<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Cornelius - Seeking Alpha</title>
    <description>'Cornelius' Tag RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <author>
      <name>SeekingAlpha.com</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius</link>
    <item>
      <title>New Zealand Dollar Rates Remain Stable</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/160764-new-zealand-dollar-rates-remain-stable?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">160764</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>NZD yawned as the Reserve Bank left rates untouched (in line with consensus projections). The central bank governor Alan Bollard provides some color on the New Zealand recovery, noting a recovery in export partners (which he believes is sustainable), flattening consumer demand and a recent increase in housing prices. He goes on to note that sustained growth is contingent on the export sector and household savings.</p> <p>Nothing revolutionary here as the focus on the current account continues but we have to believe volatility in NZD rates is currently being underpriced. With the strength and diversity of various China bear factions at this point, it's almost a foolproof bullish indicator. Additionally, some exports may be more downturn-proof than we believe (e.g. milk powder, see the <a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/new-zealand-trade-numbers-may">ZH piece</a> on NZ May trade data). The flip side also begs a simple question: how much lower can they go? It is almost inconceivable for NZD to go ZIRP.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:53:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>NZD yawned as the Reserve Bank left rates untouched (in line with consensus projections). The central bank governor Alan Bollard provides some color on the New Zealand recovery, noting a recovery in export partners (which he believes is sustainable), flattening consumer demand and a recent increase in housing prices. He goes on to note that sustained growth is contingent on the export sector and household savings.</p> <p>Nothing revolutionary here as the focus on the current account continues but we have to believe volatility in NZD rates is currently being underpriced. With the strength and diversity of various China bear factions at this point, it's almost a foolproof bullish indicator. Additionally, some exports may be more downturn-proof than we believe (e.g. milk powder, see the <a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/new-zealand-trade-numbers-may">ZH piece</a> on NZ May trade data). The flip side also begs a simple question: how much lower can they go? It is almost inconceivable for NZD to go ZIRP.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/160764-new-zealand-dollar-rates-remain-stable?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bnz">BNZ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rock, Hard Place, Chinese Economy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/160121-rock-hard-place-chinese-economy?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">160121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>At this point, the Chinese bubble theory is well out there. With a number of high profile public acknowledgements of the liquidity driven bubble over the past 6 months, China is <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a0I.vQ0VvGUc">finally looking</a> to take steps to prevent (or at least slow down) the massive publicly funded inflows into related financial markets. With the Shanghai Composite Index down about 22% in August, China is caught in a somewhat tricky situation as it attempts to slow the flood of money without plunging the economy into a further spiral.</p>  <p>Depending on the specific measures taken, we could see a controlled deleveraging or a clumsy, heavyhanded attempt to put the brakes on. The prospect of a highly leveraged Chinese economy facing a sudden liquidity shortage is terrifying for both economic and political reasons. With increasing unemployment for college graduates and a significant deterioration across other macro factors, the only real driver has been record lending by Chinese central banks. Despite all the cosmetic changes, China remains a centrally controlled economy and it is a very tough challenge to manage liquidity flows across the financial system without blowing up the current structure.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:01:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>At this point, the Chinese bubble theory is well out there. With a number of high profile public acknowledgements of the liquidity driven bubble over the past 6 months, China is <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a0I.vQ0VvGUc">finally looking</a> to take steps to prevent (or at least slow down) the massive publicly funded inflows into related financial markets. With the Shanghai Composite Index down about 22% in August, China is caught in a somewhat tricky situation as it attempts to slow the flood of money without plunging the economy into a further spiral.</p>  <p>Depending on the specific measures taken, we could see a controlled deleveraging or a clumsy, heavyhanded attempt to put the brakes on. The prospect of a highly leveraged Chinese economy facing a sudden liquidity shortage is terrifying for both economic and political reasons. With increasing unemployment for college graduates and a significant deterioration across other macro factors, the only real driver has been record lending by Chinese central banks. Despite all the cosmetic changes, China remains a centrally controlled economy and it is a very tough challenge to manage liquidity flows across the financial system without blowing up the current structure.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/160121-rock-hard-place-chinese-economy?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxi">FXI</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Crude Oil: Weak Outlook Going Forward</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/157048-crude-oil-weak-outlook-going-forward?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">157048</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The story with oil, much like most commodities, has mostly focused on two factors: tight correlations with other macro products and China.</p><p>The correlations can be reasonably expected to weaken a little once we are a little further into the deleveraging process and once we see a more familiar phase of the business cycle but until then, it's something to watch very closely.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:31:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>The story with oil, much like most commodities, has mostly focused on two factors: tight correlations with other macro products and China.</p><p>The correlations can be reasonably expected to weaken a little once we are a little further into the deleveraging process and once we see a more familiar phase of the business cycle but until then, it's something to watch very closely.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/157048-crude-oil-weak-outlook-going-forward?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dbo">DBO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/oih">OIH</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/oil">OIL</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uso">USO</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/xle">XLE</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Risk Currencies Close the Week on Weakness</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/156328-risk-currencies-close-the-week-on-weakness?