Seeking Alpha

Dan Rayburn » Comments » AAPL

  • Is Hulu Waiting For Subscription Service Before Launching iPhone App? [View article]
    Sure, it's possible, but I don't think likely as the consumer experience would suffer and the content would not be available instantly.
    Oct 16 13:11 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Breakdown Of U.S. Sales Numbers for Broadband Enabled Devices [View article]
    Minutes is what matters, not number of videos. Lets say I said 1 million videos were downloaded. That does not tell you anything since you have no idea how long each video is and they all range in length. Minutes is the best way to do it, which is why Xbox gives it out that way. You're comparing songs on iTunes, which are nearly all the same length, to videos on Xbox which are all different in length. One has nothing to do with the other.
    Sep 16 09:46 am |Rating: +2 -2 |Link to Comment
  • MLB's $0.99 per Game Live Streaming Service Launches on the iPhone  [View article]
    Yes, blackout rules still apply.
    Sep 02 13:19 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Apple Dropped the Ball on an NFL Deal [View article]
    This post makes no sense.

    For starters, the Apple TV has a very low sales rate. Even if this deal was made, how many Apple TV units would they really sell? Who's going to spend a few hundred dollars for a device that only gives them NFL games?

    Also, people who have DirecTV use it for all their cable channels, not just NFL content. There would be no "exodus" from DirecTV if NFL games were on Apple TV because Apple TV does not give you any cable programming.

    Also, you say that "For many consumers looking to quit cable or the dish there was a problem: live sporting events. The MLB deal changes that, making live baseball games easily accessible and affordable."

    But you neglect to mention that if you want to watch your local MLB team, live, you can't do that via Roku or the PC with MLB's offering. All local games are blacked out. So how does "the MLB deal change that"? It doesn't.
    Aug 21 11:52 am |Rating: +4 -5 |Link to Comment
  • Recent Analyst Research on the CDN Market Needs to Be Questioned [View article]
    @Wisdom: You say " I have read about CDNetworks problems from other sources, I would have appreciated a more precise defense."

    A more precise defense? You kidding? The point I was making was that CDNetworks has not made any major mistakes with their CDN offering. Internap on the other hand has had many public facing issues, not to mention writing down $150M of the VitalStream acquisition. It's all public info. I don't need to "defend" CDNetworks, the facts are the facts. Point me to something that shows CDNetworks has made mistakes as large as Internap.

    You also say, "It is difficult to analyze CDNs when you do not want to upset advertisers of 'streaming media magazine."

    Again, make no sense. Internap is one of the largest advertisers with Streaming Media magazine, so if I was worried about "upsetting" them, I would not have written this post saying that CDNetworks should be listed above Internap.
    Aug 20 20:19 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Recent Analyst Research on the CDN Market Needs to Be Questioned [View article]
    @CatsJam: This article is from my blog, where no ticker symbols are included. SeekingAlpha takes some of my posts and includes their own info with it on their website. If a ticker symbol appears, it's been added by SeekingAlpha and you'd have to contact them about it.
    Aug 20 20:11 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Just Plain Stupid: Digital Downloads Still Cost More than DVDs [View article]
    Yes, the HD quality download is cheaper than buying a Bluray dics of the same movie but that is not a fair comparison. Apple's HD downloads on a 50" TV do not look anything close to what a Bluray disc looks like on the TV. Bluray is MUCH better.

    And since it costs studios almost nothing to deliver a digital HD movie over a SD movie, why do they charge at least a dollar more? Where is their extra cost that warrants the extra price?
    Mar 20 17:13 pm |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Netflix May Dominate The Online Video World, But With What Business Model? [View article]
    Again, Apple and iPods have nothing to do with Netflix. iPods don't stream content, it plays content that has been downloaded. And all Netflix has said is that their streaming service for the PC will support Mac's at some point. Nothing Netflix offers has to do with downloads to an iPod.
    Oct 12 23:26 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Netflix May Dominate The Online Video World, But With What Business Model? [View article]
    What does "video downloads" have to do with Netflix? Netflix's watch now service, XBOX 360 service and Roku service are all streaming based services, with no downloads. It's a completely different service offering than Apple's.
    Oct 10 10:57 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Netflix Player by Roku Has Potential to Really Impact the Market [View article]
    If I could have said who told me the number, then I would have put it in the post. I would not have published it if it did not come from someone who would know.
    Jul 30 11:56 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on AAPL by Dan Rayburn
Comments by Ticker
Dan Rayburn's
Comments Stats
75 comments
Rating: -2 (13 - 15 )