Seeking Alpha

Clayton Rulli

 
View as an RSS Feed
View Clayton Rulli's Comments BY TICKER:
AAPL, ABCS, ACAS, ADEP, AERO, AFL, AGNC, AIG, AKAM, AMJ, AMLP, AMT, AMZN, ANGI, ANR, APA, APL, ARCP, ARMH, ARR, AT, ATHL, AUY, BA, BABA, BAC, BAM, BBEP, BBRY, BCEI, BIDU, BIP, BLMN, BNCC, BNS, BP, BPL, BPT, BRCM, BRG, BRK.A, BTU, BX, C, CAT, CBI, CCI, CEB, CELG, CERN, CHD, CHK, CHKR, CLF, CLR, CMO, COH, COLE, COP, CORR, COSWF, CP, CRC, CRZO, CSCO, CTB, CTL, CVX, CYNK, CYS, DD, DECK, DEO, DOW, DPS, DVY, EBAY, EEP, ELY, EMC, ENH, EOG, EPB, EPD, EPL, EPSEF, ESV, ETE, ETP, EWW, EXC, EXXI, F, FANG, FB, FCX, FISH, FOSL, FRBK, FTR, FXI, GCVRZ, GDP, GE, GEL, GLD, GLUU, GM, GMCR, GME, GOOG, GOOGL, GPL, GPRO, GPT, GS, GSK, GSVC, GTATQ, HCLP, HD, HEMP, HES, HK, HLF, HPQ, HTZ, IBM, IGNMF, INTC, IPO, IRBT, IVV, IXYS, JCP, JOEZ, JPM, JRCCQ, KMI, KMP, KMR, KO, KOG, KORS, KRNY, KWK, LIME, LINE, LNCO, LNG, LNREF, LOGI, LUFK, LUK, MCP, MDLZ, MGPHF, MHR, MNKD, MNST, MO, MONT, MORL, MPW, MSFT, MT, MTDR, MU, MVO, MWE, NADL, NCQ, NCT, NDRO, NFLX, NFX, NG, NHEGY, NHUR, NJR, NLY, NOK, NRF, NSC, NVAX, NVDA, NYLD, OAS, OIH, OUTR, OXY, P, PAA, PCXCQ, PDLI, PEG, PER, PG, PGLC, PII, PKY, PM, PRXI, PSX, PTAXF, PVA, PXD, QCOM, QQQ, QRE, RDS.A, RDS.B, REM, RIG, ROSE, RRMS, RSH, S, SAN, SAND, SBSI, SBUX, SCCO, SD, SDR, SDRL, SDS, SGOL, SHLD, SIRI, SLB, SLCA, SLRC, SLV, SLW, SN, SNH, SNY, SPP, SPU, SPY, STON, STRP, STXS, SVVC, SWHC, SYY, T, TD, TLM, TPCA, TPLM, TPX, TQQQ, TRLA, TRN, TRP, TSLA, TST, TWTR, UNG, UNP, UPL, UVXY, VALE, VFC, VICL, VNR, VOD, VXX, VZ, WEN, WFT, WHX, WHZ, WLL, WM, WPX, WTSL, WY, XES, XIV, YHOO, Z, ZAGG, ZARFF, ZERO, ZNGA
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • KMI Reported Solid Results, But Is The 'Reiterated' Dividend Outlook Flawed? [View article]
    Rick, you and many others arent getting my point. The original statement from December is worded to where we know the FY 2015 $2.00 dividend is starting point or basis for 10% growth each year thereafter, which equals $2.20 in 2016, $2.42 in 2017 etc.
    The new statement doesn't say 10% growth from FY 2015's 2.00 dividend as a basis, it reads starting from 2016's dividend when read in the same terms as the old statement. At first glance it doesn't explain what the dividend growth will be from 2015's $2.00 dividend, only from 2016's dividend.
    I thought the statement was a little unclear compared to Decembers announcement
    Jan 22, 2015. 09:04 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • KMI Reported Solid Results, But Is The 'Reiterated' Dividend Outlook Flawed? [View article]
    LOL okay richard. I didnt know I wasnt allowed to raise questions without answers in my articles. Thank you for the notice
    Jan 22, 2015. 08:51 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • KMI Reported Solid Results, But Is The 'Reiterated' Dividend Outlook Flawed? [View article]
    "This sounds like an attempt by KMI to misrepresent shareholders with a flawed report." If that is how you took it I do sincerely apologize.