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">156328</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a sign of risk appetite declining, EUR/JPY dipped despite Euroland GDP numbers coming out above consensus. While easy to ascribe the plunge to weak US consumer sentiment, it's interesting to see movement even on more stable pairs.</p><p>Separately, the yen closed out on strength versus most commodity currencies as it increasingly becomes the China hedge. As we noted in BRL weakness before, the real dipped for a weekly loss against the dollar for the first time in over a month and seems poised for further weakness.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 08:07:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>In a sign of risk appetite declining, EUR/JPY dipped despite Euroland GDP numbers coming out above consensus. While easy to ascribe the plunge to weak US consumer sentiment, it's interesting to see movement even on more stable pairs.</p><p>Separately, the yen closed out on strength versus most commodity currencies as it increasingly becomes the China hedge. As we noted in BRL weakness before, the real dipped for a weekly loss against the dollar for the first time in over a month and seems poised for further weakness.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/156328-risk-currencies-close-the-week-on-weakness?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Consumer: Battered but Not Beaten</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/156224-u-s-consumer-battered-but-not-beaten?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">156224</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>First, the bad news. Only 14%, an abysmally low number, believe that job prospects will improve over the rest of the year. Nearly 60% believe high unemployment to continue over the next several years, hardly a demand-inducing statistic.</p><p>Despite the massive stimulus packages, confidence in government policy retreated with a third straight monthly decline (32% holding unfavorable views), though it is significantly better than the 50% a year ago. Consumers also shied away from big ticket items as homes, vehicles and major household durables declined in July. Additionally, anticipated price discounts continue to remain at their all-time peaks; a consumer-led deflationary indicator, despite the US ZIRP.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:32:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>First, the bad news. Only 14%, an abysmally low number, believe that job prospects will improve over the rest of the year. Nearly 60% believe high unemployment to continue over the next several years, hardly a demand-inducing statistic.</p><p>Despite the massive stimulus packages, confidence in government policy retreated with a third straight monthly decline (32% holding unfavorable views), though it is significantly better than the 50% a year ago. Consumers also shied away from big ticket items as homes, vehicles and major household durables declined in July. Additionally, anticipated price discounts continue to remain at their all-time peaks; a consumer-led deflationary indicator, despite the US ZIRP.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/156224-u-s-consumer-battered-but-not-beaten?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/iyk">IYK</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>China's House of Cards: Exports Down 23% in July, Year-Over-Year</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/155368-china-s-house-of-cards-exports-down-23-in-july-year-over-year?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">155368</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Shortly after Wen Jiabao's statement that China will maintain its stimulus, Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=at6eJx0Y56Rw">reports</a> that Chinese exports tumbled in July and industrial output numbers came in under consensus. The former is significantly more troublesome, though as this drag on industrial output is going to become a bigger part of the story.</p> <p>With exports falling 23% and industrial production &quot;only&quot; gaining 10.8%, the Chinese government is going to have to pump in a whole lot more stimulus. The truly puzzling part has to be the following quote:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:20:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>Shortly after Wen Jiabao's statement that China will maintain its stimulus, Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=at6eJx0Y56Rw">reports</a> that Chinese exports tumbled in July and industrial output numbers came in under consensus. The former is significantly more troublesome, though as this drag on industrial output is going to become a bigger part of the story.</p> <p>With exports falling 23% and industrial production &quot;only&quot; gaining 10.8%, the Chinese government is going to have to pump in a whole lot more stimulus. The truly puzzling part has to be the following quote:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/155368-china-s-house-of-cards-exports-down-23-in-july-year-over-year?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxi">FXI</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Zealand: Employment Continues to Deteriorate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/154338-new-zealand-employment-continues-to-deteriorate?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">154338</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>A release of New Zealand's unemployment information is an interesting experience in reconciling medium-term price action, the general market view and what we are saying in reality.</p> <p>On a seasonally adjusted basis, we are seeing a 20% increase in unemployment QoQ (the 6th straight quarter of job losses). Curiously, in this case it has been a loss of female vs. male jobs at a clip of roughly 2:1.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:20:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>A release of New Zealand's unemployment information is an interesting experience in reconciling medium-term price action, the general market view and what we are saying in reality.</p> <p>On a seasonally adjusted basis, we are seeing a 20% increase in unemployment QoQ (the 6th straight quarter of job losses). Curiously, in this case it has been a loss of female vs. male jobs at a clip of roughly 2:1.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/154338-new-zealand-employment-continues-to-deteriorate?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Warning Signs from Brazil</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/152459-warning-signs-from-brazil?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">152459</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>BBM Gestao de Recursos <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&amp;sid=a0mvO6VNDbg8">issued</a> a statement publicly warning about imminent weakness in BRL and a potential central bank reversal of recent record low rates. BBM's Beny Parnes, himself a former central banker, explains that BBM is mostly scaled out of its positions and believes that most of the wind has been taken out of BBM's big money makers from the first half of the year.