Seeking Alpha

Daniel Colella's  Instablog

Daniel Colella
Send Message
I am an analyst/portfolio manager at a private investment firm in Phoenix, AZ. We use long and short strategies with stocks and options with a short to intermediate term time horizon. I have a BS in accounting, and an MBA in finance.
View Daniel Colella's Instablogs on:
  • Worst Company Of All Time!! (FB)

    I would have named this article something else…maybe something sounding positive, or upbeat about the newly issued FB stock, but if I did that I wouldn't really expect to get any readers, after all about 75-90% of every article I read, segment I see on TV, and "fundamental" analysis of FB are incredibly negative.

    Contrary to the title of this article, I will attempt to make a positive case for investing in the most uninvestable company in the market today.

    We have all read a myriad of reasons why you or anyone you know shouldn't EVER buy a single share of FB, and how if you did, on the IPO, or any price between here and there, you are: uninformed, irresponsible, unsophisticated, or just plain stupid. The following are just a few reasons that have been discussed on every major news outlet available:

    - FB is (insert adverb here) overvalued

    - FB has no strategy (or a desperate one)

    - FB will be crushed by their Competition

    - FB is unable to monetize their user base

    - FB's long term strategic plan is to use operating profits to drown baby kittens (Ok I made that one up, but you get the point.)

    Let us first address the valuation argument.

    Before I begin, I want to say, that I do understand that each person's view is subjective to their own personal opinions, investment philosophy, and risk tolerance among other things. That being said, I understand there are many different ways to "value" a company, DCF analysis, P/E Ratio, Price/Sales, Price/Book, Price/Cash flow, then go ahead and add the letters TTM of Forward to any of these metrics, and dozens of others, and you will derive millions of different opinions on the relative value of a company. I will look at a few of the most commonly talked about and thrown around units of measurement in the way they are relevant to investing in my opinion.

    There are countless articles out there that use TTM earnings to compare FB. However, that isn't fair, for growth companies, Wall Street uses forward P/E ratios for comparison purposes. Based on an average EPS estimate of .54, FB trades a 2012 FW P/E of 50.18, based on the closing price on Friday of 27.10. At the IPO price of 38 that P/E would be 70.37. I know what you are thinking, 50x earnings! 70x Earnings! Who would pay that for anything?! Well let us take a look. Performing a very simple scan for forward P/E on Yahoo for FW P/E ratios > 50 in the S&P 500, Dow, and Nasdaq 100, you will see there are still companies, despite summer doldrums and European woes, that trade at P/E's north of 50x, 98 to be exact. Rather than naming all of them I will name a few for comparison purposes.

    AMZN- 84.81, CRM-68.46, ECA-70.24, LNKD-77.16, NRG-143.82, N-138.94

    So you see this valuation argument, while valid for some investment methods, doesn't really hold up for those investors seeking growth or innovation. So why would an investment firm pay such a rich valuation for a company? The answer is simple, potential. With the companies above, as well as the on the 98 on the list, extreme P/E's are accepted because investors see great potential in these companies, justified or not, these are the perceived values of the collective investment community. Let us not forget people, that we, and when I say we I mean investors worldwide including investment banks and every retail investor that subscribed the this IPO, are the ones that allowed this 38 issue price to become accepted. In my opinion, the problem with the precipitous drop in FB shares comes from the short interest created by institutional investors (another topic for another article).

    There is countless doubts about the company's strategy going forward regarding the future of mobile, growth, and monetization of the user base, but the truth is these answers can only be derived from conversations with company insiders. Investors speculate on the future intentions and execution of the company once management articulates a strategy. With the one of a kind active user base that FB possesses a simple shift in strategy, or innovation, or introduction of a new product could possibly have a dramatic impact on the earnings power, and growth of the company. This is surely what believers in the FB story are investing in. In my opinion, any arguments relating to these issues are strictly relative, as each investor has the right to derive their own conclusion on whether or not they believe in the business model and the strategic direction of the company.

    One thing is clear though, Facebook is a unique company, with a product that attracts a user base unlike any other in size and activity. It is not uncommon nor surprising to see investors pay the type of premium relating to the P/E multiple that FB commands today, or at the IPO price for that matter. For those investors that have a higher risk tolerance and a longer term investment timeframe, FB will probably turn out to be a good investment. Just as easily as the worldwide media outlet, and every big portfolio manager on TV talking their own book, can breed only negative sentiment and disfavor towards a company, they can flip the script and begin to add "perceived value" to FB once again.

    Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

    Tags: FB
    Jun 11 12:51 AM | Link | Comment!
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers
Posts by Themes
Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.