CME Group Making Gold Options More Tradeable [View article]
No, this would not make gold options "even more volatile." Historical volatility is a function of changes in the price of an asset. Implied volatility is a function of expectations about future price changes. Neither is a function of the number of strike prices available for trading on an exchange.
You probably suspect banks are "smugly laughing up their sleeves over this change" because you are a conspiracy theorist and/or because you have misunderstood fundamental aspects of the options market.
I fail to see how buying gold would "end" whatever it is that is "terribly wrong in our country."
On Oct 02 12:53 PM The Recusant wrote:
> Would not this make gold options even more volatile? Why do I suspect > banks are smugly laughing up their sleeves over this change? > > There is something terribly wrong in our country. End it...buy gold.
Weekly Volatility Tracker: All That Glitters Is Volatile [View article]
Given how new those products are, I think it would be a bit hasty to draw such sweeping conclusions at this point. I don't trade VXX or VXZ since I have access to the CBOE volatility futures. But I disagree with your claim - evidence so far suggests that VXX does track its target range quite well.
Remember that the "real VIX" (if by that you mean the spot VIX) is just a statistic and is not directly tradable.
Weekly Volatility Tracker: Implied Correlation as a Reflation Proxy [View article]
For annualized realized volatility: calculate the standard deviation of log returns over the period required, multiplied by the square root of 252. This can be done easily in a spreadsheet.
The implied volatility indexes covered here already serve precisely the function you describe. They state an annualized 30-day implied volatility (forward-looking) for the asset in question, within one standard deviation.
VXV, one of the components in my VIX Premium Ratio, tracks a similar three month estimate for the S&P 500.
Alex, yes, today's realized vol corresponds to implied vol one month ago. So given today's realized vol, I want to know what the implied vol was one month ago, and that's what is reflected in the chart.
On Jun 11 03:39 AM Alex F. wrote:
> Either I'm having a brain fart or you are constructing the implied/realized > volatility ratio incorrectly. > > Implied volatility is a measure of expected volatility over the next > month. > > Realized volatility is a measure of realized volatility over the > previous month. > > So today's realized volatility value corresponds to the implied volatility > one month ago. Therefore, you should lag the realized volatility > and not implied.
Options: How to Be Risk-Averse [View article]
Thanks. I don't really have any control over this or any idea what might be wrong - this seems like something for the SA staff to sort out.
In any event, I always suggest people use Firefox, Safari, Chrome, or homemade papyrus before resorting to Internet Explorer.
CME Group Making Gold Options More Tradeable [View article]
You probably suspect banks are "smugly laughing up their sleeves over this change" because you are a conspiracy theorist and/or because you have misunderstood fundamental aspects of the options market.
I fail to see how buying gold would "end" whatever it is that is "terribly wrong in our country."
On Oct 02 12:53 PM The Recusant wrote:
> Would not this make gold options even more volatile? Why do I suspect
> banks are smugly laughing up their sleeves over this change?
>
> There is something terribly wrong in our country. End it...buy gold.
Weekly Volatility Tracker: All That Glitters Is Volatile [View article]
Remember that the "real VIX" (if by that you mean the spot VIX) is just a statistic and is not directly tradable.
Weekly Volatility Tracker: Implied Correlation as a Reflation Proxy [View article]
Monday Equity Volatility Report [View article]
VXV, one of the components in my VIX Premium Ratio, tracks a similar three month estimate for the S&P 500.
VIX Premium Ratio Finally Perks Up [View article]
On Jun 11 03:39 AM Alex F. wrote:
> Either I'm having a brain fart or you are constructing the implied/realized
> volatility ratio incorrectly.
>
> Implied volatility is a measure of expected volatility over the next
> month.
>
> Realized volatility is a measure of realized volatility over the
> previous month.
>
> So today's realized volatility value corresponds to the implied volatility
> one month ago. Therefore, you should lag the realized volatility
> and not implied.