</p> <p>Indeed, BBM's portfolio has significantly benefitted from a 22% surge in BRL and lowered rates - a position we discussed <a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/03/brazilian-real-carry-trade.html">back</a> in March, though we overshot rates by a quarter point - but Parnes defends the paring back, citing &quot;less opportunity&quot; in the current environment. We agree with the sentiment despite the recent dollar beatdown since mid April. Most of the fundamental picture has been accounted for with the recent run-up but increased liquidity may provide a second wind. Emerging markets continue to be interesting, especially from a long-term view, and we'll continue to keep an eye out.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:58:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>BBM Gestao de Recursos <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&amp;sid=a0mvO6VNDbg8">issued</a> a statement publicly warning about imminent weakness in BRL and a potential central bank reversal of recent record low rates. BBM's Beny Parnes, himself a former central banker, explains that BBM is mostly scaled out of its positions and believes that most of the wind has been taken out of BBM's big money makers from the first half of the year.</p> <p>Indeed, BBM's portfolio has significantly benefitted from a 22% surge in BRL and lowered rates - a position we discussed <a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/03/brazilian-real-carry-trade.html">back</a> in March, though we overshot rates by a quarter point - but Parnes defends the paring back, citing &quot;less opportunity&quot; in the current environment. We agree with the sentiment despite the recent dollar beatdown since mid April. Most of the fundamental picture has been accounted for with the recent run-up but increased liquidity may provide a second wind. Emerging markets continue to be interesting, especially from a long-term view, and we'll continue to keep an eye out.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/152459-warning-signs-from-brazil?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bzl">BZL</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Canada Believes That It Has a Tight Grip on Inflation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/150242-canada-believes-that-it-has-a-tight-grip-on-inflation?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">150242</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>In a continuation of central bank confidence, the BoC <a href="http://www.bank-banque-canada.ca/en/fixed-dates/2009/rate_210709.html">maintained</a> rates while announcing their inflation outlook in the medium term. The relevant paragraph:</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p> <p><span>Total CPI inflation declined to -0.3 per cent in June and should trough in the third quarter of this year before returning to the 2 per cent target in the second quarter of 2011 as aggregate supply and demand return to balance. Core inflation held up at 1.9 per cent in the second quarter of 2009. The Bank still expects core inflation to diminish in the second half of this year before gradually returning to 2 per cent in the second quarter of 2011.</span></p></p></blockquote>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:52:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>In a continuation of central bank confidence, the BoC <a href="http://www.bank-banque-canada.ca/en/fixed-dates/2009/rate_210709.html">maintained</a> rates while announcing their inflation outlook in the medium term. The relevant paragraph:</p> <blockquote class="quote"><p> <p><span>Total CPI inflation declined to -0.3 per cent in June and should trough in the third quarter of this year before returning to the 2 per cent target in the second quarter of 2011 as aggregate supply and demand return to balance. Core inflation held up at 1.9 per cent in the second quarter of 2009. The Bank still expects core inflation to diminish in the second half of this year before gradually returning to 2 per cent in the second quarter of 2011.</span></p></p></blockquote><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/150242-canada-believes-that-it-has-a-tight-grip-on-inflation?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewc">EWC</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dollar and Yen Fall on Risk Seeking Trend</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/149722-dollar-and-yen-fall-on-risk-seeking-trend?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">149722</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Recent news coming <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a3OpPp66g31Y">out</a> indicates that investors are buying the indications from earnings reports, housing data and other tepid macro news releases - of course the resulting dollar and yen weakness is not ultimately surprising, no matter what our views on the &quot;safe haven&quot; theory.</p>  <p>The implication of a strong dollar/yen rebound in the event of another crash has been pretty well documented by various outlets but the more interesting story is any further downside risk to the dollar/yen. It's pretty clear that the somewhat linear relationship between say, EUR/USD and any number of bullish indicators (SPY, HG, the Big Mac index), until now is somewhat untenable going forward and is likely to at least slow down. If the bullish sentiment is ultimately right and we have returned to &quot;normal&quot;, the ridiculously strong macro linkages we have been seeing until now are likely to break. However, if we see a bounce back south any gains posted can vaporize as quickly as they came.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:40:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>Recent news coming <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a3OpPp66g31Y">out</a> indicates that investors are buying the indications from earnings reports, housing data and other tepid macro news releases - of course the resulting dollar and yen weakness is not ultimately surprising, no matter what our views on the &quot;safe haven&quot; theory.</p>  <p>The implication of a strong dollar/yen rebound in the event of another crash has been pretty well documented by various outlets but the more interesting story is any further downside risk to the dollar/yen. It's pretty clear that the somewhat linear relationship between say, EUR/USD and any number of bullish indicators (SPY, HG, the Big Mac index), until now is somewhat untenable going forward and is likely to at least slow down. If the bullish sentiment is ultimately right and we have returned to &quot;normal&quot;, the ridiculously strong macro linkages we have been seeing until now are likely to break. However, if we see a bounce back south any gains posted can vaporize as quickly as they came.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/149722-dollar-and-yen-fall-on-risk-seeking-trend?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/udn">UDN</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/uup">UUP</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Federal Receipts: The Growing Individual / Corporate Spread</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/148092-u-s-federal-receipts-the-growing-individual-corporate-spread?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">148092</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Looking at historical data always gives a great sense of perspective (in this case, table 2.1 from the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/">White House site</a>). The graphic below represents the remarkable increase in spread between individuals and corporations when it comes to the burden of funding the federal government. This doesn't include other sources like social security payments, excise taxes and other sources - just plain consumers and businesses, Econ 101.</p>  <p>There are numerous points to take away but we want to highlight a couple:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:36:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>Looking at historical data always gives a great sense of perspective (in this case, table 2.1 from the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/">White House site</a>). The graphic below represents the remarkable increase in spread between individuals and corporations when it comes to the burden of funding the federal government. This doesn't include other sources like social security payments, excise taxes and other sources - just plain consumers and businesses, Econ 101.</p>  <p>There are numerous points to take away but we want to highlight a couple:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/148092-u-s-federal-receipts-the-growing-individual-corporate-spread?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yet Another Huge Economic Number Coming out of China. Hard to Believe</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/148008-yet-another-huge-economic-number-coming-out-of-china-hard-to-believe?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">148008</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Some huge, hard-to-believe <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aitR1CpS3KT8">numbers</a> coming from the Chinese - if I had a nickel for every time I wrote that... I could melt all those nickels, sell it on the spot market and buy enough gold to plate my new ZH decal.</p> <p>But seriously - is anyone buying this? The story being put forward by the Chinese is that the government pumped in some stimulus which has been enough to get the crank rolling again and leads to statements like:</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:15:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>Some huge, hard-to-believe <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aitR1CpS3KT8">numbers</a> coming from the Chinese - if I had a nickel for every time I wrote that... I could melt all those nickels, sell it on the spot market and buy enough gold to plate my new ZH decal.</p> <p>But seriously - is anyone buying this? The story being put forward by the Chinese is that the government pumped in some stimulus which has been enough to get the crank rolling again and leads to statements like:</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/148008-yet-another-huge-economic-number-coming-out-of-china-hard-to-believe?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/aa">AA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/fxi">FXI</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Four Forex Trends to Watch over the Next Six Months</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/147101-four-forex-trends-to-watch-over-the-next-six-months?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">147101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>The returns of some major FX players are serving as a proxied summary of the first 6 months of 2009, as Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aEOvYT4LTxJI">reports</a> both FX Concepts and John W. Henry's currency units are down so far this year.</p><p>Due to the choppy price action, the trend followers have not been looking too hot (if you don't believe me, look at the track record of a basic 50/200 dma on EUR/USD). The major reason(s) could be the unclear picture on inflation (both in the US and in the majors) but additional factors have come into play including the re-coupling of many markets, the surprising equity rally in Q2 and a suspiciously steady decrease in the price of vol. However, we are likely to see some huge macro factors come into play over the second half of this year so the record is likely to look significantly better by the end of the year.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 05:42:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>The returns of some major FX players are serving as a proxied summary of the first 6 months of 2009, as Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aEOvYT4LTxJI">reports</a> both FX Concepts and John W. Henry's currency units are down so far this year.</p><p>Due to the choppy price action, the trend followers have not been looking too hot (if you don't believe me, look at the track record of a basic 50/200 dma on EUR/USD). The major reason(s) could be the unclear picture on inflation (both in the US and in the majors) but additional factors have come into play including the re-coupling of many markets, the surprising equity rally in Q2 and a suspiciously steady decrease in the price of vol. However, we are likely to see some huge macro factors come into play over the second half of this year so the record is likely to look significantly better by the end of the year.</p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/147101-four-forex-trends-to-watch-over-the-next-six-months?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Zealand's Trade Numbers for May</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/146359-new-zealand-s-trade-numbers-for-may?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">146359</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>An interesting release coming out of New Zealand recently on trade numbers for May - interesting because on the surface, it seems to fall in line with many of the popular macro views but how digging through the numbers produces some interesting data points. The high level message is pretty simple: imports got crushed and exports saw a decent rise, resulting in the largest trade balance (as % of exports) in 16 years.</p> <div><strong>IMPORTS</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The big drop has primarily been attributed to petroleum, petroleum products and passenger cars. In NZD terms, imports fell by $809M from $3.1B (a 20.7% drop YoY) - the largest YoY drop since Feb 1993.</div><div> </div><div>Most of the drop can be attributed to intermediate goods with capital goods falling on a smaller base and consumption goods being largely flat. Most interestingly, passenger cars were down about 52% YoY. This is a huge signal on the mood of the NZ consumer especially as the decrease has been relatively even on the 3000cc over/under (i.e. economy cars and luxury cars are both seeing decreased demand).</div><div> </div><div>At some point, the derivative differential between capital goods and intermediate goods is going to need to be resolved; the relationship would seem to be banded at a long-term equilibrium relationship and the current divergence would need to be corrected in the next 6 months - 1 year.</div><div> </div><div>The one mystery has to be NZD demand for petroleum and petroleum products. For example despite the price increases we've been seeing in spot and near crude, total crude oil imports have actually gone down 32.3%. Even after having a rough adjustment for currency movements, we're still left with the implied elasticity of NZD oil demand being unlike any other major markets. The most feasible answer seems to be an oldie but a goodie; the decoupling of the academic from the practical realities. I.e. crude oil shipments are irregular enough to screw with the numbers (Edit: this is mentioned by the NZ stats bureau).</div><div> </div> <div><strong>EXPORTS</strong></div><div> </div> <div>Exports were up $218M YoY to $4.0B. The big story here is Chinese demand with exports there accounting for 80% of the increase (i.e. ~$176M). The components are mostly agricultural commodities with milk products and timber/wood products accounting for $186M increase alone. The picture isn't particularly complicated but it is interesting to note the drop in exports in crude and aluminium.</div> <div>OVERALL</div> <div> </div> <div>The trend is leaving some room for interpretation here. We have to think with the exports drivers being weak (especially in light of some troubling stuff coming <a href="http://macro-man.blogspot.com/2009/06/summertime.html">out of China</a>, hat tip Macro Man) and further weakness in imports due to the &quot;more darkness before it turns light&quot; argument, it's very possible for the surplus to remain in its general form over the medium to long term.</div><div> </div><div>Of course this a relatively weak conclusion due to the high level of uncertainty around certain line items. For example 25% of the export increase can be attributed solely to milk powder exports to China. Is more higher quality milk powder a structural shift in the political/pediatric dialogue in Beijing? Or can it be bundled as just another Chinese commodity story with demand likely to evaporate in the next few months?</div><div> </div><div>Even the crude story can be snatched by the bulls or the bears depending on if you want to believe in the practical difficulties of shipping crude oil to NZ or if you envision some complex demand function for crude driven by a highly unusual elasticity ratio - or somewhere in between those two views.</div><div> </div><div>Bottom line, despite what some of the economists are saying there's no strong reason to fade the NZD on CA fundamentals.</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:18:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>An interesting release coming out of New Zealand recently on trade numbers for May - interesting because on the surface, it seems to fall in line with many of the popular macro views but how digging through the numbers produces some interesting data points. The high level message is pretty simple: imports got crushed and exports saw a decent rise, resulting in the largest trade balance (as % of exports) in 16 years.</p> <div><strong>IMPORTS</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The big drop has primarily been attributed to petroleum, petroleum products and passenger cars. In NZD terms, imports fell by $809M from $3.1B (a 20.7% drop YoY) - the largest YoY drop since Feb 1993.</div><div> </div><div>Most of the drop can be attributed to intermediate goods with capital goods falling on a smaller base and consumption goods being largely flat. Most interestingly, passenger cars were down about 52% YoY. This is a huge signal on the mood of the NZ consumer especially as the decrease has been relatively even on the 3000cc over/under (i.e. economy cars and luxury cars are both seeing decreased demand).</div><div> </div><div>At some point, the derivative differential between capital goods and intermediate goods is going to need to be resolved; the relationship would seem to be banded at a long-term equilibrium relationship and the current divergence would need to be corrected in the next 6 months - 1 year.</div><div> </div><div>The one mystery has to be NZD demand for petroleum and petroleum products. For example despite the price increases we've been seeing in spot and near crude, total crude oil imports have actually gone down 32.3%. Even after having a rough adjustment for currency movements, we're still left with the implied elasticity of NZD oil demand being unlike any other major markets. The most feasible answer seems to be an oldie but a goodie; the decoupling of the academic from the practical realities. I.e. crude oil shipments are irregular enough to screw with the numbers (Edit: this is mentioned by the NZ stats bureau).</div><div> </div> <div><strong>EXPORTS</strong></div><div> </div> <div>Exports were up $218M YoY to $4.0B. The big story here is Chinese demand with exports there accounting for 80% of the increase (i.e. ~$176M). The components are mostly agricultural commodities with milk products and timber/wood products accounting for $186M increase alone. The picture isn't particularly complicated but it is interesting to note the drop in exports in crude and aluminium.</div> <div>OVERALL</div> <div> </div> <div>The trend is leaving some room for interpretation here. We have to think with the exports drivers being weak (especially in light of some troubling stuff coming <a href="http://macro-man.blogspot.com/2009/06/summertime.html">out of China</a>, hat tip Macro Man) and further weakness in imports due to the &quot;more darkness before it turns light&quot; argument, it's very possible for the surplus to remain in its general form over the medium to long term.</div><div> </div><div>Of course this a relatively weak conclusion due to the high level of uncertainty around certain line items. For example 25% of the export increase can be attributed solely to milk powder exports to China. Is more higher quality milk powder a structural shift in the political/pediatric dialogue in Beijing? Or can it be bundled as just another Chinese commodity story with demand likely to evaporate in the next few months?</div><div> </div><div>Even the crude story can be snatched by the bulls or the bears depending on if you want to believe in the practical difficulties of shipping crude oil to NZ or if you envision some complex demand function for crude driven by a highly unusual elasticity ratio - or somewhere in between those two views.</div><div> </div><div>Bottom line, despite what some of the economists are saying there's no strong reason to fade the NZD on CA fundamentals.</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/146359-new-zealand-s-trade-numbers-for-may?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bnz">BNZ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All's Quiet on the USD Front...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/144817-all-s-quiet-on-the-usd-front?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">144817</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, your favorite macro correspondent is back from his break. It's going to take a few days to get back into the swing of things but I may not have that much time...</p> <div>Meanwhile, a quick look at USD should be a good complement to your morning coffee - the vol has been essentially sideways for the past couple of months and the carry unwind risk is back to the middle of Greenspan-era liquidity. Yup nothing to see here folks, move it along.</div> <div> </div> <div>(quick note: the big moves in the unwind risk index have been in the IMM and swap spread z-scores - take that as you will) (<em>click on charts to enlarge</em>)</div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/23/saupload_carry_unwind.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" /><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/23/saupload_fx_vol.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" /></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:44:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>Well, your favorite macro correspondent is back from his break. It's going to take a few days to get back into the swing of things but I may not have that much time...</p> <div>Meanwhile, a quick look at USD should be a good complement to your morning coffee - the vol has been essentially sideways for the past couple of months and the carry unwind risk is back to the middle of Greenspan-era liquidity. Yup nothing to see here folks, move it along.</div> <div> </div> <div>(quick note: the big moves in the unwind risk index have been in the IMM and swap spread z-scores - take that as you will) (<em>click on charts to enlarge</em>)</div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/23/saupload_carry_unwind.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" /><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/6/23/saupload_fx_vol.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" /></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/144817-all-s-quiet-on-the-usd-front?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/udn">UDN</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Japanese Don't Think the U.S. Crisis Is So Bad</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/138300-japanese-don-t-think-the-u-s-crisis-is-so-bad?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">138300</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>At least not the way that Americans are viewing it. There have been many, many comparisons in the media to the Great Depression, the worst economic climate in the past 70 years, etc. but the reality is that this is only slightly worse than normal for the Japanese (especially in the context of the last 20 years). With the release of consumer confidence <a href="http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/en/stat/shouhi/0904shouhi-e.html">numbers</a> yesterday, it's interesting to see the Japanese consumer reaction (<em>click on chart to enlarge</em>).</p><div><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/18/saupload_japaneseconsumerindex.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" /></div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div>As we can see, employment is only slightly worse than many of the spikes in the 90s; the other numbers are also marginally worse but not indicative of a &quot;new paradigm&quot; in the macro picture.</div><div> </div><div>What is interesting though is that consumer sentiment has been at or below the 50 level for the past 27 years. One would assume eventually that consumer confidence has to rebound; this is somewhat related with our previous <a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/04/some-preliminary-thoughts-on-new-face_09.html">articles</a> on the Japanese consumer. As we've covered the various factors associated with the recovery of Japanese demand, we won't rehash but it is worth reiterating that it could be a critical factor in picking up the slack from the increased savings rate in the US. Stay tuned...<span> </span></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:03:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>At least not the way that Americans are viewing it. There have been many, many comparisons in the media to the Great Depression, the worst economic climate in the past 70 years, etc. but the reality is that this is only slightly worse than normal for the Japanese (especially in the context of the last 20 years). With the release of consumer confidence <a href="http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/en/stat/shouhi/0904shouhi-e.html">numbers</a> yesterday, it's interesting to see the Japanese consumer reaction (<em>click on chart to enlarge</em>).</p><div><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/5/18/saupload_japaneseconsumerindex.jpg" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" /></div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div>As we can see, employment is only slightly worse than many of the spikes in the 90s; the other numbers are also marginally worse but not indicative of a &quot;new paradigm&quot; in the macro picture.</div><div> </div><div>What is interesting though is that consumer sentiment has been at or below the 50 level for the past 27 years. One would assume eventually that consumer confidence has to rebound; this is somewhat related with our previous <a href="http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/04/some-preliminary-thoughts-on-new-face_09.html">articles</a> on the Japanese consumer. As we've covered the various factors associated with the recovery of Japanese demand, we won't rehash but it is worth reiterating that it could be a critical factor in picking up the slack from the increased savings rate in the US. Stay tuned...<span> </span></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/138300-japanese-don-t-think-the-u-s-crisis-is-so-bad?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewj">EWJ</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Good News: Record High Credit Card Defaults</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/138086-more-good-news-record-high-credit-card-defaults?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">138086</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>No, seriously - this is actually good <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/30767901">news</a>. The basic problem was an overleveraging across all sectors of the economy and this is good news because the US consumer unequivocally needs to deleverage before a recovery can be viable. The choice has always been simple if you owe too much money: declare bankruptcy, inflate your way out of it or find a sucker to help you roll it until you can pay it off.</p><div>The inflation part is both politically and socially intractable (pop quiz: what do the AARP and the largest Communist nation in history agree on?) - the level of inflation needed to devalue our debt would start approaching historical levels. Maybe not as bad as Weimar Republic or Zimbabwe levels, but significant enough to really hurt.</div><div> </div><div>Pitching increased capital suckage into the US economy until we can slowly repay our debt back also doesn't seem like a great option. The pitch may go well and the capital may be out there but inherently it assumes a level of self-restraint and foresight that is laughably distant from our American democracy. When we are still <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2218407/">wasting</a> billions on Cold War weapons, it is tough to believe that as a nation, we will patiently delever.</div><div> </div><div>In practicality, as always, the answer will be some combination of the three options. Bankruptcy is tremendously traumatic on a personal level, not to mention the lasting effect that it has on your credit score and the waterfall effects of that. However, on a macro level it is good and serves a very practical purpose - it wipes out debt, allows the economy to bounce back rather than stagnate in zombie land and punishes lenders for making stupid decisions. Some may argue that it makes debt more expensive - we would argue it more accurately prices money going forward. Which would you rather have?</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 07:26:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>No, seriously - this is actually good <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/30767901">news</a>. The basic problem was an overleveraging across all sectors of the economy and this is good news because the US consumer unequivocally needs to deleverage before a recovery can be viable. The choice has always been simple if you owe too much money: declare bankruptcy, inflate your way out of it or find a sucker to help you roll it until you can pay it off.</p><div>The inflation part is both politically and socially intractable (pop quiz: what do the AARP and the largest Communist nation in history agree on?) - the level of inflation needed to devalue our debt would start approaching historical levels. Maybe not as bad as Weimar Republic or Zimbabwe levels, but significant enough to really hurt.</div><div> </div><div>Pitching increased capital suckage into the US economy until we can slowly repay our debt back also doesn't seem like a great option. The pitch may go well and the capital may be out there but inherently it assumes a level of self-restraint and foresight that is laughably distant from our American democracy. When we are still <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2218407/">wasting</a> billions on Cold War weapons, it is tough to believe that as a nation, we will patiently delever.</div><div> </div><div>In practicality, as always, the answer will be some combination of the three options. Bankruptcy is tremendously traumatic on a personal level, not to mention the lasting effect that it has on your credit score and the waterfall effects of that. However, on a macro level it is good and serves a very practical purpose - it wipes out debt, allows the economy to bounce back rather than stagnate in zombie land and punishes lenders for making stupid decisions. Some may argue that it makes debt more expensive - we would argue it more accurately prices money going forward. Which would you rather have?</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/138086-more-good-news-record-high-credit-card-defaults?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More False Hope from Economic Numbers-Productivity Edition</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/136288-more-false-hope-from-economic-numbers-productivity-edition?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">136288</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>We are starting to think that beating markets in this environment is starting to devolve into a reading comprehension exercise. In the latest edition, the green shoots crowd are jumping on the release of productivity numbers by the BLS <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/prod2.nr0.htm">Thursday</a> - nonfarm productivity is up 0.8%, above consensus numbers at 0.6% after going down 0.4% the previous quarter. However, it's a bad picture when the main driver is due to hours worked dropping 9% and output only dropping 8.2% (poof, productivity gains!).</p><div> </div><div>There are many ways to read this; some may view this as a necessary purge of the fat in our labor economy while others are likely to be alarmed at the increasing weakness of business demand. None of these views are going to be new findings to our readers, but we do want to highlight one point when taking a macro view of these productivity numbers.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Much can be said about the tech bubble, and even now, "eyeballs" is a phrase that is likely to generate smirks and laughs at the madness of the markets at the time. However, underneath all the fluff and dot com mania, there were real productivity gains experienced in the economy, and it laid the groundwork (both literally and figuratively) for huge gains in the internet economy over the coming years.</div><div> </div><div>The stepbrother of that story was the rise in real wages; since then however, the increase in household wealth has not been driven by wages, but by assets (houses, etc.). Wage growth has been somewhat anemic, bounded by a relatively tight band for the past 8 years or so. With the deleveraging of the US economy and consequently the American household as a major burden, we have to wonder what this bodes for the story of American wealth over the next 10 years or so. The government burden has long been publicized but the quieter enemy is the consumer burden - remember, a decrease in wages is practically no different than an increase in an interest burden. These productivity numbers are somewhat sobering with regards to the hidden story in terms of demand for American labor and wage growth for individual families.</div><div><img src="http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/4863014635257598503-4594894173404657475?l=zerohedge.blogspot.com" width="1" height="1" /></div><p><iframe src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/%7Eah/9MwZ5PpZCD7waot0WDUpAyTwy0o/h?w=300&h=250&ca=1&fh=280" width="100%" height="280" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><br></iframe></p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:41:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>We are starting to think that beating markets in this environment is starting to devolve into a reading comprehension exercise. In the latest edition, the green shoots crowd are jumping on the release of productivity numbers by the BLS <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/prod2.nr0.htm">Thursday</a> - nonfarm productivity is up 0.8%, above consensus numbers at 0.6% after going down 0.4% the previous quarter. However, it's a bad picture when the main driver is due to hours worked dropping 9% and output only dropping 8.2% (poof, productivity gains!).</p><div> </div><div>There are many ways to read this; some may view this as a necessary purge of the fat in our labor economy while others are likely to be alarmed at the increasing weakness of business demand. None of these views are going to be new findings to our readers, but we do want to highlight one point when taking a macro view of these productivity numbers.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div>Much can be said about the tech bubble, and even now, "eyeballs" is a phrase that is likely to generate smirks and laughs at the madness of the markets at the time. However, underneath all the fluff and dot com mania, there were real productivity gains experienced in the economy, and it laid the groundwork (both literally and figuratively) for huge gains in the internet economy over the coming years.</div><div> </div><div>The stepbrother of that story was the rise in real wages; since then however, the increase in household wealth has not been driven by wages, but by assets (houses, etc.). Wage growth has been somewhat anemic, bounded by a relatively tight band for the past 8 years or so. With the deleveraging of the US economy and consequently the American household as a major burden, we have to wonder what this bodes for the story of American wealth over the next 10 years or so. The government burden has long been publicized but the quieter enemy is the consumer burden - remember, a decrease in wages is practically no different than an increase in an interest burden. These productivity numbers are somewhat sobering with regards to the hidden story in terms of demand for American labor and wage growth for individual families.</div><div><img src="http://res1.blogblog.com/tracker/4863014635257598503-4594894173404657475?l=zerohedge.blogspot.com" width="1" height="1" /></div><p><iframe src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/%7Eah/9MwZ5PpZCD7waot0WDUpAyTwy0o/h?w=300&h=250&ca=1&fh=280" width="100%" height="280" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><br></iframe></p><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/136288-more-false-hope-from-economic-numbers-productivity-edition?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/dia">DIA</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/qqqq">QQQQ</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</category>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Post-Recovery U.S. Economy Will Be Weak and Will be Clobbered by Commodities Prices </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/137236-post-recovery-u-s-economy-will-be-weak-and-will-be-clobbered-by-commodities-prices?