for your points and also those of educative nature. SA readers and commenters are a
demanding bunch, but I do appreciate that you (they) take their time to massage the more
argumentative side of my pieces.
"I did not see much on internal consumption in the economy in your analysis: why?"
A fair point, and while the Brazilian consumer is sure to wind down in the coming slow down my main argument is that she will not fold completely. Moreover, I am arguing that the relative "gusto" of Brazilian domestic demand is high compared to other (especially OECD) economies which should flatter the the economy in terms of inflows for investments and portfolio purposes.
"The structure of the demand side of the economy is weak and seriously underdeveloped for want of educational and training policies that foster the middle classes and a stable lower class and lack of economic opportunity and mobility."
Definitely, and nothing comes for free. More specifically, I would say that Brazil now has a golden opportunity to lock in a growth and optimal growth path for the next 20 something years. One of the challenges/pre-requisi... here will certainly be investment in human capital (i.e. on the quality side that is).
What's Next for Brazil's Economy? [View article]
Thanks for your comments.
@ User247325
"I agree with the points above, but the biggest issue that Brazil has today is corruption at
all levels."
Point taken! I certainly do not want to come off as someone who seems complacent towards
this issue. Honestly, I also have to admit that it is a topic of which my knowledge is very
limited. However, if I take your points at face value they would obviously constitute an
important obstacle for whatever Brazil sets out to "become".
Ultimately though beauty, as always, is in the eye of the beholder and I would be surprised
to see if Brazil's development endeavors shored up at the sluggishness by which the state
apparatus conformed to modern "western standards". This does not mean of course that
something should not be done and that the issues should not be treated.
I guess that I am seconding Egan's points here since what is "corruption" really in this
context. Clearly, if you are placed with operations in Venezuela et al. the threat of
trigger happy govvy soldiers marching in and taking your property is a BIG issue, but I
would argue that Brazil is another level up from these kinds of adverse business
environments.
@ Brahm
Thanks for this elaborate comment. I do have to concur that this piece was not one of my
most succinct.
It is of course interesting to note that those four economies you mention constitute that
almost infamous BRIC economy group coined by Goldman Sachs almost a decade ago (I think).
My main argument here is consequently first and foremost that Brazil together with other
rapidly developing emerging markets WILL see their share of world GDP grow. I think that
this is the big global development story of the 21st century and it really should not be
lamented. I would also expect that their increasing clout of their economies as a share of
world GDP be especially pronounced in DOLLAR terms. In this way, the world already HAS de-
coupled from the US economy so to speak, but it is a much longer term process than what we
are immediately seeing.
Within this frame of reference I am fundamentally bullish on Brazil (and India btw)
especially compared to China and Russia where I think we will NEVER see a them becoming a
net absorbers of global capacity (i.e. sustainable external deficit economies). Of course,
Russia may experience an external balance at some point but Gazprohm inc will fight long and
hard before that happens.
You see, what Brazil has is a relatively favorable demographic structure and one which at
this very point in time is almost at its "optimal" level if we look at age structure. This
is really the gist of my argument (I guess that I should have been clearer here).
So, I would simply put up the simple hypothesis that Brazil CANNOT be expected to crash
completely due to internal momentum. Obviously, as you say yourself; both India and Brazil
are hard at work to try to halt the spike in inflation and to prevent the money from coming
in too fast. So, they WILL definitely slow, but 1997 style crises should not occur in these
two countries I think.
"Brazil is an interesting case. My take here is that commodity prices will have some effect
on the export revenues. However, I do not expect severe decrease as commodity prices will
moderate probably by only 10-15% overall. Don't expect massive decrease in revenue because a
disproportionate fraction of exports of commodities is to emerging economies. These
economies will not have much decrease in infrastructure investment, and hence the need for
commodity imports will remain significant as most of the economies do not serious balance of
payment problems."
I could not agree more really. I think this is an excellent point. Sure, commodity prices
are falling and can fall further if the investor community starts to worry about deflation
and recessionary risks in OECD, but once countries as Brazil, India, Turkey etc start
accelerating again (my guess is end 2009), then commodities will once again begin their
structurally bound upward march.
@ Whidley
Thanks for your points and also those of educative nature. SA readers and commenters are a
demanding bunch, but I do appreciate that you (they) take their time to massage the more
argumentative side of my pieces.
"I did not see much on internal consumption in the economy in your analysis: why?"
A fair point, and while the Brazilian consumer is sure to wind down in the coming slow down my main argument is that she will not fold completely. Moreover, I am arguing that the relative "gusto" of Brazilian domestic demand is high compared to other (especially OECD) economies which should flatter the the economy in terms of inflows for investments and portfolio purposes.
"The structure of the demand side of the economy is weak and seriously underdeveloped for want of educational and training policies that foster the middle classes and a stable lower class and lack of economic opportunity and mobility."
Definitely, and nothing comes for free. More specifically, I would say that Brazil now has a golden opportunity to lock in a growth and optimal growth path for the next 20 something years. One of the challenges/pre-requisi... here will certainly be investment in human capital (i.e. on the quality side that is).
best wishes everybody
Claus