    "Anyways, the constructive criticism for you is to take more time when doing a story and make sure you get the details right, like the conference call date." I didn't ask for your criticism, and we all do make mistakes, I am sorry to upset you so severely. I have something for you to digest now...did you know that attacking an author by pointing out silly mistakes like spelling errors or dates is a common tactic used by trolls?
    Jan 21, 2015. 10:26 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • KMI Reported Solid Results, But Is The 'Reiterated' Dividend Outlook Flawed? [View article]
    It is flawed. It should be made more clear, cause frankly the dividend is everything for KMI. It should note the number of years like saying "5 years from 2015's $2.00 dividend through 2020, increasing 10% each year annually) , as in the December presentation. The new announcement wasn't as clear as the former, since the former was in terms of actual FY dividend years, while the new announcement spoke in different time frame terms. The 2 announcements were different and are contradictory. If you don't see it yet you never will.
    Jan 21, 2015. 10:18 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • KMI Reported Solid Results, But Is The 'Reiterated' Dividend Outlook Flawed? [View article]
    I suppose it is a matter of perspective, but if you read both announcements closely you'll find they are in deed different. The one from 1/21 sounds like they are saying from 2016's FY dividend ( whatever that will be in other words ) and onward, but after rereading it 10 times it sounds like they are just referring to the start of the calender year 2016 Jan 1, and not the FY 2016 dividends as in the old presentation. My apologies everyone. It was great a report and I didn't flinch holding this one along with the warrants.
    Jan 21, 2015. 10:06 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • KMI Reported Solid Results, But Is The 'Reiterated' Dividend Outlook Flawed? [View article]
    ARG1 Thank you again for your constructive comments! ::cough cough:: If you chose to rashly sell or buy KMI based on this article alone, well sir, you aren't very intelligent are you.
    Jan 21, 2015. 09:52 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • KMI Reported Solid Results, But Is The 'Reiterated' Dividend Outlook Flawed? [View article]
    ARG1,

    actually I am , which is why I posed this article, cause i read the new details and compared them to the old details. The new announcement technically doesn't say what 2016's dividend will be if you read closely
    Jan 21, 2015. 09:51 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • KMI Reported Solid Results, But Is The 'Reiterated' Dividend Outlook Flawed? [View article]
    the confusion is the new statement did not say 2016's dividend will be a 10% increase from 2015's. Again to summarize:

    The old statement from December said 10% annual increase from 2015- 2020. The new statement said 10 annual increase from 2016-2020. Will there be a 10% increase for 2016's divy from the 2.00 basis of 2015 or not?
    Jan 21, 2015. 07:38 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Shaw Communications: Unveiling A Serial Dividend Increaser Paying Monthly [View article]
    I was intrigured by the cloud acquisition... if more of that comes it will get interesting thats for sure.
    Jan 21, 2015. 07:29 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Magnum Hunter: The Nightmare [View article]
    since MHR icreates the huge majority of Eureka's volume, valuing it seprately is tricky. Sort of like valuing a horse and its legs seperately?
    Jan 20, 2015. 03:10 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Update: Selective Disclosure Highlights La Quinta's Oil Exposure [View article]
    when is their next earnings announcement? Looking to time the catalyst when the house of cards falls
    Jan 20, 2015. 03:04 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Time To Sell? Insiders Dump La Quinta Stock [View article]
    ZPG-- can you please share the link ?
    Jan 20, 2015. 11:29 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Cheap Oil Prices Do Not Benefit The Economy [View article]
    "•America is losing six-figure jobs in the oil patch for $10/hour jobs in the service economy" You are missing the trickle down affect of that extra good or service you were able to buy with that $20 saved per tank. Yes there is trickle downs in both sectors, but your statement is misleading.
    Jan 19, 2015. 01:28 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • 13.7% Dividend Payer New York Mortgage Trust Has Outperformed, But Has That Made It Riskier? [View article]
    dont forget Book Value is backward looking, so buying/selling based on this number alone is a mistake. The true question is will NYMT's portfolio increase in value going forward
    Jan 19, 2015. 08:03 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why A Dividend Hike From Best-In-Breed New York Mortgage Trust Is Inevitable [View article]
    Ive owned NYMTP for nearly a year and it has been a great holding. They can close out this debt for 25/share, therefore it's trading under par. 7.93% dividend all the way to the bank
    Jan 19, 2015. 07:58 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
2,752 Comments
2,707 Likes