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">137236</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>By now, most smart money has typically pegged the US recovery in late 09, early 2010. ZH is somewhat dismayed to see the assumption being that once the economy gets going again, we're going to return to the '05-'07 levels of good times. However, we have to believe that we are merely going from disastrous to just kind of bad. Specifically, the next few years are not going to be pretty even once the deleveraging of the US economy is over. As we come out of it we're going to see a repeat of the infamous summer of '08 with oil hitting triple digits, except the header is likely going to be reflected across commodities not just oil. So, let's explore this idea...<span><br> </span></p>  <div><span><strong>THE US IS NOT RECOVERING INTO A POSITION OF STRENGTH</strong></div>  <div> </div> <div>From a really macro view, 2000/2001 should have been the start of the corresponding secular bear market following the the post-'82 period but thanks to Greenspan's easy money, we managed to postpone the pain. The deleveraging that has occurred over this crisis can be viewed as correcting the past few years of easy money, but the underlying bear market still remains. The basis of the secular bear market is not particularly scientific, but given the 18 year movements from secular bull to bear to bull, etc. many were looking for the Internet bubble burst to merely be the start of the next secular bear market.</div> <div> </div> <div>On a more specific level, it is very interesting to note Bernanke's views (and David Rosenberg's take on those views) on the recovery and the positioning of the US economy.</div> <div> </div> <div> </div><div>On the consumer side:<span><br> </span></div>  <div><blockquote class="quote"><p><span>&hellip; A number of factors are likely to continue to weigh on consumer spending, among them the weak labor market and the declines in equity and housing wealth that households have experienced over the past two years. In addition, credit conditions for consumers remain tight.</span></p></span></blockquote></div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:25:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>By now, most smart money has typically pegged the US recovery in late 09, early 2010. ZH is somewhat dismayed to see the assumption being that once the economy gets going again, we're going to return to the '05-'07 levels of good times. However, we have to believe that we are merely going from disastrous to just kind of bad. Specifically, the next few years are not going to be pretty even once the deleveraging of the US economy is over. As we come out of it we're going to see a repeat of the infamous summer of '08 with oil hitting triple digits, except the header is likely going to be reflected across commodities not just oil. So, let's explore this idea...<span><br> </span></p>  <div><span><strong>THE US IS NOT RECOVERING INTO A POSITION OF STRENGTH</strong></div>  <div> </div> <div>From a really macro view, 2000/2001 should have been the start of the corresponding secular bear market following the the post-'82 period but thanks to Greenspan's easy money, we managed to postpone the pain. The deleveraging that has occurred over this crisis can be viewed as correcting the past few years of easy money, but the underlying bear market still remains. The basis of the secular bear market is not particularly scientific, but given the 18 year movements from secular bull to bear to bull, etc. many were looking for the Internet bubble burst to merely be the start of the next secular bear market.</div> <div> </div> <div>On a more specific level, it is very interesting to note Bernanke's views (and David Rosenberg's take on those views) on the recovery and the positioning of the US economy.</div> <div> </div> <div> </div><div>On the consumer side:<span><br> </span></div>  <div><blockquote class="quote"><p><span>&hellip; A number of factors are likely to continue to weigh on consumer spending, among them the weak labor market and the declines in equity and housing wealth that households have experienced over the past two years. In addition, credit conditions for consumers remain tight.</span></p></span></blockquote></div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/137236-post-recovery-u-s-economy-will-be-weak-and-will-be-clobbered-by-commodities-prices?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Housing Numbers Provide Another Basis for False Recovery</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/135323-housing-numbers-provide-another-basis-for-false-recovery?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">135323</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>On Monday's <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a0_dLzE63Hds&amp;refer=home">release</a> of housing numbers, Bloomberg reports more false positives on the economic recovery path. On the second straight month of pending home sales rising (up 3.2%), many are calling this the bottom, pretty much THE leading indicator that we are close to out of the woods. I mean, come on... housing got us into this mess, it'll get us out, right? A little-noticed follow up, though, was that the Housing Affordability Index was also at record highs - basically, after a long period of restrained consumption, people are reacting to lower home prices.</p><div>Of course, this is not the basis for a sustainable recovery. With unemployment numbers climbing, mortgage spreads still significant and the threat of a deflation/inflation bounce, this is unlikely to change much of the reality of the situation we are facing. None of this is new to ZH readers but merely another indication of the false rally we're going through.</div>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 07:17:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Cornelius</author>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<strong><a href='http://www.zerohedge.com'>Cornelius</a> submits: </strong><p>On Monday's <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a0_dLzE63Hds&amp;refer=home">release</a> of housing numbers, Bloomberg reports more false positives on the economic recovery path. On the second straight month of pending home sales rising (up 3.2%), many are calling this the bottom, pretty much THE leading indicator that we are close to out of the woods. I mean, come on... housing got us into this mess, it'll get us out, right? A little-noticed follow up, though, was that the Housing Affordability Index was also at record highs - basically, after a long period of restrained consumption, people are reacting to lower home prices.</p><div>Of course, this is not the basis for a sustainable recovery. With unemployment numbers climbing, mortgage spreads still significant and the threat of a deflation/inflation bounce, this is unlikely to change much of the reality of the situation we are facing. None of this is new to ZH readers but merely another indication of the false rally we're going through.</div><br/><a href='http://seekingalpha.com/article/135323-housing-numbers-provide-another-basis-for-false-recovery?source=feed'>Complete Story &raquo;</a>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="author" link="http://seekingalpha.com/author/cornelius">Cornelius</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
