mitrado: Stock Buyback did nothing for $HPQ in the last couple of years... What's the point in these buybacks anyway?
Mar 5, 8:08 AM
•!Report Abuse
jamesingram32: simply put, if you buy back @10% of the shares, there are less shares representing the market cap of your company, so they should be higher
Mar 5, 10:31 AM
•!Report Abuse
jamesingram32: IBM has done this for years, hence they are $200 today vs $100 10 years ago, even though they grow very slowly, a lot less slowly than aapl
Mar 5, 10:33 AM
•!Report Abuse
jamesingram32: IBM has done this for years, hence they are $200 today vs $100 10 years ago, even though they grow very slowly, a lot less slowly than aapl
Mar 5, 10:33 AM
•!Report Abuse
jamesingram32: It's a sensible way to spend your annual huge billions of profit. ERGO Warren Buffet's advice to SJ. If you think your stock is cheap......
Mar 5, 10:34 AM
•!Report Abuse
jamesingram32: then buy it. I hope AAPL have been in buying up their promised extra 35bn of buyback at these levels....that would be clever
Mar 5, 10:35 AM
•!Report Abuse
Clinton Holmes: Great explanation James - couldn't have said it better myself
Mar 5, 5:41 PM
•!Report Abuse
XRTrader: Exactly James - AAPL can add 3-5% EPS growth per year by buying back shares, on top of whatever growth they experience naturally.
Mar 5, 9:52 PM
•!Report Abuse
mitrado: ... and if AAPL buyback plan is as effective as HPQ's, will we be looking at AAPL around $50 a share in 2